Rapid prioritization of marine ecosystem services and ecosystem indicators

Marine Policy

Volumn 50, Issue PA, 2014, Pages 178-189

  Werner, Sandra R ^a   Spurgeon, James P G ^b,d   Isaksen, Gary H ^a   Smith, Joseph P ^a   Springer, Nina K ^a   Gettleson, David A ^c   N'Guessan, Lucie ^a   Dupont, Jennifer M ^a  

^a EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

^b Environmental Resources Management Group Inc   (United Kingdom)

^c ExxonMobil Exploration Company ^*  (United States)

^d Sustain Value   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ecosystem based management; Ecosystem services; Gulf of Mexico; Indicators; Prioritization; Valuation

Indexed keywords

BIOINDICATOR; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; PRIORITIZATION; VALUATION; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MARINE RESOURCE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; GULF OF MEXICO;

EID: 84903437162     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.03.020     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. UNEP. Taking steps toward marine and coastal ecosystem-based management-an introductory guide; 2011.
2. Beaumont NJ, Austen MC, Atkins JP, Burdon D, Degraer S, Dentinho TP, Derous S, Holm P, Horton T, van Ierland E, Marboe AH, Starkey DJ, Townsend M, Zarzycki T. Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Marine Poll Bull 2007, 54:253-265.
3. Granek EF, Polasky S, Kappel CV, Reed DJ, Stoms DM, Koch EW, Kennedy CJ, Cramer LA, Hacker SD, Barbier EB, Aswani S, Ruckelshaus M, Perillo GME, Silliman BR, Muthiga N, Bael D, Wolanski W. Ecosystem services as a common language for coastal ecosystem-based management. Conserv Biol 2009, 24(1):207-216.
4. White C, Halpern BS, Kappel CV. Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (PNAS) 2012, 10.1073/pnas.1114215109.
5. Tallis H, Levin PS, Ruckelshaus M, Lester SE, McLeod KL, Fluharty DL, Halpern BS. The many faces of ecosystem-based management: making the process work today in real places. Mar Policy 2011, 34:340-348.
6. Daily GC, Matson PA. Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (PNAS) 2008, 105(28):9455-9456.
7. Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force. Final recommendations of the interagency Ocean Policy Task Force. The White House Council on Environmental Quality; July 19, 2010. Last accessed (08/2012) at. http://www.whitehouse.gov/files/documents/OPTF_FinalRecs.pdf.
8. National Ocean Council. Draft National Ocean Policy Implementation Plan. National Ocean Council; 2011. Last accessed (08/2012) at. http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/oceans/implementationplan.
9. OJEU. EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy. Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008. Official Journal of the European Union 2008; L 164: 19-40.
10. CEC. Roadmap for maritime spatial planning: achieving common principles in the EU. Commission of the European Communities. Brussels: CEC, COM; 2008.
11. Hanson C, Ranganathan J, Iceland C, Finisdore J. The corporate ecosystem services review: guidelines for identifying business risks and opportunities arising from ecosystem change. Version 2.0 2012, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
12. IPIECA. Ecosystem services guidance. Biodiversity and ecosystem services guide and checklist. IPIECA/OGP Biodiversity and ecosystems services task force, IPIECA/OGP Biodiversity Working Group; 2011. Last accessed (08/2012) at. http://www.ipieca.org/library.
13. WBCSD, ERM, IUCN, PwC. Guide to corporate ecosystem valuation. A framework for improving corporate decision-making; 2011. Last accessed (08/2012) at. http://www.wbcsd.org/publications-and-tools.aspx.
14. TEEB. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in business and enterprise. London: edited by Joshua Bishop, Earthscan; 2012.
15. Ehler C, Douvere F. Marine spatial planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. Intergovernmental oceanographic commission and man and the biosphere programme. IOC manual and guides no. 53, ICAM Dossier no. 6 2009, UNESCO, Paris.
16. Layke C. Measuring nature's benefits: a preliminary roadmap for improving ecosystem service indicators. WRI working paper 2009, World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
17. Rice J, Rochet M-J A framework for selecting a suite of indicators for fisheries management. ICES J Mar Sci 2005 2005, 62:516-527.
18. Tallis H, Lester SE, Ruckelshaus M, Plummer M, McLeod K, Guerry A, Andelman S, Caldwell MR, Conte M, Copps S, Fox D, Fujita R, Gaines SD, Gelfenbaum G, Gold B, Kareiva P, Kim C-K, Lee K, Papenfus M, Redman S, Silliman B, Wainger L, White C. New metrics for managing and sustaining the ocean's bounty. Mar Policy 2012, 36:303-306.
19. Altman I, Blakeslee AMH, Osio GC, Rillahan CB, Teck SJ, Meyer JJ, Beyers JE, Rosenberg AA. A practical approach to implementation of ecosystem-based management: a case study using the Gulf of Maine marine ecosystem. Front Ecol Environ 2011, 9(3):183-189.
20. Maynard S, James D, Davidson A. The development of an ecosystem services framework for South East Queensland. Environ Manage 2010, 45(5):881-895.
21. Raheem N, Colt S, Fleishman E, Talberth J, Sweden P, Boyle KJ, Rudd M, Lopez RD, Crocker D, Bohan D, O'Higgins T, Willer S, Boumans RM. Application of non-market valuation to California's coastal policy decisions. Mar Policy 2012, 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.01.005.
22. Wiggin J, Hellin D, Uiterwyk K, Bowen RE, Vella P, Weber J, Moura S, Napoli N, Starbuck K, Krum H. Developing performance indicators to evaluate the management effectiveness of the Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan; (2010). Urban Harbors Institute Publications. Paper 3. Last Accessed (02/2013) at. http://scholarworks.umb.edu/uhi_pubs.
23. Douvere F. The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Mar Policy 2008, 32:762-771.
24. Waage S, Armstrong K, Hwang L. New business decision-making aids in an era of complexity, scrutiny, and uncertainty. Tools for identifying, assessing, and valuing ecosystem services. BSR's ecosystem services, Tools & markets working group; May 2011. Last accessed (08/2012) at. http://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/report-archive/2011/05.
25. NOAA National Geophysical Data Center, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Last accessed (08/2011) at. http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/coastal/crm.html.
26. MA-Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. General synthesis report. Washington, D.C.: Island Press; 2005.
27. U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI). Western and Central Gulf of Mexico Topographic Features Stipulation Map Package; June 2008.
28. Kaplan R, Norton D. The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action 1996, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass.
29. Global Environmental Management Initiative (GEMI). Measuring environmental performance: a primer and survey of metrics in use; 1998. Last accessed (02/2013) at. http://www.gemi.org/reources/met_101.pdf.
30. NOAA Fisheries: office of science & technology. Recreational fisheries statistics queries. Last accessed (08/2012) at. http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st1/recreational/%20queries/index.html.
31. Last accessed 02/2013. http://www.ogp.org.uk/global-insight/sound-and-marine-life/.
32. Last accessed 02/2013. http://www.soundandmarinelife.org/.
33. Hansen LJ, Mullin KD, Jeffersons TA, Scott GP. Visual surveys aboard ships and aircraft. In: RW Davis and GS Farigon editors, Distribution and abundance of marine mammals in the north-central and western Gulf of Mexico. Final Report. Volume II: Technical report. Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico, OCS Region, New Orleans, LA; 1996. OCS Study MMS 96-0027.
34. U.S. Navy. Integrated Comprehensive Monitoring Program; 2009. OPNAV N45.