Hyperspectral imaging: A review on UAV-based sensors, data processing and applications for agriculture and forestry

Remote Sensing

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2017, Pages

  Adão, Telmo ^a,b   Hruška, Jonáš ^b   Pádua, Luís ^b   Bessa, José ^b   Peres, Emanuel ^a,b   Morais, Raul ^a,b   Sousa, Joaquim João ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS OS MONTES AND ALTO DOURO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Agroforestry; Forestry; Hyperspectral; Hyperspectral data processing; Hyperspectral sensors; UAS; UAV

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; CROPS; DATA HANDLING; FIGHTER AIRCRAFT; FORESTRY; REMOTE SENSING; SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS; SPECTROSCOPY; TIMBER; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV);

AGROFORESTRY; HIGH-RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY; HYPERSPECTRAL; HYPERSPECTRAL DATA; HYPERSPECTRAL SENSORS; MATHEMATICAL COMPLEXITY; REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT;

HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING;

EID: 85034756154     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs9111110     Document Type: Article

References (149)

1. Pádua, L.; Vanko, J.; Hruška, J.; Adão, T.; Sousa, J.J.; Peres, E.; Morais, R. UAS, sensors, and data processing in agroforestry: A review towards practical applications. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2017, 38, 2349-2391
2. Park, S.; Nolan, A.; Ryu, D.; Fuentes, S.; Hernandez, E.; Chung, H.; O'Connell, M. Estimation of crop water stress in a nectarine orchard using high-resolution imagery from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). In Proceedings of the 21st International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Gold Coast, Australia, 29 November-4 December 2015; pp. 1413-1419
3. Primicerio, J.; Gennaro, S.F. D.; Fiorillo, E.; Genesio, L.; Lugato, E.; Matese, A.; Vaccari, F.P. A flexible unmanned aerial vehicle for precision agriculture. Precis. Agric. 2012, 13, 517-523
4. Bendig, J.; Yu, K.; Aasen, H.; Bolten, A.; Bennertz, S.; Broscheit, J.; Gnyp, M.L.; Bareth, G. Combining UAV-based plant height from crop surface models, visible, and near infrared vegetation indices for biomass monitoring in barley. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2015, 39, 79-87
5. Calderón, R.; Navas-Cortés, J.A.; Zarco-Tejada, P.J. Early Detection and Quantification of VerticilliumWilt in Olive Using Hyperspectral and Thermal Imagery over Large Areas. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 5584-5610
6. Getzin, S.; Wiegand, K.; Schöning, I. Assessing biodiversity in forests using very high-resolution images and unmanned aerial vehicles. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012, 3, 397-404
7. Merino, L.; Caballero, F.; Martínez-de-Dios, J.R.; Maza, I.; Ollero, A. An Unmanned Aircraft System for Automatic Forest Fire Monitoring and Measurement. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2012, 65, 533-548
8. Smigaj, M.; Gaulton, R.; Barr, S.L.; Suárez, J.C. Uav-Borne Thermal Imaging for Forest Health Monitoring: Detection of Disease-Induced Canopy Temperature Increase. ISPRS Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2015, XL-3/W3, 349-354
9. Horcher, A.; Visser, R.J. Unmanned aerial vehicles: Applications for natural resource management and monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2004 Council on Forest Engineering (COFE) Conference: "Machines and People, The Interface", Hot Springs, AR, Canada, 27-30 April 2004
10. Coulter, D.; Hauff, P.L.; Kerby, W.L. Airborne Hyperspectral Remote Sensing. In Proceedings of the Exploration 07: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, Toronto, ON, Canada, 9-12 September 2007; pp. 375-386
11. Qin, J.; Chao, K.; Kim, M.S.; Lu, R.; Burks, T.F. Hyperspectral and multispectral imaging for evaluating food safety and quality. J. Food Eng. 2013, 118, 157-171
