Addressing cumulative effects, maritime conflicts and ecosystem services threats through MSP-oriented geospatial webtools

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 163, Issue , 2018, Pages 417-436

  Menegon, Stefano ^a   Depellegrin, Daniel ^a   Farella, Giulio ^a   Sarretta, Alessandro ^a   Venier, Chiara ^a   Barbanti, Andrea ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCES   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cumulative effects assessment; Geoplatform; Marine ecosystem services; Maritime use conflict analysis; MSP; Webtools

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COASTAL ZONES; ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT;

CONFLICTS ANALYSIS; CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENTS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GEOPLATFORM; MARINE ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; MARITIME SPATIAL PLANNING; MARITIME USE CONFLICT ANALYSE; SPATIAL PLANNING; USE CONFLICTS; WEBTOOL;

REGIONAL PLANNING;

BIODIVERSITY; CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN ACTIVITY; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; SOFTWARE; SPATIAL PLANNING;

ADRIATIC SEA; GULF OF TRIESTE; ITALY; MEDITERRANEAN SEA; PO DELTA; VENETO; VENEZIA [VENETO]; VENICE LAGOON;

CYMODOCEA;

EID: 85050763536     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Allan, J.D., McIntyre, P.B., Smith, S.D.P., Halpern, B.S., Boyer, G.L., Buchsbaum, A., Burton, G.A., Campbell, L.M., Chadderton, W.L., Ciborowski, J.J.H., Doran, P.J., Eder, T., Infante, D.M., Johnson, L.B., Joseph, C.A., Marino, A.L., Prusevich, A., Read, J.G., Rose, J.B., Rutherford, E.S., Sowa, S.P., Steinman, A.D., Joint analysis of stressors and ecosystem services to enhance restoration effectiveness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. 110 (2013), 372–377 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213841110.
2. Andersen, J.H., Stock, A., Heinänen, S., Mannerla, M., Vinther, M., Human Uses, Pressures and Impacts in the Eastern North Sea., 2013 (Technical Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 18).
3. Atkinson, S.F., Canter, L.W., Assessing the cumulative effects of projects using geographic information systems. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, SPECIAL ISSUE on Cumulative Effects Assessment 31 (2011), 457–464 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.008.
4. Ban, N.C., Bodtker, K.M., Nicolson, D., Robb, C.K., Royle, K., Short, C., Setting the stage for marine spatial planning: ecological and social data collation and analyses in Canada's Pacific waters. Mar. Pol. 39 (2013), 11–20 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.10.017.
5. Barale, V., Jaquet, J.-M., Ndiaye, M., Algal blooming patterns and anomalies in the Mediterranean Sea as derived from the SeaWiFS data set (1998–2003). Remote Sensing of Environment. Earth Observations for Marine and Coastal Biodiversity and Ecosystems Special Issue 112 (2008), 3300–3313 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.10.014.
6. Barbanti, A., Campostrini, P., Musco, F., Sarretta, A., Gissi, E., Developing a Maritime Spatial Plan for the Adriatic-ionian Region. 2015, CNR-ISMAR, Venice, IT.
7. Barbanti, A., Sarretta, A., Venier, C., Bellaciccio, S., Depellegrin, D., Farella, G., Menegon, S., Lorito, S., Grati, F., Bolognini, L., Perini, L., Sviluppo ed analisi di proposte di ICZM-MSP in aree specifiche: costa emiliano-romagnola. Volume 1: Quadro conoscitivo di riferimento e sua analisi ai fini della pianificazione dello spazio marittimo ICM-MSP nella Regione Adriatico Ionica. 2017, Zenodo http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1160726.
8. Bastardie, F., Angelini, S., Bolognini, L., Fuga, F., Manfredi, C., Martinelli, M., Nielsen, J.R., Santojanni, A., Scarcella, G., Grati, F., Spatial planning for fisheries in the Northern Adriatic: working toward viable and sustainable fishing. Ecosphere, 8, 2017 n/a-n/a https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1696.
9. Bianchi, C.N., Proposta di suddivisione dei Mari Italiani in Settori Biogeografici. Notiziario della Società di Biologia Marina 46 (2004), 57–59.
10. Bijlsma, R., Bots, P., Wolters, H., Hoekstra, A., An empirical analysis of stakeholders’ influence on policy development: the role of uncertainty handling. Ecol. Soc., 16, 2011 https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03865-160151.
