Evaluating soft OR: Some reflections on an apparently ‘unsuccessful’ implementation using a soft systems methodology (SSM) based approach

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 150-160

  Connell, N A D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

OR practice; Soft OR; Soft systems methodology; Systems evaluation

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; PROBLEM SOLVING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY (SSM);

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 0035250215     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601054     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Checkland PB and Scholes J (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley: Chichester.
2. Gass SI (1991). The many faces of OR. JOplRes Soc 42: 3-16.
3. Rosenhead J (1989). Old and new paradigms for analysis. In: Rosenhead J (ed). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Wiley: Chichester, pp 1-20.
4. Ledington P and Donaldson J (1997). Soit OR and management practice: a study of the adoption and use of Soit Systems Methodology. J Opl Res Soc 48: 229-240.
5. Mingers J and Gill A (eds) (1997). Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Wiley: Chichester.
6. Ormerod RJ (1995). Putting soft OR methods to work: information systems strategy development at Sainsbury’s. J Opl Res Soc 46: 277-293.
7. Ormerod RJ (1996). Putting soft OR methods to work: information systems strategy development at Richards Bay. J Opl Res Soc 47: 1083-1097.
8. Bryant J (1988). Frameworks of enquiry: OR practice across the hard-soft divide. J Opl Res Soc 39: 423-435.
9. Chapman CB (1992). My two cents worth on how OR should develop. J Opl Res Soc 43: 647-664.
10. Checkland PB (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley: Chichester.
11. Mingers J and Taylor S (1992). The use of soft systems methodology in practice. J Opl Res Soc 43: 321-332.
12. Jackson MC (1982). The nature of soft systems thinking: the work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland. JAppl Syst Anal 9: 17-29.
13. Mingers J (1984). Subjectivism and soft systems methodology-a critique. JAppl Syst Anal 11: 85-103.
14. Burrell G (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice; a review. JAppl Syst Anal 10: 121-126.
15. Rreher H (1994). Some recurring themes in using SSM. J Opl Res Soc 45: 1293-1303.
16. Hindle T, Checkland P, Mumford M and Worthington D (1995). Developing a methodology for multidisciplinary ‘action research’: case study. J Opl Res Soc 46: 453-464.
17. Connell NAD, Goddard AR, Philp I and Bray J (1998). ‘Patient-centred’ performance monitoring systems and multi-agency care provision: a case study using a stakeholder participative approach. Health Serv Mngt Res 11: 92-102.
18. Pouloudi A and Whitley EA (1997). Stakeholder identification in inter-organizational systems: gaining insights for drug use management system. Eur JTnf Syst 6: 1-14.
19. Brown AD (1997). Developing a purchasing strategy: a case study of a District Health Authority using soft systems methodology. Health Serv Mngt Res 10: 58-68.
20. Checkland P and Howell S (1993). Information management and organisational processes: an approach through soft systems methodology. J Tnf Syst 3: 3-16.
21. Lehaney B and Paul RJ (1996). The use of SSM in the development of a simulation of Out-patient services at Watford General Hospital. J Opl Res Soc 47: 864-870.
22. Checkland P, Clarke S and Poulter J (1996). The use of Soft Systems Methodology for developing HISS and IMandT strategies in NHS Trusts. In: Richards B and de Glanville H (eds). Healthcare Computing 1996, BJHC Ltd: Weybridge, pp 223-233.
23. Checkland P and Holwell S (1998). Information, Systems and Information Systems. Wiley: Chichester.
24. Holwell S (1997) SSM and its role in IS. PhD thesis University of Lancaster.
25. Jackson MC (1993) Social theory and operational research practice. J Opl Res Soc 44: 563-578.
26. Rosenhead J (1984). Debating systems methodology: conflicting ideas about conflict and ideas. J Appl Syst Anal 11: 79-84.