12. Thenkabail, P.S.; Gumma, M.K.; Teluguntla, P.; Mohammed, I.A. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Vegetation and Agricultural Crops. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2014, 80, 697-723
13. Park, B.; Lu, R. Hyperspectral Imaging Technology in Food and Agriculture; Food Engineering Series; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-1-4939-2836-1
14. Multispectral vs. Hyperspectral Imagery Explained. Available online: http://gisgeography.com/multispectral-vs-hyperspectral-imagery-explained/(accessed on 15 September 2017)
15. Proctor, C.; He, Y. Workflow for Building A Hyperspectral Uav: Challenges And Opportunities. ISPRS Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2015, XL-1/W4, 415-419
16. Manolakis, D.; Marden, D.; Shaw, G.A. Hyperspectral image processing for automatic target detection applications. Linc. Lab. J. 2003, 14, 79-116
17. AVIRIS-Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer-Imaging Spectroscopy. Available online: https://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/aviris/imaging_spectroscopy.html (accessed on 9 October 2017)
18. Sahoo, R. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing (Sahoo's Report); Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute: New Delhi, India, 2013; pp. 848-859
19. Goetz, A.F. H. Three decades of hyperspectral remote sensing of the Earth: A personal view. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, S5-S16
20. Sabins, F.F. Remote sensing for mineral exploration. Ore Geol. Rev. 1999, 14, 157-183
21. Maathuis, B.H.P.; van Genderen, J.L. A review of satellite and airborne sensors for remote sensing based detection of minefields and landmines. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25, 5201-5245
22. Teke, M.; Deveci, H.S.; Haliloglu, O.; Gürbüz, S.Z.; Sakarya, U. A short survey of hyperspectral remote sensing applications in agriculture. In Proceedings of the 2013 6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), Istanbul, Turkey, 12-14 June 2013; pp. 171-176
23. Mather, P.M. (Ed.) TERRA-1: Understanding the Terrestrial Environment, the Role of Earth Observations from Space; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1992
24. Lin, J.; Singer, P.W. China to Launch Powerful Civilian Hyperspectral Satellite. Available online: http://www.popsci.com/china-to-launch-worlds-most-powerful-hyperspectral-satellite (accessed on 18 April 2017)
25. Mulla, D.J. Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 114, 358-371
26. Datt, B.; McVicar, T.R.; Niel, T.G.V.; Jupp, D.L.B.; Pearlman, J.S. Preprocessing EO-1 Hyperion hyperspectral data to support the application of agricultural indexes. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2003, 41, 1246-1259
27. Moharana, S.; Dutta, S. Spatial variability of chlorophyll and nitrogen content of rice from hyperspectral imagery. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2016, 122, 17-29
28. Clark, M.L.; Kilham, N.E. Mapping of land cover in northern California with simulated hyperspectral satellite imagery. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2016, 119, 228-245
29. Zhang, N.; Wang, M.; Wang, N. Precision agriculture-A worldwide overview. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2002, 36, 113-132
30. Pölönen, I.; Saari, H.; Kaivosoja, J.; Honkavaara, E.; Pesonen, L. Hyperspectral imaging based biomass and nitrogen content estimations from light-weight UAV. In Proceedings of the SPIE Remote Sensing, Dresden, Germany, 16 October 2013
31. WorldView-3 WorldView-3 Satellite Sensor|Satellite Imaging Corp. Available online: http://www. satimagingcorp.com/satellite-sensors/worldview-3/(accessed on 19 April 2017)
32. ESA Spatial-Resolutions-Sentinel-2 MSI-User Guides-Sentinel Online. Available online: https://earth.esa. int/web/sentinel/user-guides/sentinel-2-msi/resolutions/spatial (accessed on 19 April 2017)
33. AVIRIS-Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer. Available online: https://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/(accessed on 1 August 2017)
