On the usefulness of soft OR models in decision making: A comparison of Problem Structuring Methods supported and self-organized workshops

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 275, Issue 3, 2019, Pages 1020-1036

  Lami, Isabella M ^a   Tavella, Elena ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Model usefulness; Problem structuring; Questionnaires; Reflective discussions

Indexed keywords

SURVEYS;

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH; PROBLEM STRUCTURING; PROBLEM STRUCTURING METHODS; QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFLECTIVE DISCUSSIONS; SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY; STRATEGIC CHOICE;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 85059347338     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.016     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (88)

1. Ackermann, F., Participants’ perceptions on the role of facilitators using Group Decision Support Systems. Group Decision and Negotiation, 5, 1996, 93, 10.1007/BF0240417.
2. Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Issues in computer and non-computer supported GDSSs. Decis Support Syst 12:4–5 (1994), 381–390.
3. Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Contrasting single user and networked group decision support systems for strategy making. Group Decision and Negotiation 10 (2001), 47–66.
4. Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Using causal mapping with group support systems to elicit an understanding of failure in complex projects: some implications for organizational research. Group Decision and Negotiation 14:5 (2005), 355–376.
5. Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Strategic options development and analysis. Reynolds, M., Holwell, S., (eds.) Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide, 2010, Springer, London, 135–190.
6. Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Pyrko, I., Accelerated multi-organization conflict resolution. Group Decision and Negotiation 25:5 (2016), 901–922.
7. Ackermann, F., Franco, L.A., Gallupe, B., Parent, M., Group support systems for multi-organizational collaboration: reflections on process and content. Group Decision and Negotiation 14:4 (2005), 307–331.
8. Armando, A., Durbiano, G., Teoria del progetto architettonico. Dai disegni agli effetti, 2017, Carocci, Roma.
9. Bana e Costa, C.A., Lourenço, J.C., Oliveira, M.D., Bana e Costa, J.C., A socio-technical approach for group decision support in public strategic planning: The pernambuco PPA case. Group Decision and Negotiation 23:1 (2013), 5–29.
10. Berg, T., Pooley, R., Rich pictures: Collaborative communication through icons. Systemic Practice and Action Research 26:4 (2013), 361–376.
11. Checkland, P., Systems thinking, systems practice. 1981, Wiley, Chichester.
12. Checkland, P., Soft systems methodology. Rosenhead, J., Mingers, J., (eds.) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited, 2001, Wiley, Chichester.
13. Checkland, P., Scholes, J., Soft systems methodology in action. 1999, Wiley, New York.
14. Checkland, P., Scholes, J., Soft systems methodology in action. 1990, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.
15. Checkland, P.B., Poulter, J., Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers and students. 2006, Wiley, Chichester.
16. Connell, N.A.D., Evaluating soft OR: Some reflections on an apparently ‘unsuccessful’ implementation using Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) based approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society 52 (2001), 150–160.
17. Cronin, K., Midgley, G., Jackson, L., Issues mapping: a problem structuring method for addressing science and technology conflicts. European Journal of Operational Research 233:1 (2014), 145–158.
18. Cushman, M., Rosenhead, J., Planning in the face of politics: reshaping children's health services in Inner London. Brandeau, M., Sainfort, F., Pierskalla, W., (eds.) Operations research and health care: A handbook of methods and applications International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 2004, Kluwer Academic, London, 555–592.
19. Darling, T., Mumpower, J., Rohrbaugh, J., Vari, A., Negotiation support formulti-party resource allocation: Developing recommendation for decreasing transportation-related airpollution in Budapest. Group Decision and Negotiation 8:1 (1999), 51–75.
20. Eden, C., Modelling the influence of decision makers on the future. Futures 9:4 (1977), 272–284.
21. Eden, C., A framework for thinking about Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS). Group Decision and Negotiation 1:3 (1992), 199–218.
22. Eden, C., On evaluating the performance of ‘wide-band’ GDSS's. European Journal of Operational Research 81:2 (1995), 302–311.
23. Eden, C., On evaluating the performance of GSS: Furthering the debate, by Paul Finlay [European Journal of Operational Research 107, pp. 193-201], A response from Colin Eden. European Journal of Operational Research 120 (2000), 218–222.
24. Eden, C., Ackermann, F., Group decision and negotiation in strategy making. Group Decision and Negotiation 10:2 (2001), 119–140.
25. Eden, C., Ackermann, F., Problem structuring: on the nature of, and reaching agreement about, goals. EURO Journal on Decision Processes 1:1 (2013), 7–28.
26. Espinosa, A., Walker, J., Complexity management in practice: a viable system model intervention in an Irish eco-community. European Journal of Operational Research 225 (2013), 118–129.