11. Bokeh Development Team, Bokeh: Python Library for Interactive Visualization. 2018.
12. Bosnjakovic, B., Haber, I.M., Climate changes and adaptation policies in the baltic and the adriatic regions. UTMS Journal of Economics, 6, 2015, 21.
13. CEAA-ACEE (Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency), Technical Guidance for Assessing Cumulative Environmental Effects Technical Guidance Highlights. Appendix 2: Types of Cumulative Effects. 2016.
14. Center for Ocean Solutions, Decision Guide - Selecting Decision Support Tools for Marine Spatial Planning. 2011, Stanford University, California.
15. Certain, G., Jørgensen, L.L., Christel, I., Planque, B., Bretagnolle, V., Mapping the vulnerability of animal community to pressure in marine systems: disentangling pressure types and integrating their impact from the individual to the community level. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 72 (2015), 1470–1482 https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv003.
16. Chiogna, G., Majone, B., Cano Paoli, K., Diamantini, E., Stella, E., Mallucci, S., Lencioni, V., Zandonai, F., Bellin, A., A review of hydrological and chemical stressors in the Adige catchment and its ecological status. Sci. Total Environ. 540 (2016), 429–443 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.149.
17. Clarke Murray, C., Agbayani, S., Ban, N.C., Cumulative effects of planned industrial development and climate change on marine ecosystems. Global Ecology and Conservation 4 (2015), 110–116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2015.06.003.
18. COEXIST, Deliverable D3.9. COEXIST Project. Interaction in Coastal Waters: a Roadmap to Sustainable Integration of Aquaculture and Fisheries. 2013.
19. Colloca, F., Cardinale, M., Maynou, F., Giannoulaki, M., Scarcella, G., Jenko, K., Bellido, J.M., Fiorentino, F., Rebuilding Mediterranean fisheries: a new paradigm for ecological sustainability. Fish Fish. 14 (2013), 89–109 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00453.x.
20. Depellegrin, D., Blažauskas, N., Integrating ecosystem service values into Oil spill impact assessment. J. Coast Res., 2012, 836–846 https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-11-00191.1.
21. Depellegrin, D., Menegon, S., Farella, G., Ghezzo, M., Gissi, E., Sarretta, A., Venier, C., Barbanti, A., Multi-objective spatial tools to inform maritime spatial planning in the Adriatic Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 609 (2017), 1627–1639 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.264.
22. EC (European Council), Amending Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards the Indicative Lists of Elements to Be Taken into Account for the Preparation of Marine Strategies. [WWW Document]. URL, 2017 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017L0845&from=EN (accessed 3.1.18).
23. EC (European Council), Directive 2014/89/eu of the european parliament and of the Council of the 23 july 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. Off. J. Eur. Union, L257, 2014, 135.
24. EC (European Council), Environmental Impact Assessment Directive. EIA Directive 2011/92. 2011.
25. EC (European Council), Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament of the Council of 17 June 2008 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Marine Environmental Policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). 2008.
26. EC (European Council), Regulation No. 1967/2006 of 21 December 2006, Concerning Management Measures for the Sustainable Exploitation of Fishery Resources in the Mediterranean Sea, Amending Regulation (EEC) No. 2847/93 and Repealing Regulation (EC) No. 1626/94. 2006.
27. EC (European Council), SEA (Strategic Environmental Assessment) Directive, 2001. Directive 2001/42/EC on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Plans and Programmes on the Environment. (SEA Directive) [WWW Document]. URL, 2001 http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/sea-legalcontext.htm (accessed 2.19.18).
28. Ehler, C., Douvere, F., Marine spatial Planning, a Step-by-step Approach towards Ecosystem-based Management., 2009, UNESCO (Report).
29. Eigaard, O.R., Bastardie, F., Hintzen, N.T., Buhl-Mortensen, L., Buhl-Mortensen, P., Catarino, R., Dinesen, G.E., Egekvist, J., Fock, H.O., Geitner, K., Gerritsen, H.D., González, M.M., Jonsson, P., Kavadas, S., Laffargue, P., Lundy, M., Gonzalez-Mirelis, G., Nielsen, J.R., Papadopoulou, N., Posen, P.E., Pulcinella, J., Russo, T., Sala, A., Silva, C., Smith, C.J., Vanelslander, B., Rijnsdorp, A.D., The footprint of bottom trawling in European waters: distribution, intensity, and seabed integrity. ICES (Int. Counc. Explor. Sea) J. Mar. Sci.: Journal du Conseil, fsw194, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw194.
