Bateman's Principles: Original Experiment and Modern Data For and Against

Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 166-176

  Tang Martinez Z ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Anisogamy; Bateman; Bateman gradients; Cost of male reproduction; Cost of Sperm; Extra pair copulations; Male female differences in sexual behavior; Polyandry; Selection gradients; Sexual selection; Sperm allocation; Sperm depletion; Variance in mating success; Variance in reproductive success

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069154109     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-045337-8.00182-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Andrade M. C. B., Kasumovic M. M. Terminal investment strategies and male mate choice: Extreme tests of Bateman. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2005, 45:838-847.
2. Arnold S. J. Bateman's principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. American Naturalist 1994, 144:S126-S149.
3. Arnold S. J., Duvall D. Animal mating systems: A synthesis based on selection theory. American Naturalist 1994, 143:317-348.
4. Bateman A. J. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 1948, 2:349-368.
5. Bjork A., Pitnick S. Intensity of selection along the anisogamy-isogamy continuum. Nature 2006, 441:742-745.
6. Darwin C. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex 1871, John Murray, London.
7. Dewsbury D. A. The Darwin-Bateman paradigm in historical context. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2005, 45:831-837.
8. Gopurenko D., Williams R. N., DeWoody J. A. Reproductive and mating success in the small-mouthed salamander ( Ambystoma texanum) estimated via microsatellite parentage analysis. Evolutionary Biology 2007, 34:130-139.
9. Gowaty P. A. Sex roles, contests for the control of reproduction, and sexual selection. Sexual Selection in Primates 2004, 37-54. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. P. Kappeler, C. van Schaik (Eds.).
10. Gowaty P. A., Hubbell S. P. Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2005, 45:931-944.
11. Hauber M. E., Lacey E. A. Bateman's principle in cooperatively breeding vertebrates: The effects of non-breeding alloparents on variability in female and male reproductive success. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2005, 45:903-914.
12. Hoogland J. L. Why do female Gunnison's prairie dogs copulate with more than one male?. Animal Behaviour 1998, 55:351-359.
13. Hubbell S. P., Johnson L. K. Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. American Naturalist 1987, 130:91-112.
14. Jones A. G., Arguello J. R., Arnold S. J. Validation of Bateman's principles: A genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 2002, 269:2533-2539.
15. Jones A. G., Rosenqvist G., Berglund A., Arnold S. J., Avise J. C. The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 2000, 267:677-680.
16. Ketterson E. D., Parker P. G., Raouf S. A., Nolan V., Ziegenfus C., Chandler C. R. The relative impact of extra-pair fertilizations on variation in male and female reproductive success in dark-eyed juncos ( Junco hyemalis). Avian Reproductive Tactics: Female and Male Perspectives Ornithological Monographs 1998, vol. 49:81-101. P. G. Parker, N. T. Burley (Eds.).
17. Lanctot R. B., Schribner K. T., Kempenaers B., Weatherhead P. J. Lekking without a paradox in the buff-breasted sandpiper. American Naturalist 1997, 149:1051-1070.
18. Levitan D. R. The distribution of male and female reproductive success in a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2005, 45:848-855.
19. Lorch P. D., Bussière L., Gwynne D. T. Quantifying the potential for sexual dimorphism using upper limits on Bateman gradients. Behaviour 2008, 125:1-24.
20. Parker G. A., Baker R. R., Smith V. G. F. The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1972, 36:529-553.
21. Schulte-Hostedde A. I., Millar J. S., Gibbs H. L. Sexual selection and mating patterns in a mammal with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Behavioral Ecology 2004, 15:351-356.
22. Snyder B. F., Gowaty P. A. A re-appraisal of Bateman's classic study of intrasexual selection. Evolution 2007, 61:2457-2468.
23. Sutherland W. J. Chance can produce sex differences in mating success and explain Bateman's data. Animal Behaviour 1985, 33:1349-1352.
24. Tang-Martínez Z., Ryder T. B. The problem with paradigms: Bateman's worldview as a case study. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2005, 45:821-830.
25. Trivers R. L. Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1972, 136-179. Aldine Publishing, Chicago, IL. B. Campbell (Ed.).
26. Wedell N., Gage M. J. G., Parker G. A. Sperm competition, male precedence, and sperm-limited females. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2002, 17:313-320.
27. Williams R. N., DeWoody J. A. Reproductive success and sexual selection in eastern wild tiger salamanders ( Ambystoma t. tigrinum). Evolutionary Biology 2009, 36:201-213.
28. Woolfenden B. E., Gibbs H. L., Sealy S. G. High opportunity for sexual selection in both sexes of an obligate brood parasitic bird, the brown-headed cowbird ( Molothrus ater). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2002, 52:417-425.
29. Worden B. D., Parker P. G. Polyandry in grain beetles leads to greater reproductive success: Material and genetic benefits?. Behavioral Ecology 2001, 12:761-767.