The long-term retention of generalized equivalence classes

Psychological Record

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 405-428

  Rehfeldt, Ruth Anne ^a   Hayes, Linda J ^b  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034376488     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395363     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ADAMS, B. J., FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1993). The effects of test order on the establishment and expansion of equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 43, 133-152.
2. DETOLEDO, L., & BLACK, A. H. (1970). Retention of aversively motivated responses in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 71, 276-282.
3. ERICSSON, K. A., & SIMON, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., BUFFINGTON, D. M., YANG, W., & VERHAVE, T. (1996). Response transfer between stimuli in generalized equivalence classes: A model for the establishment of natural kind and fuzzy superordinate categories. The Psychological Record, 46, 665-684.
5. FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., & VERHAVE, T. (1993). The effects of equivalence class structure on test performances. The Psychological Record, 43, 697-712.
6. FIELDS, L., REEVE, K. F., ADAMS, B. J., BROWN, J. L., & VERHAVE, T. (1997). Predicting the extension of equivalence classes from primary generalization gradients: The merger of equivalence classes and perceptual classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 67-91.
7. FIELDS, L., REEVE, K. F., ADAMS, B. J., & VERHAVE, T. (1991). Stimulus generalization and equivalence classes: A model for natural categories. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 305-312.
8. FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987).The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317-332.
9. FIELDS, L., VERHAVE, T., & FATH, S. J. (1984). Stimulus equivalence and transitive associations: A methodological analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 143-157.
10. HAYES, S. C. (1986). The case of the silent dog: Verbal reports and the analysis of rules. A review of K. Anders Ericsson and Herbert A. Simon, "Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data." Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 351-363.
11. HOLLIS, J. H. (1987). Reading vocabulary acquisition and retention in developmentally disabled children. Working Paper in Child Development, Child Language program. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
12. HORNE, P. J., & LOWE, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-242.
13. MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1996). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529-542.
14. PILGRIM, C., CHAMBERS, L., & GALIZIO, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: II. Children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 239-254.
15. PILGRIM, C., & GALIZIO, M. (1990). Relations between baseline contingencies and equivalence probe performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 213-224.
16. PILGRIM, C., & GALIZIO, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: I. Adults. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 225-238.
17. REHFELDT, R. A., DIXON, M. R., HAYES, L. J., & STEELE, A. (1998). Stimulus equivalence and the blocking effect. The Psychological Record, 48, 647-664.
18. RICCIO, D. C., ACKIL, J., & BURCH-VERNON, A. (1992). Forgetting of stimulus attributes: Methodological implications for assessing associative phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 433-445.
19. RICCIO, D. C., RICHARDSON, R., & EBNER, D. L. (1984). Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: A paradox. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 152-165.
20. SAUNDERS, R. R., & GREEN, G. (1992). The nonequivalence of behavioral and mathematical equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 227-241.
21. SAUNDERS, R. R., WACHTER, J., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95-115.
22. SIDMAN, M., KIRK, B., & WILLSON-MORRIS, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21-42.
23. SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching-to-sample: An explanation of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23-44.
24. SIDMAN, M., WILLSON-MORRIS, M., & KIRK, B. (1986). Matching-to-sample procedures and the development of equivalence relations: The role of naming. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 1-19.
25. STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585-598.
26. STROMER, R., & STROMER, J. B. (1990a). The formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples. The Psychological Record, 40,51-66.
27. STROMER, R., & STROMER, J. B. (1990b). Matching to complex samples: Further study of arbitrary stimulus classes. The Psychological Record, 40, 505-516.
28. WULFERT, E., DOUGHER, M. J., & GREENWAY, D. E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489-504.