Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression

Omega

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 488-501

  Kadziński, Miłosz ^a   Greco, Salvatore ^b   Słowiński, Roman ^a,c  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

^c SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Multiple criteria ranking and choice; PROMETHEE like method; Robust ordinal regression; UTA like method

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

ADDITIVE VALUE FUNCTIONS; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; MULTIPLE CRITERIA RANKING AND CHOICE; PREFERENCE INFORMATION; PREFERENCE MODELS; PROMETHEE; PROMETHEE-LIKE METHOD; RANKING ANALYSIS; ROBUST ORDINAL REGRESSIONS; UTA-LIKE METHOD;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 80054860890     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2011.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. EIU. How technology sectors grow: benchmarking IT industry competitiveness 2008. Economist Intelligence Unit, London; 2008.
2. EIU. Global liveability report 2010. Economist Intelligence Unit, London; 2010.
3. Angilella S., Greco S., Matarazzo B. Non-additive robust ordinal regression: a multiple criteria decision model based on the choquet integral. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 201(1):277-288.
4. Beuthe M., Scannella G. Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods. European Journal of Operational Research 2001, 130(2):246-262.
5. Beynon M.J., Wells P. The lean improvement of the chemical emissions of motor vehicles based on preference ranking: a PROMETHEE uncertainty analysis. Omega 2008, 36(3):384-394.
6. Brans J.P., Mareschal B., Vincke Ph. PROMETHEE: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. Operational research, IFORS 84 1984, 477-490. North Holland, Amsterdam. J.P. Brans (Ed.).
7. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Ferguson R. Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Management Science 1955, 1:138-151.
8. Doumpos M., Zopounidis C. Assessing financial risks using a multicriteria sorting procedure: the case of country risk assessment. Omega 2000, 29(1):97-109.
9. Figueira J, Greco S, Słowiński R. Identifying the most representative value function among all compatible value functions in the GRIP. In: Proceedings of the 68th EURO working group on MCDA, Chania; 2008.
10. Figueira J., Greco S., Słowiński R. Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference: GRIP method. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 195(2):460-486.
11. Greco S, Kadziński M, Mousseau V, Słowiński R. Robust ordinal regression for multiple criteria group decision problems: UTAGMS-GROUP and UTADISGMS-GROUP. Decision Support Systems, doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.005. In press. http://10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.005.
12. GKMS: robust ordinal regression for outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research 2011, 214(1):118-135.
13. Greco S, Kadziński M, Słowiński R. The most representative parameter set for robust outranking approach. In: Proceedings of the 71st EURO working group on MCDA, Torino; 2010.
14. Greco S., Kadziński M., Słowiński R. Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria sorting. Computers & Operations Research 2011, 38(11):1620-1637.
15. Greco S., Mousseau V., Słowiński R. Ordinal regression revisited: multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research 2008, 191(2):415-435.
16. Greco S., Słowiński R., Mousseau V., Figueira J. Robust ordinal regression. Trends in multiple criteria decision analysis 2010, 273-320. Springer, Berlin. M. Ehrgott, J. Figueira, S. Greco (Eds.).
17. Jacquet-Lagrèze E., Siskos Y. Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: the UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research 1982, 10:151-164.
18. Kadziński M, Greco S, Słowiński R. Selection of a representative value function for robust multiple criteria ranking and choice. European Journal of Operational Research, doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.032. In press. http://10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.032.
19. Kadziński M, Greco S, Słowiński R. Selection of a representative value function for robust ordinal regression in group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, in press.
20. Keeney R.L., Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs 1976, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Lahdelma R., Hokkanen J., Salminen P. SMAA-stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 1998, 106(1):137-143.
22. Lahdelma R., Salminen P. SMAA-2: stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Operations Research 2001, 49(3):444-454.
23. Roubens M., Vincke Ph. On families of semiorders and interval orders imbedded in a valued structure of preference: a survey. Information Sciences 1984, 34:187-198.
24. Roy B. Méthodologie Multicritère d'aide à la Décision 1985, Economica, Paris.
25. Roy B. Paradigms and challenges. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys 2005, 3-26. Springer-Verlag, Boston, Dordrecht, London. J. Figueira, S. Greco, M. Ehrgott (Eds.).
26. Siskos Y. Comment modéliser les préférences au moyen de fonctions d'utilité additives. RAIRO Recherche Opérationelle 1980, 14:53-82.
27. Siskos Y. A way to deal with fuzzy preferences in multi-criteria decision problems. European Journal of Operational Research 1982, 10(3):314-324.
28. Siskos Y. Analyses de regression et programmation lineaire. Revue de Statistique Appliquée 1985, 23(2):41-55.
29. Siskos Y., Grigoroudis E., Matsatsinis N.F. UTA methods. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys 2005, 297-344. Springer-Verlag, Boston. J. Figueira, S. Greco, M. Ehrgott (Eds.).
30. Srinivasan V., Shocker A.D. Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences. Psychometrika 1973, 38(3):337-369.
31. Wiecek M., Ehrgott M., Fadel G., Figueira J.R. Multiple criteria decision making for engineering. Omega 2008, 36(3):337-339.
32. Young F.W., De Leeuw J., Takane Y. Regression with qualitative and quantitative variables: an alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika 1976, 41(4):505-529.