Public procurement and innovation-Resurrecting the demand side

Research Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 949-963

  Edler, Jakob ^a   Georghiou, Luke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Concepts of demand oriented policy; Demand and innovation; Innovation policy; Public procurement; Public sector innovation

Indexed keywords

PUBLIC POLICY; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CONCEPTS OF DEMAND-ORIENTED POLICY; INNOVATION POLICY; PUBLIC PROCUREMENT; PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION;

INNOVATION;

EID: 34548429632     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Aho, E., Cornu, J., Georghiou, L., Subira, A., January 2006. Creating an Innovative Europe. Report of the Independent Expert Group on R&D and Innovation appointed following the Hampton Court Summit. Luke Georghiou, Rapporteur.
2. Alic, J., Branscomb, A., Brooks, L.M., Carter, H., Epstein, A., 1992. Beyond Spinoff. Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World. Boston.
3. Arnold, E., Kuhlmann, S., van der Meulen, B., 2001. A Singular Council. Evaluation of the Research Council of Norway, Study Commissioned by the Norwegian Government (manuscript).
4. Audet, D., 2002. Public procurement. OECD J. Budget., Paris.
5. BDL, 2003. The Power of Customers to Drive Innovation. Report to the European Commission. Brussels.
6. Beise M. Lead Markets. Country Specific Success Factors of the Global Diffusion of Innovations (2001), Physica, Heidelberg
7. Beise, M., et al., 2003. The Emergence of Lead Markets for Environmental Innovations FFU Report 02-2003. Berlin.
8. Blind, K., Bührlen, B., Menrad, K., Hafner, S., Walz, R., Kotz, C., 2004. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems Research, New Products and Services: Analysis of Regulations Shaping New Markets. European Commission.
9. BMU (Bundesministerium für Umwelt Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit). Ökologische Industriepolitik-Memorandum für einen 'New Deal' von Wirtschaft (October 2006), Umwelt und Beschäftigung, Berlin
10. BMWI/BME (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie/Bundesverband Materialwirtschaft, Einkauf und Logistik e.V.), 2006. Impulse für Innovation im öffentlichen Beschaffungswesen. Berlin.
11. Bodewes, H., Boekholt, P., 2006. Innovation and Public Procurement. Trendchart Workshop, Madrid, 19-20 October 2006. Workshop output paper, http://trendchart.cordis.europa.eu/reports/documents/Workshop_Conclusion_Paper_4_2006.pdf.
12. Bos, L., Corvers, S., 2007. Pre-commercial public procurement. A missing link in the European Innovation Cycle. Public needs as a driver for innovation. In: Tijdschrift Aanbestedingsrecht, in press.
13. Cohen L.R., and Noll R.G. The Technological Pork Barrrel (1991), The Brookings Institute, Washington, DC
14. Dalpé R., DeBresson C., and Ciaoping H. The public sector as first user of innovations. Research Policy 21 3 (1992) S.251-S.263
15. Dalpé R. Effects of government procurement on industrial innovation. Technology in Society 16 1 (1994) 65-83
16. Directors Forum (National IST Research Directors Forum Working Group on Public Procurement), March 2006. Pre-Commercial procurement of Innovation. A missing link in the European Innovation Cycle. Brussels, http://europa.eu.int/information_society/research/key_docs/documents/procurement.pdf.
17. DOD (Department of Defence), 1999. Final Report of the Defence Science Board Task Force on Globalization and Security. Washington, DC.
18. DTI (Department of Trade and Industry), December 2003a. Innovation Report-Competing in the Global Economy: The Innovation Challenge. London.
19. DTI (Department of Trade and Industry), May 2003b. In: Porter, M., Ketels, C. (Eds.), UK competitiveness: moving to the next stage. Economics Paper No. 3. Harvard Business School.
