Synergies between stimulus and functional equivalence

European Journal of Behavior Analysis

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 62-66

  Fields, Lanny ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85073531717     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2377729X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2001.11434174     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams, B.J., Fields, L., & Verhave, T. (1999). Effects of unreinforced conditional selection training, multiple negative comparison training, and feedback on equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 49, 685–702.
2. Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (1997). Probability of stimulus equivalence as a function of training design. The Psychological Record, 47, 309–320.
3. Bentall, R. P., Jones. R. M., & Dickens, D. W. (1999). Errors and response latencies as a function of nodal distance in five-member equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 49, 93–116.
4. Cullinan, V. A., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (1998). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Analyzing stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 121–146.
5. Donahue, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (1994). Learning and Complex Behavior. Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
6. Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (1996). Some implications of a stimulus control topography analysis for emergence behavior and stimulus classes. In T.R. Zentall & P.M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus Class Formation in Humans and Animals (pp. 197–218). Elseview Science D.V.
7. Fields, L., Adams, B.J., Brown, J.L., & Verhave, T. (1993). The generalization of emergent relations in equivalence classes: Stimulus substitutability. The Psychological Record, 43, 235–254.
8. Fields, L., Adams, B.J., Verhave, T., & Newman, S. (1990). The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 345–358.
9. Fields, L., Adams, B.J., Verhave, T., & Newman, S. (1993). Are stimuli in equivalence classes equally related to each other? The Psychological Record, 45, 85–105.
10. Fields, L., Hobbie, S. A., Reeve, K. F., & Adams, B. J. (1999). Effects of training directionality and class size on equivalence class formation by adults. The Psychological Record, 49, 703–724.
11. Fields, L., Landon-Jimenez, D.V. Buffington, & Adams, B.J. (1995). Maintained nodal distance effects after equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 129–146.
12. Fields, L., Newman, S., Adams, B.J., & Verhave, T. (1992). The expansion of equivalence classes by simple discrimination training and stimulus fading. The Psychological Record, 42, 3–15.
13. Fields, L. & Reeve, K. F. (2000). Equivalence classes and natural categories from the generalization of perceptual and relational classes. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Issues in Experimental and Applied Analyses of Human Behavior (pp. 59–83). Reno, NV: Context Press.
14. Fields, L., & Reeve, K. F. (2001). A methodological integration of generalized equivalence classes, natural categories, and cross modal perception. The Psychological Record, 51, 67–88.
15. Fields, L., Reeve, K. F., Adams, B.J., Brown, J.L., & Verhave, T. (1997). Predicting the extension of equivalence classes from primary generalization gradients: The merger of equivalence classes and perceptual classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 68–92.
16. Fields, L., Reeve, K. F., Adams, B.J., & Verhave, T. (1991). The generalization of equivalence relations: A model for natural categories. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 305–312.
17. Fields, L., Reeve, K. F., Rosen, D., Varelas, A., Adams, B.J., Belanich, J., & Hobbie, S. A. (1997). Using the simultaneous protocol to study equivalence class formation: The facilitating effects of nodal number and size of previously established equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 367–389.
18. Fields, L., Reeve, K. F., Varelas, A., Rosen, D., & Belanich, J. (1997). Equivalence class formation using stimulus-pairing and yes-no responding. The Psychological Record, 47, 661–686.
19. Fields, L., & Verhave, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317–332.
20. Harrison, R. J., & Green, G. (1990). Development of conditional and equivalence relations without differential consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 325–237.
21. Lane, S. D., Clow, J. K., Innis, A., & Critchfield, T. S. (1998). Generalization of cross-modal stimulus equivalence classes: Operant processes as components in human category formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 267–279.
22. Lazar, R. M. (1977). Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 381–392.
23. Leader, G., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Establishing fraction-decimal equivalence using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 51, 151–156.
24. Leader, G., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685–706.
25. Mackay, H. M., & Sidman, M. (1984). Teaching new behavior via equivalency relations. In P. H. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. McCauley (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 493–513). Hillsdale.
26. McIlvane, W. J., Serna, R. W., Dube, W. V., & Stromer, R. (2000). Stimulus control topography and stimulus equivalence: Reconciling test outcomes with theory. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analysis of human behavior (pp. 85–110). Reno: Context Press.
27. Pilgrim, C., Chambers, L., & Galizio, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: II. Children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 239–254.
28. Rehfeldt, R. A., & Hayes, L. J. (2000). The longterm retention of generalized equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 405–428.
29. Saunders, R. R., & Green, G. (1996). Naming is not (necessary for) stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 312–314.
30. Saunders, R. R., & Green, G. (1999). A discrimination analysis of training structure effects on stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 117–138.
31. Saunders, R. R., Saunders, K. J., Kirby, K. C., & Spradlin, J. E. (1988). The merger and developmentof equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 145–162.
32. Saunders, R. R., Wachter, J. A., & Spradlin, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member stimulus class via conditional discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95–115.
33. Sigurdardottir, Z. G., Green, G., & Saunders, R. R. (1990). Equivalence classes generated by sequence training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 47–64.
34. Smeets, P. M., Leader, G., & Barnes, D. (1997). Establishing stimulus classes in adults and children using a respondent-type training procedure: A followup study. The Psychological Record, 47, 285–308.
35. Spencer, T. J., & Chase, P. N. (1996). Speed analysis of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65,643–659.
36. Vaughan, W., Jr. (1988) Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 36–42.
37. Wirth, O., & Chase, P.N. (Submitted). Stability of functional equivalence stimulus equivalence: Effects of baseline reversals.