Earthquakes, strong-ground motion

Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series

Volumn Part 5, Issue , 2011, Pages 252-260

  Panza, Giuliano F ^a,b   Mura, Cristina La ^a   Romanelli, Fabio ^a   Vaccari, Franco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^b ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85053506265     PISSN: 13884360     EISSN: 1871756X     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8702-7_141     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Aagaard, B. T., Hall, J. F., and Heaton, T., 2001. Characterization of near source ground motions with earthquake simulations. Earthquake Spectra, 17, 177–207.
2. Aki, K., and Richards, P. G., 1980. Quantitative Seismology, Theory and Method. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co.
3. Alavi, B., and Krawinkler, H., 2000. Consideration of near-fault ground motion effects in seismic design. In Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. The New Zealand Society for Earthquake, Auckland, p. 8.
4. Anderson, J. G., 2003. Strong-motion seismology. In Lee, W. H. K., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P. C., and Kisslinger, C. (eds.), International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology. San Diego: Academic. IASPEI, Vol. 81B, pp. 983–965.
5. Anderson, J. G., 2007. Physical processes that control strong ground motion. In Kanamori, H. (ed.), Treatise on Geophysics, Volume 4, Earthquake Seismology. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Vol. 4, pp. 513–565.
6. Anderson, J. G., Bodin, P., Brune, J. N., Prince, J., Singh, S. K., Quaas, R., and Onate, M., 1986. Strong Ground Motion from the Michoacan, Mexico, earthquake. Science, 233, 1043–1049.
7. Bardet, J., 2003. Advances in analysis of soil liquefaction during earthquakes. In Lee, W. H. K., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P. C., and Kisslinger, C. (eds.), International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology. San Diego: Academic Press. IASPEI, Vol. 81B, pp. 1175–1201.
8. Benioff, H., 1934. The physical evaluation of seismic destructiveness. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 24, 9–48.
9. Bielak, J., MacCamy, R. C., McGhee, D. S., and Barry, A., 1991. Unified symmetric BEM-FEM for site-effects on ground motion-SH waves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 117, 2265–2285.
10. Bielak, J., Loukakis, K., Hisada, Y., and Yoshimura, C., 2003. Domain reduction method for three-dimensional earthquake modeling in localized regions, part I: theory. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93, 817–824.
11. Bolt, B. A., 1969. Duration of strong motion. In Proceedings 4th WCEE, Rome, pp. 1304–1315.
12. Bolt, B. A., 1975. The San Fernando earthquake, 1971. Magnitudes, aftershocks, and fault dynamics. In Bulletin 196, California Division of Mines and Geology, Sacramento, Chap. 21.
13. Bolt, B. A., 1999. Estimating seismic ground motion. Earthquake Spectra, 15, 187–197.
14. Bolt, B. A., and Abrahamson, N. A., 2003. Estimation of strong seismic ground motions. In Lee, W. H. K., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P. C., and Kisslinger, C. (eds.), International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology. San Diego: Academic. IASPEI, Vol. 81B, pp. 983–1001.
15. Bommer, J. J., and Martinez-Pereira, A., 1998. The effective duration of earthquake strong motion. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 3(2), 127–172.
16. Bouchon, M., and Sánchez-Sesma, F. J., 2007. Boundary integral equations and boundary elements methods in elastodynamics. In Wu, R. S., Maupin, V., and Dmowska, R. (eds.), Advances in Wave Propagation in Heterogeneous Earth, Advances in Geophysics. New York: Elsevier–Academic, Vol. 48, pp. 157–166.
17. Cancani, A., 1904. Sur l’emploi d’une double echelle seismique des intesites, empirique et absolue. G Beitr, 2, 281–283.
18. Chàvez-Garcìa, F. J., and Salazar, L., 2002. Strong Motion in Central Mexico: a Model Based on Data Analysis and Simple Modeling. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92, 3087–3101.
19. Dan, K., Watanabe, T., Tanaka, T., and Sato, R., 1990. Stability of earthquake ground motion synthesized using different small-event records as empirical Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 80, 1433–1455.
20. Douglas, J., 2003. Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion. A review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration response spectral ordinates. Earth Science Review, 61, 43–104.
21. EN, 1998. General Rules, Seismic Actions And Rules For Buildings. Bruxelles, Belgium: CEN European Committee for Standardization.
22. Fah, D., and Panza, G. F., 1994. Realistic modeling of observed seismic motion in complex sedimentary basins. Annali di Geofisica, 37, 1771–1797.
23. Fah, D., Suhadolc, P., Mueller, S., and Panza, G. F., 1994. A hybrid method for the estimation for ground motion in sedimentary basins: quantitative modeling for Mexico City. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84, 383–399.
