Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2019, Issue 12, 2019, Pages

  Freites, Jawad ^a   Stewart, Fiona ^b   Omar, Muhammad Imran ^c,d   Mashayekhi, Atefeh ^b   Agur, Wael I ^e  

^a YORK TEACHING HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Austria   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; BLADDER PERFORATION; COLPOSUSPENSION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC COLPOSUSPENSION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MICTURITION DISORDER; OPEN SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SUBURETHRAL SLING PROCEDURE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TENSION-FREE VAGINAL TAPE PROCEDURE; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINE INCONTINENCE; WOMEN'S HEALTH; FEMALE; LAPAROSCOPY; META ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); URETHRA; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; URETHRA; URINARY INCONTINENCE; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 85076376852     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239.pub4     Document Type: Review

References (123)

1. Adile B, Cucinella G, Gugliotta G, Lo BA, Grifo S, Caputo A. A prospective randomised study of Burch laparoscopy versus tension-free vaginal tape: 2 year follow-up [Studio prospettico randomizzato Burch laparoscopica vs TVT. Follow-up a 2 anni]. Urogynaecologia International Journal 2001;15(1 Suppl):121-2. [ISSN 1121-3086; sri-incont13093]x-wiley/crsRef/2978577
2. Adile B, Granese R, Lo Bue A, Gugliotta G, Cardella AM, Adile C. A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic Burch versus TVT. Short and long term follow-up. International Continence Society, 33rd Annual Meeting; 2003 Oct 5-9; Florence, Italy. 2003:563. [sr-incont17164]x-wiley/crsRef/12427483
3. Cucinella G, Adile B, Gugliotta G, Lo Bue A, Grifo S, Caputo A. A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic Burch versus TVT. Two years follow-up (Abstract). International Urogynecology Journal 2001;12(Suppl 3):107. [sr-incont14358]x-wiley/crsRef/2978579
4. Ankardal M. Evaluation of Surgical Methods for Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence [Doctoral thesis]. Gothenburg (Sweden): University of Gothenburg, 2005. [sr-incont73958]x-wiley/crsRef/12427486
5. Ankardal M, Crafoord K, Ekerydh A, Ellstrom M, Franzen K, Olsson J-H, et al. Burch colposuspension by laparoscopic or abdominal approach: report from a randomised study (Abstract number 302). International Continence Society (ICS), 31st Annual Meeting; 2001 Sept 18-21; Seoul, Korea. 2001. [sr-incont14383]x-wiley/crsRef/12427484
6. Ankardal M, Ekerydh A, Crafoord K, Milsom I, Stjerndahl JH, Engh ME. A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJOG 2004;111(9):974-81. [sr-incont17915]x-wiley/crsRef/2978582
7. Ankardal M, Jarbrink K, Milsom I, Heiwall B, Lausten-Thomsen N, Ellstrom-Engh M. Comparison of health care costs for open Burch colposuspension, laparoscopic colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in the treatment of female urinary incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2007;26(6):761-6. [sr-incont23845]x-wiley/crsRef/12427485
8. Ankardal M. Evaluation of Surgical Methods for Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence [Doctoral thesis]. Gothenburg (Sweden): University of Gothenburg, 2005. [sr-incont73958]x-wiley/crsRef/12427489
9. Ankardal M, Jarbrink K, Milsom I, Heiwall B, Lausten-Thomsen N, Ellstrom-Engh M. Comparison of health care costs for open Burch colposuspension, laparoscopic colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in the treatment of female urinary incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2007;26(6):761-6. [sr-incont23845]x-wiley/crsRef/12427487
10. Ankardal M, Milsom I, Stjerndahl JH, Engh ME. A three-armed randomized trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures and laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2005;84(8):773-9. [sr-incont20624]x-wiley/crsRef/12427488
11. Burton G. A five year prospective randomised urodynamic study comparing open and laparoscopic colposuspension. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 18 1999; Vol. 18, issue 4:295-6. [sr-incont9875]x-wiley/crsRef/2978590
