Perspectives for Remote Sensing with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Precision Agriculture

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 152-164

  Maes, Wouter H ^a   Steppe, Kathy ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

agriculture; drone; hyperspectral; multispectral; thermal; UAV

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; REMOTE SENSING;

AGRICULTURE; REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 85058371484     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.11.007     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Colomina, I., Molina, P., Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: a review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 92 (2014), 79–97.
2. PricewaterhouseCoopers, Clarity from Above. PwC Global Report on the Commercial Applications of Drone Technology., 2016, PricewaterhouseCoopers.
3. Singh, K.K., Frazier, A.E., A meta-analysis and review of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) imagery for terrestrial applications. Int. J. Remote Sens. 39 (2018), 5078–5098.
4. Mulla, D.J., Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosyst. Eng. 114 (2013), 358–371.
5. Zhang, C., Kovacs, J.M., The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review. Precis. Agric. 13 (2012), 693–712.
6. Nijland, W., et al. Monitoring plant condition and phenology using infrared sensitive consumer grade digital cameras. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 184 (2014), 98–106.
7. Berra, E.F., et al. Commercial off-the-shelf digital cameras on unmanned aerial vehicles for multitemporal monitoring of vegetation reflectance and NDVI. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 55 (2017), 4878–4886.
8. Adão, T., et al. Hyperspectral imaging: a review on UAV-based sensors, data processing and applications for agriculture and forestry. Remote Sens., 9, 2017, 1110.
9. Shi, Y.Y., et al. Unmanned aerial vehicles for high-throughput phenotyping and agronomic research. PLoS One, 11, 2016, e0159781.
10. Yang, G.J., et al. Unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing for field-based crop phenotyping: current status and perspectives. Front. Plant Sci., 8, 2017, 1111.
11. Rockström, J., et al. Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio 46 (2017), 4–17.
12. Ding, K., State of knowledge of irrigation techniques and practicalities within given socio-economic settings. Irrig. Drain., 2018, 10.1002/ird.2237 Published online March 25, 2018.
13. Maes, W.H., Steppe, K., Estimating evapotranspiration and drought stress with ground-based thermal remote sensing in agriculture: a review. J. Exp. Bot. 63 (2012), 4671–4712.
14. Gago, J., et al. UAVs challenge to assess water stress for sustainable agriculture. Agric. Water Manag. 153 (2015), 9–19.
15. Berni, J.A.J., et al. Mapping canopy conductance and CWSI in olive orchards using high resolution thermal remote sensing imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 113 (2009), 2380–2388.
16. Gago, J., et al. Integrative field scale phenotyping for investigating metabolic components of water stress within a vineyard. Plant Methods 13 (2017), 1–14.
17. Idso, S.B., et al. Normalizing the stress-degree-day parameter for environmental variability. Agric. Meteorol. 24 (1981), 45–55.
18. Gonzalez-Dugo, V., et al. Improving the precision of irrigation in a pistachio farm using an unmanned airborne thermal system. Irrig. Sci. 33 (2015), 43–52.
19. Egea, G., et al. Assessing a crop water stress index derived from aerial thermal imaging and infrared thermometry in super-high density olive orchards. Agric. Water Manag. 187 (2017), 210–221.
20. Ballester, C., et al. Evaluating the performance of xanthophyll, chlorophyll and structure-sensitive spectral indices to detect water stress in five fruit tree species. Precis. Agric. 19 (2018), 178–193.
21. Santesteban, L.G., et al. High-resolution UAV-based thermal imaging to estimate the instantaneous and seasonal variability of plant water status within a vineyard. Agric. Water Manag. 183 (2017), 49–59.
22. Maes, W.H., et al. A new wet reference target method for continuous infrared thermography of vegetations. Agric. Forest Meteorol., 2016 226–227, 119-131.
23. Grant, O.M., et al. Thermal imaging to detect spatial and temporal variation in the water status of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 91 (2016), 43–54.
24. Rud, R., et al. Crop water stress index derived from multi-year ground and aerial thermal images as an indicator of potato water status. Precis. Agric. 15 (2014), 273–289.
