Rapid systematic review shows that using a high-flow nasal cannula is inferior to nasal continuous positive airway pressure as first-line support in preterm neonates

Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics

Volumn 107, Issue 10, 2018, Pages 1684-1696

  Conte, Francesca ^a   Orfeo, Luigi ^a   Gizzi, Camilla ^b   Massenzi, Luca ^a   Fasola, Salvatore ^c,d  

^a SAN GIOVANNI CALIBITA FATEBENEFRATELLI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b Azienda Ospedaliera Regionale San Carlo   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia; Continuous positive airway pressure; High flow nasal cannula; Neonate; Respiratory distress

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY PRESSURE; ASSISTED VENTILATION; HUMAN; LUNG DYSPLASIA; NOSE INJURY; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESPIRATORY TRACT INTUBATION; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT FAILURE; CANNULA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; NEONATAL RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; NEWBORN; NONINVASIVE VENTILATION;

CANNULA; CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; NONINVASIVE VENTILATION; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN;

EID: 85053078880     PISSN: 08035253     EISSN: 16512227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/apa.14396     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Dysart K, Miller TL, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH. Research in high flow therapy: mechanisms of action. Respir Med 2009; 103: 1400–5.
2. Manley BJ, Owen LS. High-flow nasal cannula: mechanisms, evidence and recommendations. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 21: 139–45.
3. Shetty S, Sundaresan A, Hunt K, Desai P, Greenough A. Changes in the use of humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2016; 101: F371–2.
4. Hough JL, Shearman AD, Jardine LA, Davies MW. Humidified high flow nasal cannulae: current practice in Australasian nurseries, a survey. J Paediatr Child Health 2012; 48: 106–13.
5. Roberts CT, Owen LS, Manley BJ, Davis PG, Manley BJ, Australian & New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN). High-flow support in very preterm infants in Australia and New Zealand. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2016; 101: F401–3.
6. Mukerji A, Shah PS, Shivananda S, Yee W, Read B, Minski J, et al. Canadian Neonatal Network Investigators. Survey of noninvasive respiratory support practices in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr 2017; 106: 387–93.
7. Motojima Y, Ito M, Oka S, Uchiyama A, Tamura M, Namba F. Use of high-flow nasal cannula in neonates: Nationwide survey in Japan. Pediatr Int 2016; 58: 308–10.
8. Osman M, Elsharkawy A, Abdel-Hady H. Assessment of pain during application of nasal-continuous positive airway pressure and heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannulae in preterm infants. J Perinatol 2015; 35: 263–7.
9. Klingenberg C, Pettersen M, Hansen EA, Gustavsen LJ, Dahl IA, Leknessund A, et al. Patient comfort during treatment with heated humidified high flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomised cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014; 99: F134–7.
10. Roberts CT, Manley BJ, Dawson JA, Davis PG. Nursing perceptions of high-flow nasal cannulae treatment for very preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health 2014; 50: 806–10.
11. Lemyre B, Laughon M, Bose C, Davis PG. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 12: CD005384.
12. Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O'Donnell CP, De Paoli AG, Manley BJ. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2: CD006405.
13. Kotecha SJ, Adappa R, Gupta N, Watkins WJ, Kotecha S, Chakraborty M. Safety and efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2015; 136: 542–53.
14. Fleeman N, Mahon J, Bates V, Dickson R, Dundar Y, Dwan K, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with usual care for preterm infants: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2016; 20: 1–68.
15. Yoder BA, Manley B, Collins C, Ives K, Kugelman A, Lavizzari A, et al. Consensus approach to nasal high-flow therapy in neonates. J Perinatol 2017; 37: 809–13.
16. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. New York: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: http://handbook.cochrane.org.
17. Kelly SE, Moher D, Clifford TJ. Defining rapid review: a modified Delphi consensus approach. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2016; 32: 265–75.
18. Ganann R, Ciliska D, Thomas H. Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implement Sci 2010; 5: 56.
19. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700.
20. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan) Computer program, version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, 2014.
21. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14: 135.
22. Guyatt H, Oxman D, Kunz R, Vist E, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann J. GRADE Working Group. What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 2008; 336: 995–8.
23. Schünemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. 2013. Available from URL www.guidelinedevelopment.org/handbook
24. GRADE Working Group. GRADEpro GDT Computer program. Hamilton: GRADE Working Group, McMaster University, 2015.
25. Tricco AC, Langlois EV, Straus SE. Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide. Geneva: World Health Organization, Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, 2017.
26. Yoder BA, Stoddard RA, Li M, King J, Dirnberger DR, Abbasi S. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates. Pediatrics 2013; 131: e1482–90.
27. Roberts CT, Owen LS, Manley BJ, Frøisland DH, Donath SM, Dalziel KM, et al. Nasal high-flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 1142–51.
28. Iranpour R, Sadeghnia A, Hesaraki M. High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the management of respiratory distress syndrome. J Isfahan Med School 2011; 29: 761–71.
29. Nair G, Karna P. Comparison of the effects of Vapotherm and nasal CPAP in respiratory distress in preterm infants. In: Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting 2005. Washington, DC, 2005.
30. Lavizzari A, Colnaghi M, Ciuffini F, Veneroni C, Musumeci S, Cortinovis I, et al. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome of prematurity: a randomized clinical noninferiority trial. JAMA Pediatr 2016; 170: 1228.
31. Shin J, Park K, Lee EH, Choi BM. Humidified high flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as an initial respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress: a randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial. J Korean Med Sci 2017; 32: 650–5.
32. Kugelman A, Riskin A, Said W, Shoris I, Mor F, Bader D. A randomized pilot study comparing heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with NIPPV for RDS. Pediatr Pulmonol 2015; 50: 576–83.
33. Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163: 1723–9.
34. Gøtzsche PC. Lessons from and cautions about noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. JAMA 2006; 295: 1172–4.
35. Mauri L, D'Agostino RB. Challenges in the design and interpretation of noninferiority trials. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 1357–67.
36. Kubicka ZJ, Limauro J, Darnall RA. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy: yet another way to deliver continuous positive airway pressure? Pediatrics 2008; 121: 82–8.
37. Lampland AL, Plumm B, Meyers PA, Worwa CT, Mammel MC. Observational study of humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatr 2009; 154: 177–82.
38. Manley BJ, Owen LS, Doyle LW, Andersen CC, Cartwright DW, Pritchard MA, et al. High-flow nasal cannulae in very preterm infants after extubation. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1425–33.
39. Ciuffini F, Pietrasanta C, Lavizzari A, Musumeci S, Gualdi C, Sortino S, et al. Comparison between two different modes of non-invasive ventilatory support in preterm newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome mild to moderate: preliminary data. Pediatr Med Chir 2014; 36: 88.
40. Buscemi N, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, Tjosvold L, Klassen TPJ. Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 697–703.
41. Abou-Setta AM, Jeyaraman MM, Attia A, Al-Inany HG, Ferri M, Ansari MT, et al. Methods for developing evidence reviews in short periods of time: a scoping review. PLoS ONE 2016; 11: e0165903.
42. Isayama T, Iwami H, McDonald S, Beyene J. Association of noninvasive ventilation strategies with mortality and bronchopulmonary dysplasia among preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2016; 316: 611–24.