12. Burton G. A five year prospective randomised urodynamic study comparing open and laparoscopic colposuspension (Abstract). International Urogynecology Journal of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 1999;10(Suppl 1):44-5. [sr-incont9841]x-wiley/crsRef/12427490
13. Burton G. A randomised comparison of laparoscopic and open colposuspension. Neurourology and Urodynamics 1994;13(4):497-8. [sr-incont2684]x-wiley/crsRef/2978591
14. Burton G. A three year prospective randomised urodynamic study comparing open and laparoscopic colposuspension. Neurourology and Urodynamics 1997;16(5):353-4. [sr-incont5836]x-wiley/crsRef/2978592
15. Carey M, Maher CF, Rosamilia A, Dwyer P, Cornish A, Murray C, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension - early results of a single blind prospective randomized control trial. International Continence Society (ICS), 29th Annual Meeting; 1999 Aug 23-26; Denver (CO). 1999:224-5. [sr-incont8023]x-wiley/crsRef/12427492
16. Carey M, Rosamilia A, Dwyer P, Cornish A, Murray C, Ugoni A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: a prospective multicentre randomised single-blind comparison. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2000;19(4):389-91. [sr-incont9868]x-wiley/crsRef/12427493
17. Carey MP, Goh JT, Rosamilia A, Cornish A, Gordon I, Hawthorne G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial [see comment]. BJOG 2006;113(9):999-1006. [sr-incont22334]x-wiley/crsRef/12427494
18. Carey MP, Maher CF, Rosamilla A, Cornish A, Ugoni A. Open or laparoscopic colposuspension - a prospective single blinded randomised control trial. Annual Meeting of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2000. [sr-incont12089]x-wiley/crsRef/12427495
19. Carey MP, Rosamilia A, Maher C, Tsaltas J. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension - results of a single blind prospective randomized control trial (Abstract number P5). IX Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australian Gynaecological Endoscopic Society; 1999 May 27-29; Adelaide, Australia. 1999:51. [sr-incont18194]x-wiley/crsRef/12427496
20. Cornish A, Carey M. Open versus laparoscopic Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial [Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension for women with stress urinary incontinence: a prospective multicentre randomised single blind comparison of urodynamic cure of stress urinary incontinence at 6 months following surgery]. anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12605000439640.aspx (first received 15 August 2005). [ACTRN12605000439640; sr-incont64630]x-wiley/crsRef/12427497
21. Cornish A, Fynes M, Harmer C, Hawthorne G, Rosamillia A, Carey M, et al. The genitourinary treatment satisfaction score for continence surgery (Abstract number 83). International Continence Society (ICS), 31st Annual Meeting; 2001 Sept 18-21; Seoul, Korea. 2001. [sr-incont14493]x-wiley/crsRef/12427498
22. Cheon WC, Mak JH, Liu JY. Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open colposuspension. Hong Kong Medical Journal 2003;9(1):10-4. [sr-incont15758]x-wiley/crsRef/2978602
23. Mak JH, Cheon CW, Liu JY, Lee TK, Tong WM, Wong TH. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open colposuspension (Abstract). 2nd Scientific Meeting of the Asian Society for Female Urology; 2000 Aug 26-27; Hong Kong. 2000:59-61. [sr-incont12120]x-wiley/crsRef/2978603
24. Fatthy H, El Hao M, Samaha I, Abdallah K. Modified Burch colposuspension: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 2001;8(1):99-106. [sr-incont11967]x-wiley/crsRef/2978605
25. Foote A, Carne C, Lowndes C. Laparoscopic colposuspension vs vaginal mesh sling: a randomised prospective trial. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2004;23(5/6):434-5. [sr-incont19006]x-wiley/crsRef/12427500
26. Foote AJ, Maughan V, Carne C. Laparoscopic colposuspension versus vaginal suburethral slingplasty: a randomised prospective trial. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2006;46(6):517-20. [sr-incont22592]x-wiley/crsRef/12427501
27. Dumville JC, Manca A, Kitchener HC, Smith AR, Nelson L, Torgerson DJ, COLPO Study Group. Cost-effectiveness analysis of open colposuspension versus laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence. BJOG 2006;113(9):1014-22. [ISRCTN14969683; sr-incont22332]x-wiley/crsRef/12427502
