Comparison between two different modes of non-invasive ventilatory support in preterm newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome mild to moderate: Preliminary data;Confronto tra due diverse modalità di assistenza ventilatoria non invasiva in neonati pretermine con sindrome da distress respiratorio lieve-moderata: Dati preliminari

Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 153-158

  Ciuffini, F ^a   Pietrasanta, C ^a   Lavizzari, A ^a   Musumeci, S ^a   Gualdi, C ^a   Sortino, S ^a   Colnaghi, Mariarosa ^a   Mosca, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Non invasive ventilation; Preterm infant; Respiratory distress syndrome

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; NASAL CANNULA; NONINVASIVE VENTILATION; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREMATURITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME;

EID: 84994876225     PISSN: 03915387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4081/pmc.2014.88     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Donn SM, Sinha SK. Minimising ventilator induced lung injury in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 2006; 91: 226-230.
2. Courtney SE, Barrington KJ. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Noninvasive Ventilation. Clin Perinatol 2007; 34: 73-92.
3. Cheema IU, Ahluwalia JS. The rational use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Current pediatrics 2003; 13: 190-195.
4. Yong SC, Chen SJ, Boo NY. Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure therapy in VLBWI: a randomized control study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90 (6): F480-483
5. Jatana KR, Oplatek A, Stein M, Phillips G, Kang DR, Elmaraghy CA. Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure and cannula use in the neonatal intensive care unit setting. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136(3): 287-91.
6. Wilkinson D, Andersen CC and Holberton J. Should high flow nasal cannula be used for respiratory support in preterm infants? Neonatology Today 2008; volume 3/issue 8: pag 1
7. Dani C, Pratesi S, Migliori C, Bertini G. High flow nasal cannula therapy as respiratory support in the preterm infant. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009 Jul; 44(7): 629-34
8. Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O’Donnell CP, et al. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 5: CD006405.
9. Jobe AH. The new bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Current Opinion in Pediatrics 2011, 23: 167-172
10. Kugelman A, Durand M. A comprehensive approach to the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011 Dec; 46(12): 1153-65.
11. Pfister RH, Soll RF. Initial respiratory support of preterm infants: the role of CPAP, the INSURE method, and noninvasive ventilation. Clin Perinatol 2012; 39(3): 459-81
12. Carlo WA. Gentle ventilation: the new evidence from the SUPPORT, COIN, VON, CURPAP, Colombian Network, and Neocosur Network trials. Early Hum Dev. 2012; 88 Suppl 2: S81-3
13. Manley BJ, Dold SK, Davis PG, Roehr CC. High-flow nasal cannulae for respiratory support of preterm infants: a review of the evidence. Neonatology. 2012; 102(4): 300-8.
14. Collins CL, Holberton JR, Barfield C, Davis PG. A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive pressure postextubation in premature infants. J Pediatr. 2013 May; 162(5): 949-54.e1
15. Sivieri EM, Gerdes JS, Abbasi S. Effect of HFNC Flow Rate, Cannula Size, and Nares Diameter on Generated Airway Pressures: An In Vitro Study. Pediatric Pulmonology 2013, May; 48(5): 506-14
16. Dysart K, Miller T, Wolfson M, Shaffer T. Research in high flow: mechanisms of action. Respiratory Medicine 2009; 20: 1-6
17. Wilkinson DJ, Andersen CC, Smith K, et al. Pharyngeal pressure with high-flow nasal cannulae in premature infants. J Perinatol 2008; 28: 42-47.
18. Hasan RA, Habib RH. Effects of flow rate and airleak at the nares and mouth opening on positive distending pressure delivery using commercially available high-flow nasal cannula systems: a lung model study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011; 12: e29-e33.