The neoliberalisation of strategic spatial planning

Planning Theory

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 288-303

  Olesen, Kristian ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Depoliticisation; neoliberalism; strategic spatial planning

Indexed keywords

NEOLIBERALISM; REFORM PROCESS; SPATIAL PLANNING; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

EUROPE;

EID: 84902982449     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095213499340     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ahlqvist T,Moisio S.Neoliberalisation in a Nordic state: From cartel polity towards a corporate policy in Finland.New Political Economy. 2014;19 (1): 21-55.
2. Albrechts L.The Flemish diamond: Precious gem and virgin area.European Planning Studies. 1998;6 (4): 411-424.
3. Albrechts L.How to proceed from image and discourse to action: As applied to the Flemish Diamond.Urban Studies. 2001;38 (4): 733-745.
4. Albrechts L.Strategic (spatial) planning re-examined.Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design. 2004;31:743-758.
5. Albrechts L.Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Evidence from Europe and Australia.Environment and Planning A. 2006;38 (6): 1149-1170.
6. Albrechts L.More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead?.Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design. 2010;37 (6): 1115-1127.
7. Albrechts L.Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective.Planning Theory. 2013;12 (1): 46-63.
8. Albrechts L,Healey P,Kunzmann KR.Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2003;69 (2): 113-129.
9. Allmendinger PNew Labour and Planning: From New Right to New Left. Abingdon: Routledge; 2011:.
10. Allmendinger P,Haughton G.Commentary: Critical reflections on spatial planning.Environment and Planning A. 2009;41 (11): 2544-2549.
11. Allmendinger P,Haughton G.Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2010;28 (5): 803-818.
12. Allmendinger P,Haughton G.Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus?.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2012;37 (1): 89-103.
13. Amin A,Thrift NCities: Reimagining the Urban. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2002:.
14. Andersen J,Pløger J.The dualism of urban governance in Denmark.European Planning Studies. 2007;15 (10): 1349-1367.
15. Balducci A,Fedeli V,Pasqui GStrategic Planning for Contemporary Urban Regions: City of Cities: A Project for Milan. Farnham: Ashgate; 2011:.
16. BengsC (2005) Planning theory for the naive?European Journal of Spatial Development, July2005. Available at: http://www.nordregio.se/en/European-Journal-of-Spatial-Development/Debate/.
17. Brenner N.Building 'euro-regions': Locational politics and the political geography of neoliberalism in post-unification Germany.European Urban and Regional Studies. 2000;7 (4): 319-345.
18. Brenner N.Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in western Europe, 1960-2000.Review of International Political Economy. 2004;11 (3): 447-488.
19. Brenner N,Theodore NSpaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Brenner NTheodore N, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2002:2-32.
20. Castells MThe Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers; 1996:.
21. Making Strategies in Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Values. Cerreta MConcilio GMonno V, ed. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V; 2010:.
22. Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning. Davoudi SStrange I, ed. London: Routledge; 2009:.
23. Flinders M,Buller JAutonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State. Christensen TLaegreid P, ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2006:53-80.
24. Galland D.Is regional planning dead or just coping? The transformation of a state sociospatial project into growth-oriented strategies.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2012;30 (3): 536-552.
25. Hajer M,Zonneveld W.Spatial planning in the network society - Rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands.European Planning Studies. 2000;8 (3): 337-355.
26. Harvey D.From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism.Geografiska Annaler Series B: Human Geography. 1989;71 (1): 3-17.
27. Haughton G,Allmendinger P,Counsell D, et al.The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries. Abingdon: Routledge; 2010:.
28. Healey PCollaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd; 1997:.
29. Healey P.The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2004;28 (1): 45-67.
30. Healey P.Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning.European Planning Studies. 2006;14 (4): 525-546.
31. Healey PUrban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. London: Routledge; 2007:.
32. Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe. Healey PKhakee AMotte A, ed. London: UCL Press; 1997:.
33. Heley J.Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries and spatial governance in post-devolution Wales.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2013;37 (4): 1325-1348.