30. Elliott, M., Marine science and management means tackling exogenic unmanaged pressures and endogenic managed pressures – a numbered guide. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62 (2011), 651–655 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.11.033.
31. Eno, N.C., Frid, C.L.J., Hall, K., Ramsay, K., Sharp, R. a. M., Brazier, D.P., Hearn, S., Dernie, K.M., Robinson, K.A., Paramor, O. a. L., Robinson, L.A., Assessing the sensitivity of habitats to fishing: from seabed maps to sensitivity mapsa. J. Fish. Biol. 83 (2013), 826–846 https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.1213.
32. Eurostat, Tourism Statistics at Regional Level. 2017 accessed [WWW Document]. URL http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Tourism_statistics_at_regional_level (accessed 2.2.18).
33. Fortuna, C.M., Holcer, D., Mackelworth, P., Conservation of Cetaceans and Sea Turtles in the Adriatic Sea: Status of Species and Potential Conservation Measures (Report Produced under WP7 of the NETCET Project., 2015, IPA Adriatic Cross-border Cooperation Programme.
34. Fowler, C., Smith, B., Stein, D., Building a marine spatial data infrastructure to support marine spatial planning in US waters. Geographic Technologies Applied to Marine Spatial Planning and Integrated Coastal Zone Management, 2010, 120–128.
35. Gallmetzer, I., Haselmair, A., Tomašovỳch, A., Stachowitsch, M., Zuschin, M., Responses of molluscan communities to centuries of human impact in the northern Adriatic Sea. PLoS One, 12, 2017 e0180820 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180820.
36. Galparsoro, I., Borja, A., Uyarra, M.C., Mapping ecosystem services provided by benthic habitats in the european north atlantic ocean. Front. Mar. Sci., 1, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2014.00023.
37. Geneletti, D., Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 7 (2011), 143–149 https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.617711.
38. GeoServer Development Team, GeoServer: Open Source Server for Sharing Geospatial Data. 2018.
39. Gimpel, A., Stelzenmüller, V., Töpsch, S., Galparsoro, I., Gubbins, M., Miller, D., Murillas, A., Murray, A.G., Pınarbaşı K., Roca, G., Watret, R., A GIS-based tool for an integrated assessment of spatial planning trade-offs with aquaculture. Science of the Total Environment, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.133.
40. Gissi, E., McGowan, J., Venier, C., Di Carlo, D., Musco, F., Menegon, S., Mackleworth, P., Agardy, T., Possingham, H., Addressing transboundary conservation challenges through marine spatial prioritization. Conserv. Biol., 2018, 10.1111/cobi.13134.
41. Gissi, E., Menegon, S., Sarretta, A., Appiotti, F., Maragno, D., Vianello, A., Depellegrin, D., Venier, C., Barbanti, A., Addressing uncertainty in modelling cumulative impacts within maritime spatial planning in the Adriatic and Ionian region. PLoS One, 12, 2017 e0180501 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180501.
42. González Del Campo, A., Mapping environmental sensitivity: a systematic online approach to support environmental assessment and planning. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 66 (2017), 86–98 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.06.010.
43. Gramolini, R., Grati, F., Fabi, G., Schule, T., GRID GeoReference Interactions Database. Deliverable D3.9. COEXIST Project. Interaction in Coastal Waters: a Roadmap to Sustainable Integration of Aquaculture and Fisheries. 2010.
44. Hadjimitsis, D.G., Agapiou, A., Themistocleous, K., Mettas, C., Evagorou, E., Papoutsa, C., Nisantzi, A., Mammouri, R., Tzouvaras, M., Lysssandrou, V., Resolving sea and land conflicts in Cyprus using Marine Spatial Planning. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology CEST 2015. Athens, Greece, 2015.
45. Hadžić N., Kozmar, H., Tomić M., Offshore renewable energy in the Adriatic Sea with respect to the Croatian 2020 energy strategy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 40 (2014), 597–607 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.196.
46. Halpern, B.S., Frazier, M., Potapenko, J., Casey, K.S., Koenig, K., Longo, C., Lowndes, J.S., Rockwood, R.C., Selig, E.R., Selkoe, K.A., Walbridge, S., Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world's ocean. Nat. Commun., 6, 2015, 7615 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8615.