34. Pajares, G. Overview and Current Status of Remote Sensing Applications Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2015, 81, 281-329
35. Aasen, H. The Acquisition of Hyperspectral Digital Surface Models of Crops from UAV Snapshot Cameras. Ph. D. Thesis, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Germany, 2016
36. Sullivan, J.M. Evolution or revolution? The rise of UAVs. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 2006, 25, 43-49
37. Pappalardo, J. Unmanned Aircraft "Roadmap" Reflects Changing Priorities. Available online: http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2005/3/31/2005april-unmanned-aircraft-roadmapreflects-changing-priorities (accessed on 1 September 2017)
38. Colomina, I.; Molina, P. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 92, 79-97
39. Bock, C.H.; Poole, G.H.; Parker, P.E.; Gottwald, T.R. Plant Disease Severity Estimated Visually, by Digital Photography and Image Analysis, and by Hyperspectral Imaging. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2010, 29, 59-107
40. Zarco-Tejada, P.J.; Guillén-Climent, M.L.; Hernández-Clemente, R.; Catalina, A.; González, M.R.; Martín, P. Estimating leaf carotenoid content in vineyards using high resolution hyperspectral imagery acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, 171-172, 281-294
41. Corbane, C.; Jacob, F.; Raclot, D.; Albergel, J.; Andrieux, P. Multitemporal analysis of hydrological soil surface characteristics using aerial photos: A case study on a Mediterranean vineyard. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2012, 18, 356-367
42. Zarco-Tejada, P.J.; Catalina, A.; González, M.R.; Martín, P. Relationships between net photosynthesis and steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence retrieved from airborne hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 136, 247-258
43. Wu, D.; Sun, D.-W. Advanced applications of hyperspectral imaging technology for food quality and safety analysis and assessment: A review-Part I: Fundamentals. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2013, 19, 1-14
44. Sellar, R.G.; Boreman, G.D. Classification of imaging spectrometers for remote sensing applications. Opt. Eng. 2005, 44, 13602
45. Carrère, J.P.; Place, S.; Oddou, J.P.; Benoit, D.; Roy, F. CMOS image sensor: Process impact on dark current. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International on Reliability Physics Symposium, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 1-5 June 2014; pp. 3C.1.1-3C.1.6
46. Hagen, N.; Kudenov, M.W. Review of snapshot spectral imaging technologies. Opt. Eng. 2013, 52, 090901
47. Uto, K.; Seki, H.; Saito, G.; Kosugi, Y.; Komatsu, T. Development of a Low-Cost Hyperspectral Whiskbroom Imager Using an Optical Fiber Bundle, a Swing Mirror, and Compact Spectrometers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2016, 9, 3909-3925
48. Fowler, J.E. Compressive pushbroom and whiskbroom sensing for hyperspectral remote-sensing imaging. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Paris, France, 27-30 October 2014; pp. 684-688
49. Lucieer, A.; Malenovský, Z.; Veness, T.; Wallace, L. HyperUAS-Imaging Spectroscopy from a Multirotor Unmanned Aircraft System: HyperUAS-Imaging Spectroscopy from a Multirotor Unmanned. J. Field Robot. 2014, 31, 571-590
50. Uto, K.; Seki, H.; Saito, G.; Kosugi, Y. Characterization of Rice Paddies by a UAV-Mounted Miniature Hyperspectral Sensor System. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2013, 6, 851-860
51. Uto, K.; Seki, H.; Saito, G.; Kosugi, Y.; Komatsu, T. Development of a Low-Cost, Lightweight Hyperspectral Imaging System Based on a Polygon Mirror and Compact Spectrometers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2016, 9, 861-875
52. Rozas, G.; Jusserand, B.; Fainstein, A. Fabry-Pérot-multichannel spectrometer tandem for ultra-high resolution Raman spectroscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2014, 85, 13103
