A design methodology for trust cue calibration in cognitive agents

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8525 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2014, Pages 251-262

  De Visser, Ewart J ^a,b   Cohen, Marvin ^a   Freedy, Amos ^a   Parasuraman, Raja ^b  

^a Perceptronics Solutions Inc   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automation; Bayesian Modeling; Cognitive Agents; Computational Trust Modeling; Cyber Operations; Trust; Trust Calibration; Trust Cues; Trustworthiness; Uncertainty Visualization; Unmanned Systems

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATION; CALIBRATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; UNMANNED VEHICLES; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUALIZATION;

BAYESIAN MODEL; COGNITIVE AGENTS; COMPUTATIONAL TRUST MODEL; CYBER OPERATIONS; TRUST; TRUST CUES; TRUSTWORTHINESS; UNCERTAINTY VISUALIZATION; UNMANNED SYSTEM;

DESIGN;

EID: 84903624795     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07458-0_24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Cohen, M., Parasuraman, R., Freeman, J.: Trust in decision aids: A model and its training implications. In: Proceedings of the 1998 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, pp. 1-37 (1998)
2. de Visser, E.J., Parasuraman, R.: Adaptive aiding of human-robot teaming: Effects of imperfect automation on performance, trust, and workload. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 5(2), 209-231 (2011)
3. Dzindolet, M., Peterson, S., Pomranky, R.: The role of trust in automation reliance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 58(6), 697-718 (2003)
4. Bahner, J., Huper, A., Manzey, D.: Misuse of automated decision aids: Complacency, automation bias and the impact of training experience. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 66(9), 688-699 (2008)
5. Parasuraman, R., Manzey, D.: Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration. Hum. Factors 52(3), 381-410 (2010)
6. Lee, J., See, K.: Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors 46(1), 50-80 (2004)
7. Parasuraman, R., Riley, V.: Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum. Factors 39(2), 230-253 (1997)
8. McGuirl, J., Sarter, N.: Supporting trust calibration and the effective use of decision aids by presenting dynamic system confidence information. Hum. Factors 48(4), 656-665 (2006)
9. Adolphs, R.: Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 165-178 (2003)
10. Kramer, R.: Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50, 569-698 (1999)
11. Mayer, R., Davis, J., Schoorman, F.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(3), 709-734 (1995)
12. Merritt, S.M., Ilgen, D.R.: Not All Trust Is Created Equal: Dispositional and History-Based Trust in Human-Automation Interactions. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 50(2), 194-210 (2008)
13. Madhavan, P., Wiegmann, D.A.: Similarities and differences between human-human and human-automation trust: An integrative review. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 8(4), 277-301 (2007)
14. Rotter, J.: Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. Am. Psychol (1971)
15. Barber, B.: The logic and limits of trust, p. 190. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick (1983)
16. Rempel, J., Holmes, J., Zanna, M.: Trust in close relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49(1), 95-112 (1985)
17. Loewenstein, G., Weber, E., Hsee, C., Welch, N.: Risk as feelings. Psychol. Bull. 127(2), 267-286 (2001)
18. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., MacGregor, D.: The affect heuristic. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177(3), 1333-1352 (2007)
19. Lewicki, R.J., Tomlinson, E.C., Gillespie, N.: Models of Interpersonal Trust Development: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions. J. Manage. 32(6), 991-1022 (2006)
20. Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R.: Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(3), 393-404 (1998)
21. Muir, B., Moray, N.: Trust in automation: Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. Ergonomics 39(3), 429-460 (1996)
22. Jian, J., Bisantz, A., Drury, C.: Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. (2000)
23. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T., Wickens, C.: Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 2(2), 140-160 (2008)
24. Lee, J., Moray, N.: Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics 35(10), 1243-1270 (1992)
25. Meyerson, D., Weick, K., Kramer, R.: Swift trust and temporary systems. In: Kramer, R., Tyler, T.R. (eds.) Trust in Organizations, pp. 166-195. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks (1996)
26. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T., Wickens, C.: A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Humans 30(3), 286-297 (2000)
27. de Visser, E.J., LeGoullon, M., Freedy, A., Freedy, E., Weltman, G., Parasuraman, R.: Designing an Adaptive Automation System for Human Supervision of Unmanned Vehicles: A Bridge from Theory to Practice. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 52(4), 221-225 (2008)
28. Brooks, N., de Visser, E.J., Chabuk, T., Freedy, E., Scerri, P.: An Approach to Team Programming with Markup for Operator Interaction. In: 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2013)
29. de Visser, E.J., Kidwell, B., Payne, J., Parker, J., Chabuk, T., Scerri, P., Freedy, A.: Best of both worlds: Design and evaluation of an adaptive delegation interface. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2013)
30. de Visser, E.J., Krueger, F., McKnight, P., Scheid, S., Smith, M., Chalk, S., Parasuraman, R.: The World is not Enough: Trust in Cognitive Agents. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 56(1), 263-267 (2012)
31. Verberne, F.M.F., Ham, J., Midden, C.J.H.: Trust in Smart Systems: Sharing Driving Goals and Giving Information to Increase Trustworthiness and Acceptability of Smart Systems in Cars. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 54(5), 799-810 (2012)
32. Degani, A., Shafto, M., Kirlik, A.: Modes in human-machine systems: Constructs, representation, and classification. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 9(2), 125-138 (1999)
33. Parasuraman, R., Miller, C.A.: Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Commun. ACM 47(4), 51-55 (2004)
34. Hayes, C., Miller, C.A.: Human-Computer Etiquette: Cultural Expectations and the Design Implications They Place on Computers and Technology, p. 406. Auerbach Publications (2011)