Introduction. A systemic perspective: The innovation policy dance

The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy: An International Research Handbook

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-22

  Kuhlmann, Stefan ^a   Shapira, Philip ^b,c   Smits, Ruud E ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860218041     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781849804424.00006     Document Type: Chapter

References (76)

1. Anderson, J. (1990), Public Policymaking, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
2. Antonelli, C. (ed.) (2008), The Economics of Innovation, Vol. 1, London, UK and New York, USA: Routledge.
3. Archibugi, D., Howells, J. and Michie, J. (eds) (1999), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy, Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
4. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
5. Benz, A. (2007), ‘Governance in connected arenas: political science analysis of coordination and control in complex control systems’, in D. Jansen (ed.), New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations: From Disciplinary Theories towards Interfaces and Integration, Berlin, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany and New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, pp. 3-22.
6. Biegelbauer, P. and Borrás, S. (eds) (2003), Innovation Policies in Europe and the US: The New Agenda, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
7. Bijker, W., Hughes, T. and Pinch, T. (eds) (1987), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA and London, UK: MIT Press.
8. Bozeman, B. (2000), ‘Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory’, Research Policy, 29 (4-5), 627-655.
9. Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P. and Heidenreich, M. (eds) (1998), Regional Innovation Systems, London: University College London Press.
10. Branscomb, L. and Florida, R. (1999), Challenges to Technology Policy in a Changing World, Cambridge, MA, USA and London, UK: MIT Press.
11. Branscomb, L. and Keller, J. (eds) (1998), Investing in Innovation: A Research and Innovation Policy that Works, Cambridge, MA, USA and London, UK: MIT Press.
12. Burt, R. (2003), ‘Social origins of good ideas’, paper, University of Chicago.
13. Cowan R. and van de Paal, G. (2000), ‘Innovation policy in a knowledge-based economy’, European Commission Directorate General, DG Enterprise, Brussels.
14. De Solla Price, D. (1965), ‘Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography’, Technology and Culture, 6 (4), 553-568.
15. Dodgson, M. and Bessant, J. (1996), Effective Innovation Policy: a New Approach, London: International Thomson Business Press.
16. Edquist, C. (ed.) (1997), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organisations, London, UK and New York, USA: Pinter.
17. Ende, J. van den, and Kemp, R. (1999), ‘Technological transformations in history: how the computer regime grew out of existing computing regimes’, Research Policy, 28 (8), 833-851.
18. European Commission (2006), ‘European Innovation Progress Report 2006’, Trendchart, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
19. Feldman, M. and Link, A. (2001), Innovation Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Berlin, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany and New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. Freeman, C. (1997), ‘The diversity of national research systems’, in R. Barré, M. Gibbons, J. Maddox, B. Martin and P. Papon (1997), Science in Tomorrow’s Europe, Paris: Economica International, pp. 183-194.
21. Freeman, C. (1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London, UK and New York, USA: Pinter
22. Freeman, C. and Loufa, F. (2001), As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution, Oxford, UK and New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
23. Galtung, J. (1981), ‘Structure, culture, and intellectual style: an essay comparing saxonic, teutonic, gallic and nipponic approaches’, Social Science Information, 20 (6), 817-856.
24. Gaudin, T. (1985), ‘Definition of innovation policies’, in G. Sweeney (ed.), Innovation Policies: An International Perspective, London, UK and New York, USA: Pinter, pp. 11-47.
25. Geels, F. (2006), ‘Major system change through stepwise reconfiguration: a multilevel analysis of the transformation of American factory production (1850-1930)’, Technology in Society, 28 (4), 445-476.
26. Georghiou, L., Cassingena Harper, J., Keenan, M., Miles, I. and Popper, R. (eds) (2008), The Handbook of Technology Foresight: Concepts and Practice, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
27. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotony, H., Schwartzman S., et al. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage Publishing.
28. Grande, E. (2001), ‘The erosion of state capacity and the European innovation policy dilemma: a comparison of German and EU information technology policies’, Research Policy, 30 (6), 905-921.
29. Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford, UK and New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
30. Hekkert, M., Suurs, R., Negro, S., Kuhlmann, S. and Smits, R. (2006), ‘Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74 (4), 413-432.
31. Hippel, E. von (1988), The Sources of Innovation, Cambridge, MA, USA and London, UK: MIT Press.
32. Hollingsworth, R. and Boyer, R. (eds) (1997), Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Hughes, T. (1989), American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm, 1870-1970, New York: Viking Press.
34. Jacobs, D. (1998), ‘Innovation policies within the framework of internationalization’, Research Policy, 27 (7), 711-714.
35. Jacobs, D. and de Man, A-P. (1996), ‘Clusters, industrial policy and firm strategy: a menu approach’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 8 (4), 425-437.
36. Kuhlmann, S. (2007), ‘Governance of innovation: practice, policy, and theory as dancing partners’, address delivered upon the acceptance of the Chair Foundations of Science, Technology and Society Faculty Management and Governance, University of Twente, University of Twente, Enschede.
