Cigarette pack messages about toxic chemicals: A randomised clinical trial

Tobacco Control

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 74-80

  Brewer, Noel T ^a,b   Jeong, Michelle ^a,b   Mendel, Jennifer R ^a   Hall, Marissa G ^a,b   Zhang, Dongyu ^a   Parada, Humberto ^c   Boynton, Marcella H ^a,b   Noar, Seth M ^b   Baig, Sabeeh A ^a   Morgan, Jennifer C ^a   Ribisl, Kurt M ^a,b  

^a IL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

carcinogens; packaging and labelling; prevention; public policy; smoking caused disease

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BEHAVIOR; CALIFORNIA; CIGARETTE SMOKING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PACKAGING; POLLUTION; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CALIFORNIA; CIGARETTE SMOKING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRODUCT LABELING; SMOKERS; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85049061250     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054112     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Hecht SS. Research opportunities related to establishing standards for tobacco products under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Nicotine Tob Res 2012;14:18-28.
2. Jamal A, Homa DM, O'Connor E, et al. Current cigarette smoking among adults-United States, 2005-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;64:1233-40.
3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking 5 50 years of progress: A report of the Surgeon General. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Offce on Smoking and Health, 2014. Atlanta, GA: U.S, 2014.
4. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. Lyon, France, 2004.
5. Parada H, Hall MG, Boynton MH, et al. Trajectories of responses to pictorial cigarette pack warnings. Nicotine Tob Res 2017. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx182. [Epub ahead of print 18 Aug 2017].
6. Brewer N T. Goals. In: Fischoff B, Brewer NT, Downs JS, eds. Communicating risks and benefts: An evidence-based user's guide. Washington, D.C: Food and Drug Administration, 2011:3-10.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Health warnings on tobacco products-worldwide, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58:528-9.
8. Noar SM, Francis DB, Bridges C, et al. Effects of strengthening cigarette pack warnings on attention and message processing: A systematic review. Journal Mass Commun Q 2017;94:416-442.
9. Noar SM, Francis DB, Bridges C, et al. The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies. Soc Sci Med 2016;164:118-29.
10. Noar SM, Hall MG, Francis DB, et al. Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tob Control 2016;25:341-54.
11. Canadian Cancer Society. Cigarette package health warnings: International status report. 5th ed. Canada: Ontario Canadian Cancer Society, 2016.
12. Brewer N T, Hall MG, Noar SM, et al. Effect of Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings on Changes in Smoking Behavior: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:905-12.
13. United States Public Laws. Family smoking prevention and tobacco control act of 2009. 111th Congress, 1st Session. Public Law 111531 [H.R. 1256]. 2009.
14. Kraemer JD, Baig SA. Analysis of legal and scientifc issues in court challenges to graphic tobacco warnings. Am J Prev Med 2013;45:334-42.
15. National Cancer Institute. Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 13. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 2001.
16. Morgan JC, Byron MJ, Baig SA, et al. How people think about the chemicals in cigarette smoke: a systematic review. J Behav Med 2017;40:553-64.
17. Gilpin EA, Emery S, White MM, et al. Does tobacco industry marketing of 'light' cigarettes give smokers a rationale for postponing quitting? Nicotine Tob Res 2002;4:147-55.
18. Salloum RG, Louviere JJ, Getz KR, et al. Evaluation of strategies to communicate harmful and potentially harmful constituent (HPHC) information through cigarette package inserts: a discrete choice experiment. Tob Control 2018;27:677-83.
19. Hammond D, White CM. Improper disclosure: tobacco packaging and emission labelling regulations. Public Health 2012;126:613-9.
20. Cho YJ, Thrasher J F, Swayampakala K, et al. Does Adding Information on Toxic Constituents to Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Smokers' Perceptions About the Health Risks of Smoking? A Longitudinal Study in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Health Educ Behav 2018;45:32-42.
21. Hammond D. Tobacco labelling and packaging toolkit. 2009. http://www. tobaccolabels. ca/toolkit (accessed 10 Dec 2012).
22. Moracco KE, Morgan JC, Mendel J, et al. "My First Thought was Croutons": Perceptions of Cigarettes and Cigarette Smoke Constituents Among Adult Smokers and Nonsmokers. Nicotine Tob Res 2016;18:1566-74.
23. Kelley DE, Boynton MH, Noar SM, et al. Effective Message Elements for Disclosures about Chemicals in Cigarette Smoke. Nicotine Tob Res 2017. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx109. [Epub ahead of print 17 May 2017].
24. Baig SA, Byron MJ, Boynton MH, et al. Communicating about cigarette smoke constituents: an experimental comparison of two messaging strategies. J Behav Med 2017;40:352-9.
25. Baig SA, Gottfredson NC, Noar SM, et al. UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness Scale: Development and Validation. In Preparation.
26. Noar SM, Kelley DE, Boynton MH, et al. Identifying principles for effective messages about chemicals in cigarette smoke. Prev Med 2018;106:31-7.
27. Baig SA, Moracco KE, Agans R P, et al. Testing message about cigarette smoke constituents: A mixed methods study. In Preparation.
28. Brewer N T, Hall MG, Lee JG, et al. Testing warning messages on smokers' cigarette packages: a standardised protocol. Tob Control 2016;25:153-9.
29. Klein WM, Zajac LE, Monin MM. Worry as a moderator of the association between risk perceptions and quitting intentions in young adult and adult smokers. Ann Behav Med 2009;38:256-61.