25. Park, S., et al. Adaptive estimation of crop water stress in nectarine and peach orchards using high-resolution imagery from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Remote Sens., 9, 2017, 828.
26. Zarco-Tejada, P.J., et al. A PRI-based water stress index combining structural and chlorophyll effects: assessment using diurnal narrow-band airborne imagery and the CWSI thermal index. Remote Sens. Environ. 138 (2013), 38–50.
27. Zarco-Tejada, P.J., et al. Fluorescence, temperature and narrow-band indices acquired from a UAV platform for water stress detection using a micro-hyperspectral imager and a thermal camera. Remote Sens. Environ. 117 (2012), 322–337.
28. Galioto, F., et al. Assessing the potential economic viability of precision irrigation: a theoretical analysis and pilot empirical evaluation. Water, 9, 2017, 990.
29. Lamichhane, J.R., et al. Toward a reduced reliance on conventional pesticides in European agriculture. Plant Dis. 100 (2016), 10–24.
30. Sugiura, R., et al. Field phenotyping system for the assessment of potato late blight resistance using RGB imagery from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Biosyst. Eng. 148 (2016), 1–10.
31. Tetila, E.C., et al. Identification of soybean foliar diseases using unmanned aerial vehicle images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 14 (2017), 2190–2194.
32. Hunt, E.R., Rondon, S.I., Detection of potato beetle damage using remote sensing from small unmanned aircraft systems. J. Appl. Remote Sens., 11, 2017, 026013.
33. Di Gennaro, S.F., et al. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based remote sensing to monitor grapevine leaf stripe disease within a vineyard affected by esca complex. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 55 (2016), 262–275.
34. Garcia-Ruiz, F., et al. Comparison of two aerial imaging platforms for identification of Huanglongbing-infected citrus trees. Comput. Electron. Agric. 91 (2013), 106–115.
35. Albetis, J., et al. Detection of Flavescence doree grapevine disease using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) multispectral imagery. Remote Sens., 9, 2017, 308.
36. Mahlein, A.-K., Plant disease detection by imaging sensors – parallels and specific demands for precision agriculture and plant phenotyping. Plant Dis. 100 (2016), 241–251.
37. Calderon, R., et al. High-resolution airborne hyperspectral and thermal imagery for early, detection of Verticillium wilt of olive using fluorescence, temperature and narrow-band spectral indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 139 (2013), 231–245.
38. López-López, M., et al. Early detection and quantification of almond red leaf blotch using high-resolution hyperspectral and thermal imagery. Remote Sens., 8, 2016, 276.
39. Calderon, R., et al. Detection of downy mildew of opium poppy using high-resolution multi-spectral and thermal imagery acquired with an unmanned aerial vehicle. Precis. Agric. 15 (2014), 639–661.
40. Lechenet, M., et al. Reducing pesticide use while preserving crop productivity and profitability on arable farms. Nat. Plants, 3, 2017, 17008.
41. López-Granados, F., Weed detection for site-specific weed management: mapping and real-time approaches. Weed Res. 51 (2011), 1–11.
42. Alexandridis, T., et al. Novelty detection classifiers in weed mapping: Silybum marianum detection on UAV multispectral images. Sensors, 17, 2017, 2007.
43. Tamouridou, A.A., et al. Application of multilayer perceptron with automatic relevance determination on weed mapping using UAV multispectral imagery. Sensors, 17, 2017, 2307.
44. Castaldi, F., et al. Assessing the potential of images from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) to support herbicide patch spraying in maize. Precis. Agric. 18 (2017), 76–94.
45. Lambert, J., et al. Evaluating the potential of unmanned aerial systems for mapping weeds at field scales: a case study with Alopecurus myosuroides. Weed Res. 58 (2018), 35–45.
46. Chlingaryan, A., et al. Machine learning approaches for crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation in precision agriculture: a review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 151 (2018), 61–69.
47. de Castro, A.I., et al. An automatic random forest-OBIA algorithm for early weed mapping between and within crop rows using UAV Imagery. Remote Sens., 10, 2018, 285.
