Teachers evaluating tasks

Task-Based Language Teaching

Volumn 8, Issue , 2015, Pages 247-270

  Ellis, Rod ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b SHANGHAI INTERNATIONAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064059375     PISSN: 1877346X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/tblt.8.09ell     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7, 113–141. DOI: 10.1191/1362168803lr118oa
2. Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case for exploratory practice. Modern Language Journal, 89, 353–366. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00310.x
3. Bloom, M. (2007). Tensions in a non-traditional classroom. Language Teaching Research, 11, 85–102. DOI: 10.1177/1362168806072468
4. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: The Falmer Press.
5. Chan, S. H. (1995). A micro-evaluation-based task evaluation. Unpublished MA paper, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
6. Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. 1994. Same task, different activities: analysis of SLA from an activity theory perspective. In J.Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approach to second language research, pp. 173–194. Oxford: OUP.
7. Cox, D. (2005). Can we predict language items for open tasks? In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.171–186).
8. Eckerth, J. (2008). Task-based language learning and teaching – Old wine in new bottles? In J. Eckerth & S.Siekmann (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching: Theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical perspectives, (pp. 13–46). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
9. Edwards, C., & Willis, J. (Eds.). (2005). Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51: 36–42. DOI: 10.1093/elt/51.1.36
11. Ellis, R. (1998). The evaluation of communicative tasks. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 217–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Ellis, R. (2001). Non-reciprocal tasks, comprehension and second language acquisition. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second Language Learning, teaching and testing (pp. 49–74). Harlow: Longman.
13. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.11.03ell
15. Ellis, R. (2011). Macro- and micro-evaluations of task-based teaching. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching, (2nd ed.) (pp. 212–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H. & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–318. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00156
17. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 1–23. DOI: 10.1093/applin/19.1.1
18. Foster P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–324. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100015047
19. Gass, S., Mackey, A. & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575–611. DOI: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00318.x
20. Johnston, C. (2005). Fighting fossilization: Language at different stages in the task cycle. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.191–200).
21. Johnson, K. (2000). What task designers do. Language Teaching Research, 4, 301–21. DOI: 10.1177/136216880000400306
22. Lantolf, J. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp.1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Lee, S-M. (2005). Training young learners in meaning negotiation skills: Does it help? In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.103–112).
24. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x
25. Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relation-ship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303–23. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100013103
26. Loumpourdi, L. (2005). Developing from PPP to TBL: A focused grammar task. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.33–39).
27. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: an empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557–87. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263199004027
28. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp.407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Markee, N. (1994). Towards an ethnomethodological respecification of second language acquisition studies. In E. Tarone, S. Gass & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 89–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
31. Muller, T. (2005). Adding tasks to textbooks for beginner learners. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp. 69–77).
32. Nunan, D. (1990). The teacher as researcher. In C. Brumfit & R. Mitchell (Eds), Research in the language classroom. ELT documents 133 (pp.16–32). London: Modern English Publications.
33. Pica, T. (1997). Second language teaching and research relationships: A North American view. Language Teaching Research, 1, 48–72. DOI: 10.1177/136216889700100104
34. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In.G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning (pp.9–34). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
35. Seedhouse, P. (2005). ‘Task’ as research construct. Language Learning, 55, 533–70. DOI: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00314.x
36. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62. DOI: 10.1093/applin/17.1.38
37. Slimani, A. (1989). The role of topicalization in classroom language learning. System, 17, 223–34. DOI: 10.1016/0346-251X(89)90035-3
38. Slimani-Rolls, A. (2005). Rethinking task-based language learning: What we can learn from the learners. Language Teaching Research, 9, 195–218. DOI: 10.1191/1362168805lr163oa
39. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–58. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00179
40. Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M. & Norris, J. (Eds.). (2009). Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1017/s027226311100012x
41. Weir, C., & Roberts, J. (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.
42. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.
43. Willis, J. (2005). Introduction: Aims and explorations into tasks and task-based teaching. In C.Edwards & J.Willis (Eds.), (pp.1–12).
44. Wright, T. (1992). Classroom research and teacher education: Towards a collaborative approach. In J. Flowerdew, M. Brock, & S. Hsia (Eds.), Perspectives on second language teacher education (pp.187–209). Hong Kong: City Polytechnic of Hong Kong.