34. Hillier J.Agon'izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be 'real.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (1): 37-59.
35. Jensen OB,Richardson T.Being on the map: The new iconographies of power over European space.International Planning Studies. 2003;8 (1): 9-34.
36. Jørgensen I,Kjærsdam F,Nielsen JMaking Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe. Healey PKhakee AMotte A, ed. London: UCL Press; 1997:39-58.
37. Keil R.The urban politics of roll-with-it neoliberalization.City. 2009;:230-245.
38. Mäntysalo R,Saglie IL.Private influence preceding public involvement: Strategies for legitimizing preliminary partnership arrangements in urban housing planning in Norway and Finland.Planning Theory & Practice. 2010;11 (3): 317-338.
39. Metzger J.Commentary.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2011;29 (2): 191-196.
40. Metzger J,Schmitt P.When soft spaces harden: The EU strategy for the Baltic Sea Region.Environment and Planning A. 2012;44 (2): 263-280.
41. Monno VMaking Strategies in Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Values. Cerreta MConcilio GMonno V, ed. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V; 2010:161-183.
42. Mouffe CThe Democratic Paradox. London: Verso; 2000:.
43. Murray MR,Neill WJV.Strategic spatial planning in Berlin-Brandenburg: A requiem for balanced development?.Planning Practice & Research. 2011;26 (1): 107-121.
44. Newmann P.Strategic spatial planning: Collective action and moments of opportunity.European Planning Studies. 2008;16 (10): 1371-1383.
45. Nyseth TAdvances in Spatial Planning. Burian J, ed. Rijeka: InTech; 2012:27-46.
46. OlesenK (2011) Strategic Spatial Planning in Transition: A Case Study of Denmark. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Aalborg University, Denmark.
47. Olesen K.Soft spaces as vehicles for neoliberal transformations of strategic spatial planning?.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2012;30 (5): 910-923.
48. Olesen K,Richardson T.The spatial politics of spatial representation: Relationality as a medium for depoliticisation?.International Planning Studies. 2011;16 (4): 355-375.
49. Olesen K,Richardson T.Strategic spatial planning in transition: Contested rationalities and spatial logics in 21st century Danish spatial planning.European Planning Studies. 2012;20 (10): 1689-1706.
50. Peck J,Tickell ASpaces of Neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Brenner NTheodore N, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2002:33-57.
51. Pløger J.Strife: Urban planning and agonism.Planning Theory. 2004;3 (1): 71-92.
52. Purcell M.Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements?.Planning Theory. 2009;8 (2): 140-165.
53. SagerT (2005) Communicative planners as naïve mandarins of the neo-liberal state?European Journal of Spatial Development, December2005. Available at: http://www.nordregio.se/en/European-Journal-of-Spatial-Development/Debate/.
54. Sager T.Planners' role: Torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities.European Planning Studies. 2009;17 (1): 65-84.
55. Sager TReviving Critical Planning Theory: Dealing with Pressure, Neo-liberalism, and Responsibility in Communicative Planning. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013:.
56. The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning. Salet WFaludi A, ed. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen; 2000:.
57. Sehested K.Urban planners as network managers and metagovernors.Planning Theory & Practice. 2009;10 (2): 245-263.
58. Simonsen K.Networks, flows, and fluids - Reimagining spatial analysis?.Environment and Planning A. 2004;36 (8): 1333-1340.
59. Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Sørensen ETorfing J, ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 2007:.
60. Offentlig Styring socm Pluricentrisk Koordination. Sørensen ESehested KReff A, ed. Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomiforbundets Forlag; 2011:.
61. Swyngedouw EMaking Strategies in Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Values. Cerreta MConcilio GMonno V, ed. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V; 2010:185-205.
62. Swyngedouw E,Moulaert F,Rodriguez A.Neoliberal urbanisation in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy.Antipode. 2002;34 (3): 542-575.
63. Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning. Taşan-Kok TBaeten G, ed. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V; 2012:.
64. Van den Broeck P.The changing position of strategic spatial planning in Flanders. A socio-political and instrument-based perspective.International Planning Studies. 2008;13 (3): 261-283.
65. Waterhout B,Othengrafen F,Sykes O.Neo-liberalization processes and spatial planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An exploration.Planning Research & Practice. 2013;28 (1): 141-159.
66. Zonneveld WThe Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning. Salet WFaludi A, ed. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen; 2000:267-280.