Review of the current state of UAV regulations

Remote Sensing

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2017, Pages

  Stöcker, Claudia ^a   Bennett, Rohan ^a,b   Nex, Francesco ^a   Gerke, Markus ^c   Zevenbergen, Jaap ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Comparative analysis; Law and technology; Regulation; RPAS; UAV; Unmanned aerial vehicle

Indexed keywords

CRASHWORTHINESS; DATA ACQUISITION; REMOTE SENSING; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV);

BARRIERS TO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; REGULATION; REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS; REMOTE SENSING PLATFORMS; RPAS; TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SCALE;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

EID: 85019903170     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs9050459     Document Type: Review

References (107)

1. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS); ICAO: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2011.
2. Zhou, G.; Ambrosia, V.; Gasiewski, A.J.; Bland, G. Unmanned airborne vehicle (UAV) sensing systems for earth observations. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2009, 47, 687-689.
3. Nex, F.; Remondino, F. UAV for 3D mapping applications: A review. Appl. Geomat. 2014, 6, 1-15.
4. Colomina, I.; Molina, P. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 92, 79-97.
5. Eisenbeiß, H. UAV Photogrammetry; ETH: Zurich, Switzerland, 2009.
6. Watts, A.C.; Ambrosia, V.G.; Hinkley, E.A. Unmanned aircraft systems in remote sensing and scientific research: Classification and considerations of use. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 1671-1692.
7. Anders, N.; Masselink, R.; Keesstra, S.; Suomalainen, J. High-Res Digital Surface Modeling using Fixed-Wing UAV-based Photogrammetry. In Proceedings of the Geomorphometry 2013, Nanjing, China, 16-20 October 2013; pp. 2-5.
8. D'Oleire-Oltmanns, S.; Marzolff, I.; Peter, K.D.; Ries, J.B. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for monitoring soil erosion in Morocco. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 3390-3416.
9. Stöcker, C.; Eltner, A.; Karrasch, P. Measuring gullies by synergetic application of UAV and close range photogrammetry-A case study from Andalusia, Spain. Catena 2015, 132, 1-11.
10. Harwin, S.; Lucieer, A. Assessing the accuracy of georeferenced point clouds produced via multi-view stereopsis from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 1573-1599.
11. Remondino, F. Heritage recording and 3D modeling with photogrammetry and 3D scanning. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 1104-1138.
12. Grenzdörffer, G.; Engel, A.; Teichert, B. The photogrammetric potential of low-cost UAVs in forestry and agriculture. In Proceedings of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, Beijing, China, 3-11 July 2008; Volume 1, pp. 1207-1213.
13. Zhang, C.; Kovacs, J.M. The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: A review. Precis. Agric. 2012, 13, 693-712.
14. Honkavaara, E.; Kaivosoja, J.; Mäkynen, J.; Pellikka, I.; Pesonen, L.; Saari, H.; Salo, H.; Hakala, T.; Marklelin, L.; Rosnell, T. Hyperspectral reflectance signatures and point clouds for precision Agriculture by light weight UAV imaging system. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2012, 1-7, 353-358.
15. Hunt, E.R.; Dean Hively, W.; Fujikawa, S.J.; Linden, D.S.; Daughtry, C.S.T.; McCarty, G.W. Acquisition of NIR-green-blue digital photographs from unmanned aircraft for crop monitoring. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 290-305.
16. Berni, J.; Zarco-Tejada, P.J.; Suarez, L.; Fereres, E. Thermal and narrowband multispectral remote sensing for vegetation monitoring from an unmanned aerial vehicle. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2009, 47, 722-738.
17. Adams, S.M.; Friedland, C.J. A Survey of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Usage for Imagery Collection in Disaster Research and Management. In Proceedings of the 9th InternationalWorkshop on Remote Sensing for Disaster Response, Stanford, CA, USA, 15-16 September 2011.
18. Maza, I.; Caballero, F.; Capitán, J.; Martínez-De-Dios, J.R.; Ollero, A. Experimental results in multi-UAV coordination for disaster management and civil security applications. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. Theory Appl. 2011, 61, 563-585.
19. Doherty, P.; Rudol, P. A UAV search and rescue scenario with human body detection and geolocalization. In Proceedings of the AI 2007-Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Gold Coast, Australia, 2-6 December 2007; pp. 1-13.
