Does landscape play a role in strategic spatial planning of European urban regions?

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 194, Issue , 2020, Pages

  Hersperger, Anna M ^a   Bürgi, Matthias ^a   Wende, Wolfgang ^b   Bacău, Simona ^a   Grădinaru, Simona R ^a,c  

^a SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGICAL URBAN AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST   (Romania)

Author keywords

Governance; Green infrastructure; Landscape science; Plan; Plan evaluation; Spatial planning

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; GREENSPACE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

EUROPE;

EID: 85074639167     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103702     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Acuto, M., Parnell, S., Seto, K.C., Building a global urban science. Nature Sustainability 1:1 (2018), 2–4.
2. Ahern, J., Spatial concepts. Klopatek, J.M., Gardner, R.H., (eds.) planning strategies, and future scenarios: a framework method for integrating landscape ecology and landscape planning, in: Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications, 1999, Springer, New York, 175–201.
3. Albert, C., Von Haaren, C., Implications of applying the green infrastructure concept in landscape planning for ecosystem services in peri-urban areas: An expert survey and case study. Planning Practice & Research 32:3 (2017), 227–242.
4. Albrechts, L., Balducci, A., Hillier, J., Situated practices of strategic planning - an international perspective. 2017, Routledge, London.
5. Albrechts, L., Healey, P., Kunzmann, K.R., Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. Journal of the American Planning Association 69:2 (2003), 113–129.
6. Angelstam, P., Andersson, K., Annerstedt, M., Axelsson, R., Elbakidze, M., Garrido, P., Stjernquist, I., Solving problems in social-ecological systems: Definition, practice and barriers of transdisciplinary research. Ambio 42:2 (2013), 254–265.
7. Antrop, M., Van Eetvelde, V., Landscape Perspectives: The Holistic Nature of Landscape. 2017, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
8. Bastian, O., Schreiber, K.-F., Analyse und ökologische Bewertung der Landschaft. 1999, Spektrum Verlag, Heidelberg.
9. Bastian, O., Steinhardt, U., Development and perspectives of landscape ecology. 2002, Springer.
10. Beunen, R., Opdam, P., When landscape planning becomes landscape governance, what happens to the science?. Landscape and Urban Planning 100:4 (2011), 324–326.
11. Bieling, C., Plieninger, T., The Emergence of Landscape Stewardship in Practice, Policy and Research. 2017, Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
12. Bjärstig, T., Thellbro, C., Stjernström, O., Svensson, J., Sandström, C., Sandström, P., Zachrisson, A., Between protocol and reality – Swedish municipal comprehensive planning. European Planning Studies 26:1 (2018), 35–54.
13. Brandt, J., Our common landscapes for the future. Antrop, M., Van Eetvelde, V., (eds.) Landscape perspectives, 2017, Springer, Dortrecht pp. v-viii.
14. Brandt, J., Vejre, H., Multifunctional landscapes: Theories, values and history. 2004, WIT press, Gateshead.
15. Brussels Capital Region, 2017, PRDD: Regional Plan for Sustainable Development, Brussels.
16. Bürgi, M., Ali, P., Chowdhury, A., Heinimann, A., Hett, C., Kienast, F., Verburg, P.H., Integrated landscape approach: closing the gap between theory and application. Sustainability, 9(8), 2017, 1371.
17. Bürgi, M., Kienast, F., Hersperger, A.M., In search of a resilient behaviour: Using the driving forces framework to study cultural landscapes. Bieling, T., Plienninger, C., (eds.) Resilience and cultural landscape: Understanding and managing change in human-shaped environments, 2012, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 113–125.
18. City of Helsinki, 2009, From city to city region. City of Helsinki strategic spatial plan, City Planning Department, Helsinki.
19. Clark, J., Darlington, J., Fairclough, G., 2003, Pathways to europe's landscape, European Pathways to Cultural Landscape (EPCL), http://www.pcl-eu.de.
20. Cosgrove, D., Daniels, S., The iconography of landscape. 1988, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Council of Europe European landscape convention 2000 Firenze.
22. Cumming, G.S., Spatial resilience: Integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landscape Ecology 26:7 (2011), 899–909.
23. Dale, V.H., Brown, S., Haeuber, R.A., Hobbs, N.T., Huntly, N., Naiman, R.J., Valone, T.J., Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecological Applications 10:3 (2000), 639–670.
24. Davies, C., Lafortezza, R., Urban green infrastructure in Europe: Is greenspace planning and policy compliant?. Land Use Policy 69 (2017), 93–101.
25. di Marino, M., Lapintie, K., Exploring the concept of green infrastructure in urban landscape Experiences from Italy, Canada and Finland. Landscape Research 43:1 (2018), 139–149.
26. Elinbaum, P., Galland, D., Analysing contemporary metropolitan spatial plans in Europe through their institutional context, instrumental content and planning process. European Planning Studies 24:1 (2016), 181–206.
27. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Norberg, J., Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:1 (2005), 441–473.
