Deep clustering of protein folding simulations

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 19, Issue , 2018, Pages

  Bhowmik, Debsindhu ^a   Gao, Shang ^a   Young, Michael T ^a   Ramanathan, Arvind ^a  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conformational substates; Deep learning; Protein folding; Variational autoencoder

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; DEEP LEARNING; PROTEIN FOLDING; TRAJECTORIES;

ATOMISTIC MECHANISM; AUTO ENCODERS; BIOMOLECULAR SIMULATION; BIOPHYSICAL PROCESS; CONFORMATIONAL SUBSTATES; LEARNING TECHNIQUES; LOW-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATION; PROTEIN FOLDING SIMULATION;

PROTEINS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN FOLDING;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

EID: 85058922260     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2507-5     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ingólfsson HI, Arnarez C, Periole X, Marrink SJ. Computational 'microscopy' of cellular membranes. J Cell Sci. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.176040.
2. Dror RO, Dirks RM, Grossman JP, Xu H, Shaw DE. Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology. Annu Rev Biophys. 2012; 41(1):429-52.
3. Lee EH, Hsin J, Sotomayor M, Comellas G, Schulten K. Discovery through the computational microscope. Structure. 2009; 17(10):1295-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2009.09.001.
4. Dhindsa GK, Bhowmik D, Goswami M, O'Neill H, Mamontov E, Sumpter BG, Hong L, Ganesh P, Chu X. -q.Enhanced dynamics of hydrated trna on nanodiamond surfaces: A combined neutron scattering and md simulation study. J Phys Chem B. 2016; 120(38):10059-68. PMID: 27584158. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b07511.
5. Lynch VE, Borreguero JM, Bhowmik D, Ganesh P, Sumpter BG, Proffen TE, Goswami M. An automated analysis workflow for optimization of force-field parameters using neutron scattering data. J Comput Phys. 2017; 340:128-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.03.045.
6. Adcock SA, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics: Survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. Chem Rev. 2006; 106(5):1589-615.
7. Ramanathan A, Savol A, Burger V, Chennubhotla C, Agarwal PK. Protein Conformational Populations and Functionally Relevant Substates. Acc Chem Res. 2014; 47(1):149-156. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar400084s.
8. Ramanathan A, Savol A, Burger V, Quinn S, Agarwal PK, Chennubhotla C. Statistical inference for big data problems in molecular biophysics. In: Neural Information Processing Systems: Workshop on Big Learning: 2012. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1055187.
9. Maisuradze GG, Liwo A, Scheraga HA. Principal component analysis for protein folding dynamics. J Mol Biol. 2009; 385(1):312-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.018.
10. Ramanathan A, Savol AJ, Langmead CJ, Agarwal PK, Chennubhotla C. Discovering conformational sub-states relevant to protein function. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(1):15827.
11. Burger VM, Ramanathan A, Savol AJ, Stanley CB, Agarwal PK, Chennubhotla C. Quasi-anharmonic analysis reveals intermediate States in the nuclear co-activator receptor binding domain ensemble. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2012;:70-81. https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9789814366496_0008.
12. Ramanathan A, Savol AJ, Agarwal PK, Chennubhotla C. Event detection and sub-state discovery from biomolecular simulations using higher-order statistics: application to enzyme adenylate kinase. Proteins Struct Func Bioinform. 2012; 80(11):2536-51.
13. Das P, Moll M, Stamati H, Kavraki LE, Clementi C. Low-dimensional, free-energy landscapes of protein-folding reactions by nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006; 103(26):9885-90. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603553103. http://www.pnas.org/content/103/26/9885.full.pdf.
14. Kim SB, Dsilva CJ, Kevrekidis IG, Debenedetti PG. Systematic characterization of protein folding pathways using diffusion maps: Application to trp-cage miniprotein. J Chem Phys. 2015; 142(8):085101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4913322.
15. Duan M, Fan J, Li M, Han L, Huo S. Evaluation of dimensionality-reduction methods from peptide folding-unfolding simulations. J Chem Theory Comput. 2013; 9(5):2490-7. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct400052y.
16. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep Learning; 2016. http://www.deeplearningbook.org. Accessed 28 Nov 2018.
17. Gawehn E, Hiss JA, Schneider G. Deep learning in drug discovery. Mol Inform. 2016; 35(1):3-14.
18. Ramsundar B, Kearnes S, Riley P, Webster D, Konerding D, Pande V. Massively multitask networks for drug discovery. 2015. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.02072. https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.02072.