20. DTI (Department of Trade and Industry), November 2006. Environmental Innovation: Bridging the Gap Between Environmental Necessity and Economic Opportunity (in Association with DEFRA). First Report of the Environmental Innovations Advisory Group.
21. DTI/OGC (Department of Trade and Industry/Office of Government Commerce), December 2003. Increasing Competition and Improving Long-term Capacity Planning in the Government Market Place ("Kelly Programme"). London.
22. Ebersberger, B., 2007. Nachfrageorientierung in der Innovationspolitik in Finnland, In: Edler, J. (Ed.), Bedürfnisse als Innovationsmotor. Konzepte und Instrumente nachfrageorientierter Innovationspolitik. Studien des Büros für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag. edition sigma, Berlin, 115-129.
23. ECTP (European Construction Technology Platform), 2006. Cites and Buildings. Vision 2030 & Strategic Research Agenda. Focus Area Cities and Buildings, 19 October 2005, http://www.ectp.org/documentation/FA-Cities(Building-Vision2030-SRA-v02b.pdf.
24. Edler, J., Edquist, C., Georghiou, L., Hommen, L., Hafner, S., Papadakou, M., Rigby, J., Rolfstam, M., Ruhland, S., Tsipouri, L., 2006. Innovation and Public Procurement. Review of Issues at Stake. Final Report. Brussels, ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/innovation-policy/studies/full_study.pdf.
25. Edler, J. Demand oriented innovation policy. In: Smits, R., Kuhlmann, S., Shapira, P. (Eds.), The Co-Evolution of Innovation Policy-Innovation Policy Dynamics, Systems and Governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, in press.
26. Edler, J., 2007a. Bedürfnisse als Innovationsmotor. Konzepte und Instrumente nachfrageorientierter Inovationspolitik (Needs as Drivers for Innovation. Concepts and instruments of demand oriented innovation policy). Studien des Büros für Technolfolgenabschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag - 21: Edition Sigma, Berlin
27. Edler, J., 2007b. Demand oriented innovation policy. In: Smits, R., Kuhlmann, S., Shapira, P. (Eds.), The Co-Evolution of Innovation Policy-Innovation Policy Dynamics, Systems and Governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, in press.
28. Edler, J., Corvers, S., Xielin, L., 2007. Public Procurement and Innovation in China. Status Quo, Lessons from Abroad and Ways Forward. Report to the OECD. Manchester, Paris, in press.
29. Edler, J., Hafner, S., 2007. Nachfrageorientierte Innovationspolitik in Schweden, In: Edler, J. (Ed.), Bedürfnisse als Innovationsmotor. Konzepte und Instrumente nachfrageorientierter Innovationspolitik. Studien des Büros für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag. edition sigma, Berlin, pp. 97-114.
30. Edquist, C., 1998. The ISE Final Report: Scientific Findings and Policy Implications of the "Innovation Systems and European Integration" (ISE). Research Project. European Commission.
31. Edquist, C., Hommen, L., 1998. Government technology procurement and innovation theory. Paper for the project "Innovation Systems and European Integration" (ISE). Linkoping.
32. Edquist C., Hommen L., and Tsipouri L. Public Technology Procurement and Innovation (2000), Kluwer, Dordrecht
33. European Commission, 2003. Research Investment Action Plan. Brussels.
34. European Commission, 2006a. Putting Knowledge into Practice: A Broad-based Innovation Strategy for the EU. Brussels, 13.9.2006, COM(2006) 502 final.
35. European Commission, May 2006b. European Technology Platforms. Moving into Implementation. Second Status Report. Brussels.
36. European Commission, 2007. Guide on dealing with innovative solutions in public procurement. 10 elements of good practice. Commission staff working document SEC (2007) 280, Brussels, http://www.proinno-europe.eu/doc/procurement_manuscript.pdf.
37. European Council, 2005. Brussels European Council 22/23 March 2005, Presidency Conclusions. Brussels, 23 May 2005, http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/84335.pdf.