48. Pérez-Ortiz, M., et al. Selecting patterns and features for between- and within-crop-row weed mapping using UAV-imagery. Expert Syst. Appl. 47 (2016), 85–94.
49. Gao, J.F., et al. Fusion of pixel and object-based features for weed mapping using unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 67 (2018), 43–53.
50. López-Granados, F., et al. Object-based early monitoring of a grass weed in a grass crop using high resolution UAV imagery. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 36, 2016, 67.
51. López-Granados, F., et al. Early season weed mapping in sunflower using UAV technology: variability of herbicide treatment maps against weed thresholds. Precis. Agric. 17 (2016), 183–199.
52. Ali, M.M., et al. Leaf nitrogen determination using non-destructive techniques – a review. J. Plant Nutr. 40 (2017), 928–953.
53. Colaço, A.F., Bramley, R.G.V., Do crop sensors promote improved nitrogen management in grain crops?. Field Crops Res. 218 (2018), 126–140.
54. Maresma, A., et al. Analysis of vegetation indices to determine nitrogen application and yield prediction in maize (Zea mays L.) from a standard UAV service. Remote Sens., 8, 2016, 973.
55. Schirrmann, M., et al. Monitoring agronomic parameters of winter wheat crops with low-cost UAV imagery. Remote Sens., 8, 2016, 706.
56. Hunt, E.R., et al. Monitoring nitrogen status of potatoes using small unmanned aerial vehicles. Precis. Agric. 19 (2018), 314–333.
57. Perry, E.M., et al. Remote sensing using canopy and leaf reflectance for estimating nitrogen status in red-blush pears. HortScience 53 (2018), 78–83.
58. Franceschini, M.H.D., et al. Intercomparison of unmanned aerial vehicle and ground-based narrow band spectrometers applied to crop trait monitoring in organic potato production. Sensors, 17, 2017, 1428.
59. Liu, H., et al. Quantitative modelling for leaf nitrogen content of winter wheat using UAV-based hyperspectral data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 38 (2017), 2117–2134.
60. Elarab, M., et al. Estimating chlorophyll with thermal and broadband multispectral high resolution imagery from an unmanned aerial system using relevance vector machines for precision agriculture. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 43 (2015), 32–42.
61. Maimaitijiang, M., et al. Unmanned aerial system (UAS)-based phenotyping of soybean using multi-sensor data fusion and extreme learning machine. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 134 (2017), 43–58.
62. Yu, F.H., et al. Radiative transfer models (RTMs) for field phenotyping inversion of rice based on UAV hyperspectral remote sensing. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 10 (2017), 150–157.
63. Vilfan, N., et al. Fluspect-B: a model for leaf fluorescence, reflectance and transmittance spectra. Remote Sens. Environ. 186 (2016), 596–615.
64. van der Tol, C., et al. An integrated model of soil-canopy spectral radiances, photosynthesis, fluorescence, temperature and energy balance. Biogeosciences 6 (2009), 3109–3129.
65. Roth, L., et al. Extracting leaf area index using viewing geometry effects – a new perspective on high-resolution unmanned aerial system photography. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 141 (2018), 161–175.
66. Roosjen, P.P.J., et al. Improved estimation of leaf area index and leaf chlorophyll content of a potato crop using multi-angle spectral data – potential of unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 66 (2018), 14–26.
67. Duan, S.-B., et al. Inversion of the PROSAIL model to estimate leaf area index of maize, potato, and sunflower fields from unmanned aerial vehicle hyperspectral data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 26 (2014), 12–20.
68. Du, M.M., Noguchi, N., Monitoring of wheat growth status and mapping of wheat yield's within-field spatial variations using color images acquired from UAV-camera system. Remote Sens., 9, 2017, 289.
69. Burkart, A., et al. Phenological analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle based time series of barley imagery with high temporal resolution. Precis. Agric. 19 (2018), 134–146.
70. Madec, S., et al. High-throughput phenotyping of plant height: comparing unmanned aerial vehicles and ground LiDAR estimates. Front. Plant Sci., 8, 2017, 2002.
