Evaluation of strategies to communicate harmful and potentially harmful constituent (HPHC) information through cigarette package inserts: A discrete choice experiment

Tobacco Control

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 677-683

  Salloum, Ramzi G ^a   Louviere, Jordan J ^b   Getz, Kayla R ^a   Islam, Farahnaz ^c   Anshari, Dien ^c,d   Cho, Yoojin ^c   O'Connor, Richard J ^e   Hammond, David ^f   Thrasher, James F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA   (Indonesia)

^e ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

carcinogens; packaging and labelling; public policy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PACKAGING; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; SMOKING; TOBACCO; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRODUCT LABELING; SMOKERS; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85032940156     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053579     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Borland R, Hill D. Initial impact of the new Australian tobacco health warnings on knowledge and beliefs. Tob Control 1997;6:317-25.
2. Thrasher J F, Pérez-Hernández R, Arillo-Santillán E, et al. Hacia el consumo informado de tabaco en México: efecto De las advertencias con pictogramas en población fumadora. Salud Publica Mex 2012;54:242-53.
3. Thrasher J F, Murukutla N, Pérez-Hernández R, et al. Linking mass media campaigns to pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages: a cross-sectional study to evaluate effects among mexican smokers. Tob Control 2013;65:e57-65.
4. Swayampakala K, Thrasher J F, Hammond D, et al. Pictorial health warning label content and smokers' understanding of smoking-related risks-a cross-country comparison. Health Educ Res 2015;30:35-45.
5. Hammond D, Fong G T, McNeill A, et al. Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: fndings from the International tobacco control (ITC) Four country survey. Tob Control 2006;15(Suppl 3):iii19-25.
6. Siahpush M, McNeill A, Hammond D, et al. Socioeconomic and country variations in knowledge of health risks of tobacco smoking and toxic constituents of smoke: results from the 2002 International tobacco control (ITC) Four country survey. Tob Control 2006;15(Suppl 3):iii65-70.
7. Chapman S, Wilson D, Wakefeld M. Smokers' understandings of cigarette yield labels. Med J Aust 1986;145:376-9.
8. Cohen JE. The FTC Cigarette Test Method for Determining Tar, Nicotine, and Carbon Monoxide Yields of U.S. Cigarettes. Washington, DC, 1996.
9. Gori GB. Consumer perception of cigarette yields: is the message relevant? Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 1990;12:64-8.
10. O'Connor RJ, Kozlowski LT, Borland R, et al. Relationship between constituent labelling and reporting of tar yields among smokers in four countries. J Public Health 2006;28:324-9.
11. Pollay RW, Dewhirst T. The dark side of marketing seemingly "Light" cigarettes: successful images and failed fact. Tob Control 2002;11(Suppl 1):i18-31.
12. Hammond D, Parkinson C. The impact of cigarette package design on perceptions of risk. J Public Health 2009;31:345-53.
13. Shiffman S, Pillitteri JL, Burton SL, et al. Smokers' beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes. Tob Control 2001;10(Suppl 1):i17-23.
14. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Dep Heal Hum Serv Centers Dis Control Prev Natl Cent Chronic Dis Prev Heal Promot Off Smok Heal, 2014.
15. Hatsukami DK, Biener L, Leischow SJ, et al. Tobacco and nicotine product testing. Nicotine Tob Res 2012;14:7-17.
16. WHO FCTC Conference of the Parties. Guidelines for implementation of Article 11 of the WHO Framework Convention on tobacco control (Packaging and labelling of tobacco products) decision FCTC/COP3, 2008. (1. Tob Control).
17. Sanders-Jackson AN, Song AV, Hiilamo H, et al. Effect of the Framework Convention on tobacco control and voluntary industry health warning labels on passage of mandated cigarette warning labels from 1965 to 2012: transition probability and event history analyses. Am J Public Health 2013;103:2041-7.
18. Canadian Cancer Society. Cigarette Package Health Warnings: international Status Report, 2016. http://www.cancer.ca/~/media/cancer.ca/CW/For media/Media releases/2014/Tobacco Warnings Oct 2014/CCS-international-package-warnings-report-2014-ENG.pdf.
19. Thrasher J F, Osman A, Abad-Vivero EN, et al. The Use of Cigarette Package Inserts to Supplement Pictorial Health Warnings: An Evaluation of the Canadian Policy. Nicotine Tob Res 2015;17:870-5.
20. Congress 111th United States. Family Smoking Prevention and tobacco control Act. United States of America 2009.
21. Johnson SE. FDA experimental study on the public display of lists of quantities of 470 HPHCs: study design. Silver Spring, MD, 2013.
22. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry and FDA Staff "Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents" in Tobacco Products as Used in Section 904 (e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff "Harmful and Potentially Harmful Const. 904, 2011.
23. Portnoy D. FDA experimental study on the Public display of lists of quantities of HPHC: analysis & results. Silver Spring, MD, 2013.
24. Czoli CD, Hammond D. Cigarette packaging: youth perceptions of "natural" cigarettes, flter references, and contraband tobacco. J Adolesc Health 2014;54:33-9.
25. Skaczkowski G, Durkin S, Kashima Y, et al. Infuence of premium versus value brand names on the smoking experience in a plain packaging environment: an experimental study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e014099.
26. Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide. Pharmacoeconomics 2008;26:661-77.
27. Pierce J P, Choi WS, Gilpin EA, et al. Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. Health Psychol 1996;15:355-61.
28. Cornelius ME, Driezen P, Fong G T, et al. Trends in the use of premium and discount cigarette brands: fndings from the ITC US surveys (2002-2011). Tob Control 2014;23(Suppl 1):i48-53.
29. Bodnar JA, Morgan WT, Murphy PA, et al. Mainstream smoke chemistry analysis of samples from the 2009 US cigarette market. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2012;64:35-42.
30. Louviere JJ, Woodworth G. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an Approach based on Aggregate Data. J Marketing Res 1983;20:350-67.
31. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers of econometrics. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1974:105-42.
32. Hammond D, White CM. Improper disclosure: tobacco packaging and emission labelling regulations. Public Health 2012;126:613-9.
33. Gallopel-Morvan K, Moodie C, Hammond D, et al. Consumer understanding of cigarette emission labelling. Eur J Public Health 2011;21:373-5.
34. Sheeran P. Intention-Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 2002;12:1-36.
35. Devinney T. Analysis of Consumer Research evidence on the impact of Plain packaging for tobacco Products, 2010. http://www.jti.com/fles/3313/3164/0525/Devinney.pdf.
36. Churchill GA, Iacobucci D. Marketing Research: methodological foundations Auf. 4, 2005.
37. Lindblom E, Berman M, Thrasher J F. FDA-required tobacco product inserts and onserts-and the First Amendment. Food Drug Law J 2016.
38. Leavell NR. The low tar lie. Tob Control 1999;8:433-7.