38. European Council, 2006. Brussels European Council 23/24 March 2006, Presidency Conclusions. Brussels, 18 May 2006, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/89013.pdf.
39. Finland's EU Presidency, 2006. Demand as a Driver of Innovation-Towards a more Effective European Innovation Policy. Discussion Note to the Informal Meeting of the Competitiveness Ministers, Finland, July 10-11.
40. French, German, UK Governments, February 2004. Towards and innovative Europe. A Paper by the French, German and UK Governments, http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/C0B/BF/towards_innov_europe_200204.pdf.
41. Georghiou, L., et al., 2003. Raising EU R&D Intensity: Improving the Effectiveness of Public Support Mechanisms for Private Sector Research and Development: Direct Measures 2003, EUR 20716.
42. Georghiou L. The UK technology foresight programme. Futures 28 4 (1996) 359-377
43. Georghiou, L., 2004. Evaluation of behavioural additionality. Concept Paper to the European Conference on Good Practice in Research and Evaluation Indicators: Research and the Knowledge based Society. Measuring the Link, NUI Galway, 24 May 2004, http://www.forfas.ie/icsti.
44. Georghiou L. Effective Innovation Policies for Europe-The Missing Demand-Side (September 2006), Prime Minister's Office of Finland, Economic Council of Finland
45. Georghiou, L., February 2007. Demanding Innovation-Lead Markets, Public Procurement and Innovation, NESTA Provocation 02. NESTA, London, in press.
46. Geroski P.A. Procurement policy as a tool of industrial policy. International Review of Applied Economics 4 2 (1990) S.182-S.198
47. Gibbons, M., Gummett, P. (Eds.), Science, Technology and Society Today. Manchester.
48. Gregersen, B., 1992. The public sector as a pacer in national systems of innovation. In: Lundvall, B.A. (Ed.), National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London, pp. S.129-S.145.
49. James, A., 2004. U.S. Defence R&D Spending: An Analysis of the Impacts. Rapporteur's Report for the EURAB Working Group ERA Scope and Vision, EURAB 04.011, Manchester, http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/eurab/pdf/recommendations10.pdf.
50. Kelley M.R. From Mission to Commercial Orientation: Perils and Possibilities for Federal Industrial Technology Policy (1997), Carnegie Mellon University (manuscript revised)
51. Koch, P., Hauknes, J., 2005. On Innovation in the Public Sector. Publin Report No. D20. NIFU STEP, Oslo, http://www.step.no/publin/.
52. Kok, W., et al., November 2004. Facing the Challenge. The Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Employment. Report from a High Level Group. Luxembourg.
53. Lundvall B.A. Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., and Soete L. (Eds). Technical Change and Economic Theory (1988), Pinter, London 349-369
54. In: Lundvall B.A. (Ed). National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (1992), Pinter, London
55. McCrudden C. Using public procurement to achieve societal outcomes. Natural Resource Forum 28 (2004) 257-267
56. Meyer-Krahmer F. In: Grimmer K., et al. (Ed). Was bedeutet Globalisierung für Aufgaben und Handlungsspielräume nationaler Innovationspolitiken? (1999), Innovationspolitik in globalisierten Arenen, Neue Aufgaben für Forschung und Lehre 43-74
57. Meyer-Krahmer F. Vorreiter-Märkte und Innovation. Ein neuer Ansatz der Technologie- und Innovationspolitik- Made in Germany '21 (2004), Steinmeier, Frank-Walter, Machnig, Matthias, Hamburg pp. 95-110
58. Meyer-Krahmer F., and Reger G. Konsequenzen veränderter industrieller F&E-Strategien für die nationale Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik. In: Gerybadze A., Meyer-Krahmer F., and Reger G. (Eds). Globales Management von Forschung und Innovation (1997), Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag, Stuttgart 196-215
59. Moors E., Enzing C., van der Giessen A., and Smits R. User-producer interactions in functional genomics innovations. Innovation Management, Policy & Practice 5 (2003) 2-3
60. Mowery D., and Rosenberg N. The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy 8 2 (1979) 102-153
61. Nachum, L., Wymbs, C., 2002. Firm-specific attributes and MNE location choices: financial and professional services FDI to New York and London. Working Paper No. 223. ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, http://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/pdf/WP223.pdf.