20. Siebert, S.; Teizer, J. Mobile 3D mapping for surveying earthwork projects using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) system. Autom. Constr. 2014, 41, 1-14.
21. Gevaert, C.; Sliuzas, R.; Persello, C.; Vosselman, G. Opportunities for UAV mapping to support unplanned settlement upgrading. In Proceedings of the GeoTech Rwanda 2015, Kigali, Rwanda, 18-20 November 2015.
22. Aicardi, I.; Nex, F.; Gerke, M.; Lingua, A. An image-based approach for the co-registration of multi-temporal UAV image datasets. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 779.
23. Remondino, F.; Barazzetti, L.; Nex, F.; Scaioni, M.; Sarazzi, D. UAV Photogrammetry for Mapping and 3D Modeling-Current Status and Future Perspectives. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2011, XXXVIII, 14-16.
24. Agüera-Vega, F.; Carvajal-Ramírez, F.; Martínez-Carricondo, P. Assessment of photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation ground control points number using unmanned aerial vehicle. Measurement 2017, 98, 221-227.
25. Agüera-Vega, F.; Carvajal-Ramírez, F.; Martínez-Carricondo, P. Accuracy of digital surface models and orthophotos derived from unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry. J. Surv. Eng. 2016, 143, 4016025.
26. Barnes, G.; Volkmann, W. High-resolution mapping with unmanned aerial systems. Surv. Land Inf. Sci. 2015, 74, 5-13.
27. Meha, M.; Kelm, K.; çaka1, M.; Sinani1, Q.; Ahmetaj, K. UAV technology and open source software for systematic registration in the Republic of Kosovo. In Proceedings of the Land and Poverty Conference 2016: Scaling up Responsible Land Governance, Washington, DC, USA, 14-18 March 2016.
28. Crommelinck, S.; Bennett, R.; Gerke, M.; Nex, F.; Yang, M.Y.; Vosselman, G. Review of automatic feature extraction from high-resolution optical sensor data for UAV-based cadastral mapping. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 689
29. Mumbone, M.; Bennett, R.M.; Gerke, M.; Volkmann, W. Innovations in boundary mapping: Namibia, customary lands and UAVs. In Proceedings of the Land and Poverty Conference 2015: Linking Land Tenure and Use for Shared Prosperity, Washington, DC, USA, 23-27 March 2015.
30. Koh, L.P.; Wich, S.A. Dawn of drone ecology: Low-cost autonomous aerial vehicles for conservation. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 2012, 5, 121-132.
31. Jain, M. A next-generation approach to the characterization of a non-model plant transcriptome. Curr. Sci. 2011, 101, 1435-1439.
32. Pajares, G. Overview and current status of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2015, 81, 281-330.
33. Everaerts, J. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for remote sensing and mapping. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2008, XXXVII, 1187-1192.
34. Carvajal-Ramírez, F.; Agüera-Vega, F.; Martínez-Carricondo, P.J. Effects of image orientation and ground control points distribution on unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry projects on a road cut slope. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2016, 10, 34004.
35. Zein, T. Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration: An implementation model for cadastre and land administration systems. In Proceedings of the Land and Poverty Conference 2016: Scaling up Responsible Land Governance, Washington, DC, USA, 14-18 March 2016.
36. Haarbrink, R.B. Uas for Geo-Information: Current Status and Perspectives. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2012, XXXVIII-1, 207-212.
37. Finn, R.L.; Wright, D. Study on Privacy, Data Protection and Ethical Risks in Civil Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems Operations Final Report; European Comission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014.
38. Van Blyenburgh, P. Harmonising UAS Regulations and Standards; UAS Special Issue; GIM International: Lemmer, The Netherlands, 2016.
39. VanWegen, W.; Stumpf, J. Bringing a New Level of Intelligence to UAVs-Interview with Jan Stumpf; UAS Special Issue; GIM International: Lemmer, The Netherlands, 2016.
40. Boucher, P. Domesticating the drone: The demilitarisation of unmanned aircraft for civil markets. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2015, 21, 1393-1412.
41. Rango, A.; Laliberte, A.S. Impact of flight regulations on effective use of unmanned aircraft systems for natural resources applications. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2010, 4, 043539.
42. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Manual on Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS); ICAO: Montréal, QC, Canada, 2015.
43. Morales, A.C.; Paez, D.; Arango, C. Multi-criteria analysis of UAVs regulations in 6 countries using the analytical hierarchical process and expert knowledge. In International Conference on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Geomatics; ISPRS: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2015; Volume 40, pp. 175-181.
44. Villasenor, J. Observations from above: Unmanned aircraft systems and privacy. Harv. J. Law Public Policy 2013, 36, 457.
45. Jansen, P. The Ethics of Domestic Drones-An Evaluation of the Use of Surveillance-Capable Unmanned Aerial Systems in Civil Contexts. Master's Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2015.
46. Finn, R.L.; Wright, D. Unmanned aircraft systems: Surveillance, ethics and privacy in civil applications. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 2012, 28, 184-194.
47. Finn, R.L.; Wright, D. Privacy, data protection and ethics for civil drone practice: A survey of industry, regulators and civil society organisations. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 2016, 32, 577-586.
48. European RPAS Steering Group. Roadmap for the Integration of Civil Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Systems into the European Aviation System. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/10484/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native (accessed on 13 October 2016).
49. EU Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation (accessed on 31 October 2016).
50. Clarke, R.; Bennett Moses, L. The regulation of civilian drones' impacts on behavioural privacy. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 2014, 30, 286-305.
51. Bennett Moses, L. Recurring Dilemmas: The Laws's Race to Keep Up with Technological Change. J. Law Technol. Policy 2007, 2, 239-285.
52. Cooper, H.; Hedges, L.V. Research synthesis as a scientific process. In The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, 2nd ed.; Russell Sage Foundation: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 3-17.
53. Bennett Moses, L. How to Think about Law, Regulation and Technology: Problems with 'Technology ' as a Regulatory Target. Law Innov. Technol. 2013, 1, 1-20.
54. EUROCONTROL List of UAV Regulations. Available online: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/nationalrpas-regulations (accessed on 15 October 2016).
55. JARUS List of UAV Regulations. Available online: http://jarus-rpas.org/regulations (accessed on 15 October 2016).
56. Global Drone Regulations Database. Available online: https://droneregulations.info/index.html (accessed on 15 October 2016).
57. UVS International Regulation Monitor Europe. Available online: http://uvs-info.com/index.php/europeanmatters/regulation-monitor-europe/european-matters-regulation-monitor-europe-open-access (accessed on 15 October 2016).
58. EU Drone Regulation. Available online: http://dronerules.eu/en/professional/regulations (accessed on 15 October 2016).
59. Lijphart, A. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 1971, 65, 682-693.
60. UNC Comparing and Contrasting. Available online: http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/comparingand-contrasting/(accessed on 10 October 2016).
61. Kumar, R. Research Methodology; SAGE: New York, NY, USA, 2014.
62. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Convention on International Civil Aviation; ICAO: Chicago, IL, USA, 1944.
63. The Japan Times. Man Who Landed Drone on Roof of Japanese Prime Minister's Office Gets Suspended Sentence. Available online: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/02/16/national/crime-legal/manlanded-drone-roof-japanese-prime-ministers-office-gets-suspended-sentence/#.WFEvqIrQf_w (accessed on 17 December 2016).
64. Joint Aviation Authorities; Eurocontrol. A Concept for European Regulations for Civil Umanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs); UAV TASK-FORCE Final Report; 2004. Available online: http://www.easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/NPA_16_2005_Appendix.pdf (accessed on 15 October 2016).
65. Joint Authorities for Rulemaking of Unmanned Systems (JARUS). Certification Specification for Light Unmanned Rotorcraft Systems (CS-LURS); 2013. Available online: http://www.nlr.nl/downloads/jarus_cslurs. pdf (accessed on 15 Octboer 2016).
