Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: What is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study

Implementation Science

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Marquez, Christine ^a   Johnson, Alekhya Mascarenhas ^a   Jassemi, Sabrina ^a   Park, Jamie ^a   Moore, Julia E ^a   Blaine, Caroline ^b   Bourdon, Gertrude ^c   Chignell, Mark ^d   Ellen, Moriah E ^e,f,g   Fortin, Jacques ^h   Graham, Ian D ^i,j   Hayes, Anne ^k   Hamid, Jemila ^a,l   Hemmelgarn, Brenda ^m   Hillmer, Michael ^f,k   Holmes, Bev ^n,o   Holroyd Leduc, Jayna ^m,p   Hubert, Linda ^q   Hutton, Brian ⁱ   Kastner, Monika ^f   Lavis, John N ^g   Michell, Karen ^r   Moher, David ⁱ   Ouimet, Mathieu ^s   Perrier, Laure ^f   Proctor, Andrea ^k   Noseworthy, Thomas ^m   Schuckel, Victoria ^t   Stayberg, Sharlene ^u   Tonelli, Marcello ^m   Tricco, Andrea C ^a,v   Straus, Sharon E ^a,d   more..

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b BMJ   (United Kingdom)

^c LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^g MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^h Programme québécois de cancérologie   (Canada)

ⁱ OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^j UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^k ONTARIO MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND LONG TERM CARE   (Canada)

^l MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^m UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

ⁿ Canadian Institutes of Health Research   (Canada)

^o SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^p ALBERTA HEALTH SERVICES   (Canada)

^q CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^r Women s College Hospital   (Canada)

^s UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^t MINISTRY OF HEALTH   (Canada)

^u Alberta Health   (Canada)

^v UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Decision making; Evidence implementation; Health care managers; Integrated knowledge translation; Knowledge synthesis; Knowledge translation; Policy makers; Systematic reviews; Usability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FOREST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERVIEW; MALE; MANAGER; PERCEPTION; PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; CANADA; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MANAGEMENT;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; CANADA; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; POLICY MAKING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85048926652     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID, Zwarenstein M, Bhattacharyya O, Shepperd S. Monitoring use of knowledge and evaluating outcomes. CMAJ. 2010;182(2):E94-8. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081335.
2. Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, Dirnagl U, Chalmers I, Ioannidis JP, Al-Shahi Salman R, Chan AW, Glasziou P. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):101-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62329-6.
3. Brownlee S, Chalkidou K, Doust J, Elshaug AG, Glasziou P, Heath I, Nagpal S, Saini V, Srivastava D, Chalmers K, Korenstein D. Evidence for underuse of effective medical services around the world. Lancet. 2017;390(10090):169-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32585-5.
4. Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care. 2001;39(8 Suppl 2):Ii46-54.
5. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000326. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326.
6. Cochrane Library About Cochrane Reviews. What is a systematic review? http://www.cochranelibrary.com/about/about-cochrane-systematic-reviews.html Accessed 30 July 2013.
7. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Systematic reviews and research waste. Lancet. 2016;387(10014):122-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01353-7.
8. Clarke M, Brice A, Chalmers I. Accumulating research: a systematic account of how cumulative meta-analyses would have provided knowledge, improved health, reduced harm and saved resources. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102670. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102670.
9. Petkovic J, Welch V, Jacob MH, Yoganathan M, Ayala AP, Cunningham H, Tugwell P. The effectiveness of evidence summaries on health policymakers and health system managers use of evidence from systematic reviews: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0530-3.
10. Tricco AC, Cardoso R, Thomas SM, Motiwala S, Sullivan S, Kealey MR, Hemmelgarn B, Ouimet M, Hillmer MP, Perrier L, Shepperd S, Straus SE. Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0370-1.
11. Wallace J, Byrne C, Clarke M. Improving the uptake of systematic reviews: a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and relevance. BMJ Open. 2014;4(10):e005834. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005834.
12. Wallace J, Byrne C, Clarke M. Making evidence more wanted: a systematic review of facilitators to enhance the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012;10(4):338-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00288.x.
13. Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-2.
14. Murthy L, Shepperd S, Clarke MJ, Garner SE, Lavis JN, Perrier L, Roberts NW, Straus SE. Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(9):Cd009401. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009401.pub2.
15. Dillman DA. Why choice of survey mode makes a difference. Public Health Rep. 2006;121(1):11-3. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335490612100106.
16. Brooke J. SUS-a quick and dirty usability scale. 1986. https://hell.meiert.org/core/pdf/sus.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2014.
17. System Usability Scale. http://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/system-usability-scale.html. Accessed 7 Feb 2014.
18. Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
19. Kushniruk AW, Patel VL, Cimino JJ. Usability testing in medical informatics: cognitive approaches to evaluation of information systems and user interfaces. In: Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1997. p. 218-22.
20. Tricco AC, Antony J, Ivers NM, Ashoor HM, Khan PA, Blondal E, Ghassemi M, MacDonald H, Chen MH, Ezer LK, Straus SE. Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies for coordination of care to reduce use of health care services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2014;186:E568-78. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.140289.
21. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Incorporated; 2013.
22. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1(2):112-333.
23. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005.
24. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Incorporated; 2013.
25. Gupta S, Wan FT, Newton D, Bhattacharyya O, Chignell M, Straus SE. WikiBuild: a new online collaboration process for multi-stakeholder tool development and consensus building. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e108. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1833.
26. Perrier L, Kealey MR, Straus SE. A usability study of two formats of a shortened systematic review for clinicians. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):e005919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005919.
27. Perrier L, Persaud N, Ko A, Kastner M, Grimshaw J, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. Development of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians. Implement Sci. 2013;8:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-68.
28. Kastner M, Lottridge D, Marquez C, Newton D, Straus SE. Usability evaluation of a clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management. Implement Sci. 2010;5:-96. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-96.
29. Lavis J, Davies H, Oxman A, Denis JL, Golden-Biddle K, Ferlie E. Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(Suppl 1):35-48. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308549.
30. Ellen ME, Horowitz E, Vaknin S, Lavis JN. Views of health system policymakers on the role of research in health policymaking in Israel. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016;5:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-016-0088-1.
31. Ellen ME, Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Grimshaw J, Haynes RB, Ouimet M, Raina P, Gruen R. Health system decision makers' feedback on summaries and tools supporting the use of systematic reviews: a qualitative study. Evidence Policy. 2014;10:337-59. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426514X672362.
32. El-Jardali F, Lavis JN, Ataya N, Jamal D, Ammar W, Rauof S. Use of health systems evidence by policymakers in eastern Mediterranean countries: views, practices, and contextual influences. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:200. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-200.
33. Vogel JP, Oxman AD, Glenton C, Rosenbaum S, Lewin S, Gulmezoglu AM, Souza JP. Policymakers' and other stakeholders' perceptions of key considerations for health system decisions and the presentation of evidence to inform those considerations: an international survey. Health Res Policy Syst. 2013;11:-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-11-19.
34. Halcomb EJ, Davidson PM. Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary? Appl Nurs Res. 2006;19(1):38-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2005.06.001.
35. Lewis JR. Sample sizes for usability studies: additional considerations. Hum Factors. 1994;36(2):368-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089403600215.
36. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR): Guide to knowledge translation planning at CIHR: integrated and end-of-grant approaches; 2015. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/45321.html#a3 Accessed 7 Feb, 2014.