Microbial abundance, activity and population genomic profiling with mOTUs2

Nature Communications

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2019, Pages

  Milanese, Alessio ^a   Mende, Daniel R ^b   Paoli, Lucas ^c,d   Salazar, Guillem ^c   Ruscheweyh, Hans Joachim ^c   Cuenca, Miguelangel ^c   Hingamp, Pascal ^e   Alves, Renato ^a,f   Costea, Paul I ^a   Coelho, Luis Pedro ^a   Schmidt, Thomas S B ^a   Almeida, Alexandre ^g,h   Mitchell, Alex L ^g   Finn, Robert D ^g   Huerta Cepas, Jaime ^a,i   Bork, Peer ^a,j,k,l   Zeller, Georg ^a   Sunagawa, Shinichi ^c  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^e AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^f UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^g EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^h WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ ETSI MontesTechnical University of Madrid   (Spain)

^j MAX DELBRÜCK CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (Germany)

^k Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit   (Germany)

^l UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; GENOMICS; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PHYLOGENETICS; RELATIVE ABUNDANCE; TAXONOMY;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME; HOUSEKEEPING GENE; HUMAN; MARKER GENE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA SEQUENCE; ESSENTIAL GENE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; METAGENOMICS; MICROFLORA; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ALGORITHMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENES, ESSENTIAL; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME; HOST MICROBIAL INTERACTIONS; HUMANS; METAGENOMICS; MICROBIOTA; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 85062382608     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08844-4     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Apprill, A., McNally, S., Parsons, R. & Weber, L. Minor revision to V4 region SSU rRNA 806R gene primer greatly increases detection of SAR11 bacterioplankton. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 75, 129–137 (2015).
2. Parada, A. E., Needham, D. M. & Fuhrman, J. A. Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1403–1414 (2016).
3. Claesson, M. J. et al. Comparison of two next-generation sequencing technologies for resolving highly complex microbiota composition using tandem variable 16S rRNA gene regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e200 (2010).
4. Mende, D. R., Sunagawa, S., Zeller, G. & Bork, P. Accurate and universal delineation of prokaryotic species. Nat. Methods 10, 881–884 (2013).
5. Arumugam, M. et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 473, 174–180 (2011).
6. Lu, J., Breitwieser, F. P., Thielen, P. & Salzberg, S. L. Bracken: estimating species abundance in metagenomics data. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 3, e104 (2017).
7. Truong, D. T. et al. MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling. Nat. Methods 12, 902–903 (2015).
8. Marcy, Y. et al. Dissecting biological “dark matter” with single-cell genetic analysis of rare and uncultivated TM7 microbes from the human mouth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11889–11894 (2007).
9. Sunagawa, S. et al. Metagenomic species profiling using universal phylogenetic marker genes. Nat. Methods 10, 1196–1199 (2013).
10. Li, S. S. et al. Durable coexistence of donor and recipient strains after fecal microbiota transplantation. Science 352, 586–589 (2016).
11. Schloissnig, S. et al. Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome. Nature 493, 45–50 (2013).
12. Truong, D. T. et al. Microbial strain-level population structure and genetic diversity from metagenomes. Genome Res. 27, 626–638 (2017).
13. Mende, D. R. et al. proGenomes: a resource for consistent functional and taxonomic annotations of prokaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D529–D534 (2017).
14. Human Microbiome Project, C. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).
15. Lloyd-Price, J. et al. Strains, functions and dynamics in the expanded Human Microbiome Project. Nature 550, 61–66 (2017).
16. Feng, Q. et al. Gut microbiome development along the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Nat. Commun. 6, 6528 (2015).
17. Karlsson, F. H. et al. Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Nature 498, 99–103 (2013).
18. Qin, J. et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464, 59–65 (2010).
19. Qin, J. et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490, 55–60 (2012).
20. Voigt, A. Y. et al. Temporal and technical variability of human gut metagenomes. Genome Biol. 16, 73 (2015).
