Assessment Feedback using Screencapture Technology in Political Science

Journal of Political Science Education

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 375-390

  Anson, Ian G ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

instructional technology; recording; response; student writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947255569     PISSN: 15512169     EISSN: 15512177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15512169.2015.1063433     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. C.M.Anson, Christopher M. 2012. “What Good Is It?: The Effects of Teacher Response on Students’ Development.” In Writing assessment in the 21st Century: Essays in honor of Edward M. White, eds. N.Elliot and L.Perelman (pp. 187–202). New York, NY: Hampton Press, Inc.
2. C.M.Anson, Christopher M. Forthcoming. “She Really Took the Time: Students’ Opinions of Screen-capture Response to Their Writing in Online Courses.” In Writing in Online Courses: Disciplinary Differences, eds. C.Weaver and P.Jackson. Norwood, NJ: Hampton Press, 33–64.
3. R.Bailey, Richard and M.GarnerMark. 2010. “Is the Feedback in Higher Education Assessment Worth the Paper it is Written On?: Teachers’ Reflections on their Practices.” Teaching in Higher Education 15(2): 187–198.
4. D.Boud, David and M.ProsserMichael. 2002. “Appraising New Technologies for Learning: A Framework for Development.” Educational Media International 39(3–4): 237–245.
5. A.N.Crigler, Ann N., M.JustMarion, and W.Russell Neuman. 1994. “Interpreting Visual Versus Audio Messages in Television News.” Journal of Communication 44(4): 132–149.
6. N.Duncan, Neil. 2007. “Feed-Forward: Improving Students’ Use of Tutors’ Comments.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32(3): 271–283.
7. P.Ferguson, Peter. 2011. “Student Perception of Quality Feedback in Teacher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36(1): 51–62.
8. C.O.Fritz, Catherine O., P.E.MorrisPeter E., R.A.BjorkRobert A., R.GelmanRochel, and T.D.WickensThomas D. 2000. “When Further Learning Fails: Stability and Change Following Repeated Presentation of Text.” British Journal of Psychology 91(4): 493–511.
9. M.W.Horowitz, Milton W. and J.B.NewmanJohn B. 1964. “Spoken and Written Expression: An Experimental Analysis.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68(6): 640–647.
10. J.L.Howland, Jane L. and J.L.MooreJoi L. 2002. “Student Perceptions as Distance Learners in Internet-Based Courses.” Distance Education 23(2): 183–195.
11. P.Ice, Philip, R.CurtisReagan, P.PhillipsPerry, and J.WellsJohn. 2007. “Using Asynchronous Audio Feedback to Enhance Teaching Presence and Students’ Sense of Community.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11(2): 3–25.
12. R.Moreno, Roxana and R.MayerRichard. 2007. “Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments.” Educational Psychology Review 19(3): 309–326.
13. D.Nicol, David. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35(5): 501–517.
14. M.Price, Margaret, K.HandleyKaren, J.MillarJill, and B.O’DonovanBerry. 2010. “Feedback: All that Effort, But What Is the Effect?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35(3): 277–289.
15. A.P.Rovai, Alfred P. 2002. “Sense of Community, Perceived Cognitive Learning, and Persistence in Asynchronous Learning Networks.” The Internet and Higher Education 5(4): 319–332.
16. C.Rust, Chris. 2002. “The Impact of Assessment on Student Learning: How Can the Research Literature Practically Help to Inform the Development of Departmental Assessment Strategies and Learner-Centered Assessment Practices?” Active Learning in Higher Education 3(2): 145–158.
17. Screencast-O-Matic 2009. “Screencast-O-Matic: Make it Easy.” http://www.screencast-o-matic.com (February 1st, 2015).
18. R.Straub, Richard. 1999. A Sourcebook for Responding to Student Writing. New York, NY: Hampton Press, Inc.
19. TechSmith Corporation. 2015. “Download Jing for Free.” http://www.techsmith.com/download/jing/ (February 1st, 2014).
20. M.R.Weaver, Melanie R. 2006. “Do Students Value Feedback?: Student Perceptions of Tutors’ Written Responses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31(3): 379–394.