24. Field, E. H., and SCEC Phase III Working Group, 2000. Accounting for site effects in probabilistic seismic hazard analyses of Southern California: overview of the SCEC Phase III report. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(6B), S1–S31.
25. Geller, R. J., 1976. Scaling relations for earthquake source parameters and magnitudes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 66, 1501–1523.
26. Graves, R. W., 1996. Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86, 1091–1106.
27. Gusev, A. A., 2010. Broadband kinematic stochastic simulation of an earthquake source: a refined procedure for application in seismic hazard studies. Submitted to Pure and Applied Geophysics.
28. Hartzell, S. H., 1978. Earthquake aftershocks as Green’s functions. Geophysical Research Letters, 5, 1–4.
29. Haskell, N. A., 1964. Total energy and energy spectra density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 54, 1811–1841.
30. Haskell, N. A., 1966. Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults. 2. A statistical source model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 56, 125–140.
31. Hisada, Y., and Bielak, J., 2003. A theoretical method for computing near-fault ground motions in layered half-spaces considering static offset due to surface faulting, with a physical interpretation of fling step and rupture directivity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93, 1154–1168.
32. th Japan Earth. Eng. Symp., Tokyo, pp. 151–156.
33. Irikura, K., Miyake, H., Iwata, T., Kamae, K., Kawabe, H., and Dalguer, L. A., 2004. Recipe for predicting strong ground motions from future large earthquakes. Proceedings 13th world conference of Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1371.
34. Jennings, P. C., 2003. An introduction to the earthquake response of structures. In Lee, W. H. K., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P. C., and Kisslinger, C. (eds.), International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology. San Diego: Academic. IASPEI, Vol. 81B, pp. 1097–1125.
35. Kawase, H., 2003. Site effects on strong ground motion. In Lee, W. H. K., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P. C., and Kisslinger, C. (eds.), International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology. San Diego: Academic. IASPEI, Vol. 81B, pp. 1013–1030.
36. Komatitsch, D., and Tromp, J., 1999. Introduction to the spectral-element method for 3-D seismic wave propagation. Geophysical Journal International, 139, 806–822.
37. Komatitsch, D., and Tromp, J., 2002a. Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation, I. Validation. Geophysical Journal International, 149, 390–412.
38. Komatitsch, D., and Tromp, J., 2002b. Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation, II. 3-D models, oceans, rotation, and self-gravitation. Geophysical Journal International, 150, 303–318.
39. Komatitsch, D., and Vilotte, J. P., 1998. The spectral-element method: an efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88, 368–392.
40. Komatitsch, D., Liu, Q., Tromp, J., Peter Suss, P., Stidham, C., John, H., and Shaw, J. H., 2004. Simulations of Ground Motion in the Los Angeles Basin Based upon the Spectral-Element Method. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94, 187–206.
41. La Mura, C., Yanovskya, T. B., Romanelli, F., and Panza, G. F., 2010. Three-dimensional seismic wave propagation by modal summation: method and validation. Pure and Applied Geophysics, in press, doi:10.1007/s00024-010-0165-2.
42. Moczo, P., Bystricky, J., Kristek, J., Carcione, J. M., and Bouchon, M., 1997. Hybrid modeling of P-SV seismic motion at inhomogeneous visco-elastic topographic structures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 87, 1305–1323.
43. Montejo, L. A., and Kowalsky, M. J., 2008. Estimation of frequency-dependent strong motion duration via wavelets and its influence on nonlinear seismic response. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 23, 253–264.
44. Nunziata, C., De Nisco, G., and Panza, G. F., 2008. Evaluation of liquefaction potential for building code. In Santini, A., and Moraci, N. (eds.), Seismic Engineering Conference Commemorating the 1908 Messina and Reggio Calabria Earthquake. New York: Melville, pp. 370–377.
45. Oprsal, I., and Zahradnik, J., 1999. Eòastic finite-difference method for irregular grids. Geophysics, 64, 240–250.
46. Oprsal, I., and Zahradnik, J., 2002. Three-dimensional finite-difference method and hybrid modeling of earthquake ground motion. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107(B8), 2161 doi: 10.1029/2000JB000082.
47. Oth, A., Wenzel, F., Wust-Bloch, H., Gottschammer, E., and Ben-Avraham, Z., 2007. Parametrization of a composite attenuation relation for the Dead Sea area based on 3D modeling of elastic wave propagation. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 164, 23–37.
48. Panza, G. F., and Suhadolc, P., 1989. Realistic simulation and prediction of strong ground motion. In Carlomagno, G. M., and Brebbia, C. A. (eds.), Computers and experiments in Stress Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 77–98.