47. Halpern, B.S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K.A., Kappel, C.V., Micheli, F., D'Agrosa, C., Bruno, J.F., Casey, K.S., Ebert, C., Fox, H.E., Fujita, R., Heinemann, D., Lenihan, H.S., Madin, E.M.P., Perry, M.T., Selig, E.R., Spalding, M., Steneck, R., Watson, R., A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319 (2008), 948–952 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149345.
48. Hansen, H.S., Reiter, I.M., Schrøder, L., A system architecture for a transnational data infrastructure supporting maritime spatial planning. Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Presented at the International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, 2017, Springer, Cham, 158–172 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64248-2_12.
49. Harrison, P.A., Berry, P.M., Simpson, G., Haslett, J.R., Blicharska, M., Bucur, M., Dunford, R., Egoh, B., Garcia-Llorente, M., Geamănă N., Geertsema, W., Lommelen, E., Meiresonne, L., Turkelboom, F., Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecosystem Services 9 (2014), 191–203 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.006.
50. Hooper, T., Beaumont, N., Griffiths, C., Langmead, O., Somerfield, P.J., Assessing the sensitivity of ecosystem services to changing pressures. Ecosystem Services 24 (2017), 160–169 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.016.
51. IUCN, An International Instrument on Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity in Marine Areas beyond National Jurisdiction Exploring Different Elements to Consider. 2013 (PAPER VII: Relation between Environmental Impact Assessments, Strategic Environmental Assessments and Marine Spatial Planning).
52. JPI Oceans, JPI Oceans Workshop: Cumulative Effects of Human Activities. [WWW Document]. URL, 2017 http://www.jpi-oceans.eu/news-events/events/jpi-oceans-workshop-cumulative-effects-human-activities (accessed 2.19.18).
53. Judd, A.D., Backhaus, T., Goodsir, F., An effective set of principles for practical implementation of marine cumulative effects assessment. Environ. Sci. Pol. 54 (2015), 254–262 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.008.
54. Krueger, I., Schouten-de Groot, P., KPP Noordzee: Tools (Deltares Report)., 2011.
55. Malačič V., Faganeli, J., Malej, A., Environmental impact of lng terminals in the Gulf of trieste (northern adriatic). Integration of Information for Environmental Security, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, 2008, Springer, Dordrecht, 361–381 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6575-0_25.
56. Marcotte, D., Hung, S.K., Caquard, S., Mapping cumulative impacts on Hong Kong's pink dolphin population. Ocean Coast Manag. 109 (2015), 51–63 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.02.002.
57. Maron, M., Mitchell, M.G.E., Runting, R.K., Rhodes, J.R., Mace, G.M., Keith, D.A., Watson, J.E.M., Towards a threat assessment framework for ecosystem services. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32 (2017), 240–248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.12.011.
58. McKinney, W., Data structures for statistical computing in python. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. Austin, TX, 2010, 51–56.
59. Menegon, S., Tools4MSP: Geospatial Tools to Support Maritime Spatial Planning. 2018 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1186159.
60. Menegon, S., Rectifiedgrid: Geospatial python Library for Grid-based Analyses. 2018 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1160651.
61. Menegon, S., Depellegrin, D., Farella, G., Gissi, E., Sarretta, A., Venier, C., Barbanti, A., Developing a modelling framework for MSP-oriented cumulative effects assessment: a case study for the Italian Adriatic Sea. Ecol. Indicat. 91 (2018), 171–181, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.060.
62. Menegon, S., Depellegrin, D., Venier, C., Geospatial Dataset for Cumulative Effects Assessment in the Italian Adriatic Sea. [WWW Document]. URL, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1173764 (accessed 2.5.18).
63. Menegon, S., Ghezzo, M., Depellegrin, D., Cumulative Impact Analysis: Affinamento della metodologia e delle stime di impatti cumulativi. 2017 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.569815.
64. Menegon, S., Sarretta, A., Barbanti, A., Gissi, E., Venier, C., Open source tools to support integrated coastal management and maritime spatial planning. Marchesini, I., Pierleoni, A., (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Open Source Geospatial Research and Education Symposium (OGRS2016). Perugia, 2016 https://doi.org/10.30437/ogrs2016_paper_22.