28. Forman, R.T.T., Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. García-Martín, M., Bieling, C., Hart, A., Plieninger, T., Integrated landscape initiatives in Europe: Multi-sector collaboration in multi-functional landscapes. Land Use Policy 58 (2016), 43–53.
30. Grădinaru, S., Iojă, C., Pătru-Stupariu, I., Hersperger, A., Are spatial planning objectives reflected in the evolution of urban landscape patterns? A framework for the evaluation of spatial planning outcomes. Sustainability, 9(8), 2017, 1279.
31. Gradinaru, S.R., Hersperger, A.M., Green infrastructures in strategic spatial plans: Evidence from European urban regions. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018.
32. Gunderson, L.H., Ecological resilience — in theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31 (2000), 425–439.
33. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., Valuing and assessing of multifunctional landscapes: An approach based upon the natural capital concept. Brandt, J., Vejre, H., (eds.) Multifunctional landscapes. Theory, values and history, 2004, WIT Press, Southampton, 181–192.
34. Hallgren, K.A., Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 2012, 23.
35. Hanspach, J., Hartel, T., Milcu, A.I., Mikulcak, F., Dorresteijn, I., Loos, J., Báldi, A.J.F, A holistic approach to studying social-ecological systems and its application to southern Transylvania. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 2014, 32, 10.5751/ES-06915-190432.
36. Healey, P., In search of the ‘strategic’ in spatial strategy making. Planning Theory & Practice 10:4 (2009), 439–457.
37. Hersperger, A.M., Langhamer, D., Dalang, T., Inventorying human-made objects: A step towards better understanding land use for multifunctional planning in a periurban Swiss landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 105:3 (2012), 307–314.
38. Hersperger, A.M., Mueller, G., Knöpfel, M., Siegfried, A., Kienast, F., Evaluating outcomes in planning: Indicators and reference values for Swiss landscapes. Ecological Indicators 77 (2017), 96–104.
39. Hersperger, A.M., Oliveira, E., Pagliarin, S., Palka, G., Verburg, P., Bolliger, J., Grădinaru, S., Urban land-use change: The role of strategic spatial planning. Global Environmental Change 51 (2018), 32–42.
40. Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E., Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15:9 (2005), 1277–1288.
41. Jongman, R.H.G., Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: Ecological consequences and solutions. Landscape and Urban Planning 58 (2002), 211–221.
42. Kato, S., Ahern, J., ‘Learning by doing’: Adaptive planning as a strategy to address uncertainty in planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51:4 (2008), 543–559.
43. Kienast, F., Degenhardt, B., Weilenmann, B., Wäger, Y., Buchecker, M., GIS-assisted mapping of landscape suitability for nearby recreation. Landscape and Urban Planning 105:4 (2012), 385–399.
44. Legacy, C., Achieving legitimacy through deliberative plan-making processes—lessons for metropolitan strategic planning. Planning Theory & Practice 13:1 (2012), 71–87.
45. Leibenath, M., Lintz, G., Understanding ‘landscape governance’: The case of wind energy landscapes in Germany. Landscape Research 43:4 (2018), 476–488.
46. Mann, C., Garcia-Martin, M., Raymond, C.M., Shaw, B.J., Plieninger, T., The potential for integrated landscape management to fulfil Europe's commitments to the Sustainable Development Goals. Landscape and Urban Planning 177 (2018), 75–82.
47. Mastop, H., Faludi, A., Evaluation of strategic plans: The performance principle. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 24:6 (1997), 815–832.
48. McPhearson, T., Parnell, S., Simon, D., Gaffney, O., Elmqvist, T., Bai, X.D.R., Revi, A., Scientists must have a say in the future of cities. Nature 538 (2016), 165–166.
49. Merriam, G., Connectivity: A fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern. Brandt, J., Aggerin, P., (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st international seminar on methodology in landscape ecological research and planning, 1984, Roskilde University, Denmark pp. 5-15.
50. Newman, P., Thornley, A., Urban planning in Europe. 1996, Routledge, London.
51. Olesen, K., The neoliberalisation of strategic spatial planning. Planning Theory 13:3 (2014), 288–303.
52. Oliveira, E., Place branding in strategic spatial planning: An analysis at the regional scale with special reference to Northern Portugal. PhD Dissertation, 2016, Doctor of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Groningen.
53. Oliveira, E., Hersperger, A.M., Disentangling the governance configurations of strategic spatial plan-making in European Urban Regions. Planning Practice & Research, 2018, 1–15.
54. Oliveira, E., Hersperger, A.M., Governance arrangements, funding mechanisms and power configurations in current practices of strategic spatial plan implementation. Land Use Policy 76 (2018), 623–633.
55. Oliveira, E., Tobias, S., Hersperger, A., Can strategic spatial planning contribute to land degradation reduction in urban regions? State of the art and future research. Sustainability, 10(4), 2018, 949.