53. Honkavaara, E.; Hakala, T.; Kirjasniemi, J.; Lindfors, A.; Mäkynen, J.; Nurminen, K.; Ruokokoski, P.; Saari, H.; Markelin, L. New light-weight stereosopic spectrometric airborne imaging technology for high-resolution environmental remote sensing case studies in water quality mapping. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2013, 1, W1
54. Bioucas-Dias, J.M.; Plaza, A.; Camps-Valls, G.; Scheunders, P.; Nasrabadi, N.; Chanussot, J. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data Analysis and Future Challenges. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 2013, 1, 6-36
55. Habib, A.; Xiong, W.; He, F.; Yang, H.L.; Crawford, M. Improving Orthorectification of UAV-Based Push-Broom Scanner Imagery Using Derived Orthophotos From Frame Cameras. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2017, 10, 262-276
56. Photonics, Headwall VNIR. Available online: http://www.headwallphotonics.com/spectral-imaging/hyperspectral/vnir (accessed on 2 April 2017)
57. Duan, S.-B.; Li, Z.-L.; Tang, B.-H.;Wu, H.; Ma, L.; Zhao, E.; Li, C. Land Surface Reflectance Retrieval from Hyperspectral Data Collected by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle over the Baotou Test Site. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66972
58. Jakob, S.; Zimmermann, R.; Gloaguen, R. The Need for Accurate Geometric and Radiometric Corrections of Drone-Borne Hyperspectral Data for Mineral Exploration: MEPHySTo-A Toolbox for Pre-Processing Drone-Borne Hyperspectral Data. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 88
59. Hruska, R.; Mitchell, J.; Anderson, M.; Glenn, N.F. Radiometric and Geometric Analysis of Hyperspectral Imagery Acquired from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 2736-2752
60. Chen, H.S. Remote Sensing Calibration Systems: An Introduction; A. Deepak: Oakland, CA, USA, 1997; ISBN 978-0-937194-38-6
61. Richter, R.; Schlapfer, D.; Muller, A. Operational Atmospheric Correction for Imaging Spectrometers Accounting for the Smile Effect. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2011, 49, 1772-1780
62. Mendez-Rial, R.; Calvino-Cancela, M.; Martin-Herrero, J. Accurate Implementation of Anisotropic Diffusion in the Hypercube. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2010, 7, 870-874
63. Qian, S.E.; Chen, G. Enhancing Spatial Resolution of Hyperspectral Imagery Using Sensor's Intrinsic Keystone Distortion. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50, 5033-5048
64. Alparone, L.; Wald, L.; Chanussot, J.; Thomas, C.; Gamba, P.; Bruce, L.M. Comparison of Pansharpening Algorithms: Outcome of the 2006 GRS-S Data-Fusion Contest. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2007, 45, 3012-3021
65. Herrero, R.; Cadirola, M.; Ingle, V.K. Preprocessing and compression of Hyperspectral images captured onboard UAVs. In Proceedings of the SPIE 9647, Unmanned/Unattended Sensors and Sensor Networks XI; and Advanced Free-Space Optical Communication Techniques and Applications, Toulouse, France, 13 October 2015; p. 964705
66. Burger, J.; Gowen, A. Data handling in hyperspectral image analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2011, 108, 13-22
67. Landgrebe, D. Hyperspectral image data analysis. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2002, 19, 17-28
68. Du, Q.; Raksuntorn, N. Hyperspectral image analysis using noise-adjusted principal component transform. In Proceedings of the SPIE Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XII, Orlando, FL, USA, 4 May 2006
69. Chen, C. Comparison of principal components analysis and minimum noise fraction transformation for reducing the dimensionality of hyperspectral imagery. Geogr. Res. 2000, 163-178
70. Nasrabadi, N.M. Hyperspectral Target Detection: An Overview of Current and Future Challenges. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2014, 31, 34-44
71. Manolakis, D.; Shaw, G. Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2002, 19, 29-43