66. Joint Authorities for Rulemaking of Unmanned Systems. JARUS RPAS 'Required C2 Performance' (RLP) Concept; 2016. Available online: https://jarus-rpas.org/sites/jarus-rpas.org/files/storage/Library-Documents/jar_doc_13_rpl_concept_upgraded.pdf (accessed on 15 Octboer 2016).
67. Joint Authorities for Rulemaking of Unmanned Systems. JARUS FCL Recommendation; 2015. Available online: http://jarus-rpas.org/sites/jarus-rpas.org/files/jar_03_doc-fcl_0.pdf (accessed on 15 Octboer 2016).
68. European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). Riga Declaration on Remotely Piloted Aircraft (Drones); EASA: Riga, Latvia, 2015.
69. European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). A Proposal to Create Common Rules For operating Drones in Europe; EASA: Cologne, Germany, 2015.
70. European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). 'Prototype' Commission Regulation on Unmanned Aircraft Operations-Explanatory Note; EASA: Cologne, Germany, 2016; Volume 149.
71. European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). Concept of Operations for Drones: A Risk Based Approach to Regulation of unmanned Aircraft; EASA: Cologne, Germany, 2015.
72. UAViators. Humanitarian UAV Network. UAV Code of Conduct & Guidelines; 2015. Available online: http://uaviators.org/docs (accessed on 15 October 2016).
73. Civil Aviation Authority UK. Unmanned Aircraft System Operations in UK Airspace-Guidance; 2015. Available online: https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP%20722%20Sixth%20Edition%20March% 202015.pdf (accessed on 15 October 2016).
74. CASA Advisory Cirular. AC 101-10 Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems-Operation of Excluded RPA (Other than Model Aircraft); 2016. Available online: https://www.casa.gov.au/files/ac10110pdf (accessed on 15 February 2017).
75. Aeronautical Information Services Malaysia. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Operations in Malaysian Airspace; 2008. Available online: http://aip.dca.gov.my/aip%20pdf%20new/AIC/AIC%20200804.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2017).
76. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration. Advisory Circular Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS); 2016. Available online: https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.list/parentTopicID/137 (accessed on 15 October 2016).
77. Transport Canada. Notice of Proposed Amendment Unmanned Air Vehicles; 2015. Available online: http://wwwapps.tc.gc.ca/Saf-Sec-Sur/2/NPA-APM/doc.aspx?id=10294 (accessed on 15 February 2017).
78. Diretion Generale de l'Aviation Civile Guide DSAC-Aeronefs Circulant Sans Personne a Bord: Activites Particulieres; 2016. Available online: http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/Guide%20Activites%20particulieres%20v1.2%2010jan17.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2017).
79. ILT Staatscourant Nr. 27761; 2016. Available online: https://www.ilent.nl/onderwerpen/transport/luchtvaart/dronevliegers/(accessed on 15 February 2017).
80. Deutsche Flugsicherung. Nachrichten fuer Luftfahrer; 2016. Available online: https://www.dfs.de/dfs_homepage/de/Unternehmen/Richtlinien/1-786-16.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2017).
81. L'Ente Nazionale per l'Aviazione Civile. Regulation Remotely Piloted Aerial Vehicles; 2015. Available online: https://www.enac.gov.it/La_Normativa/Normativa_Enac/Regolamenti/Regolamenti_ad_hoc/info-122671512.html (accessed on 15 February 2017).
82. Austro Control Lufttüchtigkeits-und Betriebstüchtigkeitsanforderungen für Unbemannte Luftfahrzeuge der Klasse 1; 2015. Available online: http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Dokumentnummer=NOR40151655 (accessed on 15 February 2017).
83. Ministerio De Agricultura. Boletín oficial del estado Aeronaves civiles pilotadas por control remoto; 2014. Available online: http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2014/10/17/pdfs/BOE-A-2014-10517.pdf (accessed on 18 March 2017).
84. Republic of Azerbaijan State Civil Aviation Administration. Unmanned Aircraft Operations; 2015. Available online: http://www.caa.gov.az/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=297:unmannedaircraft-operations&Itemid=174&lang=en (accessed on 15 February 2017).
85. Direccion General De Aeronautica Chile Dan 151-Operaciones de Aeronaves Pilotadas a Distancia (RPAS). Available online: https://www.dgac.gob.cl/portalweb/rest-portalweb/jcr/repository/collaboration/sites%20content/live/dgac/categories/normativas/normasDAN/documents/DAN_151-20150413.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2017).