28. ISRCTN14969683. A randomised trial of open versus laparoscopic colposuspension for genuine stress incontinence. isrctn.org/ISRCTN14969683 (first received 25 October 2000). [ISRCTN14969683; TrialID.MRC COLPO; sr-incont16345]x-wiley/crsRef/12427503
29. Kitchener HC, Dunn G, Lawton V, Reid F, Nelson L, Smith AR, COLPO Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension--results of a prospective randomised controlled trial [see comment]. BJOG 2006;113(9):1007-13. [ISRCTN14969683; sr-incont22333]x-wiley/crsRef/12427504
30. Reid FM, Smith AR, Dunn G. Which questionnaire? A psychometric evaluation of three patient-based outcome measures used to assess surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2007;26(1):123-8. [sr-incont22577]x-wiley/crsRef/2978613
31. Smith A, Kitchener H, Dunne G, Torgerson D, Lawton V, Reid F, et al. A prospective randomised controlled trial of open and laparoscopic colposuspension. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2005;24(5/6):422-3. [sr-incont20986]x-wiley/crsRef/2978614
32. Maher C, Qatawneh A, Baessler K, Cropper M, Schluter P. Laparoscopic colposuspension or tension-free vaginal tape for recurrent stress urinary incontinence and/or intrinsic sphincter deficiency - a randomised controlled trial. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2004;23(5/6):433-4. [sr-incont19005]x-wiley/crsRef/2978616
33. Mirosh M, Epp A. TVT vs laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (Abstract number 640). 35th Annual Meeting of the International Incontinence Society (ICS); 2005 Aug 28-Sep 2; Montreal, Canada. 2005. [sr-incont20990]x-wiley/crsRef/12427505
34. Morris AR, Reilly ET, Hassan A, Ramsay IN, Hawthorn RJ. 5-7 year follow-up of a randomised trial comparing laparoscopic colposuspension (LC) and open colposuspension (OC) in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. International Urogynecology Journal 2001;12(Suppl 3):S6. [sr-incont12582]x-wiley/crsRef/2978620
35. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Karram MM, Walters MD, Paraiso MF. Randomised trial of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: long-term follow up. BJOG 2008;115(2):219-225, discussion 225. [sr-incont26265]x-wiley/crsRef/2978622
36. Paraiso MF, Walters M, Karram M, Barber M. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus the tension-free vaginal tape procedure: a randomized clinical trial (Abstract). Neurourology and Urodynamics 2003;22(5):487-8. [sr-incont17108]x-wiley/crsRef/2978623
37. Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Karram MM, Barber MD. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: a randomized trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004;104(6):1249-58. [sr-incont19401]x-wiley/crsRef/12427506
38. Persson J, Wolner-Hanssen P. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence: a randomized comparison of one or two sutures on each side of the urethra. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;95(1):151-5. [sr-incont9014]x-wiley/crsRef/2978626
39. Persson J. Stress Urinary Incontinence Among Women: Aspects of Risk Factors, Evaluation and Surgical Treatment [PhD thesis]. Lund, Sweden: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, 2001:1-61. [sr-incont16386]x-wiley/crsRef/12427507
40. Persson J, Teleman P, Eten-Bergquist C, Wolner-Hanssen P. Cost-analyses based on a prospective, randomised study comparing laparoscopic colposuspension with tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2002;81(11):1066-73. [sr-incont14362]x-wiley/crsRef/2978628
41. Ross J. Two techniques of laparoscopic Burch repair for stress incontinence: a prospective, randomized study. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1996;3(3):351-7. [sr-incont5658]x-wiley/crsRef/12427509
42. Samiee H, Tavoli Z, Ghanbari Z, Poormand GH, Taslimi SH, Eslami B, et al. Treatment of urinary stress incontinence: laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus transobturator tape procedure. Majallah-i Danishkadah-'i Pizishki [Tehran University Medical Journal] 2009;67(9):629-36. [ISSN: 1683-1764; sr-incont43325]x-wiley/crsRef/12427511
43. Stangel-Wojcikiewicz K. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension compared to laparotomy for treatment urinary stress incontinence (Abstract number 121). Neurourology and Urodynamics 2008;27(7):714. [sr-incont31857]x-wiley/crsRef/12427513