72. Kay, S.M. Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1998
73. Shippert, P. Introduction to hyperspectral image analysis. Online J. Space Commun. 2003, 3, 13
74. Bioucas-Dias, J.M.; Plaza, A.; Dobigeon, N.; Parente, M.; Du, Q.; Gader, P.; Chanussot, J. Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2012, 5, 354-379
75. Keshava, N.; Mustard, J.F. Spectral unmixing. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2002, 19, 44-57
76. Richmond, C.D. Derived PDF of maximum likelihood signal estimator which employs an estimated noise covariance. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 1996, 44, 305-315
77. Kelly, E.J. An Adaptive Detection Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 1986, AES-22, 115-127
78. Kelly, E.J. Adaptive Detection in Non-Stationary Interference, Part III; MIT Lincoln Laboratory: Lexington, MA, USA, 1987
79. Reed, I.S.; Yu, X. Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 1990, 38, 1760-1770
80. Kraut, S.; Scharf, L.L. The CFAR adaptive subspace detector is a scale-invariant GLRT. In Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE Signal on Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing, Portland, OR, USA, 14-16 September 1998; pp. 57-60
81. Kraut, S.; Scharf, L.L.; McWhorter, L.T. Adaptive subspace detectors. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2001, 49, 1-16
82. Scharf, L.L.; Friedlander, B. Matched subspace detectors. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 1994, 42, 2146-2157
83. Manolakis, D.; Siracusa, C.; Shaw, G. Hyperspectral subpixel target detection using the linear mixing model. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2001, 39, 1392-1409
84. Goldberg, H.; Nasrabadi, N.M. A comparative study of linear and nonlinear anomaly detectors for hyperspectral imagery. In Proceedings of the SPIE Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XIII, Orlando, FL, USA, 9-13 April 2007; p. 656504
85. Kwon, H.; Nasrabadi, N.M. Kernel RX-algorithm: A nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2005, 43, 388-397
86. Banerjee, A.; Burlina, P.; Diehl, C. A support vector method for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006, 44, 2282-2291
87. Pieper, M.; Manolakis, D.; Truslow, E.; Cooley, T.; Brueggeman, M.; Weisner, A.; Jacobson, J. Comparison of hyperspectral change detection algorithms. In Proceedings of the SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications, San Diego, CA, USA, 9-13 August 2015; p. 96110Z
88. Robey, F.C.; Fuhrmann, D.R.; Kelly, E.J.; Nitzberg, R. A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 1992, 28, 208-216
89. Harsanyi, J.C.; Chang, C.I. Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: An orthogonal subspace projection approach. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1994, 32, 779-785
90. Scholkopf, B.; Smola, A.J. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2001; ISBN 978-0-262-19475-4
91. Schaum, A. Continuum fusion: A theory of inference, with applications to hyperspectral detection. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 8171-8181
92. Manolakis, D.; Truslow, E.; Pieper, M.; Cooley, T.; Brueggeman, M. Detection Algorithms in Hyperspectral Imaging Systems: An Overview of Practical Algorithms. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2014, 31, 24-33
93. DiPietro, R.S.; Manolakis, D.; Lockwood, R.B.; Cooley, T.; Jacobson, J. Hyperspectral matched filter with false-alarm mitigation. Opt. Eng. 2012, 51, 16202
94. Pieper, M.L.; Manolakis, D.; Truslow, E.; Cooley, T.; Brueggeman, M. False alarm mitigation techniques for hyperspectral target detection. In Proceedings of the SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing, Baltimore, MD, USA, 29 April-3 May 2013; p. 874304
95. Burr, T.; Fry, H.; McVey, B.; Sander, E.; Cavanaugh, J.; Neath, A. Performance of Variable Selection Methods in Regression Using Variations of the Bayesian Information Criterion. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 2008, 37, 507-520
