The role and evolution of boundary concepts in transdisciplinary landscape planning

Planning Theory and Practice

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 63-78

  Opdam, Paul ^a   Westerink, Judith ^a   Vos, Claire ^a   de Vries, Barry ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

collaboration and collective action; consensus building; knowledge integration; landscape change; urban planning

Indexed keywords

COLLECTIVE ACTION; DECISION MAKING; KNOWLEDGE; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; LOCAL PLANNING; URBAN PLANNING;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84924249789     PISSN: 14649357     EISSN: 1470000X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2014.997786     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571. 10.1093/jopart/mum032.
2. Arts, B., & van Tatenhove, J. (2004). Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms. Policy Sciences, 37, 339–356. 10.1007/s11077-005-0156-9.
3. Beunen, R., & Opdam, P. (2011). When landscape planning becomes landscape governance, what happens to the science?Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 324–326. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.018.
4. Brunckhorst, D. J. (2005). Integration research for shaping sustainable regional landscapes. Journal of Research Practice, 1, artM7.
5. Buizer, I. M. (2008). Worlds apart: Interactions between local initiatives and established policy. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wageningen, PhD thesis Wageningen University.
6. Campbell, H. (2012). Planning to change the world: Between knowledge and action lies synthesis. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32, 135–146. 10.1177/0739456X11436347.
7. Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15, 555–568. 10.1287/orsc.1040.0094.
8. Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F. F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., & … Mitchell, R. B. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 8086–8091. 10.1073/pnas.1231332100.
9. Deppisch, S., & Hasibovic, S. (2013). Social-ecological resilience thinking as a bridging concept in transdisciplinary research on climate-change adaptation. Natural Hazards, 67, 117–127. 10.1007/s11069-011-9821-9.
10. Faehnle, M., & Tyrväinen, L. (2013). A framework for evaluating and designing collaborative planning. Land Use Policy, 34, 332–341. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.006.
11. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for civil society?British Journal of Sociology, 49, 210–233. 10.2307/591310.
12. Gerritsen, A. L., Stuiver, M., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2013). Knowledge governance: An exploration of principles, impact, and barriers. Science and Public Policy, 40, 604–615. 10.1093/scipol/sct012.
13. Görg, C. (2007). Landscape governance. The “politics of scale” and the “natural” conditions of places. Geoforum, 38, 954–966.
14. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multi-party problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15. Habermas, J. (1983). The theory of communicative action (vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Pres.
16. Hagens, J. E. (2010). The performance of landscape concepts in spatial planning: Branding, bonding and bringing about. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) Wageningen, PhD thesis Wageningen University.
17. Harvey, F., & Chrisman, N. (1998). Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1683–1694. 10.1068/a301683.
18. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan Press.
19. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems-A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, 412–423. 10.1080/01944369908976071.
20. Innes, J. E., & Rongerude, J. (2013). Civic networks for sustainable regions – innovative practices and emergent theory. Planning Theory & Practice, 14, 75–100. 10.1080/14649357.2012.754487.
21. Kooij, H., Van Assche, K., & Lagendijk, A. (2014). Open concepts as crystallization points and enablers of discursive configurations: The case of the innovation campus in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 22, 84–100. 10.1080/09654313.2012.731039.
22. Kueffer, C., & Hirsch Hadorn, G. H. (2008). How to achieve effectiveness in problem-oriented landscape research: The example of research on biotic invasions. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 2, 1–49. 10.12942/lrlr-2008-2.
23. Lang, J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., & … Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7, 25–43. 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
24. Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35, 601–617. 10.1177/0162243910377624.
25. Matthews, R., & Selman, P. (2006). Landscape as a focus for integrating human and environmental processes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57, 199–212. 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00047.x.
26. Metze, T. A. P. (2011). Deliberative governance in synergy with government: A case study of credible environmental improvements in the Dairy Gateway, USA. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77, 31–49. 10.1177/0020852310390446.
27. Mollinga, P. P. (2010). Boundary work and the complexity of natural resources management. Crop Science, 50, S-1–S-9. 10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0570.
28. Opdam, P., Nassauer, J. I., Wang, Z., Albert, C., Bentrup, G., Castella, J., & … Swaffield, S. (2013). Science for action at the local landscape scale. Landscape Ecology, 28, 1439–1445. 10.1007/s10980-013-9925-6.
29. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325, 419–422. 10.1126/science.1172133.
30. Ren, C., Ng, E. Y., & Katzschner, L. (2011). Urban climatic map studies: A review. International Journal of Climatology, 31, 2213–2233. 10.1002/joc.2237.
31. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ´translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420. 10.1177/030631289019003001.
32. Steingröver, E. G., Geertsema, W., & Van Wingerden, W. K. R. E. (2010). Designing agricultural landscapes for natural pest control: A transdisciplinary approach in the Hoeksche Waard (the Netherlands). Landscape Ecology, 25, 825–838.
33. Termorshuizen, J.W., & Opdam, P. (2009). Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, 24, 1037–1052. 10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8.
34. Turnhout, E., Stuiver, M., Klostermann, J., Harms, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2013). New roles of science in society: Different repertoires of knowledge brokering. Science and Public Policy, 40, 354–365. 10.1093/scipol/scs114.
35. Van Duinen, L. (2013). Mainport and corridor: Exploring the mobilizing capacities of Dutch spatial concepts. Theory and Practice, 14, 211–232.
36. Werkman, R., Van den Berg, J., Van Paassen, A., & Harms, B. (2010). What is collaborative landscape research about? In A.Van Paassen, J.Van den Berg, E.Steingröver, R.Werkman, & B.Pedroli (Eds.), Knowledge in action-The search for collaborative research for sustainable landscape development (pp. 41–56). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
37. Westerink, J., Lagendijk, A., Dühr, S., Van der Jagt, P., & Kempenaar, A. (2013a). Contested spaces? The use of place concepts to communicate visions for peri-urban areas. European Planning Studies, 21, 780–800. 10.1080/09654313.2012.665042.
38. Westerink, J., Melman, T. C. P., & Schrijver, R. A. M. (2014). Scale and self-governance in agri-environment schemes. Experiences with two alternative approaches in The Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, online first.
39. Westerink, J., Stortelder, A. H. F., Ottburg, F. G. W. A., De Boer, T. A., Schrijver, R. A. M., De Vries, C. K., & … Bulten, G. H. (2013b). Boeren voor Natuur: Hoe werkt het en wat levert het op?Wageningen: Alterra Wageningen UR.
40. Wilkinson, C. (2013). Urban Resilience: What does it mean in planning practice?In: Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider L.J., et al. Resilience: A bridging concept or dead end?Planning Theory and Practice, 13, 299–333.
41. Wu, J., & Hobbs, R. J. (2007). Landscape ecology: The state of the science. In J.Wu & R. J.Hobbs (Eds.), Key topics in landscape ecology (pp. 271–287). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.