Comment & response

JAMA Pediatrics

Volumn 170, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 1228-

  Lavizzari, Anna ^a   Colnaghi, Mariarosa ^a   Ciuffini, Francesca ^a   Veneroni, Chiara ^b   Cortinovis, Ivan ^a   Musumeci, Stefano ^a   Mosca, Fabio ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^c FONDAZIONE IRCCS CA GRANDA OSPEDALE MAGGIORE POLICLINICO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; HUMAN; LETTER; NASAL CANNULA; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE VENTILATOR; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; CANNULA; INFANT; NEONATAL RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; NEWBORN; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRELIMINARY DATA;

CANNULA; CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; PRELIMINARY DATA; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, ADULT; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN;

EID: 85011341302     PISSN: 21686203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1243     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Lavizzari A, Colnaghi M, Ciuffini F, et al. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome of prematurity: a randomized clinical noninferiority trial [published online August 8, 2016]. JAMA Pediatr. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1243
2. Ciuffini F, Pietrasanta C, Lavizzari A, et al. Comparison between two different modes of non-invasive ventilatory support in preterm newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome mild to moderate: preliminary data. Pediatr Med Chir. 2014;36(4):88.