96. Keshava, N. Distance metrics and band selection in hyperspectral processing with applications to material identification and spectral libraries. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2004, 42, 1552-1565
97. Matteoli, S.; Diani, M.; Corsini, G. A tutorial overview of anomaly detection in hyperspectral images. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 2010, 25, 5-28
98. Kwon, H.; Nasrabadi, N.M. A Comparative Analysis of Kernel Subspace Target Detectors for Hyperspectral Imagery. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2006, 2007, 29250
99. Richards, J.A.; Jia, X. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1990
100. Plaza, A.; Benediktsson, J.A.; Boardman, J.W.; Brazile, J.; Bruzzone, L.; Camps-Valls, G.; Chanussot, J.; Fauvel, M.; Gamba, P.; Gualtieri, A.; et al. Recent advances in techniques for hyperspectral image processing. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113 (Suppl. S1), S110-S122
101. Boser, B.E.; Guyon, I.M.; Vapnik, V.N. A Training Algorithm for Optimal Margin Classifiers. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, New York, NY, USA, 27-29 July 1992; pp. 144-152
102. Mercier, G.; Lennon, M. Support vector machines for hyperspectral image classification with spectral-based kernels. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conferences on Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Toulouse, France, 21-25 July 2003; pp. 288-290
103. Chi, M.; Bruzzone, L. Semisupervised Classification of Hyperspectral Images by SVMs Optimized in the Primal. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2007, 45, 1870-1880
104. Kasetkasem, T.; Arora, M.K.; Varshney, P.K. Super-resolution land cover mapping using a Markov random field based approach. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 96, 302-314
105. Chen, Y.; Wang, G.; Dong, S. Learning with progressive transductive support vector machine. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2003, 24, 1845-1855
106. Tadjudin, S.; Landgrebe, D. Classification of High Dimensional Data with Limited Training Samples. Available online: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ecetr/56/(accessed on 20 March 2017)
107. Appice, A.; Guccione, P.; Malerba, D. A novel spectral-spatial co-training algorithm for the transductive classification of hyperspectral imagery data. Pattern Recognit. 2017, 63, 229-245
108. Bandos, T.V.; Bruzzone, L.; Camps-Valls, G. Classification of Hyperspectral Images with Regularized Linear Discriminant Analysis. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2009, 47, 862-873
109. Camps-Valls, G.; Marsheva, T.V. B.; Zhou, D. Semi-Supervised Graph-Based Hyperspectral Image Classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2007, 45, 3044-3054
110. Agapiou, A.; Hadjimitsis, D.G.; Alexakis, D.D. Evaluation of Broadband and Narrowband Vegetation Indices for the Identification of Archaeological Crop Marks. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 3892-3919
111. Stagakis, S.; Markos, N.; Sykioti, O.; Kyparissis, A. Monitoring canopy biophysical and biochemical parameters in ecosystem scale using satellite hyperspectral imagery: An application on a Phlomis fruticosa Mediterranean ecosystem using multiangular CHRIS/PROBA observations. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 977-994
112. Haboudane, D.; Miller, J.R.; Pattey, E.; Zarco-Tejada, P.J.; Strachan, I.B. Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: Modeling and validation in the context of precision agriculture. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 90, 337-352
113. Zarco-Tejada, P.; Berjon, A.; Lopezlozano, R.; Miller, J.; Martin, P.; Cachorro, V.; Gonzalez, M.; Defrutos, A. Assessing vineyard condition with hyperspectral indices: Leaf and canopy reflectance simulation in a row-structured discontinuous canopy. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 99, 271-287
