Next-generation innovation policy and Grand Challenges

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 448-454

  Kuhlmann, Stefan ^a   Rip, Arie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Concertation; Governance; Grand Challenges; Innovation policy; Transformation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85052193278     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/SCIPOL/SCY011     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arentsen, M. and Bellekom, S. (2014) 'Power to the People: Local Energy Initiatives as Seedbeds of Innovation?', Energy, Sustainability and Society, 4/1: 1-12
2. Battilana, J., Leca, B., and Boxenbaum, E. (2009) 'How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship', The Academy of Management Annals, 3/1: 65-107
3. BMBF, Federal Ministry of Education and Research. (2014) The new High-Tech Strategy Innovations for Germany. Berlin: BMBF accessed 3 Feb 2018
4. Boekholt, P. (2010) 'The Evolution of Innovation Policy Paradigms and Its Effects on Research, Technological Development and Innovation Policy Instruments'. In Smits, R., Kuhlmann, S., and Shapira, P. (eds) The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy. An International Research Handbook, pp. 333-59. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
5. Boon, W., Moors, E. H., Kuhlmann, S., et al. (2011) 'Demand Articulation in Emerging Technologies: Intermediary User Organisations as Coproducers?', Research Policy, 40: 242-52
6. Compston, H. (2003) 'Beyond Corporatism: A Configurational Theory of Policy Concertation', European Journal of Political Research, 42/6: 787-809
7. Dachs, B., Dinges, M., Weber, M., et al. (2015) Herausforderungen und Perspektiven missionsorientierter Forschungs-und Innovationspolitik. Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI), Berlin: Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 12-2015
8. Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., et al. eds (2016) Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact. Eu-SPRI Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Series. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
9. Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., and Kuhlmann, S. (2008) 'Co-ordination within Fragmentation. Governance in Knowledge Policy in the German Federal System', Science and Public Policy, 35/4: 265-76
10. Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., and Georghiou, L. (2007) 'Public Procurement and Innovation-Resurrecting the Demand Side', Research Policy, 36/7: 949-63
11. Edquist, C., Vonortas, N. S., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., et al. eds (2015) Public Procurement for Innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing
12. Fisher, E. and Rip, A. (2013) 'Responsible Innovation: Multi-level Dynamics and Soft Intervention Practices', in Owen, R., Bessant, J., and Heintz, M. (eds) Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, pp. 165-83. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
13. Foray, D., Mowery, D. C., and Nelson, R. R. (2012) 'Public R&D and Social Challenges: What Lessons from Mission R&D Programs?', Research Policy, 41/10: 1697-702
14. Fresco, L. O., Martinuzzi, A., Anvret, M., et al. (2015) Commitment and Coherence. Ex-Post-Evaluation of the 7th EU Framework Programme (2007-2013).
15. Hudson, M. (1980) 'Concerted Action': Wages Policy in West Germany, 1967-1977', Industrial Relations Journal, 11/4: 5-16
16. Jessop, R. D. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State. Oxford: Blackwell
17. Joint Institute for Innovation Policy (JIIP). (2012) Investing in Research and Innovation for Grand Challenges. Study to Assist ERAB. Brussels: European Commission, January 2012
18. Kallerud, E., Klitkou, A., Olsen, D. S., et al. (2013) Dimensions of research and innovation policies to address grand and global challenges. EU-SPRI Forum Position Paper
19. Krull, W. (2016) 'Public Private Partnerships Revisited', in acatech (Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften) (eds) Science Finance, pp. 12-17. Bonn/Berlin/New York: Lemmens Medien
20. Kuhlmann, S. (2001) 'Governance of Innovation Policy in Europe-Three Scenarios', Research Policy, 30/6: 953-76
