Does firm size matter? Evidence on the impact of the green innovation strategy on corporate financial performance in the automotive sector

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 229, Issue , 2019, Pages 974-988

  Lin, Woon Leong ^a   Cheah, Jun Hwa ^a   Azali, Mohamed ^a   Ho, Jo Ann ^a   Yip, Nick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Automotive industry; Corporate financial performance; Firm size; GMM; Green innovation strategy

Indexed keywords

FINANCE; METHOD OF MOMENTS;

AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR; CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; DYNAMIC CORRELATION; DYNAMIC PANEL DATA; FIRM SIZE; GREEN INNOVATIONS; NEGATIVE CORRELATION; SMALLER FIRMS;

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY;

EID: 85065832477     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.214     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., Innovation and Small Firms. 1990, Mit Press.
2. Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., Feldman, M.P., R & D spillovers and recipient firm size. Rev. Econ. Stat., 1994, 336–340.
3. Adams, M., Hardwick, P., An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. J. Manag. Stud. 35:5 (1998), 641–654.
4. Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., The Financial Performance of Green Prospector Firms: a Contingent Approach (No. 13.02). 2013.
5. Aiken, L.S., West, S.G., Reno, R.R., Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. 1991, Sage.
6. Aragón-Correa, J.A., Martín-Tapia, I., Hurtado-Torres, N.E., Proactive environmental strategies and employee inclusion: the positive effects of information sharing and promoting collaboration and the influence of uncertainty. Organ Environ 26:2 (2013), 139–161.
7. Aragón-Correa, J.A., Sharma, S., A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Acad. Manag. Rev. 28:1 (2003), 71–88.
8. Archibugi, D., Evangelista, R., Simonetti, R., Concentration, firm size and innovation: evidence from innovation costs. Technovation 15:3 (1995), 153–163.
9. Arellano, M., Bond, S., Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58:2 (1991), 277–297.
10. Arellano, M., Bover, O., Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econom. 68:1 (1995), 29–51.
11. Bansal, P., Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strat. Manag. J. 26:3 (2005), 197–218.
12. Bansal, P., Gao, J., Building the future by looking to the past: examining research published on organizations and environment. Organ. Environ. 19:4 (2006), 458–478.
13. Blundell, R., Bond, S., Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87:1 (1998), 115–143.
14. Bhambri, A., Sonnenfeld, J., Organization structure and corporate social performance: a field study in two contrasting industries. Acad. Manag. J. 31:3 (1988), 642–662.
15. Blundell, R., Bond, S., GMM estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions. Econom. Rev. 19:3 (2000), 321–340.
16. Blundell, R., Bond, S., Windmeijer, F., Estimation in dynamic panel data models: improving on the performance of the standard GMM estimator. Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, 2001, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 53–91.
17. Bond, S., Hoeffler, A., Temple, J., GMM Estimation of Empirical Growth Models. 2001.
18. Bonini, S.M., Oppenheim, J.M., Helping ‘green’ products grow. McKinsey Q. 3:2 (2008), 1–8.
19. Bragdon, J.H., Marlin, J., Is pollution profitable. Risk Manag. 19:4 (1972), 9–18.
20. Brambor, T., Clark, W.R., Golder, M., Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Polit. Anal. 14:1 (2006), 63–82.
21. Brammer, S., Millington, A., Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: an empirical analysis. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 15:1 (2006), 6–18.
22. Campos, L.M., de Melo Heizen, D.A., Verdinelli, M.A., Miguel, P.A.C., Environmental performance indicators: a study on ISO 14001 certified companies. J. Clean. Prod. 99 (2015), 286–296.
23. Chang, C.H., Chen, Y.S., Green organizational identity and green innovation. Manag. Decis. 51:5 (2013), 1056–1070.
24. Chen, Y.S., The driver of green innovation and green image–green core competence. J. Bus. Ethics 81:3 (2008), 531–543.
25. Chen, Y.S., Lai, S.B., Wen, C.T., The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. J. Bus. Ethics 67:4 (2006), 331–339.
