Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets

Nature Communications

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2019, Pages

  Zhou, Yingyao ^a   Zhou, Bin ^a   Pache, Lars ^b   Chang, Max ^c   Khodabakhshi, Alireza Hadj ^a   Tanaseichuk, Olga ^a   Benner, Christopher ^c   Chanda, Sumit K ^b  

^a GENOMICS INSTITUTE OF THE NOVARTIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

^b BURNHAM INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

BIOLOGY; DATA SET; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; PROTEIN;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; AUTOPHOSPHORYLATION; BIOINFORMATICS; DATA BASE; DNA MICROARRAY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EPIGENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE ONTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAPK SIGNALING; METABOLOMICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOUSE; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; QUALITY CONTROL; RNA METABOLISM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; GENETIC DATABASE; GENOMICS; SOFTWARE; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

DATABASES, GENETIC; GENOMICS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; ORIENTATION, SPATIAL; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 85063948265     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Creixell, P. et al. Pathway and network analysis of cancer genomes. Nat. Methods 12, 615–621 (2015).
2. Spirin, V. & Mirny, L. A. Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12123–12128 (2003).
3. Gonzalez, R. et al. Screening the mammalian extracellular proteome for regulators of embryonic human stem cell pluripotency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3552–3557 (2010).
4. Arrowsmith, C. H. et al. Corrigendum: The promise and peril of chemical probes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 887 (2015).
5. Bushman, F. D. et al. Host cell factors in HIV replication: meta-analysis of genome-wide studies. PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000437 (2009).
6. Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).
7. Wadi, L., Meyer, M., Weiser, J., Stein, L. D. & Reimand, J. Impact of outdated gene annotations on pathway enrichment analysis. Nat. Methods 13, 705–706 (2016).
8. Wang, J., Vasaikar, S., Shi, Z., Greer, M. & Zhang, B. WebGestalt 2017: a more comprehensive, powerful, flexible and interactive gene set enrichment analysis toolkit. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, W130–W137 (2017).
9. Tripathi, S. et al. Meta- and Orthogonal Integration of Influenza “OMICs” Data Defines a Role for UBR4 in Virus Budding. Cell Host Microbe 18, 723–735 (2015).
10. Chen, B. & Butte, A. J. Leveraging big data to transform target selection and drug discovery. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 99, 285–297 (2016).
11. Chen, R. et al. A meta-analysis of lung cancer gene expression identifies PTK7 as a survival gene in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 74, 2892–2902 (2014).
12. DAVID Release and Version Information: (Accessed 20 Nov 2018).
13. Brass, A. L. et al. The IFITM proteins mediate cellular resistance to influenza A H1N1 virus, West Nile virus, and dengue virus. Cell 139, 1243–1254 (2009).
14. Karlas, A. et al. Genome-wide RNAi screen identifies human host factors crucial for influenza virus replication. Nature 463, 818–822 (2010).
15. Konig, R. et al. Human host factors required for influenza virus replication. Nature 463, 813–817 (2010).
16. Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).
17. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).
18. Fabregat, A. et al. The Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D649–D655 (2018).
19. Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
20. Ruepp, A. et al. CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes--2009. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D497–D501 (2010).
21. Cherry, J. M. et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D700–D705 (2012).
22. Gramates, L. S. et al. FlyBase at 25: looking to the future. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D663–D671 (2017).
23. Lee, R. Y. N. et al. WormBase 2017: molting into a new stage. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D869–D874 (2018).
24. Chatr-Aryamontri, A. et al. The BioGRID interaction database: 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D369–D379 (2017).
25. Consortium, T. U. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 2699 (2018).
26. Wishart, D. S. et al. DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D1074–D1082 (2018).
27. Zerbino, D. R. et al. Ensembl 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D754–D761 (2018).
28. Cohen, J. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 37–46 (1960).
29. Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
30. Kuleshov, M. V. et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W90–W97 (2016).
31. Chen, J., Bardes, E. E., Aronow, B. J. & Jegga, A. G. ToppGene Suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W305–W311 (2009).
32. Pizzuti, C. & Rombo, S. E. Algorithms and tools for protein-protein interaction networks clustering, with a special focus on population-based stochastic methods. Bioinformatics 30, 1343–1352 (2014).
33. Bader, G. D. & Hogue, C. W. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinforma. 4, 2 (2003).
34. Evangelou, E. & Ioannidis, J. P. Meta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 379–389 (2013).
35. Liberali, P., Snijder, B. & Pelkmans, L. Single-cell and multivariate approaches in genetic perturbation screens. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 18–32 (2015).
36. Krzywinski, M. et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639–1645 (2009).
37. Gillis, J. & Pavlidis, P. Assessing identity, redundancy and confounds in Gene Ontology annotations over time. Bioinformatics 29, 476–482 (2013).
38. Maglott, D., Ostell, J., Pruitt, K. D. & Tatusova, T. Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D52–D57 (2011).
39. Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1–13 (2009).
40. Jing, L. S. et al. A review on bioinformatics enrichment analysis tools towards functional analysis of high throughput gene set data. Curr. Proteom. 12, 14–27 (2015).
41. Khatri, P. & Draghici, S. Ontological analysis of gene expression data: current tools, limitations, and open problems. Bioinformatics 21, 3587–3595 (2005).
42. Reimand, J. et al. g:Profiler-a web server for functional interpretation of gene lists (2016 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W83–W89 (2016).
43. Mi, H. et al. PANTHER version 11: expanded annotation data from Gene Ontology and Reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D183–D189 (2017).
44. Kalderimis, A. et al. InterMine: extensive web services for modern biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W468–W472 (2014).
45. Zheng, Q. & Wang, X. J. GOEAST: a web-based software toolkit for Gene Ontology enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W358–W363 (2008).
46. Stockel, D. et al. Multi-omics enrichment analysis using the GeneTrail2 web service. Bioinformatics 32, 1502–1508 (2016).
47. Martin, D. et al. GOToolBox: functional analysis of gene datasets based on Gene Ontology. Genome Biol. 5, R101 (2004).
48. McLean, C. Y. et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 495–501 (2010).
49. Tian, T. et al. agriGO v2.0: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community, 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, W122–W129 (2017).
50. Carmona-Saez, P., Chagoyen, M., Tirado, F., Carazo, J. M. & Pascual-Montano, A. GENECODIS: a web-based tool for finding significant concurrent annotations in gene lists. Genome Biol. 8, R3 (2007).
51. Zeeberg, B. R. et al. GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data. Genome Biol. 4, R28 (2003).
52. Merico, D., Isserlin, R., Stueker, O., Emili, A. & Bader, G. D. Enrichment map: a network-based method for gene-set enrichment visualization and interpretation. PLoS One 5, e13984 (2010).
53. Alonso, R. et al. Babelomics 5.0: functional interpretation for new generations of genomic data. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W117–W121 (2015).
54. Herwig, R., Hardt, C., Lienhard, M. & Kamburov, A. Analyzing and interpreting genome data at the network level with ConsensusPathDB. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1889–1907 (2016).
55. Li, T. et al. A scored human protein-protein interaction network to catalyze genomic interpretation. Nat. Methods 14, 61–64 (2017).
56. Turei, D., Korcsmaros, T. & Saez-Rodriguez, J. OmniPath: guidelines and gateway for literature-curated signaling pathway resources. Nat. Methods 13, 966–967 (2016).
57. Saldanha, A. J. Java Treeview--extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20, 3246–3248 (2004).
58. Zar J. H. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. (Prentice Hall, NJ, 1999).
59. Hochberg, Y. & Benjamini, Y. More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat. Med. 9, 811–818 (1990).