21. Zeller, G. et al. Potential of fecal microbiota for early-stage detection of colorectal cancer. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 766 (2014).
22. Sunagawa, S. et al. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348, 1261359 (2015).
23. Parks, D. H. et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1533–1542 (2017).
24. Bowers, R. M. et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 725–731 (2017).
25. Sczyrba, A. et al. Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation-a benchmark of metagenomics software. Nat. Methods 14, 1063–1071 (2017).
26. Meyer, F., et al. Assessing taxonomic metagenome profilers with OPAL. Preprint at 10.1101/372680 (2018).
27. Ott, S. J. et al. Reduction in diversity of the colonic mucosa associated bacterial microflora in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 53, 685–693 (2004).
28. Franzosa, E. A. et al. Relating the metatranscriptome and metagenome of the human gut. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2329–2338 (2014).
29. Neves, A. L. A. et al. Enhancing the resolution of rumen microbial classification from metatranscriptomic data using Kraken and Mothur. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2445 (2017).
30. Martinez, X. et al. MetaTrans: an open-source pipeline for metatranscriptomics. Sci. Rep. 6, 26447 (2016).
31. Heintz-Buschart, A. et al. Integrated multi-omics of the human gut microbiome in a case study of familial type 1diabetes. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 16180 (2016).
32. Ciccarelli, F. D. et al. Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311, 1283–1287 (2006).
33. Sorek, R. et al. Genome-wide experimental determination of barriers to horizontal gene transfer. Science 318, 1449–1452 (2007).
34. Costea, P. I. et al. metaSNV: A tool for metagenomic strain level analysis. PLoS One 12, e0182392 (2017).
35. Costea, P. I. et al. Subspecies in the global human gut microbiome. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 960 (2017).
36. Donati, C. et al. Uncovering oral Neisseria tropism and persistence using metagenomic sequencing. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16070 (2016).
37. Oh, J. et al. Biogeography and individuality shape function in the human skin metagenome. Nature 514, 59–64 (2014).
38. Nayfach, S., Rodriguez-Mueller, B., Garud, N. & Pollard, K. S. An integrated metagenomics pipeline for strain profiling reveals novel patterns of bacterial transmission and biogeography. Genome Res. 26, 1612–1625 (2016).
39. Karst, S. M. et al. Retrieval of a million high-quality, full-length microbial 16S and 18S rRNA gene sequences without primer bias. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 190–195 (2018).
40. Rognes, T. et al. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584 (2016).
41. Nielsen, H. B. et al. Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 822–828 (2014).
42. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
43. Suzek, B. E. et al. UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches. Bioinformatics 31, 926–932 (2015).
44. Carradec, Q. et al. A global ocean atlas of eukaryotic genes. Nat. Commun. 9, 373 (2018).
45. Steinegger, M. & Soding, J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1026–1028 (2017).
46. Huerta-Cepas, J., Serra, F. & Bork, P. ETE 3: Reconstruction, Analysis, and Visualization of Phylogenomic Data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1635–1638 (2016).
47. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).
48. Nguyen, L. T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274 (2015).
49. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
50. Wood, D. E. & Salzberg, S. L. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 15, R46 (2014).
51. Nurk, S., Meleshko, D., Korobeynikov, A. & Pevzner, P. A. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 27, 824–834 (2017).
52. Kang, D. D., Froula, J., Egan, R. & Wang, Z. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ 3, e1165 (2015).
53. Parks, D. H. et al. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
54. Johnson, S. et al. A better sequence-read simulator program for metagenomics. BMC Bioinform. 15, S14 (2014).
55. Logares, R. et al. Metagenomic 16S rDNA Illumina tags are a powerful alternative to amplicon sequencing to explore diversity and structure of microbial communities. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 2659–2671 (2014).
56. Edgar, R. C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996–998 (2013).
57. Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H. & Wagner, H. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (2013).
58. Robin, X. et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinform. 12, 77 (2011).