19. Gomes J, Ramsundar B, Feinberg EN, Pande VS. Atomic convolutional networks for predicting protein-ligand binding affinity. 2017. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.10603. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.10603.
20. Doerr S, Ariz-Extreme I, Harvey MJ, De Fabritiis G. Dimensionality reduction methods for molecular simulations. 2017. ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10629.
21. Hernández CX, Wayment-Steele HK, Sultan MM, Husic BE, Pande VS. Variational Encoding of Complex Dynamics. 2017. ArXiv e-prints. https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.062412.
22. Beauchamp KA, Bowman GR, Lane TJ, Maibaum L, Haque IS, Pande VS. Msmbuilder2: Modeling conformational dynamics on the picosecond to millisecond scale. J Chemical Theory Computat. 2011; 7(10):3412-9.
23. Kubelka J, Chiu TK, Davies DR, Eaton WA, Hofrichter J. Sub-microsecond protein folding. J Mol Biol. 2006; 359(3):546-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.03.034.
24. Sarisky CA, Mayo SL. The bba-fold: explorations in sequence space. J Mol Biol. 2001; 307(5):1411-8. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4345.
25. Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, Shaw DE. How fast-folding proteins fold. Science. 2011; 334(6055):517-20.
26. Shaw DE, Deneroff MM, Dror RO, Kuskin JS, Larson RH, Salmon JK, Young C, Batson B, Bowers KJ, Chao JC, Eastwood MP, Gagliardo J, Grossman JP, Ho CR, Ierardi DJ, Kolossváry I, Klepeis JL, Layman T, McLeavey C, Moraes MA, Mueller R, Priest EC, Shan Y, Spengler J, Theobald M, Towles B, Wang SC. Anton a special-purpose machine for molecular dynamics simulation. Commun ACM. 2008; 51(7):91-7. https://doi.org/10.1145/1364782.1364802.
27. Lindorff-Larsen K, Maragakis P, Piana S, Eastwood MP, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Systematic validation of protein force fields against experimental data. PLOS ONE. 2012; 7(2):32131.
28. Michaud-Agrawal N, Denning EJ, Woolf TB, Beckstein O. Mdanalysis: A toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem. 2011; 32(10):2319-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21787.
29. Gowers RJ, Linke M, Barnoud J, Reddy TJE, Melo MN, Seyler SL, Domanski J, Dotson DL, Buchoux S, Kenney IM, Beckstein O. MDAnalysis: A python package for the rapid analysis of molecular dynamics simulations In: Benthall S, Rostrup S, editors. Proceedings of the 15th Python in Science Conference: 2016. p. 98-105. http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/scipy2016/pdfs/oliver_beckstein.pdf.
30. Baldi P. Autoencoders, unsupervised learning, and deep architectures. In: Proceedings of ICML Workshop on Unsupervised and Transfer Learning: 2012. p. 37-49. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v27/baldi12a/baldi12a.pdf.
31. Doersch C. Tutorial on variational autoencoders. 2016. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05908.
32. Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Palmo K, Maragakis P, Klepeis JL, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the amber ff99sb protein force field. Proteins Struct Func Bioinform. 2010; 78(8):1950-58.
33. Savol AJ, Chennubhotla C. Quantifying the sources of kinetic frustration in folding simulations of small proteins. J Chem Theory Comput. 2014; 10(8):2964-74. PMID: 25136267. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct500361w.
34. Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ. Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J Glob Optim. 1998; 13(4):455-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306431147.
35. Bergstra JS, Bardenet R, Bengio Y, Kégl B.Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems: 2011. p. 2546-54. https://papers.nips.cc/paper/4443-algorithms-for-hyper-parameter-optimization.pdf.
36. Snoek J, Larochelle H, Adams RP. Practical bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 2. NIPS'12. Curran Associates Inc.: 2012. p. 2951-2959. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2999325.2999464.
37. Maaten LVD, Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-sne. J Mach Learn Res. 2008; 9(Nov):2579-605.
38. Gsponer J, Caflisch A. Molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding from the transition state. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002; 99(10):6719-24. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.092686399. http://www.pnas.org/content/99/10/6719.full.pdf.
39. Vendruscolo M, Kussell E, Domany E. Recovery of protein structure from contact maps. Fold Des. 1997; 2(5):295-306.
40. Domany E. Protein folding in contact map space. Physica A Stat Mech App. 2000; 288(1):1-9. Dynamics Days Asia-Pacific: First International Conference on NonLinear Science.
41. Bowman GR, Beauchamp KA, Boxer G, Pande VS. Progress and challenges in the automated construction of markov state models for full protein systems. J Chem Phys. 2009; 131(12):124101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3216567.
42. Ramanathan A, Yoo JO, Langmead CJ. On-the-fly identification of conformational substates from molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Theory Comput. 2011; 7(3):778-89. PMID: 26596308.