44. Su TH, Wang KG, Hsu CY, Wei HJ, Hong BK. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and traditional colposuspensions in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1997;6(76):576-82. [sr-incont5558]x-wiley/crsRef/2978679
45. Summitt RL, Lucente VL, Karram MM, Shull BL, Bent AE. Randomised comparison of laparoscopic and transabdominal Burch urethropexy for the treatment of genuine stress incontinence (Abstract). Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;95(4 Suppl 1):2. [sr-incont11862]x-wiley/crsRef/12427514
46. Tuygun C, Bakirtas H, Eroglu M, Alisir I, Zengin K, Imamoglu A. Comparison of two different surgical approaches in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: open and laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. Türk Üroloji Dernegi 2006;32(2):248-53. [sr-incont26724]x-wiley/crsRef/12427516
47. Ustun Y, Engin-Ustun Y, Gungor M, Tezcan S. Tension-free vaginal tape compared with laparoscopic Burch urethropexy. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 2003;10(3):386-9. [sr-incont16694]x-wiley/crsRef/12427517
48. Ustun Y, Engin-Ustun Y, Gungor M, Tezcan S. Randomized comparison of Burch urethropexy procedures concomitant with gynecologic operations. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 2005;59(1):19-23. [sr-incont20187]x-wiley/crsRef/12427519
49. Valpas A, Ala-Nissila S, Tomas E, Nilsson CG. TVT versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. International Urogynecology Journal 2015;26(1):57-63. [sr-incont64697]x-wiley/crsRef/12427520
50. Valpas A, Kivela A, Penttinen J, Kauko M, Kujansuu E, Tomas E, et al. Comparison of TVT and laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (Abstract). XXXIII Congress of the Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (NFOG); 2002 June 1-4; Umea, Sweden. 2002. [sr-incont14356]x-wiley/crsRef/2978646
51. Valpas A, Kivela A, Penttinen J, Kauko M, Kujansuu E, Tomas E, et al. Intra-operative and immediate post-operative results comparing tensionfree vaginal tape (TVT) and laparoscopic colposuspension (LC) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) - a randomized clinical trial (Preliminary results). 10th Congress of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy; 2001 Nov 21-24; Lisbon, Portugal. 2001:355-8. [sr-incont13460]x-wiley/crsRef/12427521
52. Valpas A, Kivela A, Penttinen J, Kauko M, Kujansuu E, Tomas E, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: immediate outcome and complications--a randomized clinical trial. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2003;82(7):665-71. [sr-incont16587]x-wiley/crsRef/12427522
53. Valpas A, Kivela A, Penttinen J, Kujansuu E, Haarala M, Nilsson CG. Tension-free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004;104(1):42-9. [sr-incont19322]x-wiley/crsRef/2978649
54. Valpas A, Rissanen P, Kujansuu E, Nilsson C. A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape procedure vs. laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for primary female stress incontinence - a randomised clinical trial. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2005;24(5/6):418-9. [sr-incont20987]x-wiley/crsRef/2978650
55. Valpas A, Rissanen P, Kujansuu E, Nilsson CG. A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for primary female stress incontinence. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2006;85(12):1485-90. [sr-incont22539]x-wiley/crsRef/2978651
56. Valpas AK, Rissanen P, Kujansuu E, Nilsson CG. In a randomised clinical trial tension-free vaginal tape is more cost-effective than laparoscopic colposuspension (Abstract number 111). International Urogynecology Journal 2005;16(Suppl 2):S58-9. [sr-incont29162]x-wiley/crsRef/2978652
57. Wallwiener D, Grischke EM, Rimbach S, Maleika A, Bastert G. Endoscopic retropubic colposuspension: "Retziusscopy" versus laparoscopy--a reasonable enlargement of the operative spectrum in the management of recurrent stress incontinence?. Endoscopic Surgery and Allied Technologies 1995;3(2-3):115-8. [sr-incont2928]x-wiley/crsRef/2978654