21. Kuhlmann, S. and Rip, A. (2014) The challenge of addressing Grand Challenges. A think piece on how innovation can be driven towards the "Grand Challenges" as defined under the prospective European Union Framework Programme Horizon 2020. Report to ERIAB. Brussels: European Commission
22. Kuhlmann, S. and Rip, A. (2016) Grand Societal and Economic Challenges: A Challenge for the Norwegian Knowledge and Innovation System. Oslo: Research Council of Norway
23. Kuhlmann, S. Rip, A, Edler, J., Ordóñez-Matamoros, G., et al. (2015) Responsibility Navigator. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI www.responsibility-navigator.eu
24. Kuhlmann, S. Rip, A, Edler, J., Ordóñez-Matamoros, G., Konrad, K., and Stegmaier, P. (2018) 'Tentative Governance in Emerging Science and Technology-Conceptual Introduction and Overview', Research Policy(Special Section), forthcoming
25. Kuhlmann, S. Rip, A, Edler, J., Ordóñez-Matamoros, G., Shapira, P., and Smits, R. (2010) 'Introduction. A Systemic Perspective: The Innovation Policy Dance', in Smits, R., Kuhlmann, S., and Shapira, P. (eds) The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy. An International Research Handbook, pp. 1-22. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
26. Lehmbruch, G. (2003) 'Concertation and the Structure of Corporatist Networks', in Verhandlungsdemokratie, pp. 103-128. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
27. Lindner, R., Daimer, S., Beckert, B., et al. (2016) Addressing Directionality: Orientation Failure and the Systems of Innovation Heuristic. Towards Reflexive Governance. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis No. 52, Karlsruhe, ISSN 1612-1430
28. List, F. (1856) National System of Political Economy. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott&Company
29. Mazzucato, M. (2015) The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press
30. Mintzberg, H. and Waters, J. A. (1985) 'Of Strategies, Deliberate, and Emergent', Strategic Management Journal, 6/3: 257-72
31. Ornston, D. (2012) 'Creative Corporatism. The Politics of High-Technology Competition in Nordic Europe', Comparative Political Studies, 46/6: 702-29
32. Ornston, D. and Schulze-Cleven, T. (2015) 'Conceptualizing Cooperation Coordination and Concertation as Two Logics of Collective Action', Comparative Political Studies, 48/5: 555-85
33. Rip, A. (2006) 'A Co-Evolutionary Approach to Reflexive Governance-and Its Ironies', in Voss, J. P. et al. (eds) Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, pp. 82-100. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing
34. Rip, A. (2010) 'De Facto Governance of Nanotechnologies', in Goodwin, M., Koops, B. J., and Leenes, R. (eds) Dimensions of Technology Regulation, pp. 285-308. Oisterwijk: Wolf Legal Publishers
35. Rip, A. and Joly, P. (2012) Emerging Spaces and Governance. A position paper for EU-SPRI. accessed 3 Feb 2018
36. Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1981) Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990. London: Frances Pinter
37. Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Framework. Boulder: Westview
38. Scharpf, F. W. (1997) Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
39. Schot, J. and Steinmueller, W. E. (2016) Framing Innovation Policy for Transformative Change: Innovation Policy 3.0. SPRU working paper series, Brighton
40. Smits, R. and Kuhlmann, S. (2004) 'The Rise of Systemic Instruments in Innovation Policy', International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1/1/2: 4-32
41. Smits, R. Kuhlmann, S. and Teubal, M. (2010) 'A System-Evolutionary Approach for Innovation Policy', in Smits, R., Kuhlmann, S., and Shapira, P. (eds) The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy. An International Research Handbook, pp. 417-48. Cheltenham, UK; Edward Elgar
42. Schmitter, P. C. (1985) 'Neo-corporatism and the State', in Grant, W. (ed.) The Political Economy of Corporatism Sociology, Politics and Cities, pp. 32-62. London: Palgrave
43. Van der Have, R. and Rubalcaba, L. (2016) 'Social Innovation Research: An Emerging Area of Innovation Studies? Research Policy, 45/9: 1923-35
44. Van der Meulen, B. (1998) 'Science Policies as Principal-Agent Games: Institutionalization and Path Dependency in the Relation between Government and Science', Research Policy, 27/4: 397-414