26. Chen, Y.S., Chang, C.H., Wu, F.S., Origins of green innovations: the differences between proactive and reactive green innovations. Manag. Decis. 50:3 (2012), 368–398.
27. Cheng, C.C., Yang, C.L., Sheu, C., The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry context. J. Clean. Prod. 64 (2014), 81–90.
28. Chiou, T.Y., Chan, H.K., Lettice, F., Chung, S.H., The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev. 47:6 (2011), 822–836.
29. Christmann, P., Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Acad. Manag. J. 43:4 (2000), 663–680.
30. Cohen, W.M., Klepper, S., The tradeoff between firm size and diversity in the pursuit of technological progress. Small Bus. Econ. 4:1 (1992), 1–14.
31. Cordano, M., Frieze, I.H., Pollution reduction preferences of US environmental managers: applying Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Acad. Manag. J. 43:4 (2000), 627–641.
32. Cowen, S.S., Ferreri, L.B., Parker, L.D., The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis. Account. Org. Soc. 12:2 (1987), 111–122.
33. Cronin, J.J., Smith, J.S., Gleim, M.R., Ramirez, E., Martinez, J.D., Green marketing strategies: an examination of stakeholders and the opportunities they present. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 39:1 (2011), 158–174.
34. Dangelico, R.M., Pujari, D., Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. J. Bus. Ethics 95:3 (2010), 471–486.
35. Demsetz, H., The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. J. Law Econ. 26:2 (1983), 375–390.
36. Donaldson, L., The Contingency Theory of Organizations. 2001, Sage.
37. Dong, Y., Wang, X., Jin, J., Qiao, Y., Shi, L., Effects of eco-innovation typology on its performance: empirical evidence from Chinese enterprises. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 34 (2014), 78–98.
38. Driessen, P., Hillebrand, B., Adoption and Diffusion of Green Innovations. 2002.
39. Eiadat, Y., Kelly, A., Roche, F., Eyadat, H., Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. J. World Bus. 43:2 (2008), 131–145.
40. Fargnoli, M., De Minicis, M., Tronci, M., Design Management for Sustainability: an integrated approach for the development of sustainable products. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 34 (2014), 29–45.
41. Felder, J., Licht, G., Nerlinger, E., Stahl, H., Factors determining R&D and innovation expenditure in German manufacturing industries. Determinants of Innovation, 1996, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 125–154.
42. Fraj, E., Martínez, E., Matute, J., Green marketing in B2B organisations: an empirical analysis from the natural-resource-based view of the firm. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 28:5 (2013), 396–410.
43. Friedman, M., A theoretical framework for monetary analysis. J. Political Econ. 78:2 (1970), 193–238.
44. Ge, B., Yang, Y., Jiang, D., Gao, Y., Du, X., Zhou, T., An empirical study on green innovation strategy and sustainable competitive advantages: path and boundary. Sustainability, 10(10), 2018, 3631.
45. Gelb, D.S., Strawser, J.A., Corporate social responsibility and financial disclosures: an alternative explanation for increased disclosure. J. Bus. Ethics 33:1 (2001), 1–13.
46. Gluch, P., Gustafsson, M., Thuvander, L., An absorptive capacity model for green innovation and performance in the construction industry. Constr. Manag. Econ. 27:5 (2009), 451–464.
47. Green, K.W. Jr., Zelbst, P.J., Meacham, J., Bhadauria, V.S., Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance. Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J. 17:3 (2012), 290–305.
48. Greer, J., Bruno, K., Greenwash: the Reality behind Corporate Environmentalism. IBON Foundation Incorporated. 1998, Third World Network.
49. Hair, J.F. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., Multivariate Data Analysis. 1998, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
50. Hall, B.K., Organic selection: proximate environmental effects on the evolution of morphology and behaviour. Biol. Philos. 16:2 (2001), 215–237.
51. Hall, M., Weiss, L., Firm size and profitability. Rev. Econ. Stat., 1967, 319–331.
52. Hart, S.L., A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20:4 (1995), 986–1014.
53. Harvey, C.R., Lins, K.V., Roper, A.H., The effect of capital structure when expected agency costs are extreme. J. Financ. Econ. 74:1 (2004), 3–30.
