Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM

Nature Communications

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  O'Dea R E ^a,b   Lagisz, M ^a   Jennions, M D ^b   Nakagawa, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE; APPLIED SCIENCE; GENDER; INDIVIDUAL VARIATION; MATHEMATICS; TECHNOLOGY; THRESHOLD; WOMENS STATUS;

ARTICLE; CHILD; FEMALE; GIRL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SIMULATION; STUDENT; ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ENGINEERING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOTIVATION; SEX FACTOR; SEX RATIO; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TECHNOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; DATASETS AS TOPIC; ENGINEERING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOTIVATION; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SEX FACTORS; STUDENTS; TECHNOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85053904085     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06292-0     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O. & Marsh, H. W. A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Rev. Educ. Res. 79, 1129–1167 (2009)
2. Mandel, H. The role of occupational attributes in gender earnings inequality, 1970-2010. Soc. Sci. Res. 55, 122–138 (2016)
3. Holmes, K., Gore, J., Smith, M. & Lloyd, A. An integrated analysis of school students’ aspirations for stem careers: which student and school factors are most predictive? Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 29, 1–21 (2017)
4. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O. & Baumert, J. Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Dev. 76, 397–416 (2005)
5. French, M. T., Homer, J. F., Popovici, I. & Robins, P. K. What you do in high school matters: high school GPA, educational attainment, and labor market earnings as a young adult. East. Econ. J. 41, 370–386 (2015)
6. Voyer, D. & Voyer, S. D. Gender differences in scholastic achievement: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1174–1204 (2014)
7. Shields, S. A. The variability hypothesis: the history of a biological model of sex. Signs 7, 1–30 (1982)
8. Johnson, W., Carothers, A. & Deary, I. J. Sex differences in variability in general intelligence: a new look at the old question. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3, 518–531 (2008)
9. Reinhold, K. & Engqvist, L. The variability is in the sex chromosomes. Evolution 67, 3662–3668 (2013)
10. Halpern, D. F. et al. The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psycho. Sci. Public Interest 8, 1–51 (2007)
11. Wang, M. T. & Degol, J. L. Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem): current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 29, 119–140 (2017)
12. Spencer, S. J., Logel, C. & Davies, P. G. Stereotype threat. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67, 415–437 (2016)
13. Rudman, L. A. & Phelan, J. E. Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 28, 61–79 (2008)
14. OECD. STEM workers receive a significant earnings premium over other workers with the same level of education: private wage and salary, workers aged 25 and over. 10.1787/eco_surveys-usa-2012-graph47-en (2012)
15. Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D. & Hauser, C. E. The gender gap in science: how long until women are equally represented?. PLoS Biol. 16, e2004956 (2018)
16. Penner, A. M. Gender differences in extreme mathematical achievement: an international perspective on biological and social factors. Am. J. Sociol. 114, S138–S170 (2008)
17. Feingold, A. Gender differences in variability in intellectual abilities: a cross-cultural perspective. Sex Roles 30, 81–92 (1994)
18. Hedges, L. V. & Nowell, A. Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science 269, 41–45 (1995)
19. Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L. & Andrews, G. Sex differences in mathematics and science achievement: a meta-analysis of National Assessment of Educational Progress assessments. J. Educ. Psychol. 107, 645–662 (2015)
20. Cimpian, J. R., Lubienski, S. T., Timmer, J. D., Makowski, M. B. & Miller, E. K. Have gender gaps in math closed? Achievement, teacher perceptions, and learning behaviors across two ECLS-K cohorts. AERA Open 2, 1–19 (2016)
21. Lakin, J. M. Sex differences in reasoning abilities: surprising evidence that male–female ratios in the tails of the quantitative reasoning distribution have increased. Intelligence 41, 263–274 (2013)
22. Wai, J., Cacchio, M., Putallaz, M. & Makel, M. C. Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: a 30 year examination. Intelligence 38, 412–423 (2010)
23. Baye, A. & Monseur, C. Gender differences in variability and extreme scores in an international context. Large-scale Assess. Educ. 4, 541 (2016)
24. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Revised Edition) (Academic Press, New York, 1977)
25. Duckworth, A. L. & Seligman, M. E. P. Self-discipline gives girls the edge: gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. J. Educ. Psychol. 98, 198–208 (2006)
26. McCandless, B. R., Roberts, A. & Starnes, T. Teachers’ marks, achievement test scores, and aptitude relations with respect to social class, race, and sex. J. Educ. Psychol. 63, 153–159 (1972)
27. Borghans, L., Golsteyn, B. H. H., Heckman, J. J. & Humphries, J. E. What grades and achievement tests measure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13354–13359 (2016)
28. Zwick, R. & Green, J. G. New perspectives on the correlation of scholastic assessment test scores, high school grades, and socioeconomic factors. J. Educ. Meas. 44, 1–23 (2007)
29. Cornwell, C., Mustard, D. B. & Van Parys, J. Noncognitive skills and the gender disparities in test scores and teacher assessments: evidence from primary school. J. Hum. Resour. 48, 236–264 (2013)
30. Betts, J. R. & Morell, D. The determinants of undergraduate grade point average: the relative importance of family background, high school resources, and peer group effects. J. Hum. Resour. 34, 268–293 (1999)
31. Zhang, G., Anderson, T. J., Ohland, M. W. & Thorndyke, B. R. Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation: a longitudinal and cross-institutional study. J. Eng. Educ. 93, 313–320 (2004)
32. Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S. & Linn, M. C. Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 136, 103–127 (2010)
33. Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L. & Linn, M. C. New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 136, 1123–1135 (2010)
34. Taylor, L. R. Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature 189, 732–735 (1961)
35. Nakagawa, S. et al. Meta-analysis of variation: ecological and evolutionary applications and beyond. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 143–152 (2015)
36. Trahan, L. H., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M. & Hiscock, M. The Flynn effect: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1332–1360 (2014)
37. Lackey, L. W. & Lackey, W. J. Grade inflation: potential causes and solutions. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 22, 130–139 (2006)
38. Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M. & Freeland, E. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 347, 262–265 (2015)
39. Niederle, M. & Vesterlund, L. Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: the role of competition. J. Econ. Perspect. 24, 129–144 (2010)
40. Gneezy, U. & Rustichini, A. Gender and competition at a young age. Am. Econ. Rev. 94, 377–381 (2004)
41. Rudman, L. A. & Fairchild, K. Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87, 157–176 (2004)
42. Coyle, T. R., Snyder, A. C. & Richmond, M. C. Sex differences in ability tilt: support for investment theory. Intelligence 50, 209–220 (2015)
43. Wang, M. T., Eccles, J. S. & Kenny, S. Not lack of ability but more choice: individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychol. Sci. 24, 770–775 (2013)
44. Valla, J. M. & Ceci, S. J. Breadth-based models of women’s underrepresentation in STEM fields: an integrative commentary on Schmidt (2011) and Nye et al. (2012). Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 9, 219–224 (2014)
45. Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B. & Moore, C. Do they stay or do they go? The switching decisions of individuals who enter gender atypical college majors. Sex Roles 74, 436–449 (2016)
46. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D. G. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62, 1006–1012 (2009)
47. Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J. & Curtis, P. S. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80, 1150–1156 (1999)
48. Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 (2010)
49. Noble, D. W., Lagisz, M., O’Dea, R. E. & Nakagawa, S. Nonindependence and sensitivity analyses in ecological and evolutionary meta-analyses. Mol. Ecol. 26, 2410–2425 (2017)
50. Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M. & Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315, 629–634 (1997)
51. Nakagawa, S. & Santos, E. S. A. Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis. Evol. Ecol. 26, 1253–1274 (2012)
52. O’Dea, R. E., Lagisz, M., Jennions, M. D. & Nakagawa, S. Data for “Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM”. Open Science Framework https://osf.io/efm9t (2018)
53. O’Dea, R. E., Lagisz, M., Jennions, M. D. & Nakagawa, S. Code for “Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM”. Open Science Framework https://osf.io/q68ae (2018)