Trajectories of responses to pictorial cigarette pack warnings

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2018, Pages 876-881

  Parada, Humberto ^a   Hall, Marissa G ^a   Boynton, Marcella H ^a   Brewer, Noel T ^a  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIFORNIA; CIGARETTE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; NORTH CAROLINA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; SMOKING CESSATION; SMOKING REGULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADVERSE EVENT; CIGARETTE SMOKING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PACKAGING; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMOKING; SMOKING PREVENTION; THERAPY; TOBACCO; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CALIFORNIA; CIGARETTE SMOKING; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORTH CAROLINA; PRODUCT LABELING; SMOKERS; SMOKING CESSATION; SMOKING PREVENTION; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85048377665     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: 1469994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx182     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Jamal A, King BA, Neff LJ, Whitmill J, Babb SD, Graffunder CM. Current cigarette smoking among adults-United States, 2005-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:1205-1211. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/ 65/wr/mm6544a2.htm?s_cid=mm6544a2_w. Accessed April 12, 2017
2. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of smoking-50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014
3. Hammond D, Fong GT, McDonald PW, Cameron R, Brown KS. Impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behaviour. Tob Control. 2003;12(4):391-395
4. Borland R. Tobacco health warnings and smoking-related cognitions and behaviours. Addiction. 1997;92(11):1427-1435. http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/9519486. Accessed April 11, 2017
5. Noar SM, Hall MG, Francis DB, Ribisl KM, Pepper JK, Brewer NT. Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tob Control. 2016;25(3):341-354
6. Malouff JM, Schutte NS, Rooke SE, MacDonell G. Effects on smokers of exposure to graphic warning images. Am J Addict. 2012;21(6):555-557
7. Noar SM, Francis DB, Bridges C, Sontag JM, Brewer NT, Ribisl KM. Effects of strengthening cigarette pack warnings on attention and message processing. Journal Mass Commun Q. October 2016:1-27
8. Noar SM, Francis DB, Bridges C, Sontag JM, Ribisl KM, Brewer NT. The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: systematic review of longitudinal observational studies. Soc Sci Med. 2016;164:118-129
9. Brewer NT, Hall MG, Noar SM, et al. Effect of Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings on Changes in Smoking Behavior: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(7):905-912
10. Li L, Borland R, Yong H, et al. Longer term impact of cigarette package warnings in Australia compared with the United Kingdom and Canada. Health Educ Res. 2015;30(1):67-80
11. Fong GT, Hammond D, Hitchman SC. The impact of pictures on the effectiveness of tobacco warnings. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(8):640-643
12. LeDoux J. Emotion, memory and the brain. The neural routes underlying the formation of memories about primitive emotional experiences, such as fear, have been traced. Sci Am. 1994;270(6):50-57
13. Andersen PA. Nonverbal Communication. Forms and Functions. Long Grove, Ill.: Waveland Press, Inc.; 2008
14. Thrasher JF, Carpenter MJ, Andrews JO, et al. Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(6):590-600
15. Thrasher JF, Villalobos V, Szklo A, et al. Assessing the impact of cigarette package health warning labels: a cross-country comparison in Brazil, Uruguay and Mexico. Salud Publica Mex. 2010;52(Suppl 2):S206-S215
16. Nonnemaker J, Farrelly M, Kamyab K, Busey A, Mann N. Experimental Study of Graphic Cigarette Warning Labels: Final Results Report. Rockville, MD; 2010. http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/wp/wp-content/ uploads/2013/12/USA-2010-Experimental-Study-of-Graphic-Cigarette-Warning-Labels-Final-Results-Report-FDA.pdf
17. Calder BJ, Sternthal B. Television Commercial Wearout: An Information Processing View. J Mark Res. 1980;17(2):173
18. Hammond D, Fong GT, Borland R, Cummings KM, McNeill A, Driezen P. Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: findings from the international tobacco control four country study. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(3):202-209
19. Strahan EJ, White K, Fong GT, Fabrigar LR, Zanna MP, Cameron R. Enhancing the effectiveness of tobacco package warning labels: a social psychological perspective. Tob Control. 2002;11(3):183-190
20. Hitchman SC, Driezen P, Logel C, Hammond D, Fong GT. Changes in effectiveness of cigarette health warnings over time in Canada and the United States, 2002-2011. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(5):536-543
21. Thrasher JF, Abad-Vivero EN, Huang L, et al. Interpersonal communication about pictorial health warnings on cigarette packages: policy-related influences and relationships with smoking cessation attempts. Soc Sci Med. 2016;164:141-149
22. Swayampakala K, Thrasher JF, Yong H-H, et al. Over-time impacts of pictorial health warning labels and their differences across smoker subgroups: results from adult smokers in Canada and Australia. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017; doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx134
23. Thrasher JF, Swayampakala K, Cummings KM, et al. Cigarette package inserts can promote efficacy beliefs and sustained smoking cessation attempts: a longitudinal assessment of an innovative policy in Canada. Prev Med. 2016;88:59-65
24. Brandon TH, Baker TB. The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire: the subjective expected utility of smoking in college students. Psychol Assess. 1991;3(3):484-491
25. Keller PA, Block LG. Increasing the persuasiveness of fear appeals: the effect of arousal and elaboration. J Consum Res. 1996;22(4):448-459
26. Leshner G, Bolls P, Wise K. Motivated processing of fear appeal and disgust images in televised anti-tobacco ads. J Media Psychol Theor Methods Appl. 2011;23(2):77-89
27. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063-1070
28. Klein WM, Zajac LE, Monin MM. Worry as a moderator of the association between risk perceptions and quitting intentions in young adult and adult smokers. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38(3):256-261
29. Li L, Borland R, Fong GT, et al. Smoking-related thoughts and microbehaviours, and their predictive power for quitting. Tob Control. 2015;24(4):354-361
30. Wolfinger R, Chang M. Comparing the SAS ® GLM and MIXED Procedures for Repeated Measures. http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/ library/mixedglm.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2017
31. Hammond D, Fong GT, McDonald PW, Brown KS, Cameron R. Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: evidence from Canadian smokers. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(8):1442-1445
32. United States Public Laws. Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009. United States 111th Congress, 1st Session. Public Law 111-31; 2009
33. Brodar K, Hall M, Butler E, et al. Recruiting diverse smokers: enrollment yields and cost. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(12):1251
34. Peebles K, Hall MG, Pepper JK, Byron MJ, Noar SM, Brewer NT. Adolescents' responses to pictorial warnings on their parents' cigarette packs. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(6):635-641