30. Borland R, Yong HH, Wilson N, et al. How reactions to cigarette packet health warnings infuence quitting: fndings from the ITC Four-Country survey. Addiction 2009;104:669-75.
31. Hammond D, Fong G T, McDonald PW, et al. Impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behaviour. Tob Control 2003;12:391-5.
32. Fong G T, Cummings KM, Borland R, et al. The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project. Tob Control 2006;15:iii3-i ii11.
33. IARC. Handbooks of cancer prevention. Tobacco control: Methods for evaluating tobacco control policies. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2009.
34. Yong HH, Borland R, Thrasher J F, et al. Mediational pathways of the impact of cigarette warning labels on quit attempts. Health Psychol 2014;33:1410-20.
35. Sheeran P, Harris PR, Epton T. Does heightening risk appraisals change people's intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychol Bull 2014;140:511-43.
36. Cho YJ, Thrasher J F, Yong HH, et al. Path analysis of warning label effects on negative emotions and quit attempts: A longitudinal study of smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the US. Soc Sci Med 2018;197.
37. Thrasher J F, Abad-Vivero EN, Huang L, et al. Interpersonal communication about pictorial health warnings on cigarette packages: Policy-related infuences and relationships with smoking cessation attempts. Soc Sci Med 2016;164:141-9.
38. Nonnemaker J, Farrelly M, Kamyab K, et al; Experimental study of graphic cigarette warning labels: Final results report. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International, 2010.
39. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988;54:1063-70.
40. Keller PA, Block LG. Increasing the Persuasiveness of Fear Appeals: The Effect of Arousal and Elaboration. J Consum Res 1996;22:448-59.
41. Hall MG, Peebles K, Bach LE, et al. Social Interactions Sparked by Pictorial Warnings on Cigarette Packs. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015;12:13195-208.
42. Morgan JC, Southwell BG, Noar SM, et al. Frequency and Content of Conversations about Pictorial Warnings on Cigarette Packs. Nicotine Tob Res 2017. [Epub ahead of print 17 August 2017].
43. Borland R, Hill D. Initial impact of the new Australian tobacco health warnings on knowledge and beliefs. Tob Control 1997;6:317-25.
44. Li L, Borland R, Fong G T, et al. Smoking-related thoughts and microbehaviours, and their predictive power for quitting: fndings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) China Survey. Tob Control 2015;24:354-61.
45. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adult Tobacco Survey (ATS, 2008.
46. Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. PATH: Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health, 2014. http://www.pathstudyinfo.nih.gov/UI/HomeMobile.aspx. (accessed April 3 2014).
47. Brody T. Intent to treat analysis vs. per protocol analysis. Clinical trials: study design, endpoints and biomarkers, drug safety, and FDA and ICH guidelines. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 2011.
48. Peters E, Lipkus I, Diefenbach MA. The Functions of Affect in Health Communications and in the Construction of Health Preferences. J Commun 2006;56(suppl_1):S140-S162.
49. Goodman E P. Visual gut punch: persuasion, emotion, and the constitutional meaning of graphic disclosure. Cornell Law Rev 2014;99:513-70.
50. Witte K. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Commun Monogr 1992;59:329-49.
51. Wang AL, Lowen SB, Romer D, et al. Emotional reaction facilitates the brain and behavioural impact of graphic cigarette warning labels in smokers. Tob Control 2015;24:225-32.
52. Partos TR, Borland R, Thrasher J F, et al. The predictive utility of micro indicators of concern about smoking: fndings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country study. Addict Behav 2014;39:1235-42.
53. Li L, Borland R, Fong G T, et al. Smoking-related thoughts and microbehaviours, and their predictive power for quitting. Tob Control 2015;24:354-61.
54. Hall MG, Sheeran P, Noar SM, et al. Negative affect, message reactance and perceived risk: how do pictorial cigarette pack warnings change quit intentions? Tob Control 2018;27:e136-e142.
55. Crawford MA, Balch GI, Mermelstein R. Tobacco Control Network Writing Group. Responses to tobacco control policies among youth. Tob Control 2002;11:14-19.
56. Brennan E, Durkin SJ, Cotter T, et al. Mass media campaigns designed to support new pictorial health warnings on cigarette packets: evidence of a complementary relationship. Tob Control 2011;20:412-8.
57. Duke JC, Alexander TN, Zhao X, et al. Youth's Awareness of and Reactions to The Real Cost National Tobacco Public Education Campaign. PLoS One 2015;10:e0144827.
58. Huang LL, Lazard AJ, Pepper JK, et al. Impact of The Real Cost Campaign on Adolescents' Recall, Attitudes, and Risk Perceptions about Tobacco Use: A National Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14:42.
59. American Meat Institute vs United States Department of Agriculture. Case No. 13-5281: United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, 2014.
60. Hammond D, Fong G T, Borland R, et al. Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: fndings from the international tobacco control four country study. Am J Prev Med 2007;32:202-9.
61. Hitchman SC, Driezen P, Logel C, et al. Changes in effectiveness of cigarette health warnings over time in Canada and the United States, 2002-2011. Nicotine Tob Res 2014;16:536-43.
62. Swayampakala K, Thrasher J, Carpenter MJ, et al. Level of cigarette consumption and quit behavior in a population of low-intensity smokers-longitudinal results from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) survey in Mexico. Addict Behav 2013;38:1958-65.
63. Kowitt S, Sheeran P, Jarman KL, et al. Cigarette constituent health communications for smokers: impact of chemical, imagery, and source. Nicotine Tob Res 2017. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx226. [Epub ahead of print 3 Oct 2017].
64. Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol 2013;4:863.