71. Watanabe, K., et al. High-throughput phenotyping of sorghum plant height using an unmanned aerial vehicle and its application to genomic prediction modeling. Front. Plant Sci., 8, 2017, 421.
72. Hu, P.C., et al. Estimation of plant height using a high throughput phenotyping platform based on unmanned aerial vehicle and self-calibration: example for sorghum breeding. Eur. J. Agron. 95 (2018), 24–32.
73. Brocks, S., Bareth, G., Estimating barley biomass with crop surface models from oblique RGB imagery. Remote Sens., 10, 2018, 268.
74. Diaz-Varela, R.A., et al. High-resolution airborne UAV imagery to assess olive tree crown parameters using 3D photo reconstruction: application in breeding trials. Remote Sens. 7 (2015), 4213–4232.
75. Dillen, M., et al. Productivity, stand dynamics and the selection effect in a mixed willow clone short rotation coppice plantation. Biomass Bioenergy 87 (2016), 46–54.
76. Bendig, J., et al. Combining UAV-based plant height from crop surface models, visible, and near infrared vegetation indices for biomass monitoring in barley. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 39 (2015), 79–87.
77. Yue, J.B., et al. Estimation of winter wheat above-ground biomass using unmanned aerial vehicle-based snapshot hyperspectral sensor and crop height improved models. Remote Sens., 9, 2017, 708.
78. Wang, J.-J., et al. Unsupervised discrimination between lodged and non-lodged winter wheat: a case study using a low-cost unmanned aerial vehicle. Int. J. Remote Sens. 39 (2018), 2079–2088.
79. Chu, T.X., et al. Assessing lodging severity over an experimental maize (Zea mays L.) field using UAS images. Remote Sens., 9, 2017, 923.
80. Yang, M.-D., et al. Spatial and spectral hybrid image classification for rice lodging assessment through UAV imagery. Remote Sens., 9, 2017, 583.
81. Liu, T., et al. Estimates of rice lodging using indices derived from UAV visible and thermal infrared images. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 252 (2018), 144–154.
82. Chu, T., et al. Cotton growth modeling and assessment using unmanned aircraft system visual-band imagery. J. Appl. Remote Sens., 10, 2016, 036018.
83. Gracia-Romero, A., et al. Comparative performance of ground vs. aerially assessed RGB and multispectral indices for early-growth evaluation of maize performance under phosphorus fertilization. Front. Plant Sci., 8, 2017, 2004.
84. Kyratzis, A.C., et al. Assessment of vegetation indices derived by UAV imagery for durum wheat phenotyping under a water limited and heat stressed Mediterranean environment. Front. Plant Sci., 8, 2017, 1114.
85. Zhou, X., et al. Predicting grain yield in rice using multi-temporal vegetation indices from UAV-based multispectral and digital imagery. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 130 (2017), 246–255.
86. Rembold, F., et al. Using low resolution satellite imagery for yield prediction and yield anomaly detection. Remote Sens., 5, 2013, 1704.
87. Vega, F.A., et al. Multi-temporal imaging using an unmanned aerial vehicle for monitoring a sunflower crop. Biosyst. Eng. 132 (2015), 19–27.
88. Kim, M., et al. Monitoring canopy growth and grain yield of paddy rice in South Korea by using the GRAMI model and high spatial resolution imagery. GISci. Remote Sens. 54 (2017), 534–551.
89. Matese, A., et al. Intercomparison of UAV, aircraft and satellite remote sensing platforms for precision viticulture. Remote Sens. 7 (2015), 2971–2990.
90. Manfreda, S., et al. On the use of unmanned aerial systems for environmental monitoring. Remote Sens., 10, 2018, 641.
91. Aasen, H., et al. Quantitative remote sensing at ultra-high resolution with UAV spectroscopy: a review of sensor technology, measurement procedures, and data correction workflows. Remote Sens., 10, 2018, 1091.
92. Deng, L., et al. UAV-based multispectral remote sensing for precision agriculture: a comparison between different cameras. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 146 (2018), 124–136.
93. Coussement, J., et al. Modelling leaf spectral properties in a soybean functional–structural plant model by integrating the prospect radiative transfer model. Ann. Bot. 122 (2018), 669–676.
