Undertaking network meta-analyses

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 285-320

  Chaimani, Anna ^a   Caldwell, Deborah M ^b   Li, Tianjing ^c   Higgins, Julian P T ^b   Salanti, Georgia ^d  

^a PARIS DESCARTES UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cochrane review; Confidence intervals; Evidence base; Indirect intervention comparisons; Network meta analyses; Research question; Statistical methods; Transitivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065097480     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781119536604.ch11     Document Type: Chapter

References (69)

1. Ades AE, Caldwell DM, Reken S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, Dias S. Evidence synthesis for decision making 7: a reviewer’s checklist. Medical Decision Making 2013; 33:679-691.
2. Baker WL, Baker EL, Coleman CI. Pharmacologic treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis. Pharmacotherapy 2009; 29:891-905.
3. Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, Walter SD. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1997; 50:683-691.
4. Caldwell DM, Ades AE, Higgins JPT. Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments:combining direct and indirect evidence. BMJ 2005; 331:897-900.
5. Caldwell DM, Welton NJ, Ades AE. Mixed treatment comparison analysis provides internally coherent treatment effect estimates based on overviews of reviews and can reveal inconsistency. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2010; 63:875-882.
6. Caldwell DM, Dias S, Welton NJ. Extending treatment networks in health technology assessment: how far should we go? Value in Health 2015; 18:673-681.
7. Chaimani A, Salanti G. Using network meta-analysis to evaluate the existence of small-study effects in a network of interventions. Research Synthesis Methods 2012; 3:161-176.
8. Chaimani A, Higgins JPT, Mavridis D, Spyridonos P, Salanti G. Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PloS One 2013; 8:e76654.
9. Chaimani A, Salanti G. Visualizing assumptions and results in network meta-analysis:the network graphs package. Stata Journal 2015; 15:905-950.
10. Chaimani A, Caldwell DM, Li T, Higgins JPT, Salanti G. Additional considerations are required when preparing a protocol for a systematic review with multiple interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2017; 83:65-74.
11. Cipriani A, Higgins JPT, Geddes JR, Salanti G. Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 159:130-137.
12. Cooper NJ, Peters J, LaiMC, Jüni P,Wandel S, Palmer S, Paulden M, Conti S,Welton NJ, Abrams KR, Bujkiewicz S, Spiegelhalter D, Sutton AJ. How valuable are multiple treatment comparison methods in evidence-based health-care evaluation? Value in Health 2011; 14:371-380.
13. Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2010; 29:932-944.
14. Dias S, Ades AE, Welton NJ, Jansen JP, Sutton AJ. Network meta-analysis for decisionmaking. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2018.
15. Donegan S, Williamson P, Gamble C, Tudur-Smith C. Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality. PloS One 2010; 5:e11054.
16. Donegan S, Williamson P, D’Alessandro U, Tudur Smith C. Assessing key assumptions of network meta-analysis: a review of methods. Research Synthesis Methods 2013; 4:291-323.
17. Dumville JC, Soares MO, O’Meara S, Cullum N. Systematic review and mixed treatment comparison: dressings to heal diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetologia 2012; 55:1902-1910.
18. Efthimiou O, Debray TPA, Valkenhoef G, Trelle S, Panayidou K, Moons KGM, Reitsma JB, Shang A, Salanti G, GetReal Methods Review Group. GetReal in network meta-analysis:a review of the methodology. Research Synthesis Methods 2016; 7:236-263.
19. Giovane CD, Vacchi L, Mavridis D, Filippini G, Salanti G. Network meta-analysis models to account for variability in treatment definitions: application to dose effects. Statistics in Medicine 2013; 32:25-39.
20. Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, D’Amico R, Bradburn M, Eastwood AJ. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. Health Technology Assessment 2005; 9:1-iv.
21. Higgins JPT, Whitehead A. Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 1996; 15:2733-2749.
22. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effectsmeta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) 2009; 172:137-159.
23. Higgins JPT, Jackson D, Barrett JK, Lu G, Ades AE, White IR. Consistency and insconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Research Synthesis Methods 2012; 3:98-110.
24. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, Ioannidis JPA, Straus S, Thorlund K, Jansen JP, Mulrow C, Catalá-López F, Gøtzsche PC, Dickersin K, Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Annals of Internal Medicine 2015; 162:777-784.
25. Jackson D, Riley R, White IR. Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise. Statistics in Medicine 2011; 30:2481-2498.
26. Jackson D, Barrett JK, Rice S, White IR, Higgins JPT. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects. Statistics in Medicine 2014; 33:3639-3654.
27. James A, Yavchitz A, Ravaud P, Boutron I. Node-making process in network meta-analysis of nonpharmacological treatment are poorly reported. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2018; 97:95-102.
28. Jansen JP, Naci H. Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers. BMC Medicine 2013; 11:159.
29. Jansen JP, Trikalinos T, Cappelleri JC, Daw J, Andes S, Eldessouki R, Salanti G. Indirect treatment comparison/network meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC good practice task force report. Value in Health 2014; 17:157-173.
30. König J, Krahn U, Binder H. Visualizing the flow of evidence in network meta-analysis and characterizing mixed treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine 2013; 32:5414-5429.
31. Krahn U, Binder H, Konig J. A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network metaanalyses. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2013; 13:35.
32. Li T, Dickersin K. Citation of previous meta-analyses on the same topic: a clue to perpetuation of incorrect methods? Ophthalmology 2013; 120:1113-1119.
33. Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine 2004; 23:3105-3124.
34. Lu G, Ades AE. Assessing evidence inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2006; 101:447-459.