58. Wallwiener D, Grischke EM, Rimbach S, Maleika A, Kaufmann M, Bastert G. Endoscopic retropubic colposuspension: "Retziuscopy" versus laparoscopy - a reasonable enlargement of the operative spectrum in the management of recurrent stress incontinence? [Endoskopische kolposuspension ("Retziuskopie" versus laparoskopie). Eine sinnvolle erweiterung des operationsspektrum der stressinkontinenz?]. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 1995;5(55):235-9. [sr-incont2996]x-wiley/crsRef/2978655
59. Palomba S, Russo T, Iuzzolino D, Cosco C, Noia R, Arduino B, et al. Comparison between two laparoscopic retropubic urethropexy. Minerva Chirurgica 2002;57(3):323-9. [sr-incont14445]x-wiley/crsRef/2978657
60. Piccione F, Zullo F, Palomba S, Sena T, Giovinazzi F, Biamonte M, et al. Different techniques of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. Italian Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics 2001;13(1):10-3. [ISSN:1121-8339; sr-incont18049]x-wiley/crsRef/12427523
61. Zullo F, Morelli M, Russo T, Iuzzolino D, Palomba S. Two techniques of laparoscopic retropubic urethropexy. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 2002;9(2):178-81. [sr-incont14687]x-wiley/crsRef/2978659
62. Zullo F, Palomba S, Piccione F, Morelli M, Arduino B, Mastrantonio P. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension: a randomized controlled trial comparing two transperitoneal surgical techniques. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001;98(5 Pt 1):783-8. [sr-incont12169]x-wiley/crsRef/12427524
63. Zullo F, Palomba S, Russo T, Sbano FM, Falbo A, Morelli M, et al. Laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures or prolene meshes: a 3-year follow-up. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2004;117(2):201-3. [sr-incont19421]x-wiley/crsRef/2978661
64. Choi SJ, Kim YH, Choi SH, Ki WS, Kim SA, Jung H. A prospective study of transobturator tension free tape (TOT) and laparoscopic Burch operation for stress urinary incontinence (Abstract number 462). International Urogynecology Journal 2006;17(Suppl 2):307. [sr-incont64442]x-wiley/crsRef/12427526
65. Foote AJ, Moore KH. The cost of urogynaecological treatments: which are more cost-effective?. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2007;47(3):240-6. [sr-incont23787]x-wiley/crsRef/2978665
66. ISRCTN44339585. Laparoscopic treatment for female urinary incontinence. isrctn.org/ISRCTN44339585 (first received 23 January 2004). [ISRCTN44339585; sr-incont17206]x-wiley/crsRef/12427528
67. Koster S, Volz J, Melchert F. Indications for 3 D laparoscopy in gynecology [Zur indikation der 3 D-laparoskopie in der gynaekologie]. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 1996;56(8):431-3. [sr-incont6892]x-wiley/crsRef/2978667
68. Lee YS, Kim JH, Seo JT. A comparison of laparoscopic versus open Burch procedure for stress urinary incontinence. International Urogynecology Journal of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 1997;8(1 Suppl):S37. [sr-incont9822]x-wiley/crsRef/12427529
69. Lernis P, Pantekhis G, Kalakoutis G. Presentation of our experience with laparoscopic colposuspension (Burch) at Makarios Hospital, Nicosia, Cyprus. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1997;76 Suppl 167(1):14. [sr-incont6669]x-wiley/crsRef/2978671
70. NCT00573703, Palomba S, Zullo F. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus transobturatory tape for the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence [A comparison between laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and transobturatory tape (TOT) for the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence]. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00573703 (first received 14 December 2007). [NCT00573703; sr-incont61582]x-wiley/crsRef/12427531
71. Prezioso D, Iacono F, Di Lauro G, Illiano E, Romeo G, Ruffo A, et al. Retraction note: stress urinary incontinence: long-term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. BMC Surgery 2016;16(1):26 [Retraction of: BMC Surgery 2013;13(Suppl 2):S38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S38. PMC3851039]. [PMC4848875; PUBMED: 27122153]x-wiley/crsRef/12427533
72. Prezioso D, Iacono F, Di Lauro G, Illiano E, Romeo G, Ruffo A, et al. Stress urinary incontinence: long-term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. BMC Surgery 2013;13(Suppl 2):38 [Retraction in: BMC Surgery 2016;16(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0141-6. PMC4848875]. [sr-incont49424; PUBMED: 24268031]x-wiley/crsRef/12427534