62. Neji L. Evaluation of Swedish market transformation programmes. Paper for the Conference of the European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Summer Study Proceedings (1999) (manuscript)
63. Nelson, R., 1982. Government and Technical Progress, New York.
64. NUTEK, 1994. Effective Market Influence-An Effect Chain Analysis of NUTEK's High Frequency Lightning Campaign. Report R 1994:70. Stockholm.
65. OGC (Office of Government Commerce). Capturing Innovation. Nurturing Supplier's Ideas in the Public Sector (2004), Brochure, London
66. Palmberg C. The sources of innovations - looking beyond technological opportunities. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13 (2004) 183-197
67. Pinnau H. Exchange lights. 2:1 for the climate. Modern technology for more efficiency. Presentation at the Conference on Public Procurement stimulating Research & Innovation. Brussels, 14 December 2005 (2005)
68. Porter M.E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations (1990), Macmillan, London and Basingstoke
69. Rolfstam, M., Hommen, L., Edler, J., 2005. Literature review: innovation and public procurement. Review of issues. In: Edler, J., et al. (Eds.), Innovation and Public Procurement. Review of Issues at Stake. Final Report. Brussels, ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/innovation-policy/studies/full_study.pdf.
70. Rothwell R., and Gardiner P. The strategic management of re-innovation. R&D Management 19 2 (1989) 147-160
71. Rothwell R. Technology based small firms and regional innovation potential: the role of public procurement. Journal of Public Policy 4 4 (1984) 307-332
72. Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W., 1981. Government regulations and innovation-industrial Innovation and Public Policy, London. In: Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W. (Eds.), Industrial Innovation and Public Policy, London, pp. 116-147.
73. Saarinen, J., 2005. Innovations and industrial performance in Finland 1945-1998. In: Almqvist & Wicksell International, Ch. 4.2-4.3.
74. Smits R. Innovation studies in the 21st century, questions from a user's perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 69 (2002) 861-883
75. STEM Task Force, August 2006. Conservative Party Policy Task-Force Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics 'Stem'. The Stem Challenge-A Progress Report. Conservative Party.
76. Suvilehto, H.-M., 1997. An Evaluation of NUTEK's Programme for more Efficient Use of Energy. Final Report. National Board for Industrial and Technical Development.
77. Suvilehto, H.-M., Överholm, E., 1998. Swedish Procurment and Marcet Activities-Different Design Solutions on Different Markets. Presentation at the 1998 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings.
78. Tellis G.J., Stremersch S., and Yin E. The international takeoff of new products. Marketing Science 22 (2003) S.188-S.208
79. von Hippel E. The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy 5 3 (1976) 212-239
80. von Hippel E. Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Management Science 32 July (7) (1986) 791-805
81. WEF (World Economic Forum), 2002. Global Competitiveness Report 2001-2002.
82. Wessner C. Innovation, Security & Growth. Perspectives from the U.S. Innovation System. Myths, Realities & Opportunities Presentation at the 6 Countries Programme Workshop: Linking Defence and Security R&D to Innovation: The Challenge Ahead. Brussels (2004)
83. Wilkinson, R., Georghiou, L., Cave, J., et al., 2005. Public Procurement for Research and Innovation. European Commission, DG Research, EUR 21793.
84. Winson R. UK Approach to Procurement and Innovation Public Procurement Stimulating Research & Innovation. Towards Better Practice, Presentation at the Conference on Public Procurement stimulating Research & Innovation. Brussels, 14 December 2005 (2005)