A research proposal on the parametric city governance

Green Energy and Technology

Volumn 0, Issue , 2017, Pages 205-219

  Wagner, Magdalena ^a  

^a WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

City governance; Multi criteria decision analysis; PROMETHEE; Urban policy making

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; STATISTICS; URBAN PLANNING;

CITY GOVERNANCE; COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; OPERATIONAL RESEARCH; PROMETHEE; RESEARCH PROPOSALS; URBAN POLICY;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 85009094267     PISSN: 18653529     EISSN: 18653537     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44899-2_12     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bouyssou, D. (2001). Outranking methods. In C. A. Floudas & P. M. Pardalos (Eds), Encyclopedia of optimization. Kluwer.
2. Brans, J. P., & De Smet, Y. (2015). Promethee methods. (to appear in) J. Figueira, S. Greco & M. Ehrgott (Eds), Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys (2nd edn). Brol, R. (2004). Ekonomika i zarządzanie miastem. Wrocław.
3. de Boer, L., van der Wegen, L., & Telgen, J. (1998). Outranking methods in support of supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 1998(4), 109-118.
4. Eom, S. B. (2001). Decision support systems. In M. Warner (Ed), International encyclopaedia of business and management (2nd ed). London, England: International Thomson Business Publishing Co.
5. Fontela, E., & Gabus, A. (1974). DEMATEL, innovative methods, Technical report no. 2, Structural analysis of the world problematique. Battelle Geneva Research Institute.
6. Giove, S., Brancia, A., Satterstrom, F. K., & Linkov, I. (2009). Decision support systems and environment: Role of MCDA. In A. Marcomini, G. W. Suter, & A. Critto (Eds), Decision support systems for risk based management of contaminated sites. New York: Springer Verlag.
7. Jaeckel, P. (2002). Monte Carlo methods in finance. Wiley.
8. Lorens, P., & Martyniuk-Pęczek, J. (Eds). (2010). Zarządzanie rozwojem przestrzennym miast. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Urbanista.
9. Macharis, C., Springael, J., De Brucker, K., & Verbeke, A. (2004). PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 307-317.
10. Markowski, T. (1999). Zarządzanie rozwojem miast. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
11. Ogrodnik, K. (2015). Możliwość zastosowania analizy wielokryterialnej do diagnozy procesu planowania przestrzennego na poziomie lokalnym: przykład teoretyczny. Architecturae et Artibus, 7(1), 44-52.
12. Ossowicz, T. (2003). Metoda ustalania kolejności przedsięwzięć polityki przestrzennej miasta wielkiego. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.
13. Pęski, W. (1999). Zarządzanie zrównoważonym rozwojem miast. Warszawa: Arkady.
14. Saaty, T. L. (2008). The analytic network process. Iranian Journal of Operations Research, 1(1), 1-27.
15. Saaty, T. L., & Peniwati, K. (2008). Group decision making: Drawing out and reconciling differences. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.
16. Simon, H. A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In C. B. McGuire & R. Radner (Eds), Decision and organization: A volume in honor of Jacob Marschak (Chapter 8). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
17. Sprague, R. H., & Carlson, E. D. (1982). Building effective decision support systems. Englewood Cliffs: N.J., Prentice-Hall Inc.
18. Stańczak, J. (2005). Optimal control of multistage deterministic, stochastic and fuzzy processes in the fuzzy environment via an evolutionary algorithm. Control and cybernetics 01/2005; 34(2), 525-552.
19. Trzaskalik, T. (2014). Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. PWE, Warszawa: Metody I zastosowania.
20. Tyszka, T. (2004). Psychologia ekonomiczna. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
21. Xu, D. L., & Yang, B. (2001). Introduction to multi-criteria decision making and the evidential reasoning approach. In Working Paper Series, Paper No.: 0106, Manchester School of Management, UMIST, (pp 1-21).
22. Zeleny, M. (2011). Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM): From paradigm lost to paradigm regained. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (Wiley Online Library), 18, 77-89.