Salt Bridge in Aqueous Solution: Strong Structural Motifs but Weak Enthalpic Effect

Scientific Reports

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Pylaeva, Svetlana ^a   Brehm, Martin ^a   Sebastiani, Daniel ^a  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGININE; INORGANIC SALT; ION; PROTEIN; SOLVENT; WATER;

CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; THERMODYNAMICS;

ARGININE; IONS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SALTS; SOLUTIONS; SOLVENTS; THERMODYNAMICS; WATER;

EID: 85053242822     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31935-z     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Donald, J. E., Kulp, D. W. & DeGrado, W. F. Salt bridges: Geometrically specific, designable interactions. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinforma. 79, 898–915, 10.1002/prot.22927 (2011)
2. Bosshard, H. R., Marti, D. N. & Jelesarov, I. Protein stabilization by salt bridges: Concepts, experimental approaches and clarification of some misunderstandings. J. Mol. Recognit. 17, 1–16, 10.1002/jmr.657 (2004)
3. Waldburger, C., Schildbach, J. & Sauer, R. T. Are buried salt bridges important for protein stability and conformational specificity? Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 122–8, PMID:7749916 (1995)
4. Petrauskas, V., Maximowitsch, E. & Matulis, D. Thermodynamics of ion pair formations between charged poly(amino acid)s. The J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 12164–12171, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05767. PMID: 26317887 (2015)
5. Pluhařová, E., Marsalek, O., Schmidt, B. & Jungwirth, P. Peptide salt bridge stability: From gas phase via microhydration to bulk water simulations. The J. Chem. Phys. 137, 185101, 10.1063/1.4765052 (2012)
6. Draper, D. E. A guide to ions and rna structure. RNA 10, 335–343, 10.1261/rna.5205404 (2004)
7. 21–30 fragment: A molecular-dynamics study. The J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 6614–6624, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp312653h. PMID: 23675877 (2013)
8. Fox, J. M. et al. Interactions between hofmeister anions and the binding pocket of a protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3859–3866, 10.1021/jacs.5b00187. PMID: 25738615 (2015)
9. 21-30 caused by ions in solution. J. Phys. Chem. B 131121094906005, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp408579v (2013)
10. 2+-binding, and oxidation on amyloid-β peptide dimers. Chem. Commun. 10.1039/C8CC02263A (2018)
11. Bye, J. W. & Falconer, R. J. Thermal stability of lysozyme as a function of ion concentration: A reappraisal of the relationship between the hofmeister series and protein stability. Protein Sci. 22, 1563–1570, 10.1002/pro.2355 (2013)
12. Pegram, L. M. et al. Why hofmeister effects of many salts favor protein folding but not dna helix formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 7716–7721, 10.1073/pnas.0913376107 (2010)
13. Senske, M. et al. The temperature dependence of the hofmeister series: thermodynamic fingerprints of cosolute-protein interactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 29698–29708, 10.1039/C6CP05080H (2016)
14. Hofmeister, F. Zur lehre von der wirkung der salze. Arch. fuer experimentelle Pathol. und Pharmakologie 24, 247–260, 10.1007/BF01918191 (1888)
15. Rinne, K. F., Schulz, J. C. F. & Netz, R. R. Impact of secondary structure and hydration water on the dielectric spectrum of poly-alanine and possible relation to the debate on slaved versus slaving water. The J. Chem. Phys. 142, 215104, 10.1063/1.4921777 (2015)
16. Fenimore, P. W., Frauenfelder, H., McMahon, B. H. & Parak, F. G. Slaving: Solvent fluctuations dominate protein dynamics and functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99, 16047–16051, 10.1073/pnas.212637899 (2002)
17. Daldrop, J. O. et al. Orientation of non-spherical protonated water clusters revealed by infrared absorption dichroism. Nat. Commun. 9, 311 (2018)
18. −. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 19895, 10.1039/c1cp21834d (2011)
19. +. J. Solut. Chem. 5, 365–388, 10.1007/bf00646412 (1976)
20. Langer, H. & Hertz, H. The Structure of the First Hydration Sphere of Ions in Electrolyte Solutions A Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Study. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 81, 478–490, 10.1002/bbpc.19770810506 (1977)
21. + by the Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Method. Z. Phys. Chem. 140, 55–70, 10.1524/zpch.1984.140.1.055 (1984)
22. Sacco, A. Structure and dynamics of electrolyte solutions. A NMR relaxation approach. Chem. Soc. Rev. 23, 129, 10.1039/cs9942300129 (1994)
