A three-armed randomized trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures and laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 84, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 773-779

  Ankardal, Maud ^a   Milsom, Ian ^a   Stjerndahl, Jan Henrik ^a   Engh, Marie Ellström ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Colposuspension; Laparoscopic; Quality of life; Randomized trial; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; CATHETER; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLPOSUSPENSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE; SWEDEN;

ADULT; AGED; COLPOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURES; SWEDEN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS; UTERINE PROLAPSE;

EID: 22844435645     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00703.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Burton G. A three year prospective randomised urodynamic study comparing open and laparoscopic colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn 1997; 16: 353-4. (Abstract)
2. Carey M, Rosamilia A, Maher C et al. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: a prospective multicentre randomised single-blind comparison. Neurourol Urodyn 2000; 19: 389-91.
3. Fatthy H, El Hao M, Samaha I, Abdallah K. Modified Burch colposuspension: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001; 8: 99-106.
4. Summitt RL, Lucente VL, Karram MM, Shull BL, Bent AE. Randomised comparison of laparoscopic and transabdominal Burch urethropexy for the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: S2.
5. Moehrer B, Carey M, Wilson D. Laparoscopic colposuspension: a systematic review. BJOG 2003; 110: 230-5.
6. Ross J. Two techniques of laparoscopic Burch repair for stress incontinence: a prospective, randomized study. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996; 3: 351-7.
7. Zullo F, Palomba S, Piccione F, Morelli M, Arduino B, Mastrantonio P. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension: a randomized controlled trial comparing two transperitoneal surgical techniques. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 783-8.
8. Ankardal M, Ekerydh A, Crafoord K, Milsom I, Stjerndahl J-H, Ellstrom Engh M. A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJOG 2004.
9. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001; 285: 1987-91.
10. Su TH WK, Hsu CY, Wei HJ, Hong BK. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and traditional colposuspensions in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 6: 576-82.
11. Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Rezapour M. A three-year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 345-50.
12. Ward KL, Hilton P. A prospective multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: two-year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 324-31.
13. Valpas A, Kivela A, Penttinen J, Kauko M, Kujansuu E, Tomas E et al. Tension-free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: immediate outcome and complications - a randomized clinical trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 665-71.