65. Meyer, R., Uncertainty as a science policy problem. Climatic Change 110 (2012), 1–2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0050-8.
66. MSP Platform, Summary: Cumulative Impact Tools for MSP Expert Roundtable. 2018 [WWW Document]. MSP Platform. URL http://msp-platform.eu/sites/default/files/20180214_finalcumulativeimpactsroundtable_mspplatform_documentation.pdf (accessed 2.19.18).
67. MSP Platform, Symphony: Tool to Estimate Cumulative Impacts. 2016 [WWW Document]. European MSP Platform. URL http://msp-platform.eu/practices/symphony-tool-estimate-cumulative-impacts (accessed 2.19.18).
68. Munaretto, S., Huitema, D., Adaptive comanagement in the Venice Lagoon? An analysis of current water and environmental management practices and prospects for change. Ecol. Soc., 17, 2012 https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04772-170219.
69. Palomino, J., Muellerklein, O.C., Kelly, M., A review of the emergent ecosystem of collaborative geospatial tools for addressing environmental challenges. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 65 (2017), 79–92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.003.
70. Papageorgiou, M., Coastal and marine tourism: a challenging factor in Marine Spatial Planning. Ocean Coast Manag. 129 (2016), 44–48 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.05.006.
71. Papathanasopoulou, E., Beaumont, N., Hooper, T., Nunes, J., Queirós, A.M., Energy systems and their impacts on marine ecosystem services. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 52 (2015), 917–926 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.150.
72. Piante, C., Ody, D., Blue Growth in the Mediterranean Sea: the Challenge of Good Environmental Status. MedTrends Project. WWF-France 192. 2015.
73. Pınarbaşı K., Galparsoro, I., Borja, Á., Stelzenmüller, V., Ehler, C.N., Gimpel, A., Decision support tools in marine spatial planning: present applications, gaps and future perspectives. Mar. Pol. 83 (2017), 83–91 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.031.
74. Populus, J., Vasquez, M., Albrecht, J., Manca, E., Agnesi, S., Al Hamdani, Z., Andersen, J., Annunziatellis, A., Bekkby, T., Bruschi, A., EUSeaMap. A European Broad-scale Seabed Habitat Map., 2017 (Final Report).
75. Port of Koper, New Cranes for the Container Terminal. [WWW Document]. Luka Koper. URL, 2015 https://luka-kp.si/eng/news/single/new-cranes-for-the-container-terminal-4075 (accessed 2.19.18).
76. Pranovi, F., Raicevich, S., Franceschini, G., Farrace, M.G., Giovanardi, O., Rapido trawling in the northern Adriatic Sea: effects on benthic communities in an experimental area. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57 (2000), 517–524 https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0708.
77. QGIS Development Team, QGIS a Free and Open Source Geographic Information System. [WWW Document]. URL, 2018 https://www.qgis.org/en/site/ (accessed 3.1.18).
78. RER (Regione Emilia-Romagna), Piano Regionale Integrato dei Trasporti 2025., 2015 (Technical Report).
79. Russo, T., Pulcinella, J., Parisi, A., Martinelli, M., Belardinelli, A., Santojanni, A., Cataudella, S., Colella, S., Anderlini, L., Modelling the strategy of mid-water trawlers targeting small pelagic fish in the Adriatic Sea and its drivers. Ecol. Model. 300 (2015), 102–113 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.12.001.
80. Salomidi, M., Katsanevakis, S., Borja, A., Braeckman, U., Damalas, D., Galparsoro, I., Mifsud, R., Mirto, S., Pascual, M., Pipitone, C., Rabaut, M., Todorova, V., Vassilopoulou, V., Vega Fernández, T., Assessment of goods and services, vulnerability, and conservation status of European seabed biotopes: a stepping stone towards ecosystem-based marine spatial management. Mediterr. Mar. Sci., 2012 https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.23.
81. Schweizer, J., Antonini, A., Govoni, L., Gottardi, G., Archetti, R., Supino, E., Berretta, C., Casadei, C., Ozzi, C., Investigating the potential and feasibility of an offshore wind farm in the Northern Adriatic Sea. Appl. Energy 177 (2016), 449–463 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.114.
82. Seasketch, SeaSketch Supports Collaborative Planning for Our Oceans. [WWW Document]. URL, 2018 https://www.seasketch.org/home.html (accessed 2.19.18).
