The Quantitative Evaluation of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program Based on Science Mapping and Scientometric Analysis

Clinical and Translational Science

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 452-457

  Zhang, Yin ^a   Wang, Lei ^a   Diao, Tianxi ^a  

^a Beijing Institute of Health Service and Medical Information   (China)

Author keywords

CTSA; Quantitative evaluation; Science mapping; Scientometric analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARDS AND PRIZES; CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; SCIENCE;

CTSA; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION; SCIENCE MAPPING; SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS;

AWARDS AND PRIZES; BIBLIOMETRICS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84890215428     PISSN: 17528054     EISSN: 17528062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cts.12078     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wehling M. Translational medicine: can it really facilitate the transition of research "from bench to bedside"? Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006; 62(2): 91-95.
2. O'Connell D, Roblin D. Translational research in the pharmaceutical industry: from bench to bedside. Drug Discov Today. 2006; 11(17-18): 833-838.
3. Rosenblum D, Alving B. The role of the clinical and translational science awards program in improving the quality and efficiency of clinical research. Chest. 2011; 140(3): 764-767.
4. Selker HP, Strom BL, Ford DE, Meltzer DO, Pauker SG, Pincus HA, Rich EC, Tompkins C, Whitlock EP. White paper on CTSA consortium role in facilitating comparative effectiveness research: September 23, 2009 CTSA consortium strategic goal committee on comparative effectiveness research. Clin Transl Sci. 2010; 3(1): 29-37.
5. Huskins WC, Sullivan CD, Wang J, Aitken M, Alexander SR, Epstein LG, Hoberman A, Neufeld E, Philipps A, Shanley TP, Szilagyi P, Purucker M, Barkin SL. Tracking the impact of the national institutes of health clinical and translational science awards on child health research: developing and evaluating a measurement strategy. Pediatr Res. 2012; 71(5): 619-624.
6. Hollander JE, Gaulton GN, Courtney DM, Lewis RJ, Lowe RA, Becker MO, Neumar RW. Facilitating emergency care research networks: integration into the clinical translational and science award (CTSA) infrastructure. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16(10): 1005-1009.
7. Berglund L, Tarantal A. Strategies for innovation and interdisciplinary translational research: removal of barriers through the CTSA mechanism. J Investig Med. 2009; 57(2): 474-476.
8. Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Russo MJ, Wang YC. Integrating economic evaluation methods into clinical and translational science award consortium comparative effectiveness educational goals. Acad Med. 2011; 86(6): 701-705.
9. Speicher LA, Fromell G, Avery S, Brassil D, Carlson L, Stevens E, Toms M. The critical need for academic health centers to assess the training, support, and career development requirements of clinical research coordinators: recommendations from the clinical and translational science award research coordinator taskforce. Clin Transl Sci. 2012; 5(6): 470-475.
10. Rubio DM, Sufian M, Trochim WM. Strategies for a national evaluation of the clinical and translational science awards. Clin Transl Sci. 2012; 5(2): 138-139.
11. Marantz PR, Strelnick AH, Currie B, Bhalla R, Blank AE, Meissner P, Selwyn PA, Walker EA, Hsu DT, Shamoon H. Developing a multidisciplinary model of comparative effectiveness research within a clinical and translational science award. Acad Med. 2011; 86(6): 712-717.
12. Kost RG, Reider C, Stephens J, Schuff KG, Clinical and Translational Science Award Research Subject Advocacy Survey Taskforce. Research subject advocacy: program implementation and evaluation at clinical and translational science award centers. Acad Med. 2012; 87(9): 1228-1236.
13. Heller C, deMelo-Martin I. Clinical and translational science awards: can they increase the efficiency and speed of clinical and translational research? Acad Med. 2009; 84(4): 424-432.
14. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2011; 62(7): 1382-1402.
15. Chen C, Hu Z, Liu S, Tseng H. Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012; 12(5): 593-608.
16. CiteSpace: Visualizing patterns and trends in scientific literature. http://cluster.ischool.drexel.edu/~cchen/citespace/download.html. Accessed Jan 1, 2013; 2013.
17. http://www8.umu.se/inforsk/Bibexcel/. Accessed Jan 1, 2013; 2013.
18. Chen K, Guan J. A bibliometric investigation of research performance in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals. J Informetrics. 2011; 5(2): 233-247.
19. Zhang J, Xie J, Hou W, Tu X, Xu J, Song F, Wang Z, Lu Z. Mapping the knowledge structure of research on patient adherence: knowledge domain visualization based co-word analysis and social network analysis. PloS One. 2012; 7(4): e34497.
20. Chen C. CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2006; 57(3): 359-377.
21. Tari L, Tu PH, Hakenberg J, Chen Y, Son TC, Gonzalez, G, Baral C. Incremental information extraction using relational databases. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng. 2012; 24(1): 86-99.
22. Feldman R, Regev Y, Gorodetsky M. A modular information extraction system. Intell Data Anal. 2008; 12(1): 51-71.
23. Viedma-Del-Jesus MI, Perakakis P, Muñoz MÁ, López-Herrera AG, Vila J. Sketching the first 45 years of the journal psychophysiology (1964-2008): a co-word-based analysis. Psychophysiology. 2011; 48(8): 1029-1036.
24. He Q. Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends. 1999; 48(1): 133-159.
25. Li H, Cui L, Cui M. Hot topics in chinese herbal drugs research documented in PubMed/MEDLINE® by authors inside china and outside of china in the past 10 years: based on co-word cluster analysis. J Altern Complement Med. 2009; 15(7): 779-785.
26. Sun A, Zeng DD, Chen H. Burst detection from multiple data streams: a network-based approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev. 2010; 40(3): 258-267.
27. Kleinberg J. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Mining Knowledge Discov. 2003; 7(4): 373-397.
28. Mane KK, Börner K. Mapping topics and topic bursts in PNAS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(Suppl 1): 5287-5290.
29. Zhang X, Huang D, Li F. Cancer nursing research output and topics in the first decade of the 21st century: Results of a bibliometric and co-word cluster analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011; 12: 2055-2058.
30. Lv PH, Wang G, Wan Y, Liu J, Liu Q, Ma F. Bibliometric trend analysis on global graphene research. Scientometrics. 2011; 88(2): 399-419.
31. Knafl K, Grey M. Clinical translational science awards: opportunities and challenges for nurse scientists. Nurs Outlook. 2008; 56(3): 132-137.e4.
32. CTSA Principal Investigators, Shamoon H, Center D, Davis P, Tuchman M, Ginsberg H, Califf R, Stephens D, Mellman T, Verbalis J, Nadler L, Shekhar A, Ford D, Rizza R, Shaker R, Brady K, Murphy B, Cronstein B, Hochman J, Greenland P, Orwoll E, Sinoway L, Greenberg H, Jackson R, Coller B, Topol E, Guay-Woodford L, Runge M, Clark R, McClain D, Selker H, Lowery C, Dubinett S, Berglund L, Cooper D, Firestein G, Johnston SC, Solway J, Heubi J, Sokol R, Nelson D, Tobacman L, Rosenthal G, Aaronson L, Barohn R, Kern P, Sullivan J, Shanley T, Blazar B, Larson R, FitzGerald G, Reis S, Pearson T, Buchanan T, McPherson D, Brasier A, Toto R, Disis M, Drezner M, Bernard G, Clore J, Evanoff B, Imperato-McGinley J, Sherwin R, Pulley J. Preparedness of the CTSA's structural and scientific assets to support the mission of the national center for advancing translational sciences (NCATS). Clin Transl Sci. 2012; 5(2): 121-129.