73. Salam TA. Laproscopic versus conventional surgical treatment of genuine urinary stress incontinence (Abstract number 4). Progres en Urologie 2004;14(3 Suppl 3):6. [sr-incont31091]x-wiley/crsRef/2978677
74. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds). In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A editor(s). Incontinence: 5th International Consultation on Incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and faecal incontinence; 2012 Feb 23-25; Paris, France. Belgium: International Consultation on Urological Diseases (ICUD), 2013.
75. Barr S, Reid FM, North CE, Hosker G, Smith AR. The long-term outcome of laparoscopic colposuspension: a 10-year cohort study. International Urogynecological Journal Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 2009;20(4):443-5.
76. Birnbaum HG, Leong SA, Oster EF, Kinchen K, Sun P. Cost of stress urinary incontinence: a claims data analysis. PharmacoEconomics 2004;22(2):95-105. [sr-incont39892]
77. Botlero R, Urquhart DM, Davis SR, Bell RJ. Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in women: review of the literature and investigation of methodological issues. International Journal of Urology 2008;15(3):230-4.
78. Chong EC, Khan AA, Anger JT. The financial burden of stress urinary incontinence among women in the United States. Current Urology Reports 2011;12(5):358-62. [sr-incont77976]
79. Cody J, Wyness L, Wallace S, Glazener C, Kilonzo M, Stearns S, et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England) 2003;7(21):iii, 1-189. [sr-incont16489]
80. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD). CRD databases: search strategies. 2015. crd.york.ac.uk/crdweb/searchstrategies.asp (accessed 10 August 2018).
81. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG (editors) on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.2.0 (updated June 2017), Cochrane, 2017. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
82. Dumville JC, Manca A, Kitchener HC, Smith AR, Nelson L, Torgerson DJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of open colposuspension versus laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence. BJOG 2006;113(9):1014-22. [ISRCTN14969683; sr-incont22332]
83. Clarivate Analytics. EndNote. Version X8.2. Philadelphia (PA): Clarivate Analytics, 2018.
84. Food, Drug Administration. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Obstetrical and gynecological devices; reclassification of surgical instrumentation for use with urogynecologic surgical mesh. Final order. Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0297. Federal Register (accessed 19 September 2018); Vol. 82, issue 4:1598-603. Available at: federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/06/2016-31862/obstetrical-and-gynecological-devices-reclassification-of-surgical-instrumentation-for-use-with.
85. Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Aluko P, Ogah JA. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4]
86. Glazener CM, Cooper K, Mashayekhi A. Anterior vaginal repair for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001755.pub2]
87. Glazener CM, Cooper K, Mashayekhi A. Bladder neck needle suspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003636.pub4]
88. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?. BMJ 2008;336(7651):995.
89. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2010;29(1):4-20.
90. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557-60. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557]
91. Higgins JP, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
92. Higgins JP, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
93. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.2.0 (updated June 2017), Cochrane, 2017. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
94. Jarvis GJ, Bent A, Cortesse A, McGuire A, Milani R, Quartey J, et al. Surgical treatment for incontinence in adult women surgery of female lower genito-urinary fistulae. In: Abrams P, Khoury S, Wein A editor(s). Incontinence: 1st International Consultation on Incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: the evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence. Vol. 15, Plymouth: Health Publication Limited, 1999:637-68.