94. McNeil, B.E., et al. Measuring leaf angle distribution in broadleaf canopies using UAVs. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 218 (2016), 204–208.
95. Jay, S., et al. Exploiting the centimeter resolution of UAV multispectral imagery to improve remote-sensing estimates of canopy structure and biochemistry in sugar beet crops. Remote Sens. Environ., 2018, 10.1016/j.rse.2018.09.011 Published online September 19, 2018.
96. Vitharana, U.W., et al. Key soil and topographic properties to delineate potential management classes for precision agriculture in the European loess area. Geoderma 143 (2008), 206–215.
97. Moral, F., et al. Delineation of management zones using mobile measurements of soil apparent electrical conductivity and multivariate geostatistical techniques. Soil Tillage Res. 106 (2010), 335–343.
98. Gonzalez-de-Santos, P., et al. Fleets of robots for environmentally-safe pest control in agriculture. Precis. Agric. 18 (2017), 574–614.
99. Stöcker, C., et al. Review of the current state of UAV regulations. Remote Sens., 9, 2017, 459.
100. Snavely, N., et al. Modeling the world from Internet photo collections. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 80 (2008), 189–210.
101. Berni, J.A.J., et al. Thermal and narrowband multispectral remote sensing for vegetation monitoring from an unmanned aerial vehicle. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 47 (2009), 722–738.
102. Ribeiro-Gomes, K., et al. Uncooled thermal camera calibration and optimization of the photogrammetry process for UAV applications in agriculture. Sensors, 17, 2017, 23.
103. Maes, W., et al. Optimizing the processing of UAV-based thermal imagery. Remote Sens., 9, 2017, 476.
104. Khanal, S., et al. An overview of current and potential applications of thermal remote sensing in precision agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 139 (2017), 22–32.
105. Gómez-Candón, D., et al. Field phenotyping of water stress at tree scale by UAV-sensed imagery: new insights for thermal acquisition and calibration. Precis. Agric. 17 (2016), 786–800.
106. Maes, W.H., et al. Early detection of Psa infection in kiwifruit by means of infrared thermography at leaf and orchard scale. Funct. Plant Biol. 41 (2014), 1207–1220.
107. Selva, D., Krejci, D., A survey and assessment of the capabilities of CubeSats for Earth observation. Acta Astronaut. 74 (2012), 50–68.
108. McCabe, M.F., et al. CubeSats in hydrology: ultra high-resolution insights into vegetation dynamics and terrestrial evaporation. Water Resour. Res. 53 (2017), 10017–10024.
109. Houborg, R., McCabe, M.F., A CubeSat enabled spatio-temporal enhancement method (CESTEM) utilizing Planet, Landsat and MODIS data. Remote Sens. Environ. 209 (2018), 211–226.
110. McCabe, M.F. et al. (2016) High-resolution sensing for precision agriculture: from Earth-observing satellites to unmanned aerial vehicles. In Proceedings of SPIE 9998: Remote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XVIII, p. 999811, International Society for Optics and Photonics.
111. Al-Gaadi, K.A., et al. Prediction of potato crop yield using precision agriculture techniques. PLoS One, 11, 2016, e0162219.
112. Clevers, J.G., et al. Using Sentinel-2 data for retrieving LAI and leaf and canopy chlorophyll content of a potato crop. Remote Sens., 9, 2017, 405.
113. Chemura, A., et al. Mapping spatial variability of foliar nitrogen in coffee (Coffea arabica L.) plantations with multispectral Sentinel-2 MSI data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 138 (2018), 1–11.
114. Söderström, M., et al. Producing nitrogen (N) uptake maps in winter wheat by combining proximal crop measurements with Sentinel-2 and DMC satellite images in a decision support system for farmers. Acta Agric. Scand. B Soil Plant Sci. 67 (2017), 637–650.
115. Piccard, I. et al. (2017) Potato monitoring in Belgium with “WatchITGrow”. In 2017 9th International Workshop on the Analysis of Multitemporal Remote Sensing Images (MultiTemp), pp. 1–4, IEEE.