Constructing nomological nets on the basis of process analyses to strengthen cscl research

Frontline Learning Research

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 25-33

  Stegmann, Karsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL); Construct Validity; Nomological Net; Research Design

Indexed keywords

EID: 85068968373     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22953159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14786/flr.v2i4.112     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. London: Sage.
2. Clark, D. B., D'Angelo, C. M. & Menekse, M. (2009). Initial structuring of online discussions to improve learning and argumentation: Incorporating students' own explanations as seed comments versus an augmented-preset approach to seeding discussions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 321-333. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9159-1
3. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field setting. MA: Houghton Mifflin.
4. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological bulletin, 52(4), 281. doi:10.1037/h0040957
5. De Jong & van Joolingen (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179-201. doi:10.3102/00346543068002179
6. Eberle, J., Stegmann, K., Lund, K., Barrat, A., Sailer, M., & Fischer, F. (2013). Fostering learning and collaboration in a scientific community – evidence from an experiment using RFID devices to measure collaborative processes. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar, S. (Eds.), To See the World and a Grain of Sand: Learning across Levels of Space, Time, and Scale: CSCL 2013 Conference Proceedings Volume 1 — Full Papers & Symposia (pp. 169-175). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
7. Jeong, A., Clark, D. B., Sampson, V. D., & Menekse, M. (2010). Sequential analysis of scientific argumentation in asynchronous online discussion environments. In S. Puntambekar, G. Erkens & C. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), Analyzing Interactions in CSCL: Methodologies, Approaches and Issues. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7710-6_10
8. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56-66. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748005
9. Fischer, S., Lowe, R. K., & Schwan, S. (2008). Effects of presentation speed of a dynamic visualization on the understanding of a mechanical system. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(8), 1126-1141. doi:10.1002/acp.1426
10. Kobarg, M., Prenzel, M., & Seidel, T. (2011). An international comparison of science teaching and learning. Further results from PISA 2006. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
11. Koschmann, T. D. (1994). Toward a theory of computer support for collaborative learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 219-225. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0303_1
12. Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. (2005). Sufficient samples sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92. doi:10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86
13. Mayfield, E., & Rosé, C. P. (2012). LightSIDE: Open Source Machine Learning for Text Accessible to Non-Experts. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Handbook of Automated Essay Grading (pp. 124-135). New York: Routledge.
14. Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Stegmann, K., Frete, A., & Streng, S. (2012). Orchestrating computer-supported collaborative learning: Effects of knowledge sharing and shared knowledge. In S. Abramovich (Ed.), Computers in education (pp. 75-91). Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
15. Molinari, G., Chanel, G., Betrancourt, M., Pun, T, & Bozelle, C. (2013). Emotion Feedback during Computer-Mediated Collaboration: Effects on Self-Reported Emotions and Perceived Interaction. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar, S. (Eds.), To See the World and a Grain of Sand: Learning across Levels of Space, Time, and Scale: CSCL 2013 Conference Proceedings Volume 1 — Full Papers & Symposia (pp. 336-343). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
16. Mu, J., Stegmann, K., Mayfield, E., Rosé, C. & Fischer, F. (2012). The ACODEA framework: Developing segmentation and classification schemes for fully automatic analysis of online discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 285–305. doi:10.1007/s11412-012-9147-y
17. Osborne, J., & Henessy, S. (2003). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: promise, problems and future directions. Bristol: NESTA Futurelab. Retrieved from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications_reports_articles/literature_reviews/Literature_Review380
18. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition & Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
19. Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2008). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(3), 237-271. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9034-0
20. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Stegmann, K. & Fischer, F. (2011). Quantifying qualities in collaborative knowledge construction: the analysis of online discussions. In S. Puntambekar, G. Erkens & C. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), Analyzing interactions in CSCL: methods, approaches and issues (pp. 247-268). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7710-6_12
22. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2011). Aktives Lernen durch Argumentieren: Evidenz für das Modell der argumentativen Wissenskonstruktion in Online-Diskussionen [Active learning by argumentation: Evidence for the model of argumentative knowledge construction in online discussions.]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 39(3), 231–244.
23. Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A. & Fischer, F. (2012). Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Instructional Science, 40(2), 297-323. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5
24. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 421-447. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_12
25. Strijbos, J.-W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46(1), 29-48. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002
26. Trochim, W., & Land, D. (1982). Designing designs for research. The Researcher, 1(1), 1-6.
27. van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., Roelofs, E., & Erkens, G. (2002). Collaborative Concept Mapping: Provoking and Supporting Meaningful Discourse. Theory Into Practice, 41(1), 40-46. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_7
28. Wecker, C. (2013). How to support prescriptive statements by empirical research: Some missing parts. Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 1-18. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9208-9
29. Wecker, C., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2012). Lern-und Kooperationsprozesse: Warum sind sie interessant und wie können sie analysiert werden? [Learning and Cooperation Processes in Case-Based Learning. Interesting Issues and Analysis Approaches] REPORT: Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung, 35(3), 30-41. doi:10.3278/REP1203W
30. Wegerif, R. (2002). Thinking skills, technology and learning: a review of the literature for NESTA FutureLab. Bristol: NESTA Futurelab. Retrieved from: http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications_reports_articles/literature_reviews/Literature_Review394
31. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71-95. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003
32. Weinberger, A., Marttunen, M., Laurinen, L., & Stegmann, K. (2013). Inducing socio-cognitive conflict in Finnish and German groups of online learners by CSCL script. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(3), 333-349. doi:10.1007/s11412-013-9173-4
33. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2005). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education: Scripts for argumentative knowledge construction in distributed groups. In T. Koschmann, D. D. Suthers & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005 (pp. 717-726). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.3115/1149293.1149387
34. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 416-426. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.007
35. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2010). Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 506-515. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.007
36. Wise, A. F., & Chiu, M. M. (2011). Analyzing temporal patterns of knowledge construction in a role-based online discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 445-470. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9120-1
37. Zottmann, J., Stegmann, K., Strijbos, J. W., Vogel, F., Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2013). Computer-supported collaborative learning with digital video cases in teacher education: The impact of teaching experience on knowledge convergence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 2100-2108. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.014