메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 59, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 697-703

Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews

Author keywords

Data extraction; Data handling error; Meta analysis; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA EXTRACTION; ERROR; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STUDENT T TEST; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 33744797104     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.010     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (317)

References (6)
  • 1
    • 33744806481 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Strang WN, Boissel P, Uberla K. Inter-reader variation. 2nd International Conference. Scientific Basis of Health Services & 5th Annual Cochrane Colloquium, October 1997, Amsterdam.
  • 2
    • 33744804940 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Jones A. Improving the reliability of data extraction [abstract]. XI Cochrane Colloquium: evidence, health care and culture, October 2003, Spain.
  • 3
    • 3042617663 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reviewing measures of outcome: reliability of data extraction
    • Haywood K.L., Hargreaves J., White R., and Lamb S.E. Reviewing measures of outcome: reliability of data extraction. J Eval Clin Pract 10 (2004) 329-337
    • (2004) J Eval Clin Pract , vol.10 , pp. 329-337
    • Haywood, K.L.1    Hargreaves, J.2    White, R.3    Lamb, S.E.4
  • 4
    • 33744793865 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT, editors. Cochrane reviewers' handbook 4.2.2 [updated December 2003]. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2004.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.