83. Simonini, R., Ansaloni, I., Bonvicini Pagliai, A.M., Prevedelli, D., Organic enrichment and structure of the macrozoobenthic community in the northern Adriatic Sea in an area facing Adige and Po mouths. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61 (2004), 871–881 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.06.018.
84. Slootweg, R., Van Beukering, P., Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Strategic Environmental Assessment-Lessons from Influential Cases. 2008.
85. Socal, G., Acri, F., Bastianini, M., Bernardi Aubry, F., Bianchi, F., Camatti, E., Conversi, A., De Lazzari, A., Pugnetti, A., The study and the impact of plankton communities over the northern Adriatic pelagic ecosystem. Volume Mare, 2011, 141–151.
86. Söderman, T., Kopperoinen, L., Shemeikka, P., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Ecosystem services criteria for sustainable development in urban regions. J. Env. Assmt. Pol. Mgmt., 14, 2012, 1250008 https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333212500081.
87. Song, N.-Q., Wang, N., Lin, W.-N., Wu, N., Use of pollution risk and ecosystem service values in marine management strategies in Bohai Sea, China. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. Int. J. 23 (2017), 1041–1055 https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1297675.
88. Stelzenmüller, V., Lee, J., South, A., Foden, J., Rogers, S.I., Practical tools to support marine spatial planning: a review and some prototype tools. Mar. Pol. 38 (2013), 214–227 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.038.
89. Stelzenmüller, V., Vega Fernández, T., Cronin, K., Röckmann, C., Pantazi, M., Vanaverbeke, J., Stamford, T., Hostens, K., Pecceu, E., Degraer, S., Buhl-Mortensen, L., Carlström, J., Galparsoro, I., Johnson, K., Piwowarczyk, J., Vassilopoulou, V., Jak, R., Louise Pace, M., van Hoof, L., Assessing uncertainty associated with the monitoring and evaluation of spatially managed areas. Mar. Pol. 51 (2015), 151–162 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.08.001.
90. TMT, Trieste Marine Terminal. [WWW Document]. Trieste Marine Terminal. URL, 2016 http://www.trieste-marine-terminal.com/it (accessed 2.21.18).
91. Turk, R., Odorico, R., Marine protected areas in the northern adriatic. Varst. Narave 22 (2009), 33–45.
92. van der Walt, S., Colbert, S.C., Varoquaux, G., The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation. Comput. Sci. Eng. 13 (2011), 22–30 https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.37.
93. van Riper, C.J., Kyle, G.T., Sutton, S.G., Barnes, M., Sherrouse, B.C., Mapping outdoor recreationists’ perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia. Appl. Geogr. 35 (2012), 164–173 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.008.
94. Vanderhaegen, M., Muro, E., Contribution of a European spatial data infrastructure to the effectiveness of EIA and SEA studies. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 25 (2005), 123–142 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.06.011.
95. Werner, S.R., Spurgeon, J.P.G., Isaksen, G.H., Smith, J.P., Springer, N.K., Gettleson, D.A., N׳Guessan, L., Dupont, J.M., Rapid prioritization of marine ecosystem services and ecosystem indicators. Mar. Pol. 50 (2014), 178–189 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.03.020.
96. WESTMED, Findings and Recommendations from Stakeholder Involvement in Phase 1. [WWW Document]. URL, 2017 http://www.westmed-initiative.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WestMed-Maritime-Initiative-Report2(public).pdf (accessed 2.19.18).
97. White, C., Halpern, B.S., Kappel, C.V., Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. 109 (2012), 4696–4701 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114215109.
98. White, L., Koss, R., Knights, A., Eriksson, A., Robinson, L., ODEMM Linkage Framework Userguide (Version 2). ODEMM Guidance Document Series. 2013.
99. Worm, B., Barbier, E.B., Beaumont, N., Duffy, J.E., Folke, C., Halpern, B.S., Jackson, J.B.C., Lotze, H.K., Micheli, F., Palumbi, S.R., Sala, E., Selkoe, K.A., Stachowicz, J.J., Watson, R., Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314 (2006), 787–790 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132294.
100. Wyatt, K.H., Griffin, R., Guerry, A.D., Ruckelshaus, M., Fogarty, M., Arkema, K.K., Habitat risk assessment for regional ocean planning in the U.S. Northeast and Mid-Atlantic. PLoS One, 12, 2017 e0188776 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188776.