54. Hess, D., Rogovsky, N., Dunfee, T.W., The next wave of corporate community involvement: corporate social initiatives. Calif. Manag. Rev. 44:2 (2002), 110–125.
55. Hoeffler, A.E., The augmented Solow model and the African growth debate. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 64:2 (2002), 135–158.
56. Hörisch, J., Johnson, M.P., Schaltegger, S., Implementation of sustainability management and company size: a knowledge-based view. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 24:8 (2015), 765–779.
57. Hsiao, C., Analysis Of Panel Data (No. 54). 2014, Cambridge university press.
58. Huang, Y.C., Jim Wu, Y.C., The effects of organizational factors on green new product success: evidence from high-tech industries in Taiwan. Manag. Decis. 48:10 (2010), 1539–1567.
59. Huber, J., Die Regenbogengesellschaft: okologie und Sozialpolitik (The Rainbow Society: Ecology and Social Politics). 1985, Fisher Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.
60. Hui, S., Multi-objective optimization for hydraulic hybrid vehicle based on adaptive simulated annealing genetic algorithm. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 23:1 (2010), 27–33.
61. Hull, C.E., Rothenberg, S., Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strat. Manag. J. 29:7 (2008), 781–789.
62. Jänicke, M., Ecological modernisation: new perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 16:5 (2008), 557–565.
63. Jensen, M.C., Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Am. Econ. Rev. 76:2 (1986), 323–329.
64. Johnson, R.A., Greening, D.W., The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. J. 42:5 (1999), 564–576.
65. King, A., Lenox, M., Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Manag. Sci. 48:2 (2002), 289–299.
66. Kleinknecht, A., Reijnen, J.O., More evidence on the undercounting of small firm R&D. Res. Pol. 20:6 (1991), 579–587.
67. Konar, S., Cohen, M.A., Does the market value environmental performance?. Rev. Econ. Stat. 83:2 (2001), 281–289.
68. KPMG. Expect the Unexpected: Building Business Value in a Changing World. Executive Summary. 2012 (accessed 24.11.18)https://www.kpmg.com/dutchcaribbean/en/Documents/KPMG%20Expect_the_Unexpected_Exctve Smmry_FINAL_WebAccessible.pdf.
69. Lai, S.B., Wen, C.T., Chen, Y.S., The exploration of the relationship between the environmental pressure and the corporate competitive advantage. December Paper Presented at the 2003 CSMOT Academic Conference, Hsinchu, Taiwan, 2003.
70. Lau, A.K., Tang, E., Yam, R.C., Effects of supplier and customer integration on product innovation and performance: empirical evidence in Hong Kong manufacturers. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 27:5 (2010), 761–777.
71. Leal-Rodríguez, A.L., Eldridge, S., Roldán, J.L., Leal-Millán, A.G., Ortega-Gutiérrez, J., Organizational unlearning, innovation outcomes, and performance: the moderating effect of firm size. J. Bus. Res. 68:4 (2015), 803–809.
72. Li, D., Cao, C., Zhang, L., Chen, X., Ren, S., Zhao, Y., Effects of corporate environmental responsibility on financial performance: the moderating role of government regulation and organizational slack. J. Clean. Prod. 166 (2017), 1323–1334.
73. Lin, H., Zeng, S.X., Ma, H.Y., Chen, H.Q., How political connections affect corporate environmental performance: the mediating role of green subsidies. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 21:8 (2015), 2192–2212.
74. Link, S., Naveh, E., Standardization and discretion: does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits?. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 53:4 (2006), 508–519.
75. López-Nicolás, C., Meroño-Cerdán, Á.L., Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 31:6 (2011), 502–509.
76. Madden, K., Scaife, W., Crissman, K., How and why small to medium size enterprises (SMEs)engage with their communities: an Australian study. Int. J. Nonprofit Voluntary Sect. Mark. 11:1 (2006), 49–60.
77. Marcus, A.A., Fremeth, A.R., Green management matters regardless. Academy of Management Perspectives 23:3 (2009), 17–26.
