Interactional ethnography

International Handbook of the Learning Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 475-488

  Green, Judith L ^b   Bridges, Susan M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85049297309     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315617572     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: Quill.
2. Agar, M. (2006) An ethnography by any other name. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4, September, Art. 36). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn: nbn: de: 0114-fqs0604367
3. Baker, W. D. & Green, J. (2007). Limits to certainty in interpreting video data: Interactional ethnography and disciplinary knowledge, Pedagogies: An International Journal, 2(3), 191-204. doi: 10.1080/15544800701366613
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1979/1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
5. Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Bloome, D., & Clarke, C. (2006). Discourse-in-use. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of comple-mentary methods in education research (pp. 227-242). Washington, DC/Mahwah, NJ: AERA/Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Bloome, D., & Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(4), 305-333.
8. Bridges, S., Botelho, M., Green, J. L., & Chau, A. C. M. (2012). Multimodality in problem-based learning (PBL): An interactional ethnography. In S. Bridges, C. McGrath, & T. L. Whitehill (Eds.), Problem-based learning in clinical education: The next generation (pp. 99-120). Dordrecht: Springer.
9. Bridges, S. M., Green, J. Botelho, M. G., & Tsang, P. C. S. (2015). Blended learning and PBL: An inter-actional ethnographic approach to understanding knowledge construction in-situ. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows (pp. 107-130). West Lafayette, IL: Purdue Press.
10. Bridges, S. M., Jin, J., & Botelho, M. G. (2016). Technology and group processes in PBL tutorials: An ethno-graphic study. In Bridges, S. M., Chan, L. K., Hmelo-Silver, C. (Eds.), Educational technologies in medical and health sciences education. (pp. 35-55). Dordrecht: Springer.
11. Bucholtz, M. (2000). The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1439-1465.
12. Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C. N., & Green, J. L. (2000). Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics and Education, 11(4), 353-400. doi: 10.1016/s0898-5898(00)00032-2
13. Danish, J., & Gresalfi, M. (2018). Cognitive and sociocultural perspective on learning: Tensions and synergy in the Learning Sciences. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 34-43). New York: Routledge.
14. Fairclough, N. (1992). Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Education, 4(3-4), 269-293.
15. Frederiksen, C., & Donin, H., (2015). Discourse and learning in contexts of educational interaction, In N. Markee (Ed.), Handbook of classroom discourse & interaction (pp. 96-114). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
16. Green, J., & Meyer, L. (1991). The embeddedness of reading in classroom life: Reading as a situated process. In C. Baker & A. Luke (Eds.), Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy (pp. 141-160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Green, J. L., Skukauskaite, A., & Baker, W. D. (2012). Ethnography as epistemology: An introduction to edu-cational ethnography. In J. Arthur, M. J. Waring, R. Coe & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Research methodologies and methods in education (pp. 309-321). London: Sage.
18. Green, J., Skukauskaite, A., Dixon, C., & Cordóva, R., (2007). Epistemological issues in the analysis of video records: Interactional ethnography as a logic of inquiry. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 115-132), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies (Vol. 1). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Gumperz, J. J., & Behrens, R. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229-252). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Heap, J. (1991). A situated perspective on what counts as reading. In C. Baker & A. Luke (Eds.), Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy (pp. 103-139). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
22. Heap, J. L. (1995). The status of claims in “qualitative” educational research. Curriculum Inquiry, 25(3), 271-292.
23. Heath, S. B. (1982). Ethnography in education: Defining the essentials. In P. Gilmore & A. A. Glatthorn (Eds.), Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education (pp. 33-55). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
24. Heath, S. B., & Street, B. V. (2008). On ethnography: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College/NCRLL.
25. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Kapur, M., & Hamstra, M. (2018) Learning through problem solving. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 210-220). New York: Routledge.
26. Hoadley, C. (2018). A short history of the learning sciences. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 11-23). New York: Routledge.
27. Jewitt, C. (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). London/New York. Routledge.
28. Kelly, G. J. (2016). Methodological considerations for the study of epistemic cognition in practice. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 393-408). New York: Routledge.
29. Koschmann, T. (2018). Ethnomethodology: Studying the practical achievement of intersubjectivity. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 465-474). New York: Routledge.
30. Kress. G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies. (pp. 182-202). London: Routledge.
31. Kress. G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London/New York. Routledge.
32. Mercer, N., & Hodgkinson, S. (2008). Exploring talk in schools. London: Sage.
33. Mitchell, C. J. (1984). Producing data. In R. F. Ellen (Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 213-293). New York: Academic Press.
34. Ochs, E., (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York: Academic.
35. Puntambekar, S. (2018). Design-based research (DBR). In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 383-392). New York: Routledge.
36. Putney, L., Green, J. L., Dixon, C., Duran, R., & Yeager, B. (2000). Consequential progressions: Exploring collective individual development in a bilingual classroom, In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry: Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research (pp. 86-126). New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
38. Street, B. (1993) Culture is a verb. In D. Graddol (Ed.), Language and Culture (pp. 23-43). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters/BAAL.
39. Tannen, D. (Ed.). (1993). Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Wertsch, J. (1994). Mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture and Activity, 1, 202-208.