Improving the uptake of systematic reviews: A systematic review of intervention effectiveness and relevance

BMJ Open

Volumn 4, Issue 10, 2014, Pages

  Wallace, John ^a   Byrne, Charles ^b   Clarke, Mike ^a  

^a Department of Continuing Education ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b Roscommon County Hospital   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DATA BASE; EMBASE; GOVERNMENT; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERVENTION STUDY; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDLINE; MIDWIFE; NURSE; PHYSICIAN; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LITERATURE;

EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84908129402     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005834     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, et al. Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7:239-44.
2. Murthy L, Shepperd S, Clarke MJ, et al. Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;9:CD009401.
3. Knottnerus JA, Tugwell P. ' The evidence base of taming continuously proliferating evidence'. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:1241-2.
4. Sackett D, Rosenberg WC, Muir Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn' t. BMJ 1996;312:71.
5. Tetzlaff J, Tricco A, Moher D. Knowledge synthesis. In: Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID, eds. Knowledge translation in health care. UK: Wiley-Blackwell, BMJ Books, 2009:15-34.
6. Dawes M, Sampson U. Knowledge management in clinical practice: a systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians. Int J Med Infor 2003;71:9-15.
7. Lavis J, Davies H, Oxman A, et al . Toward systematic reviews that inform health care management. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10 (Suppl 1):35-48.
8. Perrier L, Mrklas K, Lavis JN, et al. Interventions encouraging the use of systematic reviews by health policymakers and managers: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2011;6:43.
9. Perrier L, Mrklas K, Shepperd S, et al. Interventions encouraging the use of systematic reviews in clinical decision-making: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2011;26:419-26.
10. Wallace J, Nwosa B, Clarke J. Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers' perceptions. BMJ Open 2012;2:e001220.
11. Wallace J, Byrne C, Clarke M. Making evidence more wanted; a systematic review of facilitators to enhance the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Internal J Evid Based Healthcare 2012;10:338-46.
12. Pope C, Mays N, Popay J. Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative research. UK: McGraw-Hill, 2007.
13. Oliver S, Harden A, Rees R, et al. An emerging framework for including different types of evidence in systematic reviews for public policy. Evaluation 2005;11:428-46.
14. Noyes J, Popay J, Pearson A, et al. Qualitative research and cochrane reviews. In: Higgins JP, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2008:571-92.
15. Gartleher G, Flamm M. Is the Cochrane Collaboration prepared for the era of patient-centred outcomes research? Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;3:ED000054.
16. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westthorp PG, et al. RAMESES Publication Standards: meta-narrative review. BMC Med 2013;11:20.
17. Shepherd J, Harden A, Rees R, et al. Young people and healthy eating: a systematic reviews on research on barriers and facilitators. Health Educ Res 2005;21:239-57.
18. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group: Data Collection Checklist. EPOC resources for review authors Revised 2002. http://www.epoc.cochrane.org/en/handsearchers.html
19. Chaillet N, Dube E, Dugasm M, et al. Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1234-45.
20. Joly A, Ngueng Feze I, Simard J. Genetic discrimination and life insurance: a systematic review. BMC Medicine 2013;11:25.
21. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003;362:1225-30.
22. Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, et al. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(3):CD005470.
23. Anglin RE, Samaan Z, Walter SD, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and depression in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2013;202:100-7.
24. Thomas J, Harden A, Oakley A, et al. Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews. BMJ 2004;328:1010.
25. Brunton G, Harden A, Rees R, et al. Children and physical activity: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 2003.
26. Rees R, Harden J, Shepherd G, et al. Young people and physical activity: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Centre, 2001.
27. Harden A, Rees J, Shepherd G, et al. Young people and mental health: a systematic reviews of barriers and facilitators. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Centre, 2001.
28. Wyatt J, Paterson-Brown S, Johanson R, et al. Randomized trial of educational visits to enhance use of systematic reviews in 25 obstetric units. BMJ 1998;317:1041-6.
29. Oermann M, Roop J, Nordstrom C, et al. Effectiveness of an intervention for disseminating Cochrane reviews to nurses. Medsurg Nurs 2007;16:6.
30. Gulmezoglu AM, Lnager A, Piaggo G, et al. Cluster randomised trial of an active multi-faceted educational intervention based on the WHO Reproductive Health Library to improve obstetric practices. BJOG 2007;114:16-23.
31. Harris M, Smith BJ, Veale A, et al. Treatments: a controlled trial of outcomes. Providing patients with reviews of evidence about COPD. Chron Respir Dis 2006;3:133.
32. Kulier R, Coppus S, Zamora J, et al. The effectiveness of a clinically integrated e-learning course in evidence-ased medicine: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2009;9:21.
33. Dobbins M, Hanna S, Ciliska D, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies. Implementation Sci 2009;4:61.
34. Kulier R, Hadley J, Weinbrenner S, et al . Harmonising Evidence-based medicine teaching: a study of the outcomes of e-learning in five European countries. BMC Med Educ 2008;8:27.
35. Hadley J, Kulier R, Zamora J, et al. Effectiveness of an e-learning course in evidence-based medicine for foundation (internship) training. J R Soc Med 2010;103:288-94.
36. Davis J, Crabb S, Roger E, et al. Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: a randomized controlled trial. Med Teach 2008;30:302-7.
37. Davis J, Chyssafidou E, Zamora J, et al. Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2007;7:23.
38. Burton LJ, Tyson S, Mcgovern A. Staff perceptions of using outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:828-34.
39. Lawrence V, Fossey J, Ballard C, et al. Improving quality of life for people with dementia: making psycho-social interventions work. BJP 2012;201:344-51.
40. Van Oort L, Van Den Berg T, et al. Preliminary state of development of prediction models for primary care physical therapy: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:1257-66.
41. Matson J. Narrative overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: evidence on many treatments for psychopathology in people with developmental disabilities is limited. Evid Based Ment Health 2013;16:44.
42. Stewart CG, Omar O, Milensu S, et al. A systematic review finds that prediction models for chronic kidney were poorly reported and often developed using inappropriate methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:268-77.
43. Oxman D, Thomson MA, Davis D, et al. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc 1995;153:1423-31.
44. Eastman G, O'connell B, Gardner A. Selecting the right integration of research into practice strategy. J Nurs Care Qual 2008;23:258-64.
45. Nabulsi M, Harris J, Letelier L, et al. Effectiveness of education in evidence-based healthcare: the current state of outcome assessments and a framework for future developments. Int J Evid Based Healthcare 2007;5:468-76.
46. Coomary A, Khan K. What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ 2004;329:1017.
47. Mccoll A, Smith H, White P, et al. General practitioner's perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. BMJ 1998;316:361-5.
48. Leucht S, Hierl S, Kissling W, et al. Putting the efficacy of psychiatric and general medicine medication into perspective: review of meta-analyses. Br J Psychiatry 2012;200:97-106.