95. Kang D, Han J, Neuberger MM, Moy ML, Wallace SA, Alonso-Coello P, et al. Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010217.pub2]
96. Kilonzo M, Vale L, Stearns SC, Grant A, Cody J, Glazener CM, et al. Cost effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape for the surgical management of female stress incontinence. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2004;20(4):455-63.
97. Kirchin V, Page T, Keegan PE, Atiemo KO, Cody JD, McClinton S, et al. Urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003881.pub4]
98. Kunkle CM, Hallock JL, Hu X, Blomquist J, Thung SF, Werner EF. Cost utility analysis of urethral bulking agents versus midurethral sling in stress urinary incontinence. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 2015;21(3):154-9. [sr-incont70311]
99. Lapitan MC, Cody JD, Mashayekhi A. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002912.pub7]
100. MacArthur C, Wilson D, Herbison P, Lancashire RJ, Hagen S, Toozs-Hobson P, et al. Urinary incontinence persisting after childbirth: extent, delivery history, and effects in a 12–year longitudinal cohort study. BJOG 2016;123(6):1022-9.
101. McCormack K, Scott N, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant A, the EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785]
102. Nambiar A, Cody JD, Jeffery ST, Aluko P. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3]
103. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Urinary incontinence in women: management. NICE Clinical Guideline (NG 123). Available from nice.org.uk/guidance/ng123. London, UK: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, April 2019.
104. Papa Petros PE. The Integral Theory System. A simplified clinical approach with illustrative case histories. Pelviperineology 2010;29(2):37-51.
105. Council of the European Union. Position of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical devices. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission; 2017 March 9. Document reference No.: COM(2017)129/F1. 10728/16. Interinstitutional File: 2012/0266 (COD). Available at: ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2017/EN/COM-2017-129-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-1.PDF Page 117/143 (accessed 25 September 2018).
106. Rehman H, Bezerra CA, Bruschini H, Cody JD, Aluko P. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001754.pub4]
107. Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
108. Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub3]
109. Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M. Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007781.pub2]
110. Scottish Government. The Scottish independent review of the use, safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh implants in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: final report. Available at: www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-independent-review-use-safety-efficacy-transvaginal-mesh-implants-treatment-9781786528711/. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government, (accessed prior to 14 November 2019).
111. Shemilt I, Aluko P, Graybill E, Craig D, Henderson C, Drummond M, Wilson ECF, Robalino S, Vale L, on behalf of the Campbell and Cochrane Economics Methods Group. Chapter 20: Economic evidence. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane, 2019. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
112. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA, Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Quality of Life Research 1994;3(5):291-306.
113. Subak LL, Brubaker L, Chai TC, Creasman JM, Diokno AC, Goode PS, et al. High costs of urinary incontinence among women electing surgery to treat stress incontinence. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2008;111(4):899-907. [NCT00064662; sr-incont27122]
114. Thakar R, Stanton S. Regular review: management of urinary incontinence in women. BMJ 2000;321(7272):1326-31.
115. Valpas A, Rissanen P, Kujansuu E, Nilsson CG. A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for primary female stress incontinence. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2006;85(12):1485-90. [sr-incont22539]
116. Vancaillie TG, Schuessler W. Laparoscopic bladderneck suspension. Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery 1991;1(3):169-73.
117. Wagner TH, Hu TW. Economic costs of urinary incontinence in 1995. Urology 1998;51(3):355-61. [sr-incont16942]
118. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, 1993.
119. Wilson PD, Herbison RM, Herbison GP. Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1996;103(2):154-61.
120. Dean N, Ellis G, Herbison GP, Wilson D. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239.pub2]
121. Dean N, Ellis G, Herbison GP, Wilson D, Mashayekhi A. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239.pub3]
122. Moehrer B, Ellis G, Carey M, Wilson PD. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239]
123. Wilson PD, Carey M, Burton G. Laparoscopic surgery (retropubic suspension) for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239]