Three-dimensional finite difference method and hybrid modeling of earthquake ground motion

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Volumn 107, Issue 8, 2002, Pages

  Oprsal, Ivo ^a   Zahradnik, Jiri ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Earthquake ground motion; Hybrid modeling 3 D finite differences; Parameter studies; Seismic waves; Site effects

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC HAZARD; SITE EFFECT; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 0037055947     PISSN: 21699313     EISSN: 21699356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aboudi, J., Numerical simulation of seismic sources, Geophysics, 36, 810-821, 1971.
2. Aki, K., and P. G. Richards, Quantitative Seismology Theory and Methods, Chapter 4, W. H. Freeman, New York, 1980.
3. Alterman, Z., and F. C. Karal, Propagation of elastic waves in layered media by finite-difference methods, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 58, 367-398, 1968.
4. Bielak, J., and P. Christiano, On the effective seismic input for nonlinear soil-structure interaction systems, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 12, 107-119, 1984.
5. Boore, D. M., Love waves in a nonuniform waveguides: Finite difference calculations. J. Geophys. Res., 75, 1512-1527, 1970.
6. Boore, D. M., Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on a seismological models of the radiated spectra, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 73, 1865-1894, 1983.
7. Caserta, A., J. Zahradnik, and V. Plicka, Ground motion modeling with a stochastically perturbed excitation, J. Seismol., 3, 45-59, 1999.
8. Cerjan, C., R. Kosloff, and M. Reshef, A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations, Geophysics, 50, 705-708, 1985.
9. Cremonini, M. G., P. Christiano, and J. Bielak, Implementation of effective seismic input for soil-structure interaction systems, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 16, 615-625, 1988.
10. Eisner, L., and R. W. Clayton, Equivalent medium parameters for numerical modeling in media with near surface low velocities, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., in press, 2001.
11. Emerman, S. H., and R. A. Stephen, Comment on "Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations" by R. Clayton and B. Enquist, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 73, 661-665, 1983.
12. Faeh, D., and P. Suhadolc, Application of numerical wave-propagation techniques to study local soil effects-The case of Benevento (Italy), Pure Appl. Geophys., 143, 513-536, 1994.
13. Faeh, D., P. Suhadolc, S. Mueller, and G. F. Panza, A hybrid method for the estimation of ground motion in sedimentary basins-Quantitative modeling for Mexico City, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, 383-399, 1994.
14. Falk, J., E. Tessmer, and D. Grajevski, Tube wave modeling by the finite-differences method with varying grid spacing, Pure Appl. Geophys., 148, 77-93, 1996.
15. Fornberg, B., Generation of finite difference formulas on arbitrarily spaced grids, Math. Comput., 51, 699-706, 1988.
16. Fujiwara, H., Seismic wave fields in multi-layered media calculated by hybrid combination of boundary element method and thin layer finite element method-The case of two-dimensional SH-wavefields, J. Phys. Earth, 44, 61-77, 1996.
17. Goh, J. T., and H. Schmidt, A hybrid coupled wave-number integration approach to range-dependent seismoacoustic modeling, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 100, 1409-1420, 1996.
18. Graves, R. W., Long period 3-D finite-difference modeling of the Kobe mainshock, in The Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, Part III, Proceedings of ESG'98, December 1-3, 1998, Yokohama, Japan, edited by K. Irikura et al., pp. 1339-1345, A. A. Balkema, Brookfield, Vt., 1999.
19. Hatayama, K., and H. Fujiwara, Excitation of secondary Love and Rayleigh waves in a three-dimensional sedimentary basin evaluated by the direct boundary element method with normal modes. Geophys. J. Int., 133, 260-278, 1998.
20. Hestholm, S., Elastic wave modeling with free surfaces: Stability of long simulations, Geophysics, in press, 2001.
21. Hestholm, S. O., and B. O. Ruud, 2-D finite difference elastic wave modeling including surface topography, Geophys. Prospect., 42, 371-390, 1994.
22. Jastram, C., and E. Tessmer, Elastic modelling scheme on a grid with vertically varying spacing, Geophys. Prospect., 42, 357-370, 1994.
