Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension - Results of a prospective randomised controlled trial

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 113, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1007-1013

  Kitchener, H C ^a,c   Dunn, G ^a   Lawton, V ^a   Reid, F ^a   Nelson, L ^a   Smith, A R B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Colposuspension; Laparoscopic; Open; Randomised

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLPOSUSPENSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC COLPOSUSPENSION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORBIDITY; OPEN COLPOSUSPENSION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STRESS INCONTINENCE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INCONTINENCE PADS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; VAGINA;

EID: 33748190233     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01035.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int 2004;93:324-30.
2. Burch JC, Moehrer B, Carey M, Wilson D, Stamey TA, Vancaillie TG, et al. Cooper's ligament urethrovesical suspension for stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968;100:764-74.
3. Smith A, Daneshgari F, Dmochowski R, Milani R, Miller M, Paraiso M, et al. Surgery for urinary incontinence in women. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Koury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. Plymouth: Health Publications Ltd., 2002, p. 1297-370.
4. Stamey TA. Endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck for urinary incontinence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1973;136:547-54.
5. Vancaillie TG, Schuessler W. Laparoscopic bladderneck suspension. J Laparoendosc Surg 1991;1:169-73.
6. Moehrer B, Carey M, Wilson D. Laparoscopic colposuspension: a systematic review. BJOG 2003;110:230-5.
7. Moehrer B, Ellis G, Carey M, Wilson PD. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;CD002239.
8. Lapitan MC, Cody DJ, Grant AM. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;CD002912.
9. Dumville J, Manca A, Kitchener H, Smith A, Nelson L, Torgerson D. Cost-effectiveness analysis of open colposuspension versus laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence. BJOG 2006;113:1014-22.
10. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User Manual. Boston, MA: New England Medical Centre, 1994.
11. Jackson S, Donovan J, Brookes S, Eckford S, Swithinbank L, Abrams P. The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: development and psychometric testing. Br J Urol 1996;77:805-12.
12. Black N, Griffiths J, Pope C. Development of a symptom severity index and a symptom impact index for stress incontinence in women. Neurourol Urodyn 1996;15:630-40.
13. Kind P. The EuroQol instrument: an index of health-related quality of life. In: Spiker B, editor. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 191-201.
14. White IR. Uses and limitations of randomization-based efficacy estimators. Stat Methods Med Res 2005;14:327-47.
15. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
16. Dunn G, Maracy M, Tomenson B. Estimating treatment effects from randomized clinical trials with noncompliance and loss to follow-up: the role of instrumental variable methods. Stat Methods Med Res 2005;14:369-95.
17. Burton G. A three year prospective randomised urodynamic study comparing open and laparoscopic colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn 1997;16:353-4.
18. Carey M, Rosamilia A, Maher C, Cornish A, Murray C, Ugoni A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: a prospective multicentre randomised single blind trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2000;19:389-91.
19. Fatthy H, El Hao M, Samaha I, Abdallah K. Modified Burch colposuspension: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001;8:99-106.
20. Su TH, Wang KG, Hsu CY, Wei HJ, Hong BK. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and traditional colposuspensions in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;76:576-82.
21. Summitt RL Jr, Lucente V, Karram MM, Shull BL, Bent AE. Randomized comparison of laparoscopic and transabdominal Burch urethropexy for the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95(Suppl 1):S2.
22. Ward KL, Hilton P. A prospective multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: two-year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:324-31.
23. Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G. Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in the management of stress urinary incontinence in women. Eur Urol 2002;41:469-73.
24. Wang AC, Chen MC. Comparison of tension-free vaginal taping versus modified Burch colposuspension on urethral obstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2003;22:185-90.