78. Mansfield, E., Industrial Research and Technological Innovation; an Econometric Analysis. 1968.
79. Mansfield, E., Rapoport, J., Schnee, J., Wagner, S., Hamburger, M., Innovation and discovery in the ethical pharmaceutical industry. Research and Innovation in the Modern Corporation, 1971, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 157–185.
80. McElroy, K.M., Siegfried, J.J., The effect of firm size on corporate philanthropy. Q. Rev. Econ. Bus. 25:2 (1985), 18–26.
81. McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., Schneeweis, T., Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Acad. Manag. J. 31:4 (1988), 854–872.
82. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26:1 (2001), 117–127.
83. Meznar, M.B., Nigh, D., Buffer or bridge? Environmental and organizational determinants of public affairs activities in American firms. Acad. Manag. J. 38:4 (1995), 975–996.
84. Miles, R.H., Managing the Corporate Social Environment: A Grounded Theory. 1986, Prentice Hall.
85. Mol, A.P., Ecological modernization: industrial transformations and environmental reform. Int. Handbook Environ. Sociol., 1997, 138–149.
86. Mol, A., Sonnenfeld, D., Ecological modernisation around the world: an introduction. Environ. Pol. 9 (2000), 3–14.
87. Mu, J., Peng, G., MacLachlan, D.L., Effect of risk management strategy on NPD performance. Technovation 29:3 (2009), 170–180.
88. Murphy, J., Gouldson, A., Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernisation. Geoforum 31:1 (2000), 33–44.
89. Nguyen, Q.A., Hens, L., Environmental performance of the cement industry in Vietnam: the influence of ISO 14001 certification. J. Clean. Prod. 96 (2015), 362–378.
90. Nickell, S., Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica: J. Econ. Soc., 1981, 1417–1426.
91. Nilsson, M., Hillman, K., Magnusson, T., How do we govern sustainable innovations? Mapping patterns of governance for biofuels and hybrid-electric vehicle technologies. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 3 (2012), 50–66.
92. Nishitani, K., An empirical study of the initial adoption of ISO 14001 in Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecol. Econ. 68:3 (2009), 669–679.
93. Nooteboom, B., Innovation and diffusion in small firms: theory and evidence. Small Bus. Econ. 6:5 (1994), 327–347.
94. Organisationl for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Eco-innovation in industry – enabling green growth. 2009 http://www.oecd.org/document/62/0,3746,de_34968570_34968855_44452670_1_1_1_1.00.html Available at:.
95. Park, J., Sarkis, J., Wu, Z., Creating integrated business and environmental value within the context of China's circular economy and ecological modernization. J. Clean. Prod. 18:15 (2010), 1494–1501.
96. Pekovic, S., Rolland, S., Gatignon, H., Customer orientation and organizational innovation: the case of environmental management practices. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 31:7 (2016), 835–848.
97. Petts, J., Environmental responsiveness, individuals and organizational learning: SME experience. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 41:6 (1998), 711–730.
98. Porter, M.E., The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Acad. Manag. Rev. 6:4 (1981), 609–620.
99. Porter, M.E., Reinhardt, F.L., Schwartz, P., Esty, D.C., Hoffman, A.J., Schendler, A., et al. Climate Business. Business Climate. Harv. Bus. Rev., 1, 2007.
100. Porter, T.B., Coevolution as a research framework for organizations and the natural environment. Organ. Environ. 19:4 (2006), 479–504.
101. Porter, russo M.E., Van der Linde, C., Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 9:4 (1995), 97–118.
102. Porter, M., Van der Linde, C., Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. The Dynamics of the Eco-Efficient Economy: Environmental Regulation and Competitive Advantage, vol. 33, 1995.
103. Ramaswami, S.N., Srivastava, R.K., Bhargava, M., Market-based capabilities and financial performance of firms: insights into marketing's contribution to firm value. J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 37(2), 2009, 97.
104. Rivera, J., Assessing a voluntary environmental initiative in the developing world: the Costa Rican Certification for Sustainable Tourism. Pol. Sci. 35:4 (2002), 333–360.
