Single-nucleus and single-cell transcriptomes compared in matched cortical cell types

PLoS ONE

Volumn 13, Issue 12, 2018, Pages

  Bakken, Trygve E ^a   Hodge, Rebecca D ^a   Miller, Jeremy A ^a   Yao, Zizhen ^a   Nguyen, Thuc Nghi ^a   Aevermann, Brian ^b   Barkan, Eliza ^a   Bertagnolli, Darren ^a   Casper, Tamara ^a   Dee, Nick ^a   Garren, Emma ^a   Goldy, Jeff ^a   Graybuck, Lucas T ^a   Kroll, Matthew ^a   Lasken, Roger S ^b   Lathia, Kanan ^a   Parry, Sheana ^a   Rimorin, Christine ^a   Scheuermann, Richard H ^b   Schork, Nicholas J ^b   Shehata, Soraya I ^a   Tieu, Michael ^a   Phillips, John W ^a   Bernard, Amy ^a   Smith, Kimberly A ^a   Zeng, Hongkui ^a   Lein, Ed S ^a   Tasic, Bosiljka ^a   more..

^a ALLEN INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN SCIENCE   (United States)

^b J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; RNA; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SIZE; CELLS BY BODY ANATOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTRON; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PYRAMIDAL NERVE CELL; RNA SEQUENCE; RNA TRANSCRIPTION; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL RNA SEQUENCING; SINGLE NUCLEUS RNA SEQUENCING; VISUAL CORTEX; ANIMAL; CELL LINEAGE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; CELL LINEAGE; CELL NUCLEUS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MICE; NEURONS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTOME; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 85059242466     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209648     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Poulin J, Tasic B, Hjerling-Leffler J, Trimarchi JM, Awatramani R. Disentangling neural cell diversity using single-cell transcriptomics. Nat Neurosci. 2016; 19: 1131–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4366PMID: 27571192
2. Zeng H, Sanes JR. Neuronal cell-type classification: challenges, opportunities and the path forward. Nat Rev Neurosci. Nature Publishing Group; 2017; https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.85 PMID: 28775344
3. Bernard A, Sorensen SA, Lein ES. Shifting the paradigm: new approaches for characterizing and classifying neurons. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.010PMID: 19896835
4. Tasic B. Single cell transcriptomics in neuroscience: cell classification and beyond. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2018.04.021 PMID: 29738987
5. Tasic B, Menon V, Nguyen TN, Kim TK, Jarsky T, Yao Z, et al. Adult mouse cortical cell taxonomy revealed by single cell transcriptomics. Nat Neurosci. 2016; 19: 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn. 4216 PMID: 26727548
6. Tasic B, Yao Z, Graybuck LT, Smith KA, Nguyen TN, Bertagnolli D, et al. Shared and distinct transcriptomic cell types across neocortical areas. Nature. Springer US; 2018; 563: 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0654-5 PMID: 30382198
7. Zeisel A, Manchado ABM, Codeluppi S, Lonnerberg P, La Manno G, Jureus A, et al. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. Science (80-). 2015; science. aaa1934-. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1934 PMID: 25700174
8. Campbell JN, Macosko EZ, Fenselau H, Pers TH, Lyubetskaya A, Tenen D, et al. A molecular census of arcuate hypothalamus and median eminence cell types. Nat Neurosci. 2017; 20: 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4495 PMID: 28166221
9. Shekhar K, Lapan SW, Whitney IE, Tran NM, Macosko EZ, Kowalczyk M, et al. Comprehensive Classification of Retinal Bipolar Neurons by Single-Cell Transcriptomics. Cell. Elsevier Inc.; 2016; 166: 1308–1323.e30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.054 PMID: 27565351
10. Macosko EZ, Basu A, Satija R, Nemesh J, Shekhar K, Goldman M, et al. Highly Parallel Genome-wide Expression Profiling of Individual Cells Using Nanoliter Droplets. Cell. Elsevier Inc.; 2015; 161: 1202–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002 PMID: 26000488
11. Darmanis S, Sloan S A., Zhang Y, Enge M, Caneda C, Shuer LM, et al. A survey of human brain transcriptome diversity at the single cell level. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015; 201507125. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1507125112 PMID: 26060301
12. Krishnaswami SR, Grindberg R V, Novotny M, Venepally P, Lacar B, Bhutani K, et al. Using single nuclei for RNA-seq to capture the transcriptome of postmortem neurons. Nat Protoc. 2016; 11: 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.015 PMID: 26890679