27. Field, A, Miles, J, Discovering statistics ssing SAS. 2010, Sage, London.
28. Finlay, P.N., On evaluating the performance of GSS: furthering the debate. European Journal of Operational Research 107:1 (1998), 193–201.
29. Franco L, A., Assessing the impact of problem structuring methods in multiorganisational settings: an empirical investigation. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58:6 (2007), 760–768.
30. Franco, L.A., Facilitating Collaboration with problem structuring methods: a case study of an inter-organisational construction partnership. Group Decision and Negotiation 17 (2008), 267–286.
31. Franco, L.A., Problem structuring methods as intervention tools: reflections from their use with multi-organisational teams. Omega 37 (2009), 193–203.
32. Franco, L.A., Rethinking soft OR interventions: models as boundary objects. European Journal of Operational Research 231:3 (2013), 720–733.
33. Franco, L.A., Cushman, M., Rosenhead, J., Project review and learning in the construction industry: embedding a problem structuring method within a partnership context. European Journal of Operational Research 152 (2004), 586–601.
34. Franco, L.A., Lord, E., Understanding multi-methodology: evaluating the perceived impact of mixing methods for group budgetary decisions. OMEGA: The International Journal of Management Science 39:3 (2011), 362–372.
35. Franco, L.A., Montibeller, G., Facilitated modelling in operational research. European Journal of Operational Research 205:3 (2010), 489–500.
36. Franco, L.A., Rouwette, E.A.J.A., Decision development in facilitated modelling workshops. European Journal of Operational Research 212:1 (2011), 164–178.
37. Franco, L.A., Rouwette, E.A.J.A., Korzilius, H., Different paths to consensus? The impact of need for closure on model-supported group conflict management. European Journal of Operational Research 249:3 (2016), 878–889.
38. Friend, J., Handling organizational complexity in group decision support. Eden, C., Radford, J., (eds.) Tackling strategic problems: The role of group decision support, 1990, Sage, London, 18–28.
39. Friend, J., The strategic choice approach. Rosenhead, J., Mingers, J., (eds.) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict, 2001, Wiley, Chichester, 115–149.
40. Friend, J.K., Hickling, A., Planning under pressure: The strategic choice approach. Planning under pressure: The strategic choice approach, 1987, Oxford.
41. Friend, J.K., Hickling, A., Planning under pressure: The strategic choice approach. 3rd Ed., 2005, Routledge, LondonNew York.
42. Friend, J.K., Norris, M.E., The Institute for Operational Research: an initiative to extend the scope of OR. Journal of Operational Research Society 39 (1988), 705–713.
43. Friend, J., Wedgwood-Oppenheim, F., et al. The LOGIMP Experiment. A collaborative exercise in the application of a new approach to local planning problems, 1970, Centre for Environmental Studies, London.
44. Hämäläinen, R.P., Luoma, J., Saarinen, E., On the importance of behavioral operational research: The case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems. European Journal of Operational Research 228:3 (2013), 623–634.
45. Healey, P., Creativity and urban governance. Policy Studies 25:2 (2004), 87–102 http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals.
46. Henao, F., Franco, L.A., Unpacking multimethodology: impacts of a community development intervention. European Journal of Operational Research 253:3 (2016), 681–696.
47. Herrera, H.J., McCardle-Keurentjes, M.H.F., Videira, N., Evaluating facilitated modelling processes and outcomes: an experiment comparing a single and a multimethod approach in group model building. Group Decision and Negotiation 25:6 (2016), 1277–1318.
48. Hindle, G., Teaching soft systems methodology and a blueprint for a module. Informs Transactions on Education 12:1 (2011), 31–40.
49. Joldersma, C., Roelofs, E., The impact of soft OR-methods on problem structuring. European Journal of Operational Research 152:3 (2004), 696–708.
50. Kaner, S., Facilitator's guide to participatory decision making. 2007, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
51. Kowaltowski, D.C.C.K., Bianchi, G., Teixeira de Paiva, V., Methods that may stimulate creativity and their use in architectural design education. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 2 (2010), 453–476.
52. Lami, I.M., Abastante, F., Bottero, M., Masala, E., Pensa, S., A MCDA and data visualization framework as a Problem Structuring Method (PSM) to address transport projects. Euro Journal of Decision Processes 2:3-4 (2014), 281–312.
53. Ledington, P., Donaldson, J., Soft OR and management practice: A study of the adoption and use of Soft Systems Methodology. Journal of the Operational Research Society 48:3 (1997), 229–240.
54. McCardle-Keurentjes, M.H.F., PhD., 2015, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
55. Midgley, G, Cavana, RY, Brocklesby, J, Foote, JL, Wood, DRR, Ahuriri-Driscoli, A, Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods. European Journal of Operational Research 229:1 (2013), 143–154.
56. Mingers, J., Brocklesby, J., Multimethodology: towards a Framework for Mixing Methods. Omega – The International Journal of Management Science 25:5 (1997), 489–509.
57. Mingers, J., Taylor, S., The use of soft systems methodology in practice. Journal of the Operational Research Society 43:4 (1992), 321–332.
