3D bacterial cellulose biofilms formed by foam templating

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Rühs, Patrick A ^a,b   Storz, Flavian ^a   López Gómez, Yuly A ^a   Haug, Matthias ^a   Fischer, Peter ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; MANNITOL; SURFACTANT; XANTHAN;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIUM; BIOFILM; BIOREMEDIATION; ELASTICITY; FLOW KINETICS; FOAM; FOAMING; GLUCONOACETOBACTER XYLINUS; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 85053010858     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20555008     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41522-018-0064-3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Prosser, J. I. et al. The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology. Nat. Rev. Micro. 5, 384–392 (2007)
2. Hall-Stoodley, L., Costerton, J. W. & Stoodley, P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Micro. 2, 95–108 (2004)
3. Branda, S. S. Vik, Å. Friedman, L. & Kolter, R. Biofilms: the matrix revisited. Trends Microbiol. 13, 20–26 (2005)
4. Bottan, S. et al. Surface-structured bacterial cellulose with guided assembly-based biolithography (GAB). ACS Nano 9, 206–219 (2015)
5. Czaja, W., Krystynowicz, A., Bielecki, S. & Brown, R. M. Microbial cellulose—the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials 27, 145–151 (2006)
6. Petersen, N. & Gatenholm, P. Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91, 1277 (2011)
7. Bäckdahl, H. et al. Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27, 2141–2149 (2006)
8. Helenius, G. et al. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 76A, 431–438 (2006)
9. Chin, N. L. et al. 2nd international conference on agricultural and food engineering (CAFEi 2014)—new trends forward overview of bacterial cellulose production and application. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2, 113–119 (2014)
10. Shi, Z., Zhang, Y., Phillips, G. O. & Yang, G. Utilization of bacterial cellulose in food. Food Hydrocoll. 35, 539–545 (2014)
11. Sulaeva, I., Henniges, U., Rosenau, T. & Potthast, A. Bacterial cellulose as a material for wound treatment: properties and modifications. A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 33, 1547–1571 (2015)
12. Czaja, W. K., Young, D. J., Kawecki, M. & Brown, R. M. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8, 1–12 (2007)
13. Kowalska-Ludwicka, K. et al. Modified bacterial cellulose tubes for regeneration of damaged peripheral nerves. Arch. Med. Sci. 9, 527–534 (2013)
14. Zaborowska, M. et al. Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 6, 2540–2547 (2010)
15. Nimeskern, L. et al. Mechanical evaluation of bacterial nanocellulose as an implant material for ear cartilage replacement. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 22, 12–21 (2013)
16. Greca, L. G., Lehtonen, J., Tardy, B. L., Guo, J. & Rojas, O. J. Biofabrication of multifunctional nanocellulosic 3D structures: a facile and customizable route. Mater. Horiz. 5, 408–415 (2018)
17. Laromaine, A. et al. Free-standing three-dimensional hollow bacterial cellulose structures with controlled geometry via patterned superhydrophobic-hydrophilic surfaces. Soft Matter 14, 3955–3962 (2018)
18. Schaffner, M., Rühs, P. A., Coulter, F., Kilcher, S. & Studart, A. R. 3D printing of bacteria into functional complex materials. Sci. Adv. 3, eaao6804 (2017)
19. Jiaqing, Y. et al. Production of hollow bacterial cellulose microspheres using microfluidics to form an injectable porous scaffold for wound healing. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5, 2983–2992 (2016)
20. Yin, N. et al. Porous bacterial cellulose prepared by a facile surfactant-assisted foaming method in azodicarbonamide-NaOH aqueous solution. Mater. Lett. 81, 131–134 (2012)
21. Rambo, C. R. et al. Template assisted synthesis of porous nanofibrous cellulose membranes for tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 28, 549–554 (2008)
22. Bäckdahl, H., Esguerra, M., Delbro, D., Risberg, B. & Gatenholm, P. Engineering microporosity in bacterial cellulose scaffolds. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2, 320–330 (2008)
23. Jessica, A., Hanna, S., Henrik, B. & Paul, G. Behavior of human chondrocytes in engineered porous bacterial cellulose scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 94A, 1124–1132 (2010)
24. Yin, N., Stilwell, M. D., Santos, T. M. A., Wang, H. & Weibel, D. B. Agarose particle-templated porous bacterial cellulose and its application in cartilage growth in vitro. Acta Biomater. 12, 129–138 (2015)
25. Li, Z. et al. Improved cell infiltration and vascularization of three-dimensional bacterial cellulose nanofibrous scaffolds by template biosynthesis. RSC Adv. 6, 42229–42239 (2016)
26. Sworn, G. Handbook of Hydrocolloids. In G. O. Phillips & P. A. (ed.) Williams Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, Chapter 8, 186–203, 2nd Edition (Woodhead Publishing, 2009). www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781845694142500084
27. Bezelgues, J.-B., Serieye, S., Crosset-Perrotin, L. & Leser, M. E. Interfacial and foaming properties of some food grade low molecular weight surfactants. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 331, 56–62 (2008)
28. Schneider, W. R. & Doetsch, R. N. Effect of viscosity on bacterial motility. J. Bacteriol. 117, 696–701 (1974)
29. Rühs, P. A., Böcker, L., Inglis, R. F. & Fischer, P. Studying bacterial hydrophobicity and biofilm formation at liquid–liquid interfaces through interfacial rheology and pendant drop tensiometry. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 117, 174–184 (2014)
30. de Wouters, T., Jans, C., Niederberger, T., Fischer, P. & Rühs, P. A. Adhesion potential of intestinal microbes predicted by physico-chemical characterization methods. PLoS ONE 10, e0136437 (2015)
31. Rühs, P. A., Böni, L., Fuller, G. G., Inglis, R. F. & Fischer, P. In-situ quantification of the interfacial rheological response of bacterial biofilms to environmental stimuli. PLoS ONE 8, e78524 (2013)
32. Wu, C., Lim, J. Y., Fuller, G. G. & Cegelski, L. Quantitative analysis of amyloid-integrated biofilms formed by uropathogenic Escherichia coli at the air-liquid interface. Biophys. J. 103, 464–471 (2012)
33. Hollenbeck, E. C. et al. Molecular determinants of mechanical properties of V. cholerae biofilms at the air-liquid interface. Biophys. J. 107, 2245–2252 (2014)
34. Qin, G., Panilaitis, B. J. & Kaplan, Z. S. D. L. A cellulosic responsive ‘living’ membrane. Carbohydr. Polym. 100, 40–45 (2014)
35. Ruka, D. R., Simon, G. P. & Dean, K. M. Altering the growth conditions of Gluconacetobacter xylinus to maximize the yield of bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. 89, 613–622 (2012)