13. Lacar B, Linker SB, Jaeger BN, Krishnaswami S, Barron J, Kelder M, et al. Nuclear RNA-seq of single neurons reveals molecular signatures of activation. Nat Commun. 2016; 7: 11022. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11022 PMID: 27090946
14. Lake BB, Ai R, Kaeser GE, Salathia NS, Yung YC, Liu R, et al. Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, editor. Science (80-). Cambridge: American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2016; 352: 1586–1590. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf1204 PMID: 27339989
15. Lake BB, Chen S, Sos BC, Fan J, Kaeser GE, Yung YC, et al. Integrative single-cell analysis of transcriptional and epigenetic states in the human adult brain. Nat Biotechnol. 2017; 36: 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4038 PMID: 29227469
16. Habib N, Li Y, Heidenreich M, Swiech L, Avraham-Davidi I, Trombetta JJ, et al. Div-Seq: Single-nucleus RNA-Seq reveals dynamics of rare adult newborn neurons. Science (80-). 2016; 353: 925–928. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7038 PMID: 27471252
17. Lake BB, Codeluppi S, Yung YC, Gao D, Chun J, Kharchenko P V., et al. A comparative strategy for single-nucleus and single-cell transcriptomes confirms accuracy in predicted cell-type expression from nuclear RNA. Sci Rep. Springer US; 2017; 7: 6031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04426-wPMID: 28729663
18. Habib N, Avraham-Davidi I, Basu A, Burks T, Shekhar K, Hofree M, et al. Massively parallel single-nucleus RNA-seq with DroNc-seq. Nat Methods. 2017; 14: 955–958. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth. 4407 PMID: 28846088
19. Dobin A, Davis C A., Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29: 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 PMID: 23104886
20. Kharchenko P V, Silberstein L, Scadden DT. Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat Methods. 2014; 11: 740–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2967 PMID: 24836921
21. Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, Oh SW, Zariwala HA, Gu H, et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci. 2010; https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2467 PMID: 20023653
22. Li G-W, Xie XS. Central dogma at the single-molecule level in living cells. Nature. 2011; 475: 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10315 PMID: 21776076
23. Little SC, Tikhonov M, Gregor T. Precise Developmental Gene Expression Arises from Globally Stochastic Transcriptional Activity. Cell. Elsevier Inc.; 2013; 154: 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.025 PMID: 23953111
24. Munsky B, Neuert G, van Oudenaarden A. Using Gene Expression Noise to Understand Gene Regulation. Science (80-). 2012; 336: 183–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216379 PMID: 22499939
25. Bahar Halpern K, Caspi I, Lemze D, Levy M, Landen S, Elinav E, et al. Nuclear Retention of mRNA in Mammalian Tissues. Cell Rep. The Authors; 2015; 13: 2653–2662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.11.036 PMID: 26711333
26. Sigl-Glöckner J, Brecht M. Polyploidy and the Cellular and Areal Diversity of Rat Cortical Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons. Cell Rep. 2017; 20: 2575–2583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.069 PMID: 28903039
27. Lin N, Chang KY, Li Z, Gates K, Rana ZA, Dang J, et al. An evolutionarily conserved long noncoding RNA TUNA controls pluripotency and neural lineage commitment. Mol Cell. Elsevier Inc.; 2014; 53: 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.01.021 PMID: 24530304
28. Zhang Z, Carriero N, Gerstein M. Comparative analysis of processed pseudogenes in the mouse and human genomes. Trends Genet. 2004; 20: 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2003.12.005 PMID: 14746985
29. Cajigas IJ, Tushev G, Will TJ, tom Dieck S, Fuerst N, Schuman EM. The Local Transcriptome in the Synaptic Neuropil Revealed by Deep Sequencing and High-Resolution Imaging. Neuron. 2012; 74: 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.036 PMID: 22578497
30. Djebali S, Davis C A, Merkel A, Dobin A, Lassmann T, Mortazavi A, et al. Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature. 2012; 489: 101–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11233 PMID: 22955620
31. Gabel HW, Kinde B, Stroud H, Gilbert CS, Harmin DA, Kastan NR, et al. Disruption of DNA-methylation-dependent long gene repression in Rett syndrome. Nature. 2015; 522: 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14319 PMID: 25762136
32. Mauger O, Lemoine F, Scheiffele P. Targeted Intron Retention and Excision for Rapid Gene Regulation in Response to Neuronal Activity. Neuron. 2016; 92: 1266–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.032 PMID: 28009274