56. Opdam, P., Coninx, I., Dewulf, A., Steingröver, E., Vos, C., van der Wal, M., Does information on landscape benefits influence collective action in landscape governance?. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 18 (2016), 107–114.
57. Opdam, P., Nassauer, J.I., Wang, Z., Albert, C., Bentrup, G., Castella, J.-C., Swaffield, S., Science for action at the local landscape scale. Landscape Ecology 28:8 (2013), 1439–1445.
58. Opdam, P., Westerink, J., Vos, C., de Vries, B., The role and evolution of boundary concepts in transdisciplinary landscape planning. Planning Theory & Practice 16:1 (2015), 63–78.
59. Pahl-Wostl, C., Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resources Management 21:1 (2007), 49–62.
60. Palang, H., Fry, G., Landscape interfaces. Cultural heritage in changing landscapes. 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
61. Pǎtru-Stupariu, I., Tudor, C.A., Stupariu, M.S., Buttler, A., Peringer, A., Landscape persistence and stakeholder perspectives: The case of Romania's Carpathians. Applied Geography 69 (2016), 87–98.
62. Pedroli, B., Pinto-Correia, T., Cornish, P., Landscape - what's in it? Trends in European landscape science and priority themes for concerted research. Landscape Ecology 21:3 (2006), 421–430.
63. Pinto-Correia, T., Kristensen, L., Linking research to practice: The landscape as the basis for integrating social and ecological perspectives of the rural. Landscape and Urban Planning 120 (2013), 248–256.
64. Rall, E.L., Kabisch, N., Hansen, R., A comparative exploration of uptake and potential application of ecosystem services in urban planning. Ecosystem Services 16 (2015), 230–242.
65. Reed, J., Deakin, E.L., Sunderland, T.C.H., What are 'Integrated Landscape Approaches' and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics: A systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence, 2014, 2.
66. Robinson, G.M., Carson, D.A., Applying landscape science to natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 18(1), 2013.
67. Rudolf, S.C., Grădinaru, S.R., Hersperger, A.M., Impact of planning mandates on local plans: A multi-method assessment. European Planning Studies 25:12 (2017), 2192–2211.
68. Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J.-L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., Buck, L.E., Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110:21 (2013), 8349–8356.
69. Selman, P., Sustainable Landscape Planning: The Reconnection Agenda. 2012, Taylor & Francis, London.
70. Steiner, F., An ecological approach to landscape planning. 2008, Island Press, Washington.
71. Termorshuizen, J.W., Opdam, P., Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology 24:8 (2009), 1037–1052.
72. Termorshuizen, J.W., Opdam, P., van den Brink, A., Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 79:3 (2007), 374–384.
73. Thomas, K., Littlewood, S., From Green Belts to Green Infrastructure? The Evolution of a New Concept in the Emerging Soft Governance of Spatial Strategies. Planning Practice & Research 25:2 (2010), 203–222.
74. Trammell, E.J., Carter, S., Haby, T.S., Taylor, J.J., Evidence and opportunities for integrating landscape ecology into natural resource planning across multiple-use landscapes. Current Landscape Ecology Reports 3:1 (2018), 1–11.
75. Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H., Landscape ecology in theory and practice. 2015, Springer, New York.
76. Vogt, P., Ferrari, J.R., Lookingbill, T.R., Gardner, R.H., Riitters, K.H., Ostapowicz, K., Mapping functional connectivity. Ecological Indicators 9:1 (2009), 64–71.
77. Vos, W., Meekes, H., Trends in European cultural landscape development: Perspectives for a sustainable future Landscape and Urban Planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 46:1–3 (1999), 3–14.
78. Wang, Z., Tan, P.Y., Zhang, T., Nassauer, J.I., Perspectives on narrowing the action gap between landscape science and metropolitan governance: Practice in the US and China. Landscape and Urban Planning 125 (2014), 329–334.
79. Wende, W., Walz, U., 2017, Die räumliche Wirkung der Landschaftsplanung. Evaluation, Indikatoren, Trends, Springer, Wiesbaden.
80. Wende, W., Wojtkiewicz, W., Marschall, I., Heiland, S., Lipp, T., Reinke, M., Schmidt, C., Putting the plan into practice: Implementation of proposals for measures of local landscape plans. Landscape Research 37:4 (2012), 483–500.
81. Wiens, J.H., Moss, M.R., Turner, M.G., Mladenoff, D.J., Foundation papers in landscape ecology. 2007, Columbia University Press, New York.
82. Wilkinson, C., Saarne, T., Peterson, G.D., Colding, J., Strategic spatial planning and the ecosystem services concept – an historical exploration. Ecology and Society, 18(1), 2013, 37.
83. Woodruff, S.C., BenDor, T.K., Ecosystem services in urban planning: Comparative paradigms and guidelines for high quality plans. Landscape and Urban Planning 152 (2016), 90–100.
84. Wu, J., Key concepts and research topics in landscape ecology revisited: 30 years after the Allerton Park workshop. Landscape Ecology 28:1 (2013), 1–11.
85. Yli-Pelkonen, V., Niemelä, J., Use of ecological information in urban planning: Experiences from the Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland. Urban Ecosystems 9:3 (2006), 211–226.