58. O'Keefe, R.M., Experimental behavioural research in operational research: what we know and what we might come to know. European Journal of Operational Research 249:3 (2016), 899–907.
59. O'Keefe, R.M., Pitt, I.L., Interaction with a visual interactive simulation, and the effect of cognitive style. European Journal of Operational Research 54:3 (1991), 339–348.
60. Ormerod, R., Putting soft OR to work: The case of the business improvement project at PowerGen. European Journal of Operational Research 118 (1999), 1–29.
61. Pensa, S., Masala, E., Lami, I.M., Supporting planning processes by the use of dynamic visualization. Geertman, S., Toppen, F., Stillwell, J., (eds.) Planning support systems for sustainable urban development, 2013, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 451–467.
62. Pidd, M., Tools for thinking: Modelling in management science. 2003, Wiley, Chichester.
63. Robinson, S., General concepts of quality for discrete-event simulation. European Journal of Operational Research 138:1 (2002), 103–117.
64. Rosenhead, J., Rational Analysis for a problematic world: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. 1989, Wiley, Chichester.
65. Rosenhead, J., Mingers, M., Rational analysis of a problematic world revisited. 2001, Wiley, Chichester.
66. Rouwette, E.A.J.A., Facilitated modelling in strategy development: measuring the impact on communication, consensus and commitment. Journal of the Operational Research Society 62 (2011), 879–887.
67. Rouwette, E.A.J.A., Vennix, J.A.M., Felling, A.J.A., On evaluating the performance of problem structuring methods: An attempt at formulating a conceptual model. Group Decision & Negotiation 18:6 (2009), 567–587.
68. Rouwette, E.A.J.A., Vennix, J.A.M., Groupmodel building. Meyers, R.E., (eds.) Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science, 2009, Springer, Heidelberg, 4474–4486.
69. Rouwette, E.A.J.A., Korzilius, H., Vennix, J.A.M., Jacobs, E., Modeling as persuasion: the impact of group model building on attitudes and behavior. System Dynamics Review 27:1 (2011), 1–21.
70. Rouwette, E.A.J.A., Bastings, I., Blokker, H., A comparison of group model building and strategic options development and analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation 20:6 (2011), 781–803.
71. Salat, S, (eds.) Cities and forms on sustainable urbanism, 2011, Hermann, Paris.
72. Scott, R.J., Cavana, R.Y., Cameron, D., Recent evidence on the effectiveness of group model building. European Journal of Operational Research 249 (2016), 908–918.
73. Shaw, D., Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Approaches to sharing knowledge in group problem structuring. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54:9 (2003), 936–948.
74. Tavella, E., Papadopoulos, T., Expert and novice facilitated modelling: a case of a viable system model workshop in a local food network. Journal of the Operational Research Society 66 (2014), 247–264.
75. Tavella, E., Franco, L.A., Dynamics of group knowledge production in facilitated modelling workshops: an exploratory study. Group Decision and Negotiation 24:3 (2015), 451–475.
76. Tavella, E., Papadopoulos, T., Applying OR to problem situations within community organisations: a case in a Danish non-profit, member-driven food cooperative. European Journal of Operational Research 258:2 (2017), 726–742.
77. Tavella, E., Lami, I.M., Negotiating perspectives and values through soft OR in the context of urban renewal. Journal of Operational Research Society, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1427433.
78. Todella, E., Lami, I.M., Armando, A., Experimental use of strategic choice approach (SCA) by Individuals as an architectural design tool. Group Decision Negotiation, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9567-9.
79. Vennix, J.A.M., Group model building: Facilitating team learning using system dynamics. 1996, Wiley, Chichester.
80. Vidal, R.V.V., Community facilitation of problem structuring and decision making processes: experiences from the EU LEADER+ programme. European Journal of Operational Research 199:3 (2009), 803–810.
81. Waring, A., System methods for managers. 1989, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
82. White, L., Evaluating problem-structuring methods: developing an approach to show the value and effectiveness of PSMs. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 57:7 (2006), 842–855.
83. White, L., Understanding problem structuring methods interventions. European Journal of Operational Research 99:3 (2009), 823–833.
84. White, L., Behavioural operational research: towards a framework for understanding behaviour in OR interventions. European Journal of Operational Research 249:3 (2016), 827–841.
85. White, L., Burger, K., Yearworth, M., Understanding behaviour in problem structuring methods interventions with activity theory. European Journal of Operational Research 249:3 (2016), 983–1004.
86. Willemain, T.R., Insights on modeling from a dozen experts. Operations Research 42:2 (1994), 213–222.
87. Yearworth, M., White, L., Demystifying facilitation: a new approach to investigating the role of facilitation in group decision support processes. Bajwa, D., Koeszegi, S., Vetschera, R., (eds.) Proceedings of the group decision and negotiation. Theory, empirical evidence, and application. GDN 2016 Lecture notes in business information processing, 274, 2017, Springer, Cham.
88. Zeiderman, A., Kaker, S., Silver, J., Wood, A., Ramakrishnan, K., Urban uncertainty: Governing cities in turbulent times. 2017, LSE Citie, London.