114. Lin, P.; Qin, Q.; Dong, H.; Meng, Q. Hyperspectral vegetation indices for crop chlorophyll estimation: Assessment, modeling and validation. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International conferences on Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Munich, Germany, 22-27 July 2012; pp. 4841-4844
115. Liang, L.; Qin, Z.; Zhao, S.; Di, L.; Zhang, C.; Deng, M.; Lin, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, L.; Liu, Z. Estimating crop chlorophyll content with hyperspectral vegetation indices and the hybrid inversion method. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2016, 37, 2923-2949
116. Thenkabail, P.S.; Lyon, J.G. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Vegetation; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-1-4398-4538-7
117. Din, M.; Zheng, W.; Rashid, M.; Wang, S.; Shi, Z. Evaluating Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices for Leaf Area Index Estimation of Oryza sativa L. at Diverse Phenological Stages. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8
118. Zhao, W.; Du, S. Spectral-Spatial Feature Extraction for Hyperspectral Image Classification: A Dimension Reduction and Deep Learning Approach. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2016, 54, 4544-4554
119. Wang, Q.; Lin, J.; Yuan, Y. Salient Band Selection for Hyperspectral Image Classification via Manifold Ranking. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 2016, 27, 1279-1289
120. Zhong, Z.; Li, J.; Luo, Z.; Chapman, M. Spectral-Spatial Residual Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification: A 3-D Deep Learning Framework. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2017, PP, 1-12
121. Aptoula, E.; Ozdemir, M.C.; Yanikoglu, B. Deep LearningWith Attribute Profiles for Hyperspectral Image Classification. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2016, 13, 1970-1974
122. Li, W.; Wu, G.; Du, Q. Transferred Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2017, 14, 597-601
123. Hexagon Geospatial Erdas Imagine® 2016 Product Features and Comparisons. Available online: http://www.hexagongeospatial.com/technical-documents/product-descriptions-2016/erdas-imagine-2016-product-description (accessed on 9 October 2017)
124. Harris Geospatial ENVI Software Platform. Available online: http://www.harrisgeospatial.com/(accessed on 29 March 2017)
125. Image Lab Software Bio-Rad. Available online: http://www.bio-rad.com/en-us/product/image-labsoftware (accessed on 29 March 2017)
126. Brandywine Photonics Hyperspectral Imaging and CMOS Image Sensors. Available online: http://brandywinephotonics.com/(accessed on 29 March 2017)
127. Resonon Inc. SpectrononPro Manual (Release 5.0). Available online: http://docs.resonon.com/spectronon/pika_manual/SpectrononProManual.pdf (accessed on 29 March 2017)
128. Welcome to Spectral Python (SPy)-Spectral Python 0.18 documentation. Available online: http://www. spectralpython.net/(accessed on 29 March 2017)
129. Jelmer Oosthoek Hyperspectral Python (HypPy). Available online: https://www.itc.nl/personal/bakker/hyppy.html (accessed on 29 March 2017)
130. Rosario-Torres, S.; Arzuaga-Cruz, E.; Velez-Reyes, M.; Jimenez-Rodriguez, L.O. An update on the MATLAB hyperspectral image analysis toolbox. In Proceedings of the Defense and Security, Orlando, FL, USA, 1 June 2005; pp. 743-752
131. Isaac Gerg Matlab Hyperspectral Toolbox. Available online: https://github.com/isaacgerg/matlabHyperspectralToolbox (accessed on 29 March 2017)
132. Landgrebe, D.; Biehl, L. An Introduction & Reference for MultiSpec. Available online: ftp://bsa.bf.lu.lv/pub/TIS/atteelu_analiize/MultiSpec/Intro9_11.pdf (accessed on 29 March 2017)
133. TensorFlow. Available online: https://www.tensorflow.org/(accessed on 16 August 2017)
134. Welcome-Theano 0.9.0 Documentation. Available online: http://deeplearning.net/software/theano/(accessed on 16 August 2017)
135. Yamada, N.; Fujimura, S. Nondestructive measurement of chlorophyll pigment content in plant leaves from three-color reflectance and transmittance. Appl. Opt. 1991, 30, 3964-3973
