An adaptive approach to provide feedback for students in programming problem solving

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 11528 LNCS, Issue , 2019, Pages 14-23

  Silva, Priscylla ^a,c   Costa, Evandro ^b   de Araújo, Joseana Régis ^c  

^a Institutio Federal de Educacao Ciencia Tecnologia Alagoas Brazil   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF ALAGOAS   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINA GRANDE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Feedback; Intelligent tutoring systems; Programming education

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; FEEDBACK; INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

ADAPTIVE APPROACH; CODING PROBLEMS; FEEDBACK TO STUDENTS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; PROGRAMMING EDUCATION; PROGRAMMING PROBLEM; STUDENTS LEARNING; TUTORING SYSTEM;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 85067233413     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22244-4_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.R.: Limitations of student control: do students know when they need help? In: Gauthier, G., Frasson, C., VanLehn, K. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 292–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45108-0_33
2. Cobertt, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2001, pp. 245–252. ACM, New York (2001)
3. Crow, T., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wuensche, B.: Intelligent tutoring systems for programming education: a systematic review. In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Computing Education Conference, ACE 2018, pp. 53–62. ACM, New York (2018)
4. Douce, C., Livingstone, D., Orwell, J.: Automatic test-based assessment of programming: a review. J. Educ. Resour. Comput. 5(3), 4 (2005)
5. Keuning, H., Heeren, B., Jeuring, J.: Strategy-based feedback in a programming tutor. In: Proceedings of the Computer Science Education Research Conference, CSERC 2014, pp. 43–54. ACM, New York (2014)
6. Keuning, H., Jeuring, J., Heeren, B.: A systematic literature review of automated feedback generation for programming exercises. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 19(1), 3:1–3:43 (2018)
7. Kyrilov, A., Noelle, D.C.: Do students need detailed feedback on programming exercises and can automated assessment systems provide it? J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 31(4), 115–121 (2016)
8. Lahtinen, E., Ala-Mutka, K., Jarvinen, H.M.: A study of the difficulties of novice programmers. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2005, pp. 14–18. ACM, New York (2005)
9. Nguyen, A., Piech, C., Huang, J., Guibas, L.: Codewebs: scalable homework search for massive open online programming courses. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2014, pp. 491–502. ACM, New York (2014)
10. Rivers, K., Koedinger, K.R.: Data-driven int generation in vast solution spaces: a self-improving python programming tutor. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 27(1), 37–64 (2017)
11. Tiam-Lee, T.J., Sumi, K.: Adaptive feedback based on student emotion in a system for programming practice. In: Nkambou, R., Azevedo, R., Vassileva, J. (eds.) ITS 2018. LNCS, vol. 10858, pp. 243–255. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91464-0_24