23. Kamae, K., K. Irikura, and A. Pitarka, A technique for simulating strong motion using hybrid Green's function, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 88, 357-367, 1998.
24. Láska, V., and V. Hruška, Teorie a prakse numerického počitáni, 485 pp., Jednota Československých Matemat. a Fys., Prague, 1934.
25. Lecomte, I., Hybrid modeling with ray tracing and finite difference, paper presented at the 66th Annual International Exposition and 66th Annual Meeting, Soc. of Explor. Geophys., Denver, Colo., Nov. 1996.
26. Maggio, F., and A. Quateroni, Hybrid finite element-spectral element methods for wave propagation problems, paper presented at Proceedings of Second European Conference on Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications, Heidelberg Univ., Heidelberg, Germany, 1997.
27. McLaughlin, K. L., and S. M. Day, 3D elastic finite difference seismic wave simulations, Comput. Phys., 8, 656-663, 1994.
28. Moczo, P., Finite-difference technique for SH-waves in 2-D media using irregular grids-Application to the seismic response problem, Geophys. J. Int., 99, 321-329, 1989.
29. Moczo, P., E. Bystricky, J. Kristek, J. M. Carcione, and M. Bouchon, Hybrid modeling of P-SV seismic motion at inhomogeneous viscoelastic topographic structures, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87, 1305-1323, 1997.
30. Moczo, P., M. Lucka, J. Kristek, and M. Kristekova, 3D displacement finite differences and a combined memory optimization, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 89, 69-79, 1999.
31. Muir, F., J. Dellinger, J. Etgen, and D. Nichols, Modeling elastic fields across irregular boundaries, Geophysics, 57, 1189-1193, 1992.
32. Olsen, K. B., R. Nigbor, and T. Konno, 3D viscoelastic wave propagation in the upper Borrego Valley, California, constrained by borehole and surface data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90, 134-150, 2000.
33. Oprsal, I., and J. Zahradnik, Elastic finite-difference method for irregular grids, Geophysics, 64, 240-250, 1999a.
34. Oprsal, I., and J. Zahradnik, From unstable to stable seismic modeling by finite-difference method, Phys. Chem. Earth, Part A, 24, 247-252, 1999b.
35. Oprsal, I., M. Pakzad, V. Plicka, and J. Zahradnik, Ground motion simulation by hybrid methods, in The Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion. Part II, Proceedings of ESG'98, December 1-3. 1998, Yokohama, Japan, edited by K. Irikura et al., pp. 955-960, A. A. Balkema, Brookfield, Vt., 1998.
36. Piserchia, P. F., J. Virieux, D. Rodrigues, S. Gaffet, and J. Talandier, Hybrid numerical modelling of T-wave propagation: Application to the midplate experiment, Geophys. J. Int., 133, 789-800, 1998.
37. Pitarka, A., 3D elastic finite-difference modeling of seismic motion using staggered grids, with nonuniform spacing, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 89, 54-68, 1999.
38. Robertsson, J. O. A., and C. H. Chapman, An efficient method for calculating finite-difference seismograms after model alterations, Geophysics, 65, 907-918, 2000.
39. Rovelli, A., A. Caserta, L. Malagnini, and F. Marra, Assessment of potential strong ground motions in the city of Rome, Ann. Geofis., 37, 1745-1769, 1994.
40. Virieux, J., P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity-stress finite-difference method, Geophysics, 51, 889-901, 1986.
41. Wen, L. X., and D. V. Helmberger, A two-dimensional P-SV hybrid method and its application to modeling localized structures near the core-mantle boundary, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17,901-17,918, 1998.
42. Yokoi, T., and F. J. Sánchez-Sesma, A hybrid calculation technique of the indirect boundary element method and the analytical solutions for three-dimensional problems of topography, Geophys. J. Int., 133, 121-139, 1998.
43. Zahradnik, J., Simple elastic finite-difference scheme, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 85, 1879-1887, 1995.
44. Zahradnik, J., and P. Moczo, Hybrid seismic modeling based on discretewave number and finite-difference methods, Pure Appl. Geophys., 148, 21-38, 1996.
45. Zhang, B., A. S. Papageorgiou, and J. L. Tassoulas, A hybrid numerical technique, combining the finite-element and boundary-element methods, for modeling the 3D response of 2D scatterers, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 88, 1036-1050, 1998.