Joint analysis of stressors and ecosystem services to enhance restoration effectiveness

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 372-377

  Allan, J David ^a   McIntyre, Peter B ^b   Smith, Sigrid D P ^a   Halpern, Benjamin S ^c   Boyer, Gregory L ^d   Buchsbaum, Andy ^e   Burton, G A ^a   Campbell, Linda M ^f   Chadderton, W Lindsay ^g   Ciborowski, Jan J H ^h   Doran, Patrick J ^g   Eder, Tim ⁱ   Infante, Dana M ^j   Johnson, Lucinda B ^k   Joseph, Christine A ^a   Marino, Adrienne L ^a   Prusevich, Alexander ^l   Read, Jennifer G ^m   Rose, Joan B ^j   Rutherford, Edward S ⁿ   Sowa, Scott P ^g   Steinman, Alan D ^o   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CENTER FOR ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS   (United States)

^d STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^e National Wildlife Federation   (United States)

^f SAINT MARY S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^g THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

ⁱ Great Lakes Commission   (United States)

^j MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^m Michigan Sea Grant and Great Lakes Observing System   (United States)

ⁿ NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^o GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Cumulative impact; Fresh water; Laurentian Great Lakes; Marine spatial planning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; FISHERY; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; LAKE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECREATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84871992693     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213841110     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Austin J, Dezenski E, Affolter-Caine B (2008) The Vital Connection: Reclaiming the Great Lakes Economic Leadership in the Bi-National US-Canadian Region. (Metropolitan Policy Program, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).
2. Vaccaro L, Read J (2011) Vital to Our Nation's Economy: Great Lakes Jobs Report (Michigan Sea Grant). Available at http://www.miseagrant.umich.edu/ downloads/economy/11-203-Great-Lakes-Jobs-report.pdf. Accessed October 2011.
3. Southwick Associates (2007) Sportfishing in America: An Economic Engine and Conservation Powerhouse (American Sportfishing Association). Available at http://www. southwickassociates.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ sportfishiginamerica-2007.pdf. Accessed October 2011.
4. Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Task Force (2011) Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. Available at http://greatlakesrestoration.us/. Accessed September 2010.
5. Murray C, Songhen B (2001) Valuing water quality advisories and beach amenities in the Great Lakes. Water Resour Res 37(10):2583-2590.
6. Bernhardt ES, et al. (2007) Restoring rivers one reach at a time: Results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners. Restor Ecol 15(3):482-493.
7. Vörösmarty CJ, et al. (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467(7315):555-561.
8. Halpern BS, et al. (2008) A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319(5865):948-952.
9. Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Polasky S (2011) Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services (Oxford Univ Press, New York).
10. White C, Halpern BS, Kappel CV (2012) Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(12):4696-4701.
11. Austin JC, Anderson S, Courant PN, Litan RE (2007) Healthy Waters, Strong Economy: The Benefits of Restoring the Great Lakes Ecosystem (Great Lakes Economic Initiative, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).
12. Evans MC, Possingham HP, Wilson KA (2011) What to do in the face of multiple threats? Incorporating dependencies within a return on investment framework for conservation. Divers Distrib 17(3):437-450.
13. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water-Synthesis (World Resources Institute, Washington, DC).
14. Bullock JM, Aronson J, Newton AC, Pywell RF, Rey-Benayas JM (2011) Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: Confl icts and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 26(10):541-549.
15. Vadeboncoeur Y, McIntyre PB, Zanden MJV (2011) Borders of biodiversity: Life at the edge of the world's large lakes. Bioscience 61(7):526-537.
16. US Environmental Protection Agency (2012) Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Available at http://www.epa.gov/greatlakes/aoc/. Accessed January 10, 2012.
17. Nevers MB, Whitman RL (2010) Policies and practices of beach monitoring in the Great Lakes, USA: A critical review. J Environ Monit 12(3):581-590.
18. Johnson JE, DeWitt SP, Gonder DJA (2010) Mass-marking reveals emerging self regulation of the Chinook salmon population in Lake Huron. N Am J Fish Manage 30(2):518-529.
19. Olmstead SM (2010) The economics of water quality. Rev Environ Econ Policy 4(1):44-62.
20. Crain CM, Kroeker K, Halpern BS (2008) Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems. Ecol Lett 11(12):1304-1315.
21. Darling ES, Côté IM (2008) Quantifying the evidence for ecological synergies. Ecol Lett 11(12):1278-1286.
22. Barbiero RP, Lesht BM, Warren G (2011) Evidence for bottom-up control of recent changes in the pelagic food web of Lake Huron. J Great Lakes Res 37(1):78-85.
23. Halpern BS, et al. (2009) Mapping cumulative human impacts to California Current marine ecosystems. Conserv Lett 2(3):138-148.
24. Neslo R, et al. (2009) Modeling stakeholder preferences with probabilistic inversion: Application to prioritizing marine ecosystem vulnerabilities. Real-Time and Deliberative Decision Making, eds Linkov I, Ferguson E, Magar VS (Springer, The Netherlands), pp 265-284.
25. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).