Randomized comparison of Burch urethropexy procedures concomitant with gynecologic operations

Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 19-23

  Üstün, Yusuf ^a,b   Engin Üstün, Yaprak ^a   Güngör, Mete ^a   Tezcan, Sevgi ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Burch colposuspension; Gynecologic operations; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BURCH URETHROPEXY; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLPOSUSPENSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOMETRY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MENOPAUSE; OPERATION DURATION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URINALYSIS; URINE CULTURE; URODYNAMICS; UROFLOWMETRY; VALSALVA MANEUVER;

ADULT; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URODYNAMICS; VALSALVA MANEUVER;

EID: 11444250187     PISSN: 03787346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000080619     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Dainer M, Hall CD, Choe J, Bhatia NN: The Burch procedure: A comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1999;54:49-60.
2. Ross JW: Laparoscopic Burch repair compared to laparotomy Burch for cure of urinary stress incontinence. Int J Urogynecol 1995;6:323-328.
3. Kohli N, Jacobs PA, Sze EH, Roat TW, Karram MM: Open compared with laparoscopic approach to Burch colposuspension: A cost analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:411-415.
4. Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Anderson JT: The standardizaton of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97(suppl 6):1-16.
5. Tanagho E: Colpocystouretropexy, the way we do it. J Urol 1976;116:751-753.
6. Smith ARB, Vancaillie TG: Laparoscopic colposuspension; in Sutton C, Diamond MP (eds): Endoscopic Surgery for Gynecologists, ed 2. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1998, pp 325-333.
7. Saidi MH, Gallagher MS, Skop IP, Saidi JA, Sadler RK, Diaz KC: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic colposuspension: Short term cure rate, complications, and duration of hospital stay in comparison with Burch colposuspension. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:619-621.
8. Walter AJ, Morse AN, Hammer RH, et al: Laparoscopic versus open Burch urethropexy: Comparison of morbidity and costs when performed with concurrent vaginal prolapse repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:723-728.
9. Brill AI: Laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension procedures; in Azziz R, Murphy AA (eds): Practical Manual of Operative Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy, ed 2. New York, Springer, 1997, pp 209-223.
10. Liu CY: Laparoscopic treatment for genuine urinary stress incontinence. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1994;8:789-798.
11. Su TH, Wang KG, Hsu CY, Wei HJ, Hong BK: Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and traditional colposuspensions in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;76:576-582.
12. Hsieh GC, Klutke JJ, Kobak WH: Low Valsalva leak-point pressure and success of retropubic urethropexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;12:46-50.
13. Fantl JA, Newman DK, Colling J: Urinary Incontinence in Adults: Accurate and Chronic Management. Washington, US Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1996.