86. Aeronautica Civil de Colombia Requisitos Generales de Aeronavegabilidad y Operaciones para RPAS; 2015 Available online: http://www.aerocivil.gov.co/autoridad-de-la-aviacion-civil/certificacion-ylicenciamiento/Documents/CIRCULAR%20REGLAMENTARIA%20%20002%20-%20RPAS.pdf#search= RPAS (accessed on 15 February 2017).
87. South African Civil Aviation Authority Technical Guidance Material for RPAS Part 101. Available online: http://www.caa.co.za/Pages/RPAS/Remotely%20Piloted%20Aircraft%20Systems.aspx (accessed on 28 March 2017).
88. Japan Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism Amendments to the Aeronautical Act. Available online: http://www.mlit.go.jp/en/koku/uas.html (accessed on 15 February 2017).
89. Federal Republic of Nigeria. Nigeria Civil Aviation Regulation. Available online: http://ncaa.gov.ng/ncaaissues-safety-guidelines-for-drone-operators/(accessed on 15 February 2017).
90. Rwanda Civil Aviation Authority Ministerial Regulations No. 01/MOS/Trans/016 of 26/04/2016 Relating to Unmanned Civil Aircraft System. Available online: https://www.caa.gov.rw/fileadmin/templates/Regulatory_Services/Ministerial_Regulations_N___01-MOS-Trans-016__OF__26-04-2016_relating_to_Unmanned_Civil_Aircraft_Systems__UAS_.PDF (accessed on 15 February 2017).
91. Civil Aviation Administration of China Measures for the Administration of Air Traffic in Civil Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Available online: http://www.caac.gov.cn/XXGK/XXGK/GFXWJ/201610/P020161008345668760913.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2017).
92. Yu, X.; Zhang, Y. Sense and avoid technologies with applications to unmanned aircraft systems: Review and prospects. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2015, 74, 152-166.
93. Federal Aviation Administration. Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems. 2016. Available online: https://federalregister.gov/a/2016-15079 (accessed on 15 February 2017).
94. Federal Aviation Administration B4UFLY. Available online: https://www.faa.gov/uas/where_to_fly/b4ufly/(accessed on 12 December 2016).
95. Civil Aviation Authority UK Drone Aware. Available online: http://droneaware.org (accessed on 12 December 2016).
96. Veilig Fliegen. Available online: http://www.veiligvliegen.nl (accessed on 12 December 2016).
97. Clothier, R.A.; Palmer, J.L.; Walker, R.A.; Fulton, N.L. Definition of an airworthiness certification framework for civil unmanned aircraft systems. Saf. Sci. 2011, 49, 871-885.
98. Rao, B.; Gopi, A.G.; Maione, R. The societal impact of commercial drones. Technol. Soc. 2016, 45, 83-90.
99. Clothier, R.; Fulton, N.; Walker, R. Pilotless aircraft: The horseless carriage of the twenty-first century? J. Risk Res. 2008, 11, 999-1023.
100. European RPAS Steering Group Roadmap for the Integration of Civil Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Systems into the European Aviation System-ANNEX 3; 2013. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/aeronautics/rpas_en (accessed on 15 January 2017).
101. Space53 Nokia Smart-City-Traffic-Management. Available online: www.space53.nl/2016/09/25/nokia-andeuropes-first-drone-based-smart-city-traffic-management-test-facility-collaborate-to-ensure-safe-globalaerial-operations/(accessed on 27 January 2017).
102. Marzocchi, O. Privacy and Data Protection Implications of the Civil Use of Drones. Brussels, Belgium, 2015 Available online: https://free-group.eu/2015/06/12/privacy-and-data-protection-implications-ofthe-civil-use-of-drones/(accessed on 16 January 2017).
103. Cavoukian, A. Privacy and Drones: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles; Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2012.
104. JARUS Certification Specification for Light Unmanned Rotorcraft Systems; 2013. Available online: http://jarus-rpas.org/sites/jarus-rpas.org/files/storage/Library-documents/jar_01_doc_jarus_certification_specification_for_lurs_-_30_oct_2013.pdf (accessed on 17 October 2016).
105. Marchant, G.E.; Allenby, B.R.; Herkert, J.R. The Growing Gap between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight: The Pacing Problem, 7th ed.; Springer: New York, USA, 2011; Available online: http://www.worldcat.org/title/privacy-and-drones-unmanned-aerial-vehicles/oclc/818083884 (accessed on 15 January 2017).
106. Clothier, R.A.; Greer, D.A.; Greer, D.G.; Mehta, A.M. Risk Perception and the Public Acceptance of Drones. Risk Anal. 2015, 35, 1167-1183.
107. Ison, R.; Röling, N.; Watson, D. Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10, 499-511.