37. Kuhlmann, S. (2001), ‘Governance of innovation policy in Europe: three scenarios’, in H. Klein, S. Kuhlmann and P. Shapira (eds), ‘Innovation Policy in Europe and the US: New Policies in New Institutions’, Research Policy, Special Issue, 30 (6), 953-976.
38. Lepsius, M. (1995), ‘Institutionenanalyse und Institutionenpolitik’, in B. Nedelmann (ed.), Politische Institutionen im Wandel, Opladen: Westdeutscher-Verlag, pp. 392-403.
39. Lisbon Expert Group (LEG) (2008), ‘Lisbon strategy: between revolution and illusion — the governance challenge for knowledge policies’, synthesis report of the Lisbon Expert Group, Brussels.
40. Lundvall, B.-A. (2007), ‘Post Script: innovation system research. Where it came from and where it might go’, mimeo.
41. Lundvall, B.-A. (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, UK and New York, USA: Pinter.
42. Malerba, F. (2002), ‘Sectorial system of innovation and production’, Research Policy, 31 (2), 247-264.
43. Mayntz, R. (1998), ‘New challenges to governance theory’, European University Institute, Jean Monnet Chair Paper RSC No. 98/50 (http://www.iue.it/RSC/Mayntz.htm).
44. Metcalfe, J. (1995), ‘The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evoltionary perspectives’, in P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of Economics of Innovation and Technolology Change, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 409-512.
45. Miettinen, R. (2002), National Innovation System: Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric, Helsinki: Edita Prima Ltd.
46. Moors, E., Enzing, C., Van der Giessen, A. and Smits, R. (2003), ‘User-producer interactions in functional genomics innovations’, Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 5 (2-3), 120-143.
47. Mumford, L. (1964), The Myth of the Machine: The Pentagon of Power, New York, USA and San Diego, USA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
48. Nauwelaers, C. and Wintjes, R. (2008), Innovation Policy in Europe: Measurement and Strategy, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
49. Nelson, B. (1996), ‘Public policy and administration: an overview’, in R. Goodin and H.-D. Klingemann (eds), A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford, UK and New York, USA: Oxford University Press, pp. 551-592.
50. Nelson, R. (1993), National Innovation Systems, Oxford, UK and New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
51. Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
52. Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1977), ‘In search of a useful theory of innovation’, Research Policy, 6 (1), 36-76.
53. OECD (2005), Governance of Innovation Systems, Vol. 1, Paris: OECD Publishing.
54. OECD (2001), Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems, Paris: OECD Publishing.
55. OECD (1999), Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach, Paris: OECD Publishing.
56. OECD (1991), ‘Technology and productivity: the challenge for economic policy’, TEP-programme, Paris.
57. Porter, M. (1990), The Competitive Adantage of Nations, New York: The Free Press.
58. Powell, W. and DiMaggio, P. (eds) (1991), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, USA and London, UK: University of Chicago Press.
59. Rip, A. (2008), ‘Processes of technological innovation in context - and their modulation’, in B. van Looy (ed.), Festschrift in honour of Rene Bouwen (Louvain), forthcoming.
60. Rip, A. (1992), ‘Science and technology as dancing partners’, in R Kroes and M. Bakker (eds), Technological Development and Science in the Industrial Age, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Boston, USA and London, UK: Kluwer, pp. 231-270.
61. Rip, A. and Kemp, R. (1998), ‘Technological change’, in S. Rayner and L. Malone (eds), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 2, Resources and Technology, Washington, DC: Batelle Press, pp. 327-400.
62. Roberts, L., Schaffer, S. and Dear, P. (eds) (2007), The Mindful Hand: Inquiry and Invention from the Late Renaissance to Early Industrialization, Chicago, USA and London, UK: University of Chicago Press
63. Rothwell, R. and Dodgson, M. (1992), ‘European technology policy evolution: convergence towards SMEs and regional technology transfer’, Technovation, 12 (4), 223-238.
64. Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1985), Reindustrialization and Technology, Harlow: Longman.
65. Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1981), Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s, Portsmouth: Greenwood Publishing Group.
66. Schön, D. and Rein, M. (1994), Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies, New York: Basic Books.
67. Schumpeter, J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, UK: Polity.
68. Scott, R. (1995), Institutions and Organizations, London: Sage Publishing.
69. Shapira, P. and Kuhlmann, S. (2003), ‘Learning from science and technology policy evaluation’, in P. Shapira and S. Kuhlmann (eds), Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 1-17.
70. Sharif, N. (2006), ‘Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept’, Research Policy, 35 (5), 745-766.
71. Smits, R. and Kuhlmann, S. (2004), ‘The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy’, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1 (1-2), 4-32.
72. Smits R., Leyten, A. and Den Hertog, P. (1995), ‘Technology assessment and technology policy in Europe: new concepts, new goals, new infrastructures’, Policy Sciences, 28 (3), 271-299.
73. Ven, A. van de, Polley, H., Garud, D., Schroeder, R. and Venkataraman, S. (1989), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, New York: Harper and Row.
74. Weingart, P. (1997), ‘From “Finalization” to “Mode 2”: old wine in new bottles?’ Social Science Information, 36 (4), 591-613.
75. Zilsel, E., Raven, D., Krohm, W. and Cohen, R. (eds) (2003), The Social Origins of Modem Science, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Boston, USA and London, UK: Kluwer.
76. Ziman, J. (ed.) (2000), Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.