23. Kim, J. S., Wu, Z., Morrow, A. R., Yethiraj, A. & Yethiraj, A. Self-Diffusion and Viscosity in Electrolyte Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 12007–12013, 10.1021/jp306847t (2012)
24. Allolio, C., Salas-Illanes, N., Desmukh, Y. S., Hansen, M. R. & Sebastiani, D. H-bonding competition and clustering in aqueous lii. The J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 9939–9946, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4033468. PMID: 23909514 (2013)
25. Stirnemann, G., Wernersson, E., Jungwirth, P. & Laage, D. Mechanisms of Acceleration and Retardation of Water Dynamics by Ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11824–11831, 10.1021/ja405201s (2013)
26. Lyubartsev, A. P. & Laaksonen, A. Concentration Effects in Aqueous NaCl Solutions. A Molecular Dynamics Simulation. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 16410–16418, 10.1021/jp961317h (1996)
27. Okur, H. I. et al. Beyond the hofmeister series: Ion-specific effects on proteins and their biological functions. The J. Phys. Chem. B 121, 1997–2014, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b10797. PMID: 28094985 (2017)
28. Zhang, Y. & Cremer, P. S. Interactions between macromolecules and ions: the hofmeister series. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 10, 658–663, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.09.020. Model systems/Biopolymers (2006)
29. Debiec, K. T., Gronenborn, A. M. & Chong, L. T. Evaluating the strength of salt bridges: A comparison of current biomolecular force fields. The J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 6561–6569, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp500958r. PMID: 24702709 (2014)
30. Piana, S., Lindorff-Larsen, K. & Shaw, D. E. How robust are protein folding simulations with respect to force field parameterization? Biophys. J. 100, L47–L49, 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.051 (2011)
31. Rauscher, S. et al. Structural ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins depend strongly on force field: A comparison to experiment. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 5513–5524, 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00736 (2015)
32. Huang, J., Lopes, P. E. M., Roux, B. & MacKerell, A. D. Recent advances in polarizable force fields for macromolecules: Microsecond simulations of proteins using the classical drude oscillator model. The J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 3144–3150, https://doi.org/10.1021/jz501315h. PMID: 25247054 (2014)
33. Luo, Y., Jiang, W., Yu, H., MacKerell, A. D. & Roux, B. Simulation study of ion pairing in concentrated aqueous salt solutions with a polarizable force field. Faraday Discuss. 160, 135–149, 10.1039/C2FD20068F (2013)
34. Fyta, M. & Netz, R. R. Ionic force field optimization based on single-ion and ion-pair solvation properties: Going beyond standard mixing rules. The J. Chem. Phys. 136, 124103, 10.1063/1.3693330 (2012)
35. Gee, M. B. et al. A kirkwood-buff derived force field for aqueous alkali halides. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 1369–1380, 10.1021/ct100517z. PMID: 21789033 (2011)
36. Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. Software X 1–2, 19–25, 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 (2015)
37. Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh ewald method. The J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577–8593, 10.1063/1.470117 (1995)
38. Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101, 10.1063/1.2408420 (2007)
39. Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182–7190, 10.1063/1.328693 (1981)
40. Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Crystal structure and pair potentials: A molecular-dynamics study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1196–1199, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.1196 (1980)
41. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD–Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996)
42. Brehm, M. & Kirchner, B. Travis–a free analyzer and visualizer for monte carlo and molecular dynamics trajectories. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51, 2007–2023 (2011)
43. Grace, (c) 1996–2008 grace development team, see http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/grace
44. Rapaport, D. Hydrogen bonds in water. Mol. Phys. 50, 1151–1162, 10.1080/00268978300102931 (1983)
45. Gehrke, S. et al. Structure and lifetimes in ionic liquids and their mixtures. Faraday Discuss. 206, 219–245, 10.1039/C7FD00166E (2017)