136. Honkavaara, E.; Saari, H.; Kaivosoja, J.; Pölönen, I.; Hakala, T.; Litkey, P.; Mäkynen, J.; Pesonen, L. Processing and Assessment of Spectrometric, Stereoscopic Imagery Collected Using a Lightweight UAV Spectral Camera for Precision Agriculture. Remote Sens. 2013, 5, 5006-5039
137. Zarco-Tejada, P.J.; González-Dugo, V.; Berni, J.A. J. Fluorescence, temperature and narrow-band indices acquired from a UAV platform for water stress detection using a micro-hyperspectral imager and a thermal camera. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 117, 322-337
138. Calderón, R.; Navas-Cortés, J.A.; Lucena, C.; Zarco-Tejada, P.J. High-resolution airborne hyperspectral and thermal imagery for early detection of Verticillium wilt of olive using fluorescence, temperature and narrow-band spectral indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 139, 231-245
139. Burkart, A.; Aasen, H.; Alonso, L.; Menz, G.; Bareth, G.; Rascher, U. Angular Dependency of Hyperspectral Measurements over Wheat Characterized by a Novel UAV Based Goniometer. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 725-746
140. Mitchell, J.J.; Glenn, N.F.; Anderson, M.O.; Hruska, R.C.; Halford, A.; Baun, C.; Nydegger, N. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) hyperspectral remote sensing for dryland vegetation monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2012 4th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS), Shanghai, China, 4-7 June 2012; pp. 1-10
141. Kaivosoja, J.; Pesonen, L.; Kleemola, J.; Pölönen, I.; Salo, H.; Honkavaara, E.; Saari, H.; Mäkynen, J.; Rajala, A. A case study of a precision fertilizer application task generation for wheat based on classified hyperspectral data from UAV combined with farm history data. In Proceedings of the SPIE Remote Sensing, Dresden, Germany, 15 October 2013
142. Aasen, H.; Burkart, A.; Bolten, A.; Bareth, G. Generating 3D hyperspectral information with lightweight UAV snapshot cameras for vegetation monitoring: From camera calibration to quality assurance. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2015, 108, 245-259
143. Näsi, R.; Honkavaara, E.; Lyytikäinen-Saarenmaa, P.; Blomqvist, M.; Litkey, P.; Hakala, T.; Viljanen, N.; Kantola, T.; Tanhuanpää, T.; Holopainen, M. Using UAV-Based Photogrammetry and Hyperspectral Imaging for Mapping Bark Beetle Damage at Tree-Level. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 15467-15493
144. Kotsiantis, S.B. Supervised Machine Learning: A Review of Classification Techniques. Informatica 2007, 31
145. Berveglieri, A.; Tommaselli, A.M.G. Exterior Orientation of Hyperspectral Frame Images Collected with Uav for Forest Applications. ISPRS Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2016, XL-3/W4, 45-50
146. Saari, H.; Pellikka, I.; Pesonen, L.; Tuominen, S.; Heikkilä, J.; Holmlund, C.; Mäkynen, J.; Ojala, K.; Antila, T. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) operated spectral camera system for forest and agriculture applications. In Proceedings of the SPIE Remote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XIII, Prague, Czech Republic, 15 October 2011; Volume 8174
147. Honkavaara, E.; Kaivosoja, J.; Mäkynen, J.; Pellikka, I.; Pesonen, L.; Saari, H.; Salo, H.; Hakala, T.; Marklelin, L.; Rosnell, T. Hyperspectral Reflectance Signatures and Point Clouds for Precision Agriculture by LightWeight Uav Imaging System. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2012, 7, 353-358
148. Salamí, E.; Barrado, C.; Pastor, E. UAV Flight Experiments Applied to the Remote Sensing of Vegetated Areas. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 11051-11081
149. Adão, T.; Peres, E.; Pádua, L.; Hruška, J.; Sousa, J.J.; Morais, R. UAS-based hyperspectral sensing methodology for continuous monitoring and early detection of vineyard anomalies. In Proceedings of the Small Unmanned Aerial Systems for Environmental Research, Vila Real, Portugal, 28-30 June 2017