105. Rogers, M., Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Bus. Econ. 22:2 (2004), 141–153.
106. Roodman, D., How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. STATA J. 9:1 (2009), 86–136.
107. Rothwell, R., Dodgson, M., Innovation and size of firm. Handbook Indus. Innov., 1994, 324.
108. Runhaar, H., Tigchelaar, C., Vermeulen, W.J., Environmental leaders: making a difference. A typology of environmental leaders and recommendations for a differentiated policy approach. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 17:3 (2008), 160–178.
109. Russo, M.V., Fouts, P.A., A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Manag. J. 40:3 (1997), 534–559.
110. Scherer, F.M., Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. first ed., 1970, Rand McNally College Publishing Company, Chicago.
111. Sheng, S., Zhou, K., Li, J.J., The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: evidence from China. J. Mark. 75:1 (2011), 1–15, 10.1509/jmkg.75.1.1.
112. Shrivastava, P., The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20:4 (1995), 936–960.
113. Smith, M., Crotty, J., Environmental regulation and innovation driving ecological design in the UK automotive industry. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 17:6 (2008), 341–349.
114. Stulz, R., Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. J. Financ. Econ. 26:1 (1990), 3–27.
115. Surroca, J., Tribó, J.A., Waddock, S., Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strat. Manag. J. 31:5 (2010), 463–490.
116. Tie, S.F., Tan, C.W., A review of energy sources and energy management system in electric vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 20 (2013), 82–102.
117. Tomomi, T., Environmental management strategy for small and medium-sized enterprises: why do SMBs practice environmental management?. Asian Bus. Manag. 9:2 (2010), 265–280.
118. Tseng, M.L., Wang, R., Chiu, A.S., Geng, Y., Lin, Y.H., Improving performance of green innovation practices under uncertainty. J. Clean. Prod. 40 (2013), 71–82.
119. Van Beurden, P., Gössling, T., The worth of values–a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. J. Bus. Ethics, 82(2), 2008, 407.
120. Van de Ven, B., Jeurissen, R., Competing responsibly. Bus. Ethics Q. 15:2 (2005), 299–317.
121. Vaz, C., Rauen, T., Lezana, Á., Sustainability and innovation in the automotive sector: a structured content analysis. Sustainability, 9(6), 2017, 880.
122. Vossen, R.W., Relative strengths and weaknesses of small firms in innovation. Int. Small Bus. J. 16:3 (1998), 88–94.
123. Waddock, S.A., Graves, S.B., The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strat. Manag. J. 18:4 (1997), 303–319.
124. Welch, E.W., Mazur, A., Bretschneider, S., Voluntary behavior by electric utilities: levels of adoption and contribution of the climate challenge program to the reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 19:3 (2000), 407–425.
125. Wintoki, M.B., Linck, J.S., Netter, J.M., Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. J. Financ. Econ. 3:105 (2012), 581–606.
126. Wong, C.W., Miao, X., Cui, S., Tang, Y., Impact of corporate environmental responsibility on operating income: moderating role of regional disparities in China. J. Bus. Ethics 149:2 (2018), 363–382.
127. Wu, F., Yeniyurt, S., Kim, D., Cavusgil, S.T., The impact of information technology on supply chain capabilities and firm performance: a resource-based view. Ind. Mark. Manag. 35:4 (2006), 493–504.
128. Yang, D., Wang, A.X., Zhou, K.Z., Jiang, W., Environmental strategy, institutional force, and innovation capability: a managerial cognition perspective. J. Bus. Ethics, 2018, 1–15.
129. Yeung, A.C., Strategic supply management, quality initiatives, and organizational performance. J. Oper. Manag. 26:4 (2008), 490–502.
130. York, R., Rosa, E.A., Key challenges to ecological modernization theory: institutional efficacy, case study evidence, units of analysis, and the pace of eco-efficiency. Organ. Environ. 16:3 (2003), 273–288.
131. Zenger, T.R., Explaining organizational diseconomies of scale in R&D: agency problems and the allocation of engineering talent, ideas, and effort by firm size. Manag. Sci. 40:6 (1994), 708–729.
132. Zhu, P., Chen, Y., Wang, L.Y., Zhou, M., Treatment of waste printed circuit board by green solvent using ionic liquid. Waste Manag. 32:10 (2012), 1914–1918.