35. Lu G, Ades A. Modeling between-trial variance structure in mixed treatment comparisons. Biostatistics 2009; 10:792-805.
36. Lu G, Welton NJ, Higgins JPT, White IR, Ades AE. Linear inference for mixed treatment comparisonmeta-analysis: a two-stageapproach. Research SynthesisMethods 2011; 2:43-60.
37. Madan J, Stevenson MD, Cooper KL, Ades AE, Whyte S, Akehurst R. Consistency between direct and indirect trial evidence: is direct evidence always more reliable? Value in Health 2011; 14:953-960.
38. Madan J, Chen Y-F, Aveyard P, Wang D, Yahaya I, Munafo M, Bauld L, Welton N. Synthesis of evidence on heterogeneous interventions withmultiple outcomes recorded over multiple follow-up times reported inconsistently: a smoking cessation case-study. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 2014; 177:295-314.
39. Mavridis D, Salanti G. A practical introduction to multivariate meta-analysis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2013; 22:133-158.
40. Mawdsley D, Bennetts M, Dias S, Boucher M, Welton N. Model-based network meta-analysis:a framework for evidence synthesis of clinical trial data. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology 2016; 5:393-401.
41. Middleton LJ, Champaneria R, Daniels JP, Bhattacharya S, Cooper KG, Hilken NH, O’Donovan P, Gannon M, Gray R, Khan KS, International Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis Collaborative G, Abbott J, Barrington J, Bhattacharya S, Bongers MY, Brun JL, Busfield R, Sowter M, Clark TJ, Cooper J, Cooper KG, Corson SL, Dickersin K, Dwyer N, Gannon M, Hawe J, Hurskainen R, Meyer WR, O’Connor H, Pinion S, Sambrook AM, Tam WH, Zon-Rabelink IAA, Zupi E. Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients. BMJ 2010; 341:c3929.
42. Nikolakopoulou A, Chaimani A, Veroniki AA, Vasiliadis HS, Schmid CH, Salanti G. Characteristics of networks of interventions: a description of a database of 186 published networks. PloS One 2014; 9:e86754.
43. Owen RK, Tincello DG, Keith RA. Network meta-analysis: development of a three-level hierarchical modeling approach incorporating dose-related constraints. Value in Health 2015; 18:116-126.
44. Petropoulou M, Nikolakopoulou A, Veroniki AA, Rios P, Vafaei A, Zarin W, Giannatsi M, Sullivan S, Tricco AC, Chaimani A, Egger M, Salanti G. Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2016; 82:20-28.
45. Puhan MA, Schünemann HJ, Murad MH, Li T, Brignardello-Petersen R, Singh JA, Kessels AG, Guyatt GH; GRADE Working Group. A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis. BMJ 2014; 349:g5630.
46. Riley RD, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ 2011; 342:d549.
47. Rücker G. Network meta-analysis, electrical networks and graph theory. Research Synthesis Methods 2012; 3:312-324.
48. Rücker G, Schwarzer G. netmeta: an R package for network meta-analysis 2013. http://www. r-project.org.
49. Rücker G, Schwarzer G. Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2015; 15:58.
50. Salanti G, Higgins JPT, Ades AE, Ioannidis JPA. Evaluation of networks of randomized trials. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2008; 17:279-301.
51. Salanti G, Marinho V, Higgins JPT. A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2009; 62:857-864.
52. Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JPA. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011; 64:163-171.
53. Salanti G. Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool. Research Synthesis Methods 2012; 3:80-97.
54. Salanti G, Del Giovane C, Chaimani A, Caldwell DM, Higgins JPT. Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. PloS One 2014; 9:e99682.
55. Schmitz S, Adams R, Walsh C. Incorporating data from various trial designs into a mixed treatment comparison model. Statistics in Medicine 2013; 32:2935-2949.
56. Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Rücker G. Meta-analysis with R. Cham: Springer; 2015.
57. Soares MO, Dumville JC, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Treatment comparisons for decision making:facing the problems of sparse and few data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) 2014; 177:259-279.
58. Sobieraj DM, Cappelleri JC, Baker WL, Phung OJ, White CM, Coleman CI. Methods used to conduct and report Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons published in the medical literature: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2013; 3:pii.
59. Song F, Altman DG, Glenny AM, Deeks JJ. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 326:472.
60. Song F, Xiong T, Parekh-Bhurke S, Loke YK, Sutton AJ, Eastwood AJ, Holland R, Chen YF, Glenny AM, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ 2011; 343:d4909.
61. Song F, Clark A, Bachmann MO, Maas J. Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2012; 12:138.
62. Tan SH, Bujkiewicz S, Sutton A, Dequen P, Cooper N. Presentational approaches used in the UK for reporting evidence synthesis using indirect and mixed treatment comparisons. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2013; 18:224-232.
63. Tan SH, Cooper NJ, Bujkiewicz S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Sutton AJ. Novel presentational approaches were developed for reporting network meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2014; 67:672-680.
64. Thijs V, Lemmens R, Fieuws S. Network meta-analysis: simultaneous meta-analysis of common antiplatelet regimens after transient ischaemic attack or stroke. European Heart Journal 2008; 29:1086-1092.
65. Turner RM, Davey J, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG, Higgins JPT. Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. International Journal of Epidemiology 2012; 41:818-827.
66. Veroniki AA, Vasiliadis HS, Higgins JPT, Salanti G. Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions. International Journal of Epidemiology 2013; 42:332-345.
67. Veroniki AA, Mavridis D, Higgins JPT, Salanti G. Characteristics of a loop of evidence that affect detection and estimation of inconsistency: a simulation study. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2014; 14:106.
68. White IR, Barrett JK, Jackson D, Higgins JPT. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression. Research Synthesis Methods 2012; 3:111-125.
69. White IR. Network meta-analysis. Stata Journal 2015; 15:951-985.