49. Panza, G. F., Romanelli, F., and Vaccari, F., 2001. Seismic wave propagation in laterally heterogeneous anelastic media: theory and applications to seismic zonation. In Dmowska, R., and Saltzman, B. (eds.), Advances in Geophysics. San Diego: Academic, Vol. 43, pp. 1–95.
50. Panza, G. F., Romanelli, F., Vaccari, F., Decanini, L., and Mollaioli, F., 2004. Seismic ground motion modeling and damage earthquake scenarios: a possible bridge between seismologists and seismic engineers. In Chen, Y. T., Panza, G. F., and Wu, Z. L. (eds.), Earthquake Hazard, Risk, and Strong Ground Motion. Beijing: Seismological, pp. 323–349.
51. Parvez, A. I., Gusev, A. A., Panza, G. F., and Petukhin, A. G., 2001. Preliminary determination interdependence among strong motion amplitude, earthquake magnitude and hypocentral distance for the Himalayan region. Geophysical Journal International, 144, 577–596.
52. Peresan, A., Zuccolo, E., Vaccari, F., Gorshkov, A., and Panza, G. F., 2010. Neo-deterministic seismic hazard and pattern recognition techniques: time-dependent scenarios for north-eastern Italy. Pure and Applied Geophysics, in press, DOI 10.1007/s00024-010-0166-1.
53. Pitarka, A., 1999. 3D elastic finite-difference modeling of seismic motion using staggered grids with non-uniform spacing. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 89, 54–68.
54. Reid, H. F., 1910. The California earthquake of April 18, 1906. Report of the state earthquake investigation commission, Vol. II, The Mechanics of the earthquake, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication no. 87.
55. Rodriguez-Marek, A., 2000. Near-Fault Seismic Site Response. PhD dissertation, Berkeley, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, p. 451.
56. Romanelli, F., Vaccari, F., and Panza, G. F., 2003. Realistic modelling of the seismic input: site effects and parametric studies. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 5, 27–39.
57. Romanelli, F., Vaccari, F., and Panza, G. F., 2004. Realistic modelling of the effects of asynchronous motion at the base of bridge piers. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 6, 17–26.
58. Sato, T., Helmberger, D. V., Somerville, P. G., Graves, R. W., and Saikia, C. K., 1998. Estimates of regional and local strong motions during the Great 1923 Kanto, Japan, earthquake (Ms 8.2). Part 1: source estimation of calibration event and modeling of wave propagation path. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88, 183–205.
59. Somerville, P. G., 1998. Development of an improved representation of near fault ground motions. In Proceedings SMIP98 Seminar on Utilization of Strong Motion Data, California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program, Oakland, pp. 1–20.
60. Somerville, P. G., 2002. Characterizing near fault ground motion for the design and evaluation of bridges. In Nimis, R., and Bruneau, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Third National Seismic Conference and Workshop on Bridges and Highways. MCEER, Buttalo, pp. 137–148.
61. Somerville, P. G., Smith, N. F., Graves, R. W., and Abrahamson, N. A., 1997. Modification of Modification of Empirical Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations to Include the Amplitude and Duration effects of rupture Directivity. Seismological Research Letters, 68, 199–222.
62. Strasser, F. O., and Bommer, J. J., 2009. Review: Strong Ground Motions – Have we seen the worst? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 99, 2613–2637.
63. Takenaka, H., Furumura, T., and Fujiwara, H., 1998. Recent developments in numerical methods for ground motion simulation. In Irikura, K., Kudo, K., Okada, H., and Sasatani, T. (eds.), The Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion. Rotterdam: Balkema, Vol. 2, pp. 91–101.
64. Trifunac, M. D., and Westermo, B. D., 1977. A note on the correlation of frequency dependent duration of strong earthquake ground motion with the modified Mercalli intensity and the geologic conditions at the recording site. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 67, 917–27.
65. Villaverde, R., 2009. Fundamental Concepts of Earthquake Engineering. Boca Raton: CRC.
66. Wells, D. L., and Coppersmith, K. J., 1994. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84, 974–1002.
67. Wu, R. S., and Maupin, V., 2007. Advances in wave propagation in heterogeneous earth. In Dmowska, R. (ed.), Advances in Geophysics. San Diego: Elsevier–Academic, Vol. 48.
68. Yoshimura, C., Bielak, J., Hisada, Y., and Fernandez, A., 2003. Domain reduction method for three-dimensional earthquake modeling in localized regions part II: verification and applications. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93, 825–840.
69. Youd, T. L., 2003. Liquefaction mechanisms and induced ground failure. In Lee, W. H. K., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P. C., and Kisslinger, C. (eds.), International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology. San Diego: Academic. IASPEI, Vol. 81B, pp. 1159–1173.
70. Zahradnik, J., and Moczo, P., 1996. Hybrid seismic modeling based on discrete-wave number and finite-difference methods. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 148, 21–38.