33. Ecker JR, Geschwind DH, Kriegstein AR, Ngai J, Osten P, Polioudakis D, et al. The BRAIN Initiative Cell Census Consortium: Lessons Learned toward Generating a Comprehensive Brain Cell Atlas. Neuron. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.007 PMID: 29096072
34. Regev A, Teichmann SA, Lander ES, Amit I, Benoist C, Birney E, et al. The human cell atlas. Elife. 2017; https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27041 PMID: 29206104
35. Baker SC, Bauer SR, Beyer RP, Brenton JD, Bromley B, Burrill J, et al. The external RNA controls consortium: A progress report. Nat Methods. 2005; https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1005-731 PMID: 16179916
36. Risso D, Ngai J, Speed TP, Dudoit S. Normalization of RNA-seq data using factor analysis of control genes or samples. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2931 PMID: 25150836
37. Aronesty E. “ea-utils: Command-line tools for processing biological sequencing data.” Expr Anal. 2011; http://code.google.com/p/ea-utils
38. Lawrence M, Huber W, Pagès H, Aboyoun P, Carlson M, Gentleman R, et al. Software for Computing and Annotating Genomic Ranges. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi. 1003118 PMID: 23950696
39. SCDE by Kharchenko Lab at Harvard DBMI [Internet]. [cited 6 Jan 2018]. Available: http://hms-dbmi.github.io/scde/diffexp.html
40. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis [Internet]. Springer-Verlag New York; 2016. Available: http://ggplot2.org
41. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/ gkv007 PMID: 25605792
42. Heiberger RM, Freeny AE, Chambers J. M. Analysis of Variance; Designed Experiments. Statistical Model in S. 2017. https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.6.2.505355
43. Chen J, Bardes EE, Aronow BJ, Jegga AG. ToppGene Suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp427 PMID: 19465376
44. Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T. Revigo summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS One. 2011; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021800 PMID: 21789182
45. Levine JH, Simonds EF, Bendall SC, Davis KL, Amir ED, Tadmor MD, et al. Data-Driven Phenotypic Dissection of AML Reveals Progenitor-like Cells that Correlate with Prognosis. Cell. Elsevier Inc.; 2015; 162: 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.047 PMID: 26095251
46. Jackson DA. Stopping Rules in Principal Components Analysis: A Comparison of Heuristical and Statistical Approaches. Ecology. 1993; 74: 2204–2214. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939574
47. Fortunato S, Barthelemy M. Resolution limit in community detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007; 104: 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605965104 PMID: 17190818
48. Reichardt J, Bornholdt S. Statistical mechanics of community detection. Phys Rev E—Stat Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 2006; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.016110 PMID: 16907154
49. Guimerà R, Sales-Pardo M, Amaral LAN. Modularity from fluctuations in random graphs and complex networks. Phys Rev E. 2004; 70: 025101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.025101 PMID: 15447530
50. Langfelder P, Zhang B, Horvath S. Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: The Dynamic Tree Cut package for R. Bioinformatics. 2008; https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm563 PMID: 18024473
51. Lein ES, Hawrylycz MJ, Ao N, Ayres M, Bensinger A, Bernard A, et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature. 2006/12/08. 2007; 445: 168–176. nature05453 [pii] https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05453 PMID: 17151600
52. Paxinos G, Keith B. J. Franklin MA. Paxinos and Franklin’s the Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates [Internet]. Elsevier Science; 2012. Available: https://books.google.com/books?id=8RJZLwEACAAJ
53. Lamprecht MR, Sabatini DM, Carpenter AE. CellProfiler: free, versatile software for automated biological image analysis. Biotechniques. 2007; 42: 71–75. https://doi.org/10.2144/000112257 PMID: 17269487
54. Daigle TL, Madisen L, Hage TA, Valley MT, Knoblich U, Larsen RS, et al. A Suite of Transgenic Driver and Reporter Mouse Lines with Enhanced Brain-Cell-Type Targeting and Functionality. Cell. 2018; 174: 465–480.e22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.035 PMID: 30007418
55. Madisen L, Garner AR, Shimaoka D, Chuong AS, Klapoetke NC, Li L, et al. Transgenic mice for inter-sectional targeting of neural sensors and effectors with high specificity and